issues  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [PR] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add github on-commit tests on MacOS and Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add github on-commit tests on MacOS and Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add github on-commit tests on MacOS and Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add github on-commit tests on MacOS and Windows [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up advancing on the disjunction iterator. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up advancing on the disjunction iterator. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up advancing on the disjunction iterator. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up advancing on the disjunction iterator. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestKnnFloatVectorQuery.testScoreNegativeDotProduct failing seed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestKnnFloatVectorQuery.testScoreNegativeDotProduct failing seed [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexInput.isLoaded seems to return false for mmap index inputs on Windows [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow reading binary doc values as a RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add new Directory implementation for AWS S3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Directory implementation for AWS S3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Directory implementation for AWS S3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Directory implementation for AWS S3 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Randomize KnnVector codec params in RandomCodec; addresses gh-14047 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Randomize KnnVector codec params in RandomCodec; addresses gh-14047 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Randomize KnnVector codec params in RandomCodec; addresses gh-14047 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Randomize KnnVector codec params in RandomCodec; addresses gh-14047 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Randomize KnnVector codec params in RandomCodec; addresses gh-14047 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Randomize KnnVector codec params in RandomCodec; addresses gh-14047 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Randomize KnnVector codec params in RandomCodec; addresses gh-14047 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestSoftDeletesDirectoryReaderWrapper.testAvoidWrappingReadersWithoutSoftDeletes AssertionError: expected:<5> but was:<3> [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSoftDeletesDirectoryReaderWrapper.testAvoidWrappingReadersWithoutSoftDeletes AssertionError: expected:<5> but was:<3> [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSoftDeletesDirectoryReaderWrapper.testAvoidWrappingReadersWithoutSoftDeletes AssertionError: expected:<5> but was:<3> [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSoftDeletesDirectoryReaderWrapper.testAvoidWrappingReadersWithoutSoftDeletes AssertionError: expected:<5> but was:<3> [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce specialization in `ForUtil` and `ForDeltaUtil`. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce specialization in `ForUtil` and `ForDeltaUtil`. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce specialization in `ForUtil` and `ForDeltaUtil`. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Randomize KNN vector format parameters in tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Randomize KNN vector format parameters in tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Randomize KNN vector format parameters in tests [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add .editorConfig [LUCENE-9563] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add .editorConfig [LUCENE-9563] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add TrackingQuery to track matching documents [LUCENE-9640] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make 'precommit' an alias for gradle 'check' task. [LUCENE-9658] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Fix looping bug when calculating full KNN results in KnnGraphTester [LUCENE-9798] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] KnnVectorQuery doesn't tie break by doc ID [LUCENE-10397] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Rename VectorValues#dimension to VectorValues#getNumDimensions? [LUCENE-10177] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Rename VectorValues#dimension to VectorValues#getNumDimensions? [LUCENE-10177] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve encoding of HNSW graph offsets [LUCENE-9845] [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve encoding of HNSW graph offsets [LUCENE-9845] [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor dummy scorables. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor dummy scorables. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor dummy scorables. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] debug what happened with 14031 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] debug what happened with 14031 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] debug what happened with 14031 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] debug what happened with 14031 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] debug what happened with 14031 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Terminate automaton when it can match all suffixes, and match suffixes directly. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Terminate automaton when it can match all suffixes, and match suffixes directly. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Terminate automaton when it can match all suffixes, and match suffixes directly. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Track the number of docs left to decode instead of the number of docs decoded. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Track the number of docs left to decode instead of the number of docs decoded. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] adding changes for PR #13819 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] adding changes for PR #13819 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Optimizing use the QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimizing use the QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimizing use the QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimizing use the QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimizing use the QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add higher quantization level for kNN vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add higher quantization level for kNN vector search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused +1 on doc buffer length. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused +1 on doc buffer length. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] [WIP] Multi-Vector support for HNSW search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Multi-Vector support for HNSW search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] Multi-Vector support for HNSW search [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reduce allocation rate in HNSW concurrent merge (backport of #14011) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Revert "Ensure Panama float vector distance impls inlinable " [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "Ensure Panama float vector distance impls inlinable " [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revert "Ensure Panama float vector distance impls inlinable " [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Support multi-tenant RAM buffers for IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support multi-tenant RAM buffers for IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support multi-tenant RAM buffers for IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support multi-tenant RAM buffers for IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support multi-tenant RAM buffers for IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support multi-tenant RAM buffers for IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce a BulkScorer for DisjunctionMaxQuery. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a BulkScorer for DisjunctionMaxQuery. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a BulkScorer for DisjunctionMaxQuery. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove scoreAll() optimization from DefaultBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove scoreAll() optimization from DefaultBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove scoreAll() optimization from DefaultBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove scoreAll() optimization from DefaultBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove scoreAll() optimization from DefaultBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove scoreAll() optimization from DefaultBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove scoreAll() optimization from DefaultBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Move vector search from IndexInput to RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Move vector search from IndexInput to RandomAccessInput [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reduce specialization in TopScoreDocCollector. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce specialization in TopScoreDocCollector. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we add bfloat16 support for HNSW? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we add bfloat16 support for HNSW? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Can we store only quantized vectors to reduce disk footprint? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we store only quantized vectors to reduce disk footprint? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we store only quantized vectors to reduce disk footprint? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve search equivalence tests. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve search equivalence tests. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix changelog for GITHUB#14011 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix changelog for GITHUB#14011 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Better encapsulate locking logic in HnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better encapsulate locking logic in HnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better encapsulate locking logic in HnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Better encapsulate locking logic in HnswGraphBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] LUCENE-10073: Reduce merging overhead of NRT by using a greater mergeFactor on tiny segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] LUCENE-10073: Reduce merging overhead of NRT by using a greater mergeFactor on tiny segments. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] How to configure TieredMergePolicy for very low segment count? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Grammar and typo fixes [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Allow very small merges to merge more than segmentsPerTier segments? [LUCENE-10073] [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Simplify logic in ScoreCachingWrappingScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify logic in ScoreCachingWrappingScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify logic in ScoreCachingWrappingScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Simplify logic in ScoreCachingWrappingScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Initialize the dictionary of sorted numeric DV with a known size [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initialize the dictionary of sorted numeric DV with a known size [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add support for storing term vectors in FeatureField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for storing term vectors in FeatureField [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for storing term vectors in FeatureField [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up PostingsEnum when reading positions. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Combine all postings enum impls of the default codec into a single class [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Combine all postings enum impls of the default codec into a single class [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Combine all postings enum impls of the default codec into a single class [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Ensure Panama float vector distance impls inlinable [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure Panama float vector distance impls inlinable [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensure Panama float vector distance impls inlinable [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Reduce dotProductBody to less than the maximum bytecode size of a hot method to be inlined (325) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce dotProductBody to less than the maximum bytecode size of a hot method to be inlined (325) [lucene] via GitHub

• Later messages