Am Sa, Jul 19, 2025 at 12:21:25 +0200 schrieb NoisyCoil:
Like Andrey said, I think you might have misunderstood. The question was
whether I am willing to remove the package shipping the bible because
the bible contains that passage. If the question was whether I would
remove that quote taken
ource code comments, or
problematic variable names. This is not an accident; we are not the
morality police, and I think it serves no purpose for us to try to patch
out code of conduct-violating things in upstream source code. This is
not because I think things like that are not a problem; rather, bec
. The more you remove the
more you may be asked to remove. And wouldn't it become boring if nothing is
added? Debian's structure does not accompdate well data packages with dynamic
content. A lot of software we provide have external plugins that we do not
package. And - ahem - A
Hello,
> The quote from the bible was only in the bible, not in any other
> package, as far as I know. The referenced double standard was: we allow
> shipping the bible, which contains violent content, but we don't allow
> fortunes, which contains violent content.
fortunes do not contain anything
it speaks about
violence towards children and the Bible also speaks about violence towards
children. It is that it is*a quote* from the Bible.
Like Andrey said, I think you might have misunderstood. The question was
whether I am willing to remove the package shipping the bible because
the bibl
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 06:39:39PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
As far as I can tell from the discussion and online translations (please
correct me if I am wrong), the text that is being referenced here about
killing children is Psalms 137:9. The King James Version of this text reads:
"Happy sh
On Friday, July 18, 2025 5:59:06 AM Mountain Standard Time NoisyCoil wrote:
> It's complicated, and nuanced. These complications and nuances do not
> apply to your package, which is the subject of this thread.
The complication and nuance of this entire discussion is what fascinates me
and why I t
Since this is about a very horrible sin like... jokes!... you are out of luck.
This is a crime of the highest levels.
If you would have instead raped multiple children in the ages of 7yo and 9yo,
into a state where they can't piss anymore, that would be different.
Then you would be welcome and pro
Hi Salvo,
Am Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 04:43:38PM +0200 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> Without me debian would be shipping fascist and racist quotes like it
> has done for the past 22 years, yet somehow I'm the bad guy.
I want to stress again — as I tried to do in private — that I don’t
consider you the b
Hello,
> As I understood it from a previous message, during his clean-up work,
> the maintainer found a quote where beating women is encouraged. What did
> he do then? He left it in the package!
I even found a quote which says that killing children by cracking
their skulls on rocks is good, but i
On 18/07/25 00:41, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Hello,
You do understand fortunes-{it,scn}-off is not a sacred text?
You do understand that suggesting that killing kids is good is
extremely disturbing to most people?
Me included.
To answer your question directly, no, I will not be opening an RC
On 18/07/25 14:25, Marco d'Itri wrote:
You may not be aware of this, but many people reject the idea that some
text or object should be considered "sacred".
I am aware, I am an atheist and agree with that viewpoint. Thank you.
On Jul 18, NoisyCoil wrote:
You do understand fortunes-{it,scn}-off is not a sacred text?
You may not be aware of this, but many people reject the idea that
some text or object should be considered "sacred".
Hence arguing that a text containing some seriously disturbing passages
is all right
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:10:42AM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Am Fr, Jul 18, 2025 at 03:01:44 -0400 schrieb Tiago Bortoletto Vaz:
> > obvious issue is being overlooked by some here. Debian will not only
> > lose one user of the offending package as already inaccurately argued in
> > this thread,
Am Fr, Jul 18, 2025 at 03:01:44 -0400 schrieb Tiago Bortoletto Vaz:
obvious issue is being overlooked by some here. Debian will not only
lose one user of the offending package as already inaccurately argued in
this thread, but contributors and developers who simply won't have the
motivation to gi
Russ Allbery writes:
> A careful debian-devel observer could
> have listed most of the people who would respond to the thread and written
> a pretty good paraphrase of what they would say the moment they saw the
> first few messages in the thread.
FWIW I believe you do it better and better for e
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:12:14AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
[...]
>
> The package maintainer has already explained that he has the same general
> feeling. There are some things he has already removed from the package
> because he feels they are inappropriate for Debian. He has also express
Hello,
> If you are incapable of understanding the difference between an historical
> text which was of its time
> has great historical significance, contains both transcendental and offensive
> content, and is
> significant and/or sacred to literally billions of people all over the world,
> vs
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:18:12AM -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
>I also think that certain things he has said here, and how he has said
>them (for example, in his first message, "Can people who are offended by
>the existence of systemd request to drop it from debian?"), imply that h
Iustin Pop writes:
> And again, I want to make sure it's clear what standard we hold
> ourselves to, here.
The standard that we hold *ourselves* to is considerably more than just
"don't be racist" for any definition of racist. The code of conduct we
passed via GR says:
1. Be respectful
Salvo,
If you are incapable of understanding the difference between an
historical text which was of its time, has great historical
significance, contains both transcendental and offensive content, and is
significant and/or sacred to literally billions of people all over the
world, vs. a moder
On 2025-07-17 17:37:43, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2025-07-17 08:57:12 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
> > racism by definition has to involve a power gradient, and that
> > definitionally something is only racist if aimed at a disfavored group
> > by a group with more social power.
> [.
On 2025-07-17 08:57:12, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Iustin Pop writes:
> > On 2025-07-17 09:50:09, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
> >> Whether there can be racism against white people is an incredibly
> >> complex question with a ton of baggage, about which many PhD
> >> dissertations have been written and I
Hello,
> You do understand fortunes-{it,scn}-off is not a sacred text?
You do understand that suggesting that killing kids is good is
extremely disturbing to most people?
> To answer your question directly, no, I will not be opening an RC bug
> against the bible.
Not "the bible", but "the debia
On 17/07/25 23:41, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Hello,
Beato chi prenderà i tuoi piccoli bambini e li sbatterà contro la roccia!
Debian is shipping the bible, which contains the above quote and many
many other similar ones.
Will you be opening an RC bug against it?
I agree there's a case to be made
Hello,
> Beato chi prenderà i tuoi piccoli bambini e li sbatterà contro la roccia!
Debian is shipping the bible, which contains the above quote and many
many other similar ones.
Will you be opening an RC bug against it?
> You are indeed. It is very relevant, it is just not *much more* relevant
On 17/07/25 21:57, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Hello,
I had started preparing a PR for removing stuff like that from sicilian
offensive, because that only has a handful of fortunes and I could
review them one by one and research them on the internet if I wasn't
sure if they should be interpreted lik
Hello,
> I had started preparing a PR for removing stuff like that from sicilian
> offensive, because that only has a handful of fortunes and I could
> review them one by one and research them on the internet if I wasn't
> sure if they should be interpreted like I thought (I haven't finished
> thi
Debian to develop an explicit set of standards for what constitutes acceptable
content and then remove individual items from the package that do not meet
those standards.
Developing consensus for such a standard is non-trivial work, as can be easily
seen in the discussion so far. But it is imp
no
consensus on this issue.
My perception is that those who acted to remove this package believed there
was a consensus and acted in good faith in doing so. But now that it has been
demonstrated that there is not a consensus, I think the correct path forward
is to put the decision on hold un
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:18:49AM +0200, Alex wrote:
> >> Removing the package from future releases will not remove it from users
> >> systems, and people who want to install it still have plenty of easy ways
> >> to do
> >> so. I understand your point of vie
On Thursday, July 17, 2025 2:45:44 AM Mountain Standard Time Antoine Le
Gonidec wrote:
> I get where the confusion is coming from. I am indeed saying that
> sexism, racism, etc. are never OK. But that jokes targeted at the
> dominant group are not racism or sexism.
>
> There is no such thing, in
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 05:37:43PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2025-07-17 08:57:12 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
> > racism by definition has to involve a power gradient, and that
> > definitionally something is only racist if aimed at a disfavored group
> > by a group with more
On 2025-07-17 08:57:12 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
racism by definition has to involve a power gradient, and that
definitionally something is only racist if aimed at a disfavored
group by a group with more social power.
[...]
Conversely, a problem I've had to directly struggle wit
On 17/07/25 14:30, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Sure, make a pull request to remove them.
I had started preparing a PR for removing stuff like that from sicilian
offensive, because that only has a handful of fortunes and I could
review them one by one and research them on the internet if I wasn&#
Le Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 08:57:12AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Iustin Pop writes:
> > No, it's not off-topic, or not entirely. The post I replied to was saying
> > "it's fine to be racist against white people".
>
> No, it was not. It was saying that racism by definition has to involve a
> pow
Iustin Pop writes:
> On 2025-07-17 09:50:09, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>> Whether there can be racism against white people is an incredibly
>> complex question with a ton of baggage, about which many PhD
>> dissertations have been written and I'm sure many more will be.
>> This particular discussio
Hello,
> maintaining packages; I think it's unfair and unhelpful to take
> pot-shots at other DDs over how many packages they are listed as
> maintainer of.
I fully agree with you.
However I think that if one has time to harass me, one should have
time to reply to me when I ask for help. It seem
Hello,
> You can't blame the community team for not doing something 20 years ago
> because there wasn't a community team 20 years ago.
The community team wasn't created last week either…
> It's also unreasonable to say the only time a bug can be reported in a
> program is when a new maintainer t
On 2025-07-17 09:50:09, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Whether there can be racism against white people is an incredibly complex
> question with a ton of baggage, about which many PhD dissertations have been
> written and I'm sure many more will be.
>
> This particular discussion we are engaged in here
Hello,
it seems you are assuming my bad faith.
> This lack of regard for other people's carefully considered opinions
I'm sorry but I strongly doubt that the person who opened the bugs and
the person who reopened the bugs even bothered to read what's inside
those packages.
Asking for removal wi
I think you need to take a step back and calm down a bit really to
assess the situation more clearly.
You can't blame the community team for not doing something 20 years ago
because there wasn't a community team 20 years ago.
It's also unreasonable to say the only time a bug can be reported i
Whether there can be racism against white people is an incredibly
complex question with a ton of baggage, about which many PhD
dissertations have been written and I'm sure many more will be.
This particular discussion we are engaged in here is hard enough without
going down this particular rab
On 7/17/25 9:15 AM, Hakan Bayındır wrote:
I don't believe Salvo is angry about how his package is "not wanted
here" anymore, but how the process is handled in the first place.
That is not at all the impression I get.
Salvo seems to be upset about how the request to remove
On 2025-07-17 11:45:44, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
> Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:30:46PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> > I have a very hard time understanding how in two adjacent paragraphs you
> > can say both "Sexism, racism and such are not, never were, and can not
> > be funny." and also
Salvo Tomaselli writes:
> Also I couldn't help but notice that the DD who opened the issue maintains 0
> packages. Just something I noticed.
There are plenty of people who do valuable work in Debian other than
maintaining packages; I think it's unfair and unhelpful to take
pot-shots at other DDs
On 7/17/25 1:18 PM, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:47:36 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli
wrote:
since you agreed to it I will reply publicly.
Thank you for your open words and for all the work you’ve put into this
package. I understand that it’s frustrating when you feel your effort
isn’t
Sure, make a pull request to remove them.
But should stuff like this be blanket removed?
> - Come fa sesso un esperto di UNIX?
> - Unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; fsck ;
> more ; yes ; umount ; sleep .
> -- Dr. Zap
The real work is stuff like this:
https://
Salvo,
With the hope of being able to give you a hand as I'd really like to
keep both the italian and the sicilian *offensive* fortunes package in
Debian, I went peeking at the package and, unless I'm completely missing
something, the second offensive italian fortune says that women's "no"s
s
Otherwise, waking up after 22 years, and making me waste 2 years of
work is an abuse of power.
> * not shipping a package in Debian doesn't remove its content (or datasets)
> from the Internet (nor from the oldstable, snapshots, software archives, etc).
