issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add support for keeping the graph structure for HNSW in off heap during merges [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DiversifyingChildren speedup [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Are we undercounting RAM used by vectors buffered in an in-memory segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Are we undercounting RAM used by vectors buffered in an in-memory segment? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] TruncateTokenFilter truncates safely when the final char is a surrogate pair [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make TruncateTokenFilter truncate on codepoints not chars and no longer produce half surrogates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make TruncateTokenFilter truncate on codepoints not chars and no longer produce half surrogates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make TruncateTokenFilter truncate on codepoints not chars and no longer produce half surrogates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve TruncateTokenFilter to truncate on codepoints (and no longer produce half surrogates) or legacy utf-16 chars [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TruncateTokenFilter may split surrogate pairs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TruncateTokenFilter may split surrogate pairs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TruncateTokenFilter may split surrogate pairs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TruncateTokenFilter may split surrogate pairs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TruncateTokenFilter may split surrogate pairs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Streamline segment info logged by infostream, esp. when merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Streamline segment info logged by infostream, esp. when merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Streamline segment info logged by infostream, esp. when merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Streamline segment info logged by infostream, esp. when merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Streamline segment info logged by infostream, esp. when merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Streamline segment info logged by infostream, esp. when merging [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize LongValueFacetCutter with leaf-local ordinal cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize LongValueFacetCutter with leaf-local ordinal cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize LongValueFacetCutter with leaf-local ordinal cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize LongValueFacetCutter with leaf-local ordinal cache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize LongValueFacetCutter with leaf-local ordinal cache [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change TopGroups.merge() to accept a list of TopGroups [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in SearchGroup#merge [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in SearchGroup#merge [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in SearchGroup#merge [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in SearchGroup#merge [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Skip heavy TreeSet opts for the first group in SearchGroup#merge [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] feat : Add `keepDecimalPoint` option to Nori (`KoreanTokenizer`) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] feat : Add `keepDecimalPoint` option to Nori (`KoreanTokenizer`) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add `keepDecimalPoint` configuration option to KoreanTokenizer Nori [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix possible lost signal in `ControlledRealTimeReopenThread` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix possible lost signal in `ControlledRealTimeReopenThread` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix possible lost signal in `ControlledRealTimeReopenThread` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix possible lost signal in `ControlledRealTimeReopenThread` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix possible lost signal in `ControlledRealTimeReopenThread` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor: Extract shared SHOULD/MUST dedup into a common function [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor: Extract shared SHOULD/MUST dedup into a common function [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor: Extract shared SHOULD/MUST dedup into a common function [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor: Extract shared SHOULD/MUST dedup into a common function [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change access modifier for readAdvise in MMapDirectory [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Simplify SearchGroup#equals and SearchGroup.MergedGroup#equals [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add the ability to pass DataAccessHints in Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add BM25 k3 query-term frequency saturation to classic query parser [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add BM25 k3 query-term frequency saturation to classic query parser [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add ability to pass DataAccess hit with Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Feature/collaborative hnsw search [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deferring lambda in TermStates.java according to prefetch [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Cache frozen FieldType to skip schema validation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cache frozen FieldType to skip schema validation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cache frozen FieldType to skip schema validation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cache frozen FieldType to skip schema validation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Cache frozen FieldType to skip schema validation [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Replace explicit type conversion with instance pattern variable in some non-core modules [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace explicit type conversion with instance pattern variable in some non-core modules [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Implement method to add all stream elements into a PriorityQueue. [lucene] via GitHub

• Later messages