Anyone know why enlightenment isn't include with redhat anymore. It is a
much better wm when run alone, especially with gnome2 mods that redhat
made to the system.
Aaron
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 19:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to
> [EMAI
Hi Everyone,
I am having trouble installing enlightenment 0.16.5 on psyche. First
fnlib complained about a not installed libImlib.so.1. Imlib is installed
on the system (incl. devel package), but provides libImlib.so.11. So I
created a symlink to that. Didn't work. Trying to install fnlib
Hi Everyone,
I am having trouble installing enlightenment 0.16.5 on psyche. First
fnlib complained about a not installed libImlib.so.1. Imlib is installed
on the system (incl. devel package), but provides libImlib.so.11. So I
created a symlink to that. Didn't work. Trying to install fnlib
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:39:44PM -0500, Anyela Valentina Camargo Rodriguez wrote:
> Anybody can tell if i can get senmail for irix (Silicon graphics).
>
> Thanks
>
Anyela,
Sendmail comes with IRIX by default. If you have the IRIX CDs and need
some help to install that subsystem, let me k
Anyela Valentina Camargo Rodriguez wrote:
> Anybody can tell if i can get senmail for irix (Silicon graphics).
>
> Thanks
Yu can get the sourcetarball directly from sendmail.org, the notes about
compiling it can be found at:
http://www.sendmail.org/compiling.html#IRIX
--
---
Anybody can tell if i can get senmail for irix (Silicon graphics).
Thanks
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
nombre de Bill Crawford
Enviado el: Viernes, 05 de Abril de 2002 02:59 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: Gnome + enlightenment
On 5
Thanks this did it. Well enlightenment is borken by the updates,
but at least my xmodmap is getting loaded.
Cheers.
Dominic.
Bill Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5 Apr 2002, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
>
> > The only I got to do load my .xmodmap file would be to
On 5 Apr 2002, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
> The only I got to do load my .xmodmap file would be to start it
> after enlightenment was up. This required a restart of
> enlightenment to take full effect. But now enlightenment hangs.
If you're using GNOME, you want to go into
Hi,
I am using RH7.2 with gnome+enlightenment. Yesterday I updated
many packages. It broke enlightenment. I can't do restart
enlightenment without hanging.
First, I do not know where should I put the line
xmodmap /home/dominic/.xmodmap &
In previous version of RH I ran fvwm.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:55:44AM +0100, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
|Make sure "Apply fonts and colors to non-KDE Apps" in kcontrol Look and
|Feel/Themes/Style is not set.
Aah... so this is why my $HOME/.gtkrc is overridden in the first place.
Never used KDE before, so thanks for the tips :)
anging the interface is not only possible, but is expected and
encouraged.
To the original poster: depending on your needs, you might find it
quite liberating to ditch the "desktop manager" concept entirely, and
run only Enlightenment. I find no need for the system overhead of KDE
or Gnom
christopher j bottaro wrote:
>
> hello,
>
> i'm kinda new to linux and am having trouble (coming from win32)
> understanding this whole x server/desktop manager/window manager thing. i
> kinda understand an xserver is, but when it comes to kde2 vs
> gnome/enli
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, christopher j bottaro wrote:
> > I think it's because somehow, when run in KDE 2.0, KDE doesn't seem to
> > honour $HOME/.gtkrc. Please CMIIW. It has something to do with the toolkit
> > that default GNOME apps use. The default toolkit used for GNOME compliant
> > apps is GTK
first off, wow, thanks for answering all my questions, it really explained a
lot...
but more questions...=)
> |why is it that i can get gnome apps running in kde2, but they don't look
> | half as good as if they were running in gnome/enlightenment?
>
> I think it's becaus
gnome? what is enlightenment?
KDE and GNOME are desktop managers.
Enlightenment is a window manager.
|why does enlightenment run on top of gnome? can it run on top of kde2? if
|not, why not, and why does it run on top of gnome?
When GNOME first showed up the only window manager that support i
hello,
i'm kinda new to linux and am having trouble (coming from win32)
understanding this whole x server/desktop manager/window manager thing. i
kinda understand an xserver is, but when it comes to kde2 vs
gnome/enlightenment...i'm kinda lost.
right now i run KDE2 and i like it a
I forgot to ask in previouse email about the size of the iso. Do anyone
know why iso is 675mb for the first disc and 670mb for second? When I
burned them on my cd I noticed the size is within 640mb size so what
happened to the rest of 30 to 35mb? My installation seems to come on
without a hitch
ed
as disc1 and disc2 instead of 2nd disc to be supplement or differently
labeled instaed of disc2? Also, Enlightenment was not installed nor was
it defaulted like previous versions. I also know Enlightenment 16 had
several problems than Enlightenment 15, such as requiring more cpu
bandwidth
: this was
configured under E15, using the e-conf tool.
Fine an dandy.
At work, where I have compiled e16 into my home directory (which
incidently I beleive is not the problem!) I have apparently the same key
bindings set up (according to $E_ROOT/enlightenment/config/keybindings.cfg)
but I can
Hi, Has anyone found a fix for the enlightenment - esd problem.
For those of you who aren't aware... for some reason enlightenment (and it only
seems to be enlightenment from what I have read) causes breaks in the sound when
major screen shifts occur such as changing virtual pages or cha
I just installed 6.2 (full install) - I think Enlightenment is what's coming
up as the X manager (I may be wrong) Regardless, will gnorpm work under
this, or is Gnome required?
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Mike,
I found 1.9.8-2 at:
http://www.megaloman.com/~hany/RPM/IByName.html
Regards
Gustav
Mike Erickson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, David D.W. Downey wrote:
>
> > Mike Erickson wrote:
> >
> > > imlib = 1.9.7 is needed by imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.7-1
> > > imlib = 1.9.7 is needed by imlib-deve
If you go to where you downloaded the e16 source, you'll find a libs
directory. it'll have the version of imlib that you need.
so:
ftp://ftp.enlightenment.org/pub/enlightenment/enlightenment/libs/
contains all the libs that you'll need! they're even in rpm format!
Chris
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, David D.W. Downey wrote:
> Mike Erickson wrote:
>
> > imlib = 1.9.7 is needed by imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.7-1
> > imlib = 1.9.7 is needed by imlib-devel-1.9.7-1
> >
>
> imlib is broken into 3 packages. imlib, imlib-cfgeditor, and
> imlib-devel
>
> you need to upgrade all thre
Mike Erickson wrote:
> imlib = 1.9.7 is needed by imlib-cfgeditor-1.9.7-1
> imlib = 1.9.7 is needed by imlib-devel-1.9.7-1
>
imlib is broken into 3 packages. imlib, imlib-cfgeditor, and
imlib-devel
you need to upgrade all three packages at once.
--
David D.W. Downey Red Hat Certified En
I just got a new box at work w/ redhat 6.1 and e .15 on it. (std. install)
I'm trying to upgrade e to .16, but am having some trouble. First, I
needed to install imlib 1.9.8 and fnlib. However, imlib upgrade fails due
to dependancies of imlib 1.9.7:
imlib = 1.9.7 is needed by imlib-cfgeditor-1.9
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> Rule #1 for mailing list/newsgroup for discussions where you have been
> caught being dumb: distract everyone else by telling the audience that
> the other guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
> [...]
What the hell does any of this have to do
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 01:28:49PM -0500, Jason Costomiris wrote:
> : And it's GdkPixbuf, not Pixmap. You obviously don't know the first thing
> : about it, so I will explain.
>
> Rule #1 for mailing list/newsgroup for discussions where you have been
> caught being dumb: distract everyone else by
istract everyone else by telling the audience that
> the other guy doesn't know what he's talking about.
>
> So I mistyped one time. As you can see from my previous post, I know it's
> GdkPixbuf. Has the almighty Tom never once mistyped something? You're
> bec
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 05:41:47PM +, Tom Gilbert wrote:
: > : > The whole finger-pointing thing when he left RHAT, and now GNOME is
: > : > phasing out using Imlib in favor of GdkPixbuf, in order to overcome
: > : > shortcomings of Imlib that Raster doesn't seem willing to fix.
: > :
: > :
iconbox? Oh yeah, that thing that sits there chewing up memory.
Ok. This is getting very stupid now. Are you deliberately being a troll?
A wm needs somewhere for it's windows to go when they're iconified. For
E, that is the iconbox. If you don't want it, close it, and it won
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> > Like I've said before, I have nothing to do with the enlightenment RPM
> > (or enlightenment development in general), and I don't use it (nothing
> > against it, but I prefer the good old /dev/tty* "window manager&qu
gt; know better.
>
> Like I've said before, I have nothing to do with the enlightenment RPM
> (or enlightenment development in general), and I don't use it (nothing
> against it, but I prefer the good old /dev/tty* "window manager"), so I
> was just repeating wh
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> > This is intentional: 0.16.x adds a load of bloat^H^H^H^H^Hfeatures that
>
> That's just FUD, and I can't believe it came from someone who should
> know better.
Like I've said before, I have nothing to do with the enlig
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 05:48:57PM +, Tom Gilbert wrote:
: Ok. But it does :) It fixes a large number of bugs, an iconbox, adds
: documentation, improves speed, and reduces memory usage. Is that wrong
: somehow?
An iconbox? Oh yeah, that thing that sits there chewing up memory.
: > The whol
dkPixbuf, in order to overcome
> shortcomings of Imlib that Raster doesn't seem willing to fix.
Not fixing? Are you aware of the nearly complete imlib2? Clearly not.
> : The only change that could explain this is the fact the current
> : Enlightenment version doesn't com
* Bernhard Rosenkraenzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Tom Gilbert wrote:
>
> > I'd like to use this forum to attempt to get a straight answer from
> > Redhat on this one :)
>
> First of all, I'm not responsible for the enlightenment RPM, so
of the issues I have is the lack of control you have over this
enforced session management.
> Enlightenment insists on handling session management ..
Untrue. Nothing is insisted. E does absolutely *NO* session management
unless you tell it to. If you specifically right click on a title
luding the latest version of E, even though you know that both
Raster and Mandrake said goodbye to Gnome compatibility on
anything but their terms when they started E16 development.
A simple example .
Gnome insists on handling session management .
Enlightenment insists on handli
ground via E it gets changed at startup. This still
doesn't explain why they didn't go to E16, as the issues exist in both
15, and 16.
Here's all that needs to be done in /usr/share/enlightenment/config:
cp keybindings.gmc.cfg keybindings.cfg
change all instances of
On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> I'd like to use this forum to attempt to get a straight answer from
> Redhat on this one :)
First of all, I'm not responsible for the enlightenment RPM, so I'm not
the best person to pick this up.
> Redhat 6.2 is shipping with
ved in either project), that Raster has a bad case of sour grapes.
The whole finger-pointing thing when he left RHAT, and now GNOME is
phasing out using Imlib in favor of GdkPixbuf, in order to overcome
shortcomings of Imlib that Raster doesn't seem willing to fix.
: The only change that coul
Hi.
I'd like to use this forum to attempt to get a straight answer from
Redhat on this one :)
Redhat 6.2 is shipping with an extremely, painfully out of date version
of enlightenment (http://www.enlightenment.org)
I work on this wm, and would like an explanation from someone at Redhat
p
It automaticlly installed when I first installed.
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Scott Kasten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 8:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Enlightenment
>
>
> If I'm not mistaken, enlightenmen
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/03/00
at 09:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Elliot Lee) typed:
>You probably saved your session once when you were running Star Office.
>Do you save your session every time you log out?
Thanks - I usually don't log out, using Ctrl-Bkspace instead. Apparently
the logo
On 3 Mar 2000 16:12:42 -0500, Julian Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1. Somehow when I startx, it seems to have decided to start up Star
>Office every time. Is there a way to cure this annoyance?
You probably saved your session once when you were running Star Office. Do
you save your session
1. Somehow when I startx, it seems to have decided to start up Star
Office every time. Is there a way to cure this annoyance?
2. I can't cut and paste in my xterms. What do I need to edit where to
make this work?
--
Julian Thomas: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.epix.net/~jt
In the beau
upgrade to the newest enlightenment. The version that is included with
redhat doesn't work like the full version does.
Jake R. Johnson
Academic Computing
Information Technology Desktop Support Intern
Phone 424-3020 (Help-desk will redirect)
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Eric Cifreo
>Odd. Try running $EBIN/e_gen_menus
Actually, not really odd, since part of my environment is set for doing
OpenWindows and Xview isn't back on the system yet.
I just need something up so that I can get my web pages up and running again.
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart: Hey, why is it
* Vidiot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As I get stuff rebuilt, startx brought up Enlightenment. Ultimately I
> will be reconfiguring for OpenWindows.
>
> But, I brought up the help, but found nothing on how to close X down.
> I can't find anything in the menus that says
* C Heath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I set up enlightenment 16.3 and i used the gtk theme to setup the nice
> picuters on the panel and on the programs and I used enlightenment to
> setup the background and change the borderstyle. Everything is well
> except one pesky thing, the b
> As I get stuff rebuilt, startx brought up Enlightenment. Ultimately I
> will be reconfiguring for OpenWindows.
>
> But, I brought up the help, but found nothing on how to close X down.
> I can't find anything in the menus that says to quit this desktop.
>
> Sigh!
&g
alt+ctrl+basckspace should do it, no ?
Philippe
Vidiot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I get stuff rebuilt, startx brought up Enlightenment. Ultimately I
> will be reconfiguring for OpenWindows.
