issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a HNSW collector that exits early when nearest neighbor queue saturates [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestBPReorderingMergePolicy fails CheckIndex.testHnswGraph [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestBPReorderingMergePolicy fails CheckIndex.testHnswGraph [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Integrating GPU based Vector Search using cuVS [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] upgrade commons codec from 1.13.0 to 1.16.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Move synonym map off-heap for SynonymGraphFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move synonym map off-heap for SynonymGraphFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move synonym map off-heap for SynonymGraphFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move synonym map off-heap for SynonymGraphFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Optimize DirectIOIndexInput [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Avoid double buffering direct IO index input slices with BufferedIndexInput [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Rename`mergeThreadCount` in ConcurrentMergeScheduler to avoid clashing with method of the same name [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rename `mergeThreadCount` in ConcurrentMergeScheduler to avoid clashing with method of the same name [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rename `mergeThreadCount` in ConcurrentMergeScheduler to avoid clashing with method of the same name [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Upgrade commons-codec from 1.13.0 to 1.17.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade commons-codec from 1.13.0 to 1.17.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade commons-codec from 1.13.0 to 1.17.2 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add nullability annotations to IndexSearcher APIs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize ContextQuery with big number of contexts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ContextQuery with big number of contexts [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] add RawTFSimilarity class [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add RawTFSimilarity class [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Query parser support for wildcards in phrase queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Query parser support for wildcards in phrase queries [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add UnwrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add knn result consistency test [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove the @Deprecated methods from TopScoreDocCollector and TopFieldCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove the @Deprecated methods from TopScoreDocCollector and TopFieldCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove the @Deprecated methods from TopScoreDocCollector and TopFieldCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove the @Deprecated methods from TopScoreDocCollector and TopFieldCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove `maxMergeAtOnce` option from `TieredMergePolicy`. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove `maxMergeAtOnce` option from `TieredMergePolicy`. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add small bias towards bit set encoding. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add small bias towards bit set encoding. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Not maintain docBufferUpTo when only docs needed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Not maintain docBufferUpTo when only docs needed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Not maintain docBufferUpTo when only docs needed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Not maintain docBufferUpTo when only docs needed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Not maintain docBufferUpTo when only docs needed [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] supports force merge based on specified segments. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] feat: Added the method `forceMergeBySegmentNames` in IW, which suppor… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat: Added the method `forceMergeBySegmentNames` in IW, which suppor… [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UnsupportedOperationException instead of IllegalArgumentException from PointInSetQuery when values are out of order [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] SortedSet DV Multi Range query [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support for criteria based DWPT selection inside DocumentWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support for criteria based DWPT selection inside DocumentWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support for criteria based DWPT selection inside DocumentWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support for criteria based DWPT selection inside DocumentWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add new Acorn-esque filtered HNSW search heuristic [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] update privacy policy link [lucene-site] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove mmap isLoaded check before madvise [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add WrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add WrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add WrappingReuseStrategy for AnalyzerWrapper [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] gh-14127: remove duplicate neighbors when writing HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Advoid the use of ImpactsDISI when no minimum competitive score has been set [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] move MultiLeafKnnCollector to decorator and remove unnecessary code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] move MultiLeafKnnCollector to decorator and remove unnecessary code [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestManyKnnDocs is broken [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add an optional bandwidth cap to `TieredMergePolicy`? [lucene] via GitHub

• Later messages