issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Vector API to decode BKD docIds [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decode doc ids in BKD leaves with auto-vectorized loops [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decode doc ids in BKD leaves with auto-vectorized loops [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decode doc ids in BKD leaves with auto-vectorized loops [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decode doc ids in BKD leaves with auto-vectorized loops [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Decode doc ids in BKD leaves with auto-vectorized loops [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Deprecate Operations.concatenate(a1, a2) and Operations.union(a1, a2) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Deprecate Operations.concatenate(a1, a2) and Operations.union(a1, a2) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use multi-select instead of a full sort for DynamicRange creation [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Error prone back from the dead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Error prone back from the dead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Error prone back from the dead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Error prone back from the dead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Error prone back from the dead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Error prone back from the dead [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] improve the error prone situation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] improve the error prone situation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] improve the error prone situation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] improve the error prone situation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] improve the error prone situation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] improve the error prone situation [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update package-info.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update package-info.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update package-info.java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Migrate OpenNLP 'ant train-test-models' to Gradle [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate OpenNLP 'ant train-test-models' to Gradle [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate OpenNLP 'ant train-test-models' to Gradle [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate OpenNLP 'ant train-test-models' to Gradle [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate OpenNLP 'ant train-test-models' to Gradle [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate OpenNLP 'ant train-test-models' to Gradle [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Migrate OpenNLP 'ant train-test-models' to Gradle [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix acceptOrds in EmptyOffHeapVectorValues to match no bits [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Correct bug with seeded vector queries with incorrect entrypoint ids [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct bug with seeded vector queries with incorrect entrypoint ids [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestSeededKnnFloatVectorQuery.testSeedWithTimeout fails reproducibly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSeededKnnFloatVectorQuery.testSeedWithTimeout fails reproducibly [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestSeededKnn[Byte|Float]VectorQuery.testWithTimeout failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSeededKnn[Byte|Float]VectorQuery.testWithTimeout failure [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add posTagFormat parameter for OpenNLPPOSFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add posTagFormat parameter for OpenNLPPOSFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add posTagFormat parameter for OpenNLPPOSFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add posTagFormat parameter for OpenNLPPOSFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add posTagFormat parameter for OpenNLPPOSFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add posTagFormat parameter for OpenNLPPOSFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet(int[]) to optimize caseless matching. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet(int[]) to optimize caseless matching. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet(int[]) to optimize caseless matching. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add Automata.makeCharSet/makeCharClass to optimize regexp [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove usage of IndexSearcher#search(Query, Collector) from join package [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add new Directory implementation for AWS S3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Directory implementation for AWS S3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Directory implementation for AWS S3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Unicode Support for Case Insensitive Matching in RegExp [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Wrap Executor in TaskExecutor to never reject [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Wrap Executor in TaskExecutor to never reject [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Consistent KNN query results with multiple leafs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Create a bot to add milestones to new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Create bot to label PRs based on the files they touch [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump floor segment size to 16MB. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Allow `LogMergePolicy` to merge more than `mergeFactor` segments together when the merge is below the min merge size. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Binary vector format for flat and hnsw vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable the query cache by default. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Filtered disjunctions may miss some top hits. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Filtered disjunctions may miss some top hits. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Filtered disjunctions may miss some top hits. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Filtered disjunctions may miss some top hits. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix refill logic in nextDoc(). [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix refill logic in nextDoc(). [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix refill logic in nextDoc(). [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages