issues  

Messages by Thread

• [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] IndexOrDocValuesQuery and IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery should only be counted once when computing maxClauseCount [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Expand TieredMergePolicy deletePctAllowed limits [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] IndexOrDocValues query is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexOrDocValuesQuery is counted twice when computing `maxClauseCount` [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Too many documents collected when only boo-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Too many documents collected when only bool-filter condition is present [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Let's explore a machine-learned MergePolicy? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement IndexedDISI#docIDRunEnd [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.74 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Respect minCompetitiveScore in BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add MathUtil#unsignedMin to simplify dividing the doc ID space into windows. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add MathUtil#unsignedMin to simplify dividing the doc ID space into windows. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add code comment about use of Collections#synchronizedMap in LRUQueryCache. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add code comment about use of Collections#synchronizedMap in LRUQueryCache. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add code comment about use of Collections#synchronizedMap in LRUQueryCache. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Dynamic pruning with DocValueSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dynamic pruning with DocValueSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Does LRUQueryCache#uniqueQueries really needs wrapped by Collections.synchronizedMap? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Merge DocAndFreqBuffer and DocAndScoreBuffer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Merge DocAndFreqBuffer and DocAndScoreBuffer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Merge DocAndFreqBuffer and DocAndScoreBuffer. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Merge CombinedFieldQuery's WeightedDisiWrapper into DisiWrapper. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Merge CombinedFieldQuery's WeightedDisiWrapper into DisiWrapper. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Merge CombinedFieldQuery's WeightedDisiWrapper into DisiWrapper. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Can we support vectors to be loaded with direct I/O for full precision re-ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we support vectors to be loaded with direct I/O for full precision re-ranking? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.71 to 0.73 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.1 to 1.29.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.29.1 to 1.29.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.9 to 0.11.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.9 to 0.11.12 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix: Include tests.jvmargs in "Reproduce with" output [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Failing test: TestSpellChecking.testGeneratedSuggestions — ComparisonFailure with expected suggestion list [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failing test: TestSpellChecking.testGeneratedSuggestions — ComparisonFailure with expected suggestion list [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failing test: TestSpellChecking.testGeneratedSuggestions — ComparisonFailure with expected suggestion list [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Keep evaluating conjunction one doc-at-a-time until dynamic pruning kicks in. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Keep evaluating conjunction one doc-at-a-time until dynamic pruning kicks in. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Keep evaluating conjunction one doc-at-a-time until dynamic pruning kicks in. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Keep evaluating conjunction one doc-at-a-time until dynamic pruning kicks in. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Keep evaluating conjunction one doc-at-a-time until dynamic pruning kicks in. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Keep evaluating conjunction one doc-at-a-time until dynamic pruning kicks in. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Keep evaluating conjunction one doc-at-a-time until dynamic pruning kicks in. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: add automated backport workflow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add automated backport workflow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add automated backport workflow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add automated backport workflow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add automated backport workflow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: add automated backport workflow [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Leverage sorted dim when visiting BKD leaf. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up query node classes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up query node classes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery for int sort (#14732) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery for int sort (#14732) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up findNextGEQ by aggresive stepping [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix java doc in IndexWriter. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix java doc in IndexWriter. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix java doc in IndexWriter. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix java doc in IndexWriter. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix java doc in IndexWriter. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix java doc in IndexWriter. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery for int sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery for int sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery for int sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix IndexSortSortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery for int sort [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] VirtualMachineError is swallowed in IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove most uses of boolean success from IndexWriter and ReadersAndUpdates [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] I cannot process the word 'ที่ผ่านมา' using the Thai tokenizer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] I cannot process the word 'ที่ผ่านมา' using the Thai tokenizer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] I cannot process the word 'ที่ผ่านมา' using the Thai tokenizer. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Updating skip-changelog label [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Updating skip-changelog label [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Updating skip-changelog label [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix documentation regarding benchmark running [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix documentation regarding benchmark running [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix documentation regarding benchmark running [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix documentation regarding benchmark running [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix documentation regarding benchmark running [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix documentation regarding benchmark running [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Support for Re-Ranking Queries using Late Interaction Model Multi-Vectors. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Re-Ranking Queries using Late Interaction Model Multi-Vectors. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Re-Ranking Queries using Late Interaction Model Multi-Vectors. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Re-Ranking Queries using Late Interaction Model Multi-Vectors. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Re-Ranking Queries using Late Interaction Model Multi-Vectors. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Re-Ranking Queries using Late Interaction Model Multi-Vectors. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Re-Ranking Queries using Late Interaction Model Multi-Vectors. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix resource leak in loadMainDataFromFile [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] No ruff violation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] No ruff violation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] No ruff violation [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Clarify filter fields usage in javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Arg001 - no violations found [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Arg001 - no violations found [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Arg001 - no violations found [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Arg001 - no violations found [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.26 to 4.0.27 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.26 to 4.0.27 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.26 to 4.0.27 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.diffplug.spotless from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Only run the labeller on the main branch of the lucene repository [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only run the labeller on the main branch of the lucene repository [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only run the labeller on the main branch of the lucene repository [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only run the labeller on the main branch of the lucene repository [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only run the labeller on the main branch of the lucene repository [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Only run the labeller on the main branch of the lucene repository [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Create a bot to add milestones to new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Cache high-order bits of hashcode to speed up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cache high-order bits of hashcode to speed up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cache high-order bits of hashcode to speed up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cache high-order bits of hashcode to speed up BytesRefHash [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages