On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Jason Costomiris wrote: > Rule #1 for mailing list/newsgroup for discussions where you have been > caught being dumb: distract everyone else by telling the audience that > the other guy doesn't know what he's talking about. > [...] What the hell does any of this have to do with including or not including E.16 in RH6.2? Agree, agree to disagree, or stfu! /me -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspective Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspe... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's pe... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer'... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A develo... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A d... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2.... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2.... Isaiah Weiner
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2.... Mike Erickson
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspe... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's pe... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer'... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A develo... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A d... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspe... Samuel Flory
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspe... Earl Heather
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's pe... Tom Gilbert