issues  

Messages by Thread

• [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve 'javadoc-style-license-header' and 'license-after-package' [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.39.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.39.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feature/scalar quantized off heap scoring [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/scalar quantized off heap scoring [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Correct tests.seed to be reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct tests.seed to be reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct tests.seed to be reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable Faiss-based vector format to index larger number of vectors in a single segment [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] tests.seed is no longer reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] tests.seed is no longer reported on failures [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` heuristic to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use the new `expectedVisitedNodes` estimator to speed up filtered vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Explore bypassing HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reapply "Update the IOContext rather than the ReadAdvice on IndexInput (#14702)" [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport Faiss-based vector format to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.23.0 to 1.27.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.23.0 to 1.27.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: enable gh annotations with ast-grep [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] assertDocValuesEquals should support sparse sorted doc_values [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend PatienceKnnQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend Patience/Seeded knn queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make it possible to extend Patience/Seeded knn queries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Small enhancements to IndexWriter's InfoStream to support segment tracing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Sometimes use `FixedBitSet` when doing HNSW searches [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] A workflow "bot" that would apply formatting fixes and create a PR against a PR? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Minor] Release email URLs not clickable in some email clients [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize `CombinedFieldQuery` by `nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `CombinedFieldQuery` by `nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize `CombinedFieldQuery` by `nextDocsAndScores` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] style: fix indents inconsistent with editorconfig and validate in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix indents inconsistent with editorconfig and validate in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix indents inconsistent with editorconfig and validate in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix indents inconsistent with editorconfig and validate in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix indents inconsistent with editorconfig and validate in CI [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: replace six simple error prone checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: replace six simple error prone checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: replace six simple error prone checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: replace six simple error prone checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: replace six simple error prone checks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: replace six simple error prone checks [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Specialize `filterCompetitiveHits` when have exact 2 clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specialize `filterCompetitiveHits` when have exact 2 clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specialize `filterCompetitiveHits` when have exact 2 clauses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specialize `filterCompetitiveHits` when have exact 2 clauses [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery to leverage index statistic in DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery to leverage index statistic in DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery to leverage index statistic in DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize FieldExistsQuery to leverage index statistic in DocValuesSkipper [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Build] Fix deprecation warning about automatic loading of test framework [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] Fix deprecation warning about automatic loading of test framework [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] Fix deprecation warning about automatic loading of test framework [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] Fix deprecation warning about automatic loading of test framework [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Build] Fix deprecation warning about automatic loading of test framework [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Remove -XX:ActiveProcessorCount=1 from template.gradle.properties [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove -XX:ActiveProcessorCount=1 from template.gradle.properties [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove -XX:ActiveProcessorCount=1 from template.gradle.properties [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove -XX:ActiveProcessorCount=1 from template.gradle.properties [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove -XX:ActiveProcessorCount=1 from template.gradle.properties [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: add eclint to verify editorconfig in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add eclint to verify editorconfig in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add eclint to verify editorconfig in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add eclint to verify editorconfig in CI [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add eclint to verify editorconfig in CI [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: fix incorrect gradle dependency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: fix incorrect gradle dependency [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: fix incorrect gradle dependency [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial prototype of custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Custom google java format tasks to replace spotless [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decrease TieredMergePolicy's default number of segments per tier to 8. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] style: disable max-line-length in editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: disable max-line-length in editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: disable max-line-length in editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: disable max-line-length in editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make spotless gradle formatting an opt-in rather than default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make spotless gradle formatting an opt-in rather than default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make spotless gradle formatting an opt-in rather than default. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] style: fix sources to conform to .editorconfig (basic fixes only) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] fix sources to conform to .editorconfig [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: fix invalid html [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix invalid html [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix invalid html [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix invalid html [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix invalid html [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: fix invalid html [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Convert some complex PriorityQueue implementations to comparators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert some complex PriorityQueue implementations to comparators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert some complex PriorityQueue implementations to comparators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert some complex PriorityQueue implementations to comparators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Convert some complex PriorityQueue implementations to comparators [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Expose search strategy in KNN query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose search strategy in KNN query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose search strategy in KNN query [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix 'private' method declared 'final' in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix 'private' method declared 'final' in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix 'private' method declared 'final' in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add isEmpty in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add isEmpty in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add isEmpty in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add isEmpty in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add isEmpty in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add isEmpty in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add isEmpty in PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages