issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] docs: add VS Code and Neovim IDE links to CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add VS Code and Neovim IDE links to CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: add VS Code and Neovim IDE links to CONTRIBUTING.md [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use TernaryLongHeap in NeighborQueue for faster vector search performance [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: require Python 3.12+, add smoke-test Make target [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: require Python 3.12+, add smoke-test Make target [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: require Python 3.12+, add smoke-test Make target [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: require Python 3.12+, add smoke-test Make target [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: require Python 3.12+, add smoke-test Make target [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] SOLR-15705 Distribute a DeleteById to all shards when using the CompositeId router with a router field defined and field value is missing in request [lucene-solr] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SOLR-15705 Distribute a DeleteById to all shards when using the CompositeId router with a router field defined and field value is missing in request [lucene-solr] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add bulk off-heap scoring for vector formats [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Could bpVector reordering be used to make HNSW behave better in low memory? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Could bpVector reordering be used to make HNSW behave better in low memory? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update test for kNN query timeout test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update assert for kNN query timeout tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update assert for kNN query timeout tests [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Clarify IndexSearcher#setTimeout semantics [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused parameter in TopFieldCollecter.countHit() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused parameter in TopFieldCollecter.countHit() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused parameter in TopFieldCollecter.countHit() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.12.7 to 0.12.11 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.12.7 to 0.12.11 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 4 to 5 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 4 to 5 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.0 to 1.31.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.0 to 1.31.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.77 to 0.80 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.77 to 0.80 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Use ULP float comparison instead of epsilon-based comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use ULP float comparison instead of epsilon-based comparison [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BlockJoin] Add ParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery to support parent and c… [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding 3-ary LongHeap to speed up collectors like TopDoc*Collectors [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimize filtering on the primary index sort field [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport of #15116: Rewrite of the GroupVInt optimization without lambdas, varhandles and no code in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: implement asBulkSimScorer on FeatureFields's SimScorers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement asBulkSimScorer on FeatureFields's SimScorers [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: implement asBulkSimScorer on FeatureFields's SimScorers [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improve FirstPassGroupingCollector to support early termination and pruning/skipping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve FirstPassGroupingCollector to support early termination and pruning/skipping [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] early exit in SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery & SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] early exit in SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery & SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] early exit in SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery & SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] early exit in SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery & SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] early exit in SortedNumericDocValuesRangeQuery & SortedSetDocValuesRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove even more boolean success flags [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove even more boolean success flags [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove even more boolean success flags [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove even more boolean success flags [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove even more boolean success flags [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove even more boolean success flags [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Disabling point range collector if doc values not indexed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disabling point range collector if doc values not indexed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disabling point range collector if doc values not indexed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disabling point range collector if doc values not indexed [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Record FST ramBytesUsed correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Record FST ramBytesUsed correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Record FST ramBytesUsed correctly [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improve kNN behavior on permissive filters [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve kNN behavior on permissive filters [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve kNN behavior on permissive filters [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve kNN behavior on permissive filters [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve kNN behavior on permissive filters [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve kNN behavior on permissive filters [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Expose `SegmentSizeAndDocs` and `MergeScore` features in `TieredMergePolicy` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose `SegmentSizeAndDocs` and `MergeScore` features in `TieredMergePolicy` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose `SegmentSizeAndDocs` and `MergeScore` features in `TieredMergePolicy` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict visibility of `TieredMergePolicy.score()` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict visibility of `TieredMergePolicy.score()` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add comment on BooleanScorerSupplier#excl. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comment on BooleanScorerSupplier#excl. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comment on BooleanScorerSupplier#excl. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.28 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.28 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.28 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.28 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages