Thank you for your support, JB. I've discussed this with the team, and
we're all delighted to welcome you as a mentor for the project. I've also
updated the proposal [1] accordingly to reflect your involvement.
Best Regards,
Yu
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/di
ve also
> updated the proposal [1] accordingly to reflect your involvement.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/FlussProposal
>
> On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 16:10, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
&g
me.
> >
> > Best,
> > Hongshun
> >
> > On 2025/05/21 08:43:22 Yu Li wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project,
> and
> > > you can find the proposal [2] of Flu
; On 2025/05/21 08:43:22 Yu Li wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project, and
> > you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details.
> >
> >
> > Fluss is a distributed storage service de
i wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> > I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project, and
> > you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details.
> >
> >
> > Fluss is a distributed storage service designed to deliver high
> throu
Hi
Fluss is a very interesting project. I would be happy to help !
Regards
JB
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10:43 AM Yu Li wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project, and
> you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details
Good to see the Fluss proposal, and equally excited to see so much support
from contributors.
Looking forward to Fluss becoming part of the ASF ecosystem!
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 7:51 PM Jark Wu wrote:
> Thank you, Yu, for driving this proposal.
>
> As one of the core contributors
Thank you, Yu, for driving this proposal.
As one of the core contributors of Fluss, we set our goal to become an
Apache project when we wrote down the first line of code 2 years ago.
That’s why, from the early stages of development and open-sourcing, we
greatly emphasized compliance, licensing
: michaelkoepf
On 2025/05/21 08:43:22 Yu Li wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project, and
> you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details.
>
>
> Fluss is a distributed storage service designed to deliver high
thr
Hi Yu,
Thanks for driving the Fluss incubation proposal. As a community member and
contributor who has enjoyed working on the project, I'm looking forward to
Fluss joining the Apache ecosystem and will continue contributing to it.
Looking forward to the incubation of Fluss.
Best re
rm community base; I'm glad to see this proposal :D
>>
>> Best,
>> tison.
>>
>>
>> yuxia 于2025年5月21日周三 21:02写道：
>>
>>> Hi Yu,
>>>
>>> Thanks for driving this discussion. As a core developer of Fluss, I'm
>>> th
is devoted to providing a unified storage and has a healthy
> community. I am glad to see it joining the Apache incubator.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:07 AM tison wrote:
>
> > Fluss has a firm community base; I'm glad to see th
Fluss is devoted to providing a unified storage and has a healthy
community. I am glad to see it joining the Apache incubator.
Cheers,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:07 AM tison wrote:
> Fluss has a firm community base; I'm glad to see this proposal :D
>
>
Fluss has a firm community base; I'm glad to see this proposal :D
Best,
tison.
yuxia 于2025年5月21日周三 21:02写道：
> Hi Yu,
>
> Thanks for driving this discussion. As a core developer of Fluss, I'm
> thrilled to see this proposal submitted, and look forward to incubating
Hi Yu,
Thanks for driving this discussion. As a core developer of Fluss, I'm thrilled
to see this proposal submitted, and look forward to incubating of Fluss.
Having actively participated in Fluss' development for around half a year since
its open-source release, I firmly believe our
Thanks Yu for driving this discussion. I have waiting for a long time.
Best,
Hongshun
On 2025/05/21 08:43:22 Yu Li wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project, and
> you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details.
>
he incubator project, and
> you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details.
>
>
> Fluss is a distributed storage service designed to deliver high throughput
> and sub-second latency for streaming read and write operations. It aims to
> provide a unified data layer that
:54 PM Nicholas Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi Yu,
>
> Thanks for driving discussion of Fluss proposal. Fluss is a new streaming
> storage built for real-time analytics, which is different from message queue.
> The community of this project is also very active and healthy. Looking
> for
Hi Yu,
Thanks for driving discussion of Fluss proposal. Fluss is a new streaming
storage built for real-time analytics, which is different from message queue.
The community of this project is also very active and healthy. Looking forward
to incubating of Fluss.
Regards,
Nicholas Jiang
On
Hi Yu,
Thanks for driving discussion of Fluss proposal. Fluss is a new streaming
storage built for real-time analytics, which is different from message queue.
The community of this project is also very active and healthy. Looking forward
to incubating of Fluss.
Regards,
Nicholas Jiang
On
Hi All,
I would like to propose Fluss [1] as a new apache incubator project, and
you can find the proposal [2] of Fluss for more details.
Fluss is a distributed storage service designed to deliver high throughput
and sub-second latency for streaming read and write operations. It aims to
Hi -
It used to be the case that every podling used svn and had directories in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/.
I think that other than https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/ we
can safely remove almost all of the other directories. This will prevent others
from inadver
the Open JPA's
> proposal, which cannot be found on the Incubator wiki page.
>
> Willem Jiang
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 7:25 PM tison wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In "Initial Committers" section of the New Podling Proposal template[1], I
>>
I guess this refers to the different sections of the Open JPA's
proposal, which cannot be found on the Incubator wiki page.
Willem Jiang
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 7:25 PM tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In "Initial Committers" section of the New Podling Proposal template[
Hi,
This continues [1][2].
I'd propose to update "Project Name" section in the New Podling Proposal
template [3] as below:
## Project Name
Describe what has been done to check that the name of the project is
suitable and if the project has legal permission to continue using i
elped with
the proposal.
Performing the namesearch would be far easier for the champion than to
anyone who at that stage hasn't interacted with the foundation.
Cheers,
juan pablo
El jue, 17 abr 2025, 13:23, tison escribió:
> Hi,
>
> This continues [1][2].
>
> I'd propose
c to ASF, and the project hasn't entered / engaged with
> ASF/incubator yet, wouldn't this task better be performed by the member
> championing the request? This person most probably has already helped with
> the proposal.
>
> Performing the namesearch would be far easier for
Hi,
In "Initial Committers" section of the New Podling Proposal template[1], I
found the following sentences:
> Note this and this. Consider creating a separate section where interested
developers can express an interest (and possibly leave a brief
introduction) or ask them t
e.
>
> Best
> Jan
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Willem
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:29 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I’m excited to introduce a new project proposal: BifroMQ.
> &g
gt;>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Willem
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:29 AM Willem Jiang
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I’m excited to introduce a new project proposa
ou can start with the vote if all the concerns raised during the
discussion have been addressed.
>
> Best
> Jan
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Willem
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:29 AM Willem Jiang
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyon
ss the list is fine with more concurrent votes, then I can start PouchDB
any time.
Best
Jan
>
> Thanks,
>
> Willem
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:29 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I’m excited to introduce a new project proposal: B
If we don't have any further comments, I will start a new vote tomorrow.
Thanks,
Willem
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 8:29 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I’m excited to introduce a new project proposal: BifroMQ.
>
> BifroMQ is a Java-based, high-performance,
Hi Christofer,
We have room for you as the mentor; I already updated the proposal to
add you to the mentor list.
Please check it out
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/BifroMQ+Proposal.
Willem Jiang
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 3:50 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> Hi
Hi Calvin,
Well admittedly I was waiting for the proposal ... Are there other IPMC members
voluntering as Mentor? You would need at least 3 (4 would be better). I think
as soon as you have reached that bar, it’s ok to start the official incubation
proposal vote etc.
And I guess I’ll not be
Hi everyone,
I’m excited to introduce a new project proposal: BifroMQ.
BifroMQ is a Java-based, high-performance, distributed MQTT broker
with native multi-tenancy support, designed for large-scale
connections and message delivery.
The BifroMQ proposal document is ready for review.
https
Hi Chris
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 2:47 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
>
> I'm just asking, because for example the previous projects, that i was a
> mentor of: iotdb and answer, who's email lists I used to follow, are
> completely closed to me now. During my job at timcho I was able to access
> the
m after graduation.
>
> Hope that explains things a bit more.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: tison
> Datum: Mittwoch, 26. März 2025 um 08:53
> An: general@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal
> > There seems
oject to the
> incubator it was generally just me bein „active“ ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Yonny Hao
> Datum: Freitag, 28. März 2025 um 02:52
> An: general@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks for bringing up this c
a disqualifying question … when I brought my project to the
incubator it was generally just me bein „active“ ;-)
Chris
Von: Yonny Hao
Datum: Freitag, 28. März 2025 um 02:52
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal
Hi Chris,
Thanks for bringing up this concern
much time into a project, that I’m
> excluded from after graduation.
>
> Hope that explains things a bit more.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Von: tison
> Datum: Mittwoch, 26. März 2025 um 08:53
> An: general@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re:
. I
just don’t want to invest so much time into a project, that I’m excluded from
after graduation.
Hope that explains things a bit more.
Chris
Von: tison
Datum: Mittwoch, 26. März 2025 um 08:53
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal
> There seems
> There seems to be a pattern with Chinese projects, that as soon as graduation
> is over corporate interests take over and are valued higher than apache's.
>> This is not a pattern with Chinese projects. This is a serious accusation,
>> IMO, and I'm afraid this categorization creates a biased t
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 5:05:42 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal
Hi Chris,
Thanks for stepping in as a Mentor.
You point out a common problem in the project community in China.
There are some cultural differences between Chinese and OSS. Daniel
an
nicate almost exclusively via Feishu/Lark.