It also doesn't bring back th
gt;
> > > Any software packaged in Debian is automatically promoted, meaning that
> > > Debian itself (as a project) is responsible for disseminating its
> > > contents. This has nothing to do with free speech, which is currently
> > > the dominant narrative used b
Hello,
> I get where the confusion is coming from. I am indeed saying that
> sexism, racism, etc. are never OK. But that jokes targeted at the
> dominant group are not racism or sexism.
I can see the point but it's a wrong simplification in my opinion.
A family member of mine is transgender and
Oh I've embraced it, which is why I have been fixing things.
I don't see how making me stop doing that job is going to make debian
more welcoming, since nobody has ever complained about it, and once I
stop doing it nobody will be doing it.
So the consequence is -1 contributor, but is it going to
On 2025-07-17 at 06:18, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:47:36 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli
> wrote:
>
>> since you agreed to it I will reply publicly.
>>
>>> Thank you for your open words and for all the work you’ve put
>>> into this package. I understand that it’s frustrating when you
>>
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:45:44 +0200
Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
>
> Does that make it clearer where I am standing on this topic?
AFAIU:
All animals are equal, but cis animals are less equal than others.
Does this summarize it correctly?
--
kind regards
Frank
pgpuVZDf3ODs6.pgp
Description: Open
El jue, 17 jul 2025 a las 10:00, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
() escribió:
> Let me offer you a different perspective: through the past conversations
> around the offensive variant of the fortunes packages (in english), the
> project has converged towards considering that this is not a package that it
> wa
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 11:47:36 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli
wrote:
>since you agreed to it I will reply publicly.
>
>> Thank you for your open words and for all the work you’ve put into this
>> package. I understand that it’s frustrating when you feel your effort
>> isn’t fully recognized or valued. I wan
his has nothing to do with free speech, which is currently
> > the dominant narrative used by big tech companies to avoid
> > responsibility when their algorithms promote hatred written by others.
> > This isn't about silencing them; it's simply about not providing them
holds itself to
evolve over time
* a package that was shipped in Debian 20 years ago doesn't inherit a specific
privilege to continue being shipped by Debian today
* not shipping a package in Debian doesn't remove its content (or datasets)
from the Internet (nor from the oldstable, s
you could be more direct in the
future, since we all know they are empty words.
I know the release team is going to remove the package wether I want it or
not, as I've already been reminded in debian-devel. I'm not that stupid :)
But if you think you can go ahead and do that while some
Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:30:46PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> I have a very hard time understanding how in two adjacent paragraphs you
> can say both "Sexism, racism and such are not, never were, and can not
> be funny." and also "making fun of cis-het white males can be offensive,
> and
> This isn't about silencing them; it's simply about not providing them
> with our infrastructure to spread their hatred (jokes are one of the
> most common form of expressed hatred).
>
> > you do not have to install this content if you do not like it. if you
> > wan
lert: the Release Team will kick the whole fortunes-it and
> fortunes-scn source packages out of testing if they need to).
>
> B) get over it, remove the offensive binary packages from the source
> packages, close these two serious bugs and move on. Then if it *really* is
> that impor
> It's problematic because Debian would be providing its huge platform to
> offensive/harmful content.
Have you checked the popcon?
fortunes-scn-off has 5 installs, 3 of which are myself
fortunes-it-off has 85 installs, 3 of which are myself
Would you define these numbers "huge"?
--
Salvo Tom
promote hatred written by others.
This isn't about silencing them; it's simply about not providing them
with our infrastructure to spread their hatred (jokes are one of the
most common form of expressed hatred).
> you do not have to install this content if you do not like it. if you
>
>> Removing the package from future releases will not remove it from users
>> systems, and people who want to install it still have plenty of easy ways to
>> do
>> so. I understand your point of view but maybe there are better battles to
>> fight for.
>
> I
I'm not sure why this is on d-devel and CC'ed to leader@, but let me try to
answer in simple terms, as a random DD.
Le mercredi, 16 juillet 2025, 19.42:06 h CEST Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
> QUESTIONS
> =
>
> 1. Can the community team force me to remove a package, e
behaviour is the problem, but from a systems point of
view, the problem is the package. Its mere existence does create negative
waves.
Removing the package from future releases will not remove it from users
systems, and people who want to install it still have plenty of easy ways to do
so. I u
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:35:55PM +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
> Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:42:06PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
> > I did that by removing tens of sexist, homophobic and racist jokes
> > that were not in the offensive section, and had been there at least
> > since 2004.
>
Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:42:06PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
> I did that by removing tens of sexist, homophobic and racist jokes
> that were not in the offensive section, and had been there at least
> since 2004.
Does that mean that sexist, homophobic and/or racist jokes that were in
the -
umoristic value I kept in the offensive section. I did
remove plenty of stuff from the offensive section.
Now, in 2025, after 2 years of me working on this package, and while
in freeze, the community team wants to remove the offensive section of
the fortunes.
When I asked for help to review a
On Saturday, 19 April 2025 18:23:06 Central European Summer Time Mattia
Rizzolo wrote:
> But I recommend you just leverage control commands while filing, since
> ftp-master tools just parse the subject:
Good idea !
Thanks both for the help
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 03:46:03PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> But I forgot that all raku-modules are Architecture: any, which means that
> all
> these module must also be removed from unstable/arm*.
>
> There are 19 packages to be removed from arm*.
>
> Should I log one bug for all 19 pac
Hi
On 18-04-2025 15:46, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Should I log one bug for all 19 packages, or one bug per package ?
I'm pretty sure ftp-master has workflows that desire one bug per package
as I've seen that request often enough.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
Hi
Currently rakudo cannot be shipped on arm architectures because of build
issues. Upstream is working in this, but in the meantime, raku is not suitable
for ARM.
I've required the removal of moarm, nqp and rakudo from unstable/arm*, which
was done a few days ago.
But I forgot that all raku-
On 16 April 2025 at 19:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On 16-04-2025 18:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
| >
| > That appears to be a different set of packages.
|
|
| The packages spotted in the original list, I assume you're ta
Hi Dirk,
On 16-04-2025 18:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
That appears to be a different set of packages.
The packages spotted in the original list, I assume you're talking about
all of them except maybe cantor and vtk9?
boot: r-recom
w that you can't remove them at this stage of the release.
|
| [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
That appears to be a different set of packages. It is comprised entirely of
packages that the meta package "r-recommended" depends upon. [ The R 'engine'
d on those architectures. I think it's best to
assume for now that you can't remove them at this stage of the release.
Paul
[1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 23:04:47 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
If you need one of the team-maintained r-cran-* packages on a 32-bit or
on a big endian architectures, which are not supported upstream, please
contact me on the debian-r list and let's see how we can share the
workload.
It might be b
jects
architecture-is-64-bit in the build depends and I will add a
--little-endian one that will inject architecture-is-little-endian.
After uploading the changes, I will then ask the FTP team to remove the
team-maintained r-cran-* packages and all their reverse-dependencies
from the excluded architecture
* Holger Levsen [250102 13:03]:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 01:08:49PM +0100, Ansgar 🐱 wrote:
> > I'm wondering how we can clean up suites like experimental and
> > unstable. They tend to slowly accumulate cruft that nobody cleans up,
> > including no longer installable packages.
>
> for experiment
e: what Helmut said & does.
> As a very simple start, I would like to remove packages from
> experimental that haven't seen an upload for a long time (arbitrarily
> chosen as before 2020-01-01 for the list below).
I'd propose to be more "aggressive" and use 2021-0
* Andreas Metzler [241231 06:59]:
> On 2024-12-29 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 01:08:49PM +0100, Ansgar 🐱 wrote:
> [...]
> >> I would also like to do something similar to unstable; maybe start with
> >> packages uploaded before some arbitrary date that are also not included
>
On 2024-12-29 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 01:08:49PM +0100, Ansgar 🐱 wrote:
[...]
>> I would also like to do something similar to unstable; maybe start with
>> packages uploaded before some arbitrary date that are also not included
>> in any of oldstable/stable/testing. These ca
ple start, I would like to remove packages from
> experimental that haven't seen an upload for a long time (arbitrarily
> chosen as before 2020-01-01 for the list below).
>
> What do people think about this?
Only if that does not lead to a subsequent upload of the package to be
art, I would like to remove packages from
> experimental that haven't seen an upload for a long time (arbitrarily
> chosen as before 2020-01-01 for the list below).
>
> What do people think about this?
Thanks for cleaning up the archive. The proposed criteria vaguely makes
sense to
Ansgar dixit:
> musescore-snapshot| 2019-07-05 00:19:11.735843+00
I do have plans to pick that up once I find the tuits for it
and have finished the preceding musescore{2,3} uploads. (Lots
to do there.) So please keep that for now.
Thanks,
//mirabilos
--
[16:04:33] bkix: "veni
Hi,
On 29/12/2024 13:08, Ansgar 🐱 wrote:
[…]
As a very simple start, I would like to remove packages from
experimental that haven't seen an upload for a long time (arbitrarily
chosen as before 2020-01-01 for the list below).
Yes please.
> David Prévot
>php-sabre-event (
On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 01:08:49PM +0100, Ansgar 🐱 wrote:
> I'm wondering how we can clean up suites like experimental and
> unstable. They tend to slowly accumulate cruft that nobody cleans up,
> including no longer installable packages.
>
> As a very simple start, I
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 13:37:50 +0100
From: Matthias Geiger
To: ,
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: Remove ancient uploads from experimental (and later
unstable)
In-Reply-To: <87ikr2zo6m@43-1.org>
Hi,
As a very simple start, I would like to remove packages from
experimental that haven
Hi,
I'm wondering how we can clean up suites like experimental and
unstable. They tend to slowly accumulate cruft that nobody cleans up,
including no longer installable packages.
As a very simple start, I would like to remove packages from
experimental that haven't seen an upload for a
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 09:24:18AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> First, I think we need to understand the rationale for doing anything
> about 'netkit-rwho': do we want to do something because 1) it is not
> maintained upstream? or 2) because it is an insecure design?, or 3)
> something else?
At
t; Please have a look at https://github.com/alexmyczko/rutpime (there's
> an ITP for it, and it has
> been in new queue several times:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013361
>
> After a while I intend to clone this bug to ftp.debian.org for
> removal f
Quoting Otto Kekäläinen (2024-03-30 22:09:46)
> Is it so that the debian/copyright file is reviewed by ftp-masters
> only for packages in NEW queue, and there is probably no automation in
> place to flag subsequent copyright changes for re-review?
It is my understanding that it is, and always has
sible-island.net/personal/copywrongs.html
If someone has rewritten an author's contribution such that none of the
author's "original expression" (a manifestation of human creativity)
remains in the file/work, then it is okay to remove their attribution
and/or copyright noti
Hi!
While reviewing xz-utils commits I noticed that a bunch of old
copyright holder names were removed in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xz-utils/-/commit/d1b67558cbc06c449a0ae7b7c1694e277aef4a78.
Is this OK to do so? Having source code in the public domain means
that there is no copyright, so n
-Undiacritic
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : remove diacritics from a string
Text::Undiacritic provides a module that changes characters with diacritics
into their base characters.
Also changes into base character in cases where UNICODE does not
Hi,
Am 11.01.23 um 15:20 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
Hi Helge!
On 1/11/23 15:03, Helge Deller wrote:
Yes, sadly we don't have a working java right now on hppa, and it will
probably take some more time to get one. At least I won't have time
for it during the next few months.
But it would
Hi Helge!
On 1/11/23 15:03, Helge Deller wrote:
Yes, sadly we don't have a working java right now on hppa, and it will
probably take some more time to get one. At least I won't have time
for it during the next few months.
But it would be sad to loose those bindings...
There are some efforts to
1 - 100 of 1202 matches
Mail list logo