>
> But, I brought up the help, but found nothing on how to close X do
As I get stuff rebuilt, startx brought up Enlightenment. Ultimately I
will be reconfiguring for OpenWindows.
But, I brought up the help, but found nothing on how to close X down.
I can't find anything in the menus that says to quit this desktop.
Sigh!
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I set up enlightenment 16.3 and i used the gtk theme to setup the nice
picuters on the panel and on the programs and I used enlightenment to
setup the background and change the borderstyle. Everything is well
except one pesky thing, the borders keeps defaulting to Brushed
Metal-Tigert when I
At 16:11 00/02/26 +, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I am almost tearing my hair out of frustration. If anyone can
>shed any light on my situation I would be MUCH appreciative.
>
>Machine:Dual PII/400, 512MB ECC, MicroStar MS-6120N
> AMI MegaRAID 428, 5 SCSI Wide 4GB HDD o
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 04:11:27PM +, Red Hat Partisan wrote:
: Machine: Dual PII/400, 512MB ECC, MicroStar MS-6120N
: AMI MegaRAID 428, 5 SCSI Wide 4GB HDD on 2 channels
: Adaptec AHA3985 3-channel w/ CD-ROM, CD-R, scanner, MO, HDD.
: DE-220 (NE2
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 04:11:27PM +, Red Hat Partisan wrote:
> ... there is a message making it clear that the driver
> sees two Logical Drives ...
Such reports tend to be worthless.
A good report does not give a paraphrase, but the symbol-for-symbol
content of the messa
Hi,
I am almost tearing my hair out of frustration. If anyone can
shed any light on my situation I would be MUCH appreciative.
Machine:Dual PII/400, 512MB ECC, MicroStar MS-6120N
AMI MegaRAID 428, 5 SCSI Wide 4GB HDD on 2 channels
Adaptec AHA3985
Your backgrounds should be in ~/.enlightenment/backgrounds
HTH,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Katherine Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 5:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: enlightenment question
I was playing with enlightenment, which is the
* Katherine Harris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I was playing with enlightenment, which is the default WM that comes with
> Gnome, I guess. I had a lot of pretty backgrounds after I managed to
> install the configuration files correctly, but now said backgrounds have
> vanished. I
I was playing with enlightenment, which is the default WM that comes with
Gnome, I guess. I had a lot of pretty backgrounds after I managed to
install the configuration files correctly, but now said backgrounds have
vanished. It's entirely possible that I'm just looking in the wrong
In that case, "rpm -qa | grep enlightenment" will tell
you which rpms you have now.
To replace those with the newer ones, do this:
rpm -Uvh [ ...]
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:49:06AM -0500, John Catral wrote:
> > If I'm not mistaken, enlightenment should already be instal
- Original Message -
From: J. Scott Kasten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Enlightenment
> If I'm not mistaken, enlightenment should already be installed. If you
> boot to the gnome desktop, it should be the default.
>
Oh, I know that Enlightenment is instal
If I'm not mistaken, enlightenment should already be installed. If you
boot to the gnome desktop, it should be the default.
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 02:23:34AM -0500, John Catral wrote:
> Hi! I just installed REdhat 6.1 on my machine and I was wondering what
> Enlightenment packages d
Ummm...I presume that you're saying that GNOME/ENLIGHTENMENT don't work
any more. Otherwise why would you need to install them?
Presuming that you've used an automated process AND you told the install
process to install X and GNOME (etc) you shouldn't need to worry...
Hi! I just installed REdhat 6.1 on my machine and I was wondering what
Enlightenment packages do I have to install. I went to
www.enlightenment.org but it doesnt help in terms of telling me what I
should install. Do I do a no dependency rpm install or is it imperative
that I upgrade to all the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan E. Derhaag) writes:
> I can't seem to get the installation right in order to allow a
> non-root user to get past the login screen while in init level 5
> (gdm). Root can get in. In order to get access to enlightenment for
> a non-root user I need to
I can't seem to get the installation right in order to allow a
non-root user to get past the login screen while in init level 5
(gdm). Root can get in. In order to get access to enlightenment for
a non-root user I need to use startx.. and that works with no
problem.
I believe there
launching. Running KDE (sans Enlightenment)
everything worked fine. I upgraded again to the latest patch revision
0.16.3-1, and still the same problem.
I removed Enlightenment 0.16 and put in 0.15.9 off of the RH 6.1 CD, and
everything is fine again. Strange.
I suppose I should send this as a bug
Hi. I have Redhat 6.1 installed and I downloaded the latest version of
Enlightenment. Well Enlightenment thought it was necessary to take my
toolbar out of Gnome and I want it back.
Do you know of any way to get it back. Sorry I'm a Linux newbie trying to
figure things out.
Pa
1999 22:19:30 -0500 (EST)
From: PATRICK C. GENTRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Toolbar with Enlightenment
I've installed the newest version of Enlightenment and it's taken away my
toolbar.
Does anyone know how to get it back? I've looked through all the
I've installed the newest version of Enlightenment and it's taken away my
toolbar.
Does anyone know how to get it back? I've looked through all the options
and it isn't there.
Thanks.
Patrick
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Patrick C. Gentry
Trivergent Communications - Internet Divis
Butler, Mike wrote:
> This has likely been asked so if it has please excuse me. I'm a
> little confused about the relationship between GNOME and enlightenment.
> Aren't they both window managers? If so why does enlightenment start and
> then GNOME. I'm sure there
On Fri, Nov 05, 1999 at 02:11:08PM -0400, Butler, Mike wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Two questions (RedHat 6.1)
>
> I have an intel ethernet express card. When I use linuxconf and set
> the card up using the eexpress.o module, eth0 doesn't come up. I have to
> compile it in directly into the ker
Hello all,
Two questions (RedHat 6.1)
This has likely been asked so if it has please excuse me. I'm a
little confused about the relationship between GNOME and enlightenment.
Aren't they both window managers? If so why does enlightenment start and
then GNOME. I'm
ryo wrote:
>
>
> when I try to launch enlightenment or esd I get :
>
> esd: error in loading shared libraries
> libesd.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
I'm starting to fiddle with E myself, and also having mixed luck, but I think
the
hello,
I have problem installing enlightenment, in fact it isn't really
enlightenment that doesn't work, it's esound.
Everything is compiling OK (imlib, fnlib, esound, enlightenment, the
other are installed from rpm binaries), and seem to install properly
exept esound that gives
Michael Jinks wrote:
>
> Has anyone successfully done this recently? Is there a full rpm
> somewhere?
>
> A source tarball (enl_BETA-0.13.3.tar.gz) failed to compile on my system
> (RH5.1, slightly tweaked) with lots of missing file errors.
>
> I have rpm files for e
Like a lot of other people, I was blown away by the GNOME booth at the
LinuxExpo. Since I wanna be just like those guys when I grow up, I'm
looking to set up enlightenment, but although I've been to at least half
a dozen E-aware sites, nobody seems to have all the files to support
Enlightenment does have rpms available but they really don't work very
well...if you are a die hard e fan then you should just bite the bullet
and get the source files from them. They have a nice Install script
which works very well, providing that you have all the right libs
installed...hav
I don't know of Enlightenment being available as an RPM. It's possible
that it might be a goal of the upcoming .14 release, but there's not
much word about what is in and what is not. I know that Rasterman is
working with RedHat Labs and has begun offering his Imlib stuff as RP
Hi all !
Does anyone know where to get an rpm-package of enlightenment.
I have been all over the redhat ftp-site and for some reason
I cannot connect to ftp://ftp.enlightenment.org
Any other ftp's will be greatly appreciated
Thanks
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata an
That is the same problem I am having I believe --- well, at least that
was the problem last night...now a deal comes up and it says it cannot
find a config file...and segs away. I have nt had any luck with E or WM
or AfterStephorrible.
Van Tate
Prevue Networks
Technical Information Ma
Hi Everyone,
I have a quick question. Last night I downloaded imlib-1.4 (rpm) and
installed it. I had to reboot my machine for some reason and discovered I
could no longer get enlightenment to start. Basically, I got a Segmnet
fault error when E tried to start. Realizing that it must have
This error happens when I start X windows.
Does anyone have an idea what causes this error?
/usr/local/enlightenment/bin/enlightenment: error in loading shared
libraries
/usr/lib/libImlib.so.1: undefined symbol: jpeg_std_error
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING
Bench ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Does anyone know where can I get the 'xmkmf' file for enlightenment?
> I'm just wondering why it isn't included in Enlightenment 0.13.3.
'xmkmf' is part of the XFree86-devel package. If you don't have the
rest of w
>Does anyone know where can I get the 'xmkmf' file for enlightenment?
>I'm just wondering why it isn't included in Enlightenment 0.13.3.
If you're talking about the file xmkmf would use...ie; Imakefile, I
believe that is in the E 0.13.3 archive.
IF not, then y
Does anyone know where can I get the 'xmkmf' file for enlightenment?
I'm just wondering why it isn't included in Enlightenment 0.13.3.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat
89 matches
Mail list logo
