On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 00:54, Raphael Zwiker wrote:
> > try to change the resolution, it's asking me to logout
> > and restart the Xserver. I wonder anyone know the
> Press ++. That should work
>
hello
how can you insert ++ into a bash script
thanks in advance
randy
--
redhat-list mailing li
try to change the resolution, it's asking me to logout
and restart the Xserver. I wonder anyone know the
Press ++. That should work
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Sounds like your machine is doing a sleep mode thing and re-awakening?
And it is getting all foobard with the hardware devices.
Maybe disable gpm with:
service gpm stop
chkconfig --del gpm
Also, try disabling the apmd and see if that helps.
I'm not suggesting these things as a permanent fix
On Thursday 27 March 2003 10:46 am, Toralf Lund wrote:
> I just installed Red Hat 7.3 on a new system, and it seems like I just
> can't get the X server to start. When I boot to level 5, I just get a text
> login. Then after a short while, it looks like the X server tries to
> start, but it dies in
Oddly enough, I have run into the same issues when having problems wiht
gpm. And sometimes on reboots...
For gpm, sometimes gpm does not start properly, and for some reason I
cant fathom, if gpm isnt running, X wont load... (granted this is
probably related to the next issue more than it is to
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 20:43, John Kurtz wrote:
> I sent the full file as this was requested, see:
>
> "When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
> the full server output, not just the last messages.
> This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
> Please report
I sent the full file as this was requested, see:
"When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages.
This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I edited the file, to the
dear John Kurtz,
Your mail is too long :-(
Simple error report is desirable.
--
Miyoko Shioda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> When I run X an error message 'extension RENDER missing on display :O.O'
> gets displayed on the console. The X keeps on running but the screen
> remains black and it has to shut-down with Ctrl-Alt-BackSpace.
>
> Any info. How can I correct the problem?
>
> Regards.
Apparently Intel has drivers
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 10:16, Pieter Dumon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using redhat 8.0 on a Dell Inspirion laptop, with the vesa video
> driver. When I'm logged in into X, and then switch to another screen,
> logging in in text mode, my X session crashes or the X server restarts.
> This happens afte
I see nothing really suspicious here except :
1) you have no "glcore" module ... I don`t think it could be the reason
but... Mine (I have NV GeForce 256) is in
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
2) the last line :-(... Like someone said you have to work with your
X-server config (usin
here is the log file (I don't understand why this log
file still in 4.1.0 version, I hv already installed
ver 4.2.0)
XFree86 Version 4.1.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.1.0-3)
/ X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510)
Release Date: 2 June 2001
If the server is o
Try to reproduce some logs and post it. Without more info helping you
would be difficult ...
You can cut some parts of /var/log/messages collected during X
start (but this will give not too much).
The best in my opinion would be including /var/log/XFree86*.log file in your message.
Regards
Szymo
>
> On 13:03 23 Jul 2002, Van Den Abeele Kristof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Check out WRQ's Reflection X
>
> Also, CygWin comes with XFree86. Should just work.
X-win32 from Starnet is a nice polished commercial product.
--
George Campbell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 7:33 pm, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Nigel Peck wrote:
> > It's just I would have thought I needed a client, not a server, to do
> > that.
>
> In X, the local display is handled by a server, and the applications are
> clients. It's confusing, but the bottom
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Nigel Peck wrote:
> It's just I would have thought I needed a client, not a server, to do
> that.
In X, the local display is handled by a server, and the applications are
clients. It's confusing, but the bottom line is that anything you see on
your screen is a client, not
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Nigel Peck wrote:
> Would someone please point me in the direction of an X Server client
> that runs under M$ Windows 2000.
Exceed, MI/X, Cygwin, VNC, and a host of others all provide some sort of
display. It depends on your needs and your budget. My recommendations
would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23-Jul-2002/13:41 +0100, Nigel Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I want to connect to my RedHat 7.3 server from a Windows 2000 box to
>be able to operate the GUI as if I was sat at the server, I need a
>Windows 2000 X Server?
>
>It's just I would
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Nigel Peck wrote:
> Can I just check something.
>
> If I want to connect to my RedHat 7.3 server from a Windows 2000 box to
> be able to operate the GUI as if I was sat at the server, I need a
> Windows 2000 X Server?
>
> It's just I would have thought I needed a client, no
Can I just check something.
If I want to connect to my RedHat 7.3 server from a Windows 2000 box to
be able to operate the GUI as if I was sat at the server, I need a
Windows 2000 X Server?
It's just I would have thought I needed a client, not a server, to do
that.
Thanks
Nigel
>>> [EMAIL PROT
At 21:12 23/07/2002 +1000, you wrote:
>On 13:03 23 Jul 2002, Van Den Abeele Kristof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>| Check out WRQ's Reflection X
>
>Also, CygWin comes with XFree86. Should just work.
Cygwin works fine - I use it here..
>--
>Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13:03 23 Jul 2002, Van Den Abeele Kristof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Check out WRQ's Reflection X
Also, CygWin comes with XFree86. Should just work.
--
Cameron Simpson, DoD#743[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/
The Horn of Vengeance: When he pushes the horn button, th
Check out WRQ's Reflection X
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Peck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 23 juli 2002 12:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X Server Client for M$
Would someone please point me in the direction of an X Server client that runs under
M$ Windows 2000.
Th
Thanks for the reply Linda. I changed the default run level to 3 in inittab
and I am able to login now. Also the x problem is now sorted out when I
selected a generic type monitor with correct frequencies. Let me see whether
it behaves consistently now.
Cheers!
Kiran.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Have you try setting to boot in terminal mode and seeing if
it has the same problem. Atleast it would allow you to know
if it is a problem with x or not. Everytime I have had
this problem on a unix or Linux machine it has been caused
by bad hardware - however with a new machine that should
not
what happens when you run startx?
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; cfeller
Subject: Re: X Server
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, cfeller wrote:
>
> I am hoping that some of you can help. I hav
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, cfeller wrote:
>
> I am hoping that some of you can help. I have only been running Red Hat
> for about six months, and I know just enough to get myself in trouble,
> (which is exactly what I did). I am running RH7, which I upgraded from
> 6.2. I am running a Software Integ
No,"securecrt" doesn't contain a sshd server for windows.It's basically an
emulator for ssh,telnet,rlogin protocols.sshd needs to be running on the Unix
server where you want to connect to.
Ok,for connecting to your windows terminal from a linux box,you can use
"VNCViewer" from At&T.It requires th
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:35:52PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
: Does the `securecrt' supply a sshd to run on windows.
No, but vshell, also from van dyke does. It provides an ssh2 server.
I'm using it at my mother's house. Her PC is win2k, running on DSL,
behind a firewall. Her machine runs th
Vineeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey guys,it's working!!
> Thanks to David,Mikkel and Anthony for all your support.
> I finally managed it with "ssh2" from http://www.ssh.com and
> then,downloaded "securecrt" software as the ssh client for windows 95 which
> works out of the box and is great
Hey guys,it's working!!
Thanks to David,Mikkel and Anthony for all your support.
I finally managed it with "ssh2" from http://www.ssh.com and
then,downloaded "securecrt" software as the ssh client for windows 95 which
works out of the box and is great!
Works like a giffy!
Cheers,
Vineeta
---
I just downloaded it but it seems to have no setting for a firewall.
I need to connect to an extrenal machine from within my LAN...
I guess,ssh client from http://www.ssh.com is fine but it doesn't connect even
to the internal ip of linuxbox from the windows m/c i am using...
Any problem/suggestio
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:44:51 Vineeta wrote:
>I gather,i need a windows-ssh-client to connect through a firewall to the
>remote server from my windows box?
Look for "PuTTY". It's freeware, supports SSH2 and is easy to setup.
>For this,i'll need "sshd" daemon to be running on the remote server??
Hi,
Could you please clarify on how i can use "SSH" to accomplish the task
mentioned?
I gather,i need a windows-ssh-client to connect through a firewall to the
remote server from my windows box?
For this,i'll need "sshd" daemon to be running on the remote server??
Am i right?
Vineeta
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> You may be able to do something using SSH instead. SSH can be
>set up to forward X connections, and it will also compress the
>information, saving bandwith. Now, I have never tried a double ssh
>connection forwarding X, so I
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Vineeta wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question.regarding running X-applications of a linux box
> from a windows terminal.
> I have a windows 95 m/c on which i have configured Xserver from
> MicroImages.
> Now,i am behind a firewall which means i cannot directly connect to any
>
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, SoloCDM wrote:
> I'm not able to get man X to work. What file did I leave out? I used
> a Mandrake 7.0 installation with RPMs.
>
You might want to consider signing up for the Mandrake
lists. www.linux-mandrake.com and follow the link to the
Mailing lists. Of course you're a
Have a look to http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/linux-laptop/
I successfully configured a 210, a 420 and a 430 using hints found there.
Alain
> > I have installed Redhat 6.1 on a Toshiba 440CDX laptop.
> > Linux works fine,
> > but getting X running is an issue.
> >
> > My Toshiba has a C
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Kevin Diffily wrote:
> I have run into a problem that I don't want to resolve by a reboot if
> possible. While working in Netscape it froze to the point where I
> couldn't go to any other X windows or programs. CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE
> as well as CTRL+ALT+F1, etc did not get
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Kevin Diffily wrote:
> I have run into a problem that I don't want to resolve by a reboot if
> possible. While working in Netscape it froze to the point where I
> couldn't go to any other X windows or programs. CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE
> as well as CTRL+ALT+F1, etc did not ge
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Manuel A. Camacho Q.
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: X Server on Toshiba 440CDX Laptop
Take a look to the compatibility list on RedHat site, under Notebooks or
Laptops. In one of the
Take a look to the compatibility list on RedHat site, under Notebooks or
Laptops. In one of the links I found the procedure to make X work with my
Toshiba.
Hope this helps.
-Manuel.
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
> nombre de Mulcahy, Chris
>
%-> hi!
%->
%-> what could be wrong and what should be done with this message?
%->
%-> authentication failed - cannot start x server.
%-> perhaps you do not console ownership?
It could be a PAM problem. This is how I have it configured:
# cat /etc/pam.d/xserver
#%PAM-1.0
auth required
Actually, I have seen this too, are you logged in as root and then su to
a user or vice-versa? As with the su comments going through the lists,
when you su, you do not get full ownership of everything. Hope this
helps.
Robert Soros wrote:
>
> What version of redhat do you have ? This could pos
What version of redhat do you have ? This could possibly be a PAM
problem dealing with authentication.
take at a look at your /etc/pam.d/xserver file and it might read
something like this
#%PAM-1.0
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_rootok.so
auth required
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Nianwei Xing wrote:
> Hi, there:
> I have a question about my X server: when I logon with
> my username and type startx it give the following
> error message:
> Authenticaiton failed _ cannnot connet to X server
> Perhaps you do not have console ownership?
> (after 30 seconds
Were there any posts to answer this? If there were, I didn't get them.
This happened to me at one point, I reinstalled and it fixed it, but I would
like to know, if there is one, another way to fix the problem.
Thanks,
Jake
Original Message
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Janyce Wynter wrote:
>
> Exactly what should be in the .rhosts file? I can't seem to find anything
> about the file format anywhere.
>
> Janyce
>
Something like this:
localhost
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
window.infinity-ltd.com
The first form allows you to run pr
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>To get the r commands to work, you need to have a .rhosts in your home
>directory listing the systems/users that can connect. I don't recommend
>using the r commands on anything but a home network, and not at all on any
>system that is connected to the internet unless
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Janyce Wynter wrote:
> I dowloaded X-Win32 and have managed to get it working after a fashion. Open
> a telnet window, open X-Win32, and issue the command
>
> xterm -ls -display 192.168.0.1:0 &
>
> from the telnet window.
>
> But, the standard ways of opening the X-sess
I dowloaded X-Win32 and have managed to get it working after a fashion. Open
a telnet window, open X-Win32, and issue the command
xterm -ls -display 192.168.0.1:0 &
from the telnet window.
But, the standard ways of opening the X-session, using rsh, rexec, or XDMCP
don't seem to work on my R
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Ray Parish wrote:
> What do you recommend for an X server for Windows to connect via an X
> session on my Linux Box?
If you have $499, get Exceed. If you don't, check out VNC.
--
Todd A. Jacobs
Senior Network Consultant
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "u
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 10:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: X Server for Windows
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Butler, Mike wrote:
> Humminbird is a good client but it costs $. http://www.starnet.com has a
> nice client called xwin32 and you can get a tria
0 9:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: X Server for Windows
>
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Butler, Mike wrote:
>
> > Humminbird is a good client but it costs $. http://www.starnet.com has a
> > nice client called xwin32 and you can get a trial version. Give it a
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Butler, Mike wrote:
> Humminbird is a good client but it costs $. http://www.starnet.com has a
> nice client called xwin32 and you can get a trial version. Give it a whirl.
>
> Mike
as i read it, xwin32's eval period is only two hours and the product
costs $200. if you wan
]
Subject: RE: X Server for Windows
Hummingbird Exceed or Reflections.
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Parish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 11:38 AM
> To: Redhat-List@Redhat. Com
> Subject: X Server for Windows
>
>
> What do you recom
I use Hummingbird's Exceed at work, and XWinPro at home. XWinPro is easy to
use, and costs only $90 US.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Parish [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 2:38 PM
> To: Redhat-List@Redhat. Com
> Subject: X Server for Windows
>
> What do
Ray,
I use Reflection here at my home. I also used it at work. I have used Hummingbird, I
find it very diffcult to use.
This is my person opion. I did know users that LOVE Hummingbird. They said it was
much better then Reflections.
So I guess it is all on who you talk to. Both of them ha
Hummingbird Exceed or Reflections.
Joe
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Parish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 11:38 AM
> To: Redhat-List@Redhat. Com
> Subject: X Server for Windows
>
>
> What do you recommend for an X server for Windows to connect via an X
> se
I would look at http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/ for something that is
like PCAnywhere, but it's free.
Ray Parish wrote:
> What do you recommend for an X server for Windows to connect via an X
> session on my Linux Box?
> thanks
> Ray
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsu
Hi, Mohan
In fact you can always nest one Xserver inside other:
8<-
$Xnest :1 &
$export DISPLAY=:1
$fvwm
>8-
The last line can be substitued by wmaker, or even startkde.
A window appears (with Xnest :1 &) where a new session can be nested.
Xnest is a bit slow bu
Thank you all you linux lovers that worked great
mohan
:-)
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Steve Feehan wrote:
> Actually, I believe it is "startx -- :1"
Whoops :)
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> mohan mohta wrote:
> > Can I can i start multiple x sessions ? and shift between them using the
> > alt + function keys
>
> I believe that you can, if you specify the display number on the command
> line (with startx, like "startx -- -display :1"
>
mohan mohta wrote:
> Can I can i start multiple x sessions ? and shift between them using the
> alt + function keys
I believe that you can, if you specify the display number on the command
line (with startx, like "startx -- -display :1"
However, most window managers support virtual desktops, s
2000 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: X-server
>
>
> Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > I have a pc that doesn't not have x-windows on it, but my workstation pc
> > does. How can I run my workstations x-server on the other pc?
> >
> > Both are
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Anthony E. Greene wrote:
> Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > I have a pc that doesn't not have x-windows on it, but my workstation pc
> > does. How can I run my workstations x-server on the other pc?
> >
> > Both are runing redhat 6.1.
>
> You can't.
>
> The machine where the displa
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 03:59:09PM -0600, Bjornson, Matt wrote:
> The machine where the display will interact with the user (the X server)
> must have X installed. The machine that runs the applications (the X client)
> does not require X.
>
More precisely, the application machine does not requir
I thought that you could do that but do not know how to. What you are trying
to do is like a Network Computer, no?
-Original Message-
From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: X-server
Jeff Smelser
Jeff Smelser wrote:
> I have a pc that doesn't not have x-windows on it, but my workstation pc
> does. How can I run my workstations x-server on the other pc?
>
> Both are runing redhat 6.1.
You can't.
The machine where the display will interact with the user (the X server)
must have X installe
Hi there,
I'm also facing the same problem. It only surfaces when i use X.
So i suspect it to be the graphics card, even though windows could work
with it.
my Xconfigurator gave me an error when i tried to test the basic resolutions of
800x600 or 640x480 at 8bpp. Just for note, its a taiwan S3Vir
Jeff Smelser wrote:
>
> I have not started my X server in months on my server, but I got this
> today. Anyone know what is causing this?
>
> Yes, Font server is running and I even restarted it.
>
> _XSERVTransSocketINETCreateListener: ...SocketCreateListener() failed
> _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSSer
On May 15, 10:07pm, Tony Wells wrote:
>
> Lastly,
> Having just finished writing my POP3/SMTP proxy for 32bit windows
> I'l looking for a new project, and wonder whether I might enter
> into this strange world of x-windows. There doesn't seem to be
> *anything* in the way of GNU-type-license X-win
Hi Chris,
>Where are you running the xterm? The reason I ask is that (a) the
standard
>RedHat 5 xterm client does not understand "0.0" (although it
understands
>":0.0") and (b) on most modern Linux systems, when you telnet
into them, the
>DISPLAY variable is *automatically* set for you, you proba
On May 15, 7:27am, Tony Wells wrote:
>
> Everying thig you wrote Chris makes perfect sensce, except for
> one thing which throws me off beam and caused my original
> question. The problem is this: For the freeware products like
> TNTlite, I have to use telnet to initiate the session by setting
>Thus to connect to screen 0 of display 0 on host foo.com, set
DISPLAY to:
>
> foo.com:0.0
Ahh, the mist is clearing .
Everying thig you wrote Chris makes perfect sensce, except for
one thing which throws me off beam and caused my original
question. The problem is this: For the freeware produ
Thanks to all for the comments. Just having the real layout of the X's
client/server architecture did wonders for clearing the scales from my eyes.
It seems that the short answer to my specific situation is, sure, I should be
able to run the dotfile generator on my non-X-bearing firewall with li
'Scuse my jumping in and adding another $0.02 to the various comments so far...
>
> All of this is confusing at first, since it isn't really like the
> client-server models for just about everything else (http, ftp,
> etc.).
Actually, it is the same, but you have to think through the reasoning
Kevin Mernick wrote:
All of this is confusing at first, since it isn't really like the
client-server models for just about everything else (http, ftp,
etc.). I
hope this explanation helped. If you have more questions please
ask.
Hmn,
I'm in the queue for confusion as well, but you've' helped
On Thu, 14 May 1998, Fred Lenk wrote:
> If you are trying to share the X apps on your Linux box, the Linux is
> the X server, and the other workstations are the X clients.
Actually, the program that controls the display is the X Server (in the
sense that it serves the monitor, keyboard, and mou
Original Message-
> From: Michael Jinks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 1998 2:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: basic X questions (was Re: X server for NT?)
>
> Fred Lenk wrote:
>
> > If you are trying to share the X apps on your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Michael Jinks wrote:
> Fred Lenk wrote:
>
> > If you are trying to share the X apps on your Linux box, the Linux is
> > the X server, and the other workstations are the X clients.
>
> Okay, now this is something that's been confusing me. The layout you
> d
Fred Lenk wrote:
> If you are trying to share the X apps on your Linux box, the Linux is
> the X server, and the other workstations are the X clients.
Okay, now this is something that's been confusing me. The layout you describe
is the way I thought it was, but others have told me that I'm wron
If you are trying to share the X apps on your Linux box, the Linux is
the X server, and the other workstations are the X clients.
Hummingbird does have a nice Xterm _client_ suite which runs on
WFW, W95 and WinNT. we use them here and like them. We use their NFS
_client_ software on window
On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 03:50:13AM +, Michael Jinks wrote:
> I'd like to be able to 'send' Xwindows apps to other desktops around the
> office, and in order to do that I assume that those other desktops need
> to be running X servers, but I'm the only one here who uses Linux. Most
> of the pe
ject: Re: X server for NT?
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Michael Jinks wrote:
> I'd like to be able to 'send' Xwindows apps to other desktops around the
> office, and in order to do that I assume that those other desktops need
> to be running X servers, but I'm the only on
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Michael Jinks wrote:
> I'd like to be able to 'send' Xwindows apps to other desktops around the
> office, and in order to do that I assume that those other desktops need
> to be running X servers, but I'm the only one here who uses Linux. Most
> of the people I'd want to sha
niels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> I'm looking for a XFree86 3.3.X server for my
> Diamond Multimedia Stealth II S220 videocard.
> It has a Rendition Verité 2100 chipset on it.
>
> I tried to mail both XFree86 and XSuSE but I
> haven't heard anything from them.
>
> Sou could somebody help me by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Michael Jinks wrote:
> I'm setting up an RH5 machine on a 486/33 with a tiny (~200M) hard
> drive. The installation will be a minimal one, but I'd like to be able
> to display X windows remotely on my desktop (for ease of
> reconfiguration, dotfile generator,
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Alexei Nefediev wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I'm sorry in advance for this probably stupid question, but still maybe
> somebody has already encountered such a problems and knows how to overcome
> it. I have Red Hat 5.0 installed on i586 and
> when I install gcc-2.8.0 or gcc
I just got a matox mill II, and used it w/ 3.3.1, but everyonce-in-a-while
it would crash. Using rpms in contrib, I upgraded to 3.3.2, and it works
*great.* I'd definitely a good choice (and if you really need good 3-d,
you can get another 3d card).
Chris
<- Visit Me At http://home.hiwaay.net/~jf
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> Hmm.. I'm currently thinking about upgrading from my Matrox Mystique
>to a Matrox Millenium II... Is it really un-usable under xfree? even the
>latest version? The support for the Mystique isn't 100% but I get by fine
>and I thank them ppl at Xf
Check out the configurations at http://www.microway.com seems they use this
card, but I don't know which window manager they configure these systems with.
Jay
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat
We found that the CDE screen-saver (admittedly, not a particularly vital component of
anything these days) was completely non-functional, and apprised Xi's tech support of
this. We were promised a prompt reply. That was weeks ago, and we've since heard
precisely nothing from them. This is typical
Xi Graphics is the best display server out for Linux. Hands down.
The Matrox Millenium II w/16 megs I ran was solid under AcceleratedX.
As SuSE develops the Millenium II updates, it will be better for XFree86,
but it's tough to even even compare it to AcceleratedX. Also, I find the tech support
I'm using the SVGA X server from XFree86 3.3.2 with my Millennium II -- it's
fine and free. I don't know how it compares to AcelX, but I'm guessing that
it's probably not quite as good, but the price/performace ratio can't be beat.
=8]
pete
] XiGraphics' CDE with their AcceleratedX will r
I use the XFree 3.3.2 SVGA driver with my Millinium II is it works great.
I'm not sure why you think it is slow. It isn't as fast the the XiG
driver, but its fast enough for just about anything you'd do. I run it
at 1600x1280x16bpp and I've seen no problems.
Dr Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PLEA
Hmm.. I'm currently thinking about upgrading from my Matrox Mystique
to a Matrox Millenium II... Is it really un-usable under xfree? even the
latest version? The support for the Mystique isn't 100% but I get by fine
and I thank them ppl at Xfree for supporting it.. I guess I can put up
On 03-Apr-98 David Fisher wrote:
> XiGraphics' CDE with their AcceleratedX will run circles around most X
> servers.
> It is neither free nor cheap, and their tech support is spotty, but the
> difference is impressive. We use it on a Matrox Millennium 2 driving a 21"
> Hitachi, and it makes Linux
XiGraphics' CDE with their AcceleratedX will run circles around most X servers.
It is neither free nor cheap, and their tech support is spotty, but the
difference is impressive. We use it on a Matrox Millennium 2 driving a 21"
Hitachi, and it makes Linux almost user-friendly.
Chuck Carson wrote:
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
