Sorry, missed your earlier message! Yes, agreed, this would seem simpler all round.
Obviously, this covers the proposed scenario of a non-committer change, since a committer must actually merge the change anyway. On 2026/09/25 14:51:07 Brandon Williams wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 9:48 AM Benedict Elliott Smith > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Correcting typos, docs, website, and comments etc operate a “Commit Then > > > Review” policy > > > > I would even be fine with including minor test-only fixes under this more > > permissive policy > > This is what I was referring to earlier, and I agree. > > Kind Regards, > Brandon >
