issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] MMapDirectory.PRELOAD_HINT should also consider FileTypeHint.INDEX [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Filters cannot be set in Analysis [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filters cannot be set in Analysis [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.rat:apache-rat from 0.14 to 0.16.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.rat:apache-rat from 0.14 to 0.16.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.rat:apache-rat from 0.14 to 0.16.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.rat:apache-rat from 0.14 to 0.16.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] upgrade from rat 0.14 to rat 0.15 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade from rat 0.14 to rat 0.15 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add comment about using InverseIntersectVisit and IntersectVisitor. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comment about using InverseIntersectVisit and IntersectVisitor. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Dynamic threshold for DocIdSetBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add instructions to help/IDEs.txt for VSCode and Neovim [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add instructions to help/IDEs.txt for VSCode and Neovim [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.7 to 0.11.8 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.7 to 0.11.8 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] deps(java): bump de.jflex:jflex from 1.8.2 to 1.9.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump de.jflex:jflex from 1.8.2 to 1.9.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Enable changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Multireader Support in Searcher Manager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Multireader Support in Searcher Manager [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support adaptive refresh in Searcher Managers. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support adaptive refresh in Searcher Managers. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support adaptive refresh in Searcher Managers. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support adaptive refresh in Searcher Managers. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove deprecations in expressions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove deprecations in expressions [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] apache jenkins: Failed to save the JUnit test result [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] apache jenkins: Failed to save the JUnit test result [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] apache jenkins: Failed to save the JUnit test result [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] apache jenkins: Failed to save the JUnit test result [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't perform additional KNN querying after timeout, fixes #14639 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't perform additional KNN querying after timeout, fixes #14639 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Fix bad interaction between optimistic query and query timeout [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix bad interaction between optimistic query and query timeout [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] update commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.21 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] update commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.21 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] upgrade commons codec from 1.13.0 to 1.16.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade commons codec from 1.13.0 to 1.16.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Question for nori analyer behavior change [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TopFieldCollector mistakenly assumes that all leaves share the same index sort [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Multi range traversal for numeric range aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi range traversal for numeric range aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up flush of softdelete by intoBitset [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset and docIdRunEnd for wrappers [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a preload hint for preloading mmap data on specific open calls [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor KnnVectorReader merging to not need a finishMerge method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor KnnVectorReader merging to not need a finishMerge method [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Simplify rootBlockFP [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove DISIDocIdStream. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove DISIDocIdStream. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Clean up how the test framework creates asserting scorables. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up how the test framework creates asserting scorables. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Return MergeSpec for IndexWriter forceMergeDeletes API [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages