issues  

Messages by Thread

• [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] chore: Seal BitSet to only allow FixedBitSet and SparseFixedBitSet [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up flushing of live docs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up flushing of live docs. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] SOLR-15705 Distribute a DeleteById to all shards when using the CompositeId router with a router field defined and field value is missing in request [lucene-solr] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SOLR-15705 Distribute a DeleteById to all shards when using the CompositeId router with a router field defined and field value is missing in request [lucene-solr] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump block size of postings to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestParentBlockJoinByteKnnVectorQuery.testTimeout fails: AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0> [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Filter by `maxOtherDoc` first to reduce the overhead of `filterCompetitiveHits` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Filter by `maxOtherDoc` first to reduce the overhead of `filterCompetitiveHits` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Filter by `maxOtherDoc` first to reduce the overhead of `filterCompetitiveHits` [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add bulk off-heap scoring for vector formats [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Could bpVector reordering be used to make HNSW behave better in low memory? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Could bpVector reordering be used to make HNSW behave better in low memory? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Smoke tester requiring Python 3.12+ [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update test for kNN query timeout test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update assert for kNN query timeout tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update assert for kNN query timeout tests [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Force flush the DWPT to prevent ByteBlockPool buffers overflow during active indexing [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Clarify IndexSearcher#setTimeout semantics [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the bulk SimScorer#score API to compute impact scores. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused parameter in TopFieldCollecter.countHit() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused parameter in TopFieldCollecter.countHit() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused parameter in TopFieldCollecter.countHit() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add bulk-retrieval API to NumericDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.12.7 to 0.12.11 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.12.7 to 0.12.11 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 4.7.1 to 5.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add BandwidthCappedMergeScheduler for enforcing a global merge bandwidth cap [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support multiple HNSW graphs backed by the same vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for uint8 distance comparison [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 4 to 5 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 4 to 5 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.0 to 1.31.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.31.0 to 1.31.3 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Restrict visibility of `TieredMergePolicy.score()` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Restrict visibility of `TieredMergePolicy.score()` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.77 to 0.80 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.77 to 0.80 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in FirstPassGroupingCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Use ULP float comparison instead of epsilon-based comparison [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Use ULP float comparison instead of epsilon-based comparison [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Make calls to BM25Scorer#score inlinable. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make calls to BM25Scorer#score inlinable. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make calls to BM25Scorer#score inlinable. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify MaxScoreBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bypass HNSW graph building for tiny segments [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages