issues  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Nightly benchark regression on pre-filtered vector search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use per-segment K in filtered KNN fallback logic (fixes 14671) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use per-segment K in filtered KNN fallback logic (fixes 14671) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use per-segment K in filtered KNN fallback logic (fixes 14671) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix termination condition in TestStressNRTReplication. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix termination condition in TestStressNRTReplication. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestStressNRTReplication may never terminate (exceed suite timeout) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update verifier comment to show label [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update verifier comment to show label [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update verifier comment to show label [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Mention label in changelog verifier comment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mention label in changelog verifier comment [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] asynchronous I/O + saturating NVMe bandwidth [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] asynchronous I/O + saturating NVMe bandwidth [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] asynchronous I/O + saturating NVMe bandwidth [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] MMapDirectory.PRELOAD_HINT should also consider FileTypeHint.INDEX [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Filters cannot be set in Analysis [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] upgrade from rat 0.14 to rat 0.15 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add comment about using InverseIntersectVisit and IntersectVisitor. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add instructions to help/IDEs.txt for VSCode and Neovim [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add instructions to help/IDEs.txt for VSCode and Neovim [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Enable changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove deprecations in expressions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove deprecations in expressions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't perform additional KNN querying after timeout, fixes #14639 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't perform additional KNN querying after timeout, fixes #14639 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Fix bad interaction between optimistic query and query timeout [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix bad interaction between optimistic query and query timeout [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] update commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.21 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] update commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.21 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] upgrade commons codec from 1.13.0 to 1.16.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade commons codec from 1.13.0 to 1.16.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Question for nori analyer behavior change [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Multi range traversal for numeric range aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi range traversal for numeric range aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor KnnVectorReader merging to not need a finishMerge method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor KnnVectorReader merging to not need a finishMerge method [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Return MergeSpec for IndexWriter forceMergeDeletes API [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] Uwe Schindler
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport #14510 to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport migration from ReadAdvice to hints to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages