issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] For 4-bit quantized vectors, should we change the scheme of unpacking nibbles? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] For 4-bit quantized vectors, should we change the scheme of unpacking nibbles? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add hook for LRUQueryCache to allow custom population strategies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add hook for LRUQueryCache to allow custom population strategies [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing un-quantised vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Prevent writing vectors twice during merging HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Tessellation error for valid MultiPolygon [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tessellation error for valid MultiPolygon [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tessellation error for valid MultiPolygon [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tessellation error for valid MultiPolygon [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tessellation error for valid MultiPolygon [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix Tessellation error for holes that share the same leftmost vertex with an outer ring vertex [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] MemorySegmentIndexInput absolute read methods might modify position [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Doc values skipper: Disable prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Doc values skipper: Disable prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Doc values skipper: Disable prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Doc values skipper: Disable prefetching [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#15480 Make SortField.comparatorSource final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Make SortField.comparatorSource final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Make SortField.comparatorSource final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Make SortField.comparatorSource final [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make SortField immutable [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incorrect handling of missing values in ToParentBlockJoinSortField (#15548) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Updated MIGRATE.md for CFS threshold API changes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix LuceneTestCase to always use passed random parameter where possible [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix LuceneTestCase to always use passed random parameter where possible [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] TestSwappedIndexFiles: remove RandomIndexWriter to avoid nondeterministic CFS changes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TestSwappedIndexFiles: remove RandomIndexWriter to avoid nondeterministic CFS changes [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] TestSwappedIndexFiles: remove RandomIndexWriter to avoid nondeterministic CFS changes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TestSwappedIndexFiles: remove RandomIndexWriter to avoid nondeterministic CFS changes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TestSwappedIndexFiles: remove RandomIndexWriter to avoid nondeterministic CFS changes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TestSwappedIndexFiles: remove RandomIndexWriter to avoid nondeterministic CFS changes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add hook for LRUQueryCache to allow custom population strategies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add hook for LRUQueryCache to allow custom population strategies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add hook for LRUQueryCache to allow custom population strategies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add hook for LRUQueryCache to allow custom population strategies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add hook for LRUQueryCache to allow custom population strategies [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add IO prefetch to HNSW graph crawl? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to do prefetch and do prefetch during vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add interface to do prefetch on KnnVectorValues and an example implementation to use prefetch in Scorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add interface to do prefetch on KnnVectorValues and an example implementation to use prefetch in Scorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add interface to do prefetch on KnnVectorValues and an example implementation to use prefetch in Scorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add interface to do prefetch on KnnVectorValues and an example implementation to use prefetch in Scorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add interface to do prefetch on KnnVectorValues and an example implementation to use prefetch in Scorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add interface to do prefetch on KnnVectorValues and an example implementation to use prefetch in Scorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add interface to do prefetch on KnnVectorValues and an example implementation to use prefetch in Scorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Minor refactor/fix to l2normalize [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor refactor/fix to l2normalize [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#15480 Deprecate SortField#setMissingValue and add migration test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Deprecate SortField#setMissingValue and add migration test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Deprecate SortField#setMissingValue and add migration test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Deprecate SortField#setMissingValue and add migration test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Deprecate SortField#setMissingValue and add migration test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Deprecate SortField#setMissingValue and add migration test [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add optional query bit size hint to KnnSearchStrategy.Hnsw [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add optional query bit size hint to KnnSearchStrategy.Hnsw [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add optional query bit size hint to KnnSearchStrategy.Hnsw [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add optional query bit size hint to KnnSearchStrategy.Hnsw [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add optional query bit size hint to KnnSearchStrategy.Hnsw [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add optional query bit size hint to KnnSearchStrategy.Hnsw [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove obsolete backward codec tests for Lucene 8.x index formats [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] GITHUB#15225: Improve JavaDocs for org.apache.lucene.util package [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15225: Improve JavaDocs for org.apache.lucene.util package [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] GITHUB#15225: Improve JavaDocs for org.apache.lucene.util package [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add half-float (FP16) storage support for vectors [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip per-document stored field reads on sorted indices when no stored fields are present [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Improve user facing java docs using LLM (or otherwise) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] ToParentBlockJoinSortField does not handle missing values correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] ToParentBlockJoinSortField does not handle missing values correctly [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Tests: Remove backward compatibility tests older than previous major version [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tests: Remove backward compatibility tests older than previous major version [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Tests: Replace RandomIndexWriter with IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tests: Replace RandomIndexWriter with IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Tests: Replace RandomIndexWriter with IndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Failure in TestSwappedIndexFiles.test [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Failure in TestSwappedIndexFiles.test [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.46.0 to 2.47.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.46.0 to 2.47.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-6 to 1.5.7-7 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.7-6 to 1.5.7-7 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] HNSW connect components can take an inordinate amount of time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HNSW connect components can take an inordinate amount of time [lucene] via GitHub

• Later messages