>
> Are you aware that joining Apache comes with some expectations and how are
> you planning on meeting these expectations?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Datum: Dienstag, 25. März 2025 um 10:07
> An:
rote:
> >
> > Hi Willem
> >
> > The proposal is interesting.
> >
> > I have two questions:
> > - any relation with existing MQTT brokers (Apache ActiveMQ, etc) ?
>
> Quick answer, BifroMQ is a distributed MQTT broker which does not
> provide the generic Messa
Hi JB，
Please take a look at my answers below.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 5:07 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Willem
>
> The proposal is interesting.
>
> I have two questions:
> - any relation with existing MQTT brokers (Apache ActiveMQ, etc) ?
Quick answer, BifroMQ
Hi PJ & list,
We have now reviewed the remaining dependency licenses to our
satisfaction. Everything is in accordance with the Third Party
Licensing Policy. I have updated the proposal accordingly.
I have also taken out incubator. of the repo and mailing list
names.
We are ready to go now,
meeting these expectations?
Chris
Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Datum: Dienstag, 25. März 2025 um 10:07
An: general@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] BifroMQ Proposal
Hi Willem
The proposal is interesting.
I have two questions:
- any relation with existing MQTT brokers (Apache ActiveMQ
Hi Willem
The proposal is interesting.
I have two questions:
- any relation with existing MQTT brokers (Apache ActiveMQ, etc) ?
- do you have plans to grow the community, especially "outside" of Asia ?
Regards
JB
On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 1:29 AM Willem Jiang wrote:
>
> Hi e
asier not to
> > have multiple concurrent votes. If there is a reason to day starting a vote
> > then I might start vote threads for Hamilton and Burr (related podlings).
> >
> >
> > On 2025/03/12 12:04:53 PJ Fanning wrote:
> >> Looks like a Confluence i
re is a reason to day starting a vote then I
> might start vote threads for Hamilton and Burr (related podlings).
>
>
> On 2025/03/12 12:04:53 PJ Fanning wrote:
>> Looks like a Confluence issue regarding the New Podling Proposal
>> template. I see the same issue wher
might start vote threads for Hamilton and Burr (related podlings).
On 2025/03/12 12:04:53 PJ Fanning wrote:
> Looks like a Confluence issue regarding the New Podling Proposal
> template. I see the same issue where 'edit' opens the OpenServerless
> proposal.
>
> Could you re
Great project it looks like
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 9:42 AM PJ Fanning wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Texera proposal document is ready for review.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/TexeraProposal
>
> It would be useful if we could get another 1 or 2
Hi everyone,
The Texera proposal document is ready for review.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/TexeraProposal
It would be useful if we could get another 1 or 2 mentors, if anyone
has the time to help out.
Please respond to this thread with your thoughts on the Texera
Thanks for the detailed proposal.
Generally, the Apache Incubator takes existing projects with a pre-existing
community. We emphasise community over code so it may be feasible to start a
new project if you have a community.
Do you have a list of people who would be willing to collaborate on
Dear Apache Incubator Community,
I would like to start a discussion about an idea to start the
development of a new Java library, designed to simplify
the implementation and setup of custom communication protocols,
particularly for networked environments and device
interactions (e.g., serial p
do!
Done: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/PouchDB+Proposal
Aside: the proposal template * has a typo “sort to associate” instead of
“sought to associate”. I wanted to fix this, but hitting the [Edit] button
on that page opens the OpenServerless proposal for editing,
Looks like a Confluence issue regarding the New Podling Proposal
template. I see the same issue where 'edit' opens the OpenServerless
proposal.
Could you remove 'incubator' from the mailing lists and git repo
names? They are not required and it simplifies things not to hav
Hi, Jan
Thank you for the explanation. I must have skimmed too quickly and overlooked
that part.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, at 20:22, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> On 5. Mar 2025, at 13:17, Xuanwo wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This proposal looks great. I just have a small qu
* Could you or someone else fill in the license details for the 3rd
party libs where the tool was unable to work them out?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> # ASF Podling Proposal for PouchDB
>
> ## Abstract
>
> PouchDB is an open-source JavaScript database i
ontrol
or release artefacts or are required to run the release artefact.
We are wondering if those do need working out for the sake of the proposal
or if we can leave those for later.
Best
Jan
—
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> # ASF Podling Proposal
On 5. Mar 2025, at 13:17, Xuanwo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This proposal looks great. I just have a small question: Have you considered
> joining CouchDB as a sub-project and incubating under the CouchDB PMC instead?
Thanks for the kind words.
The proposal includes a section a
Hi,
This proposal looks great. I just have a small question: Have you considered
joining CouchDB as a sub-project and incubating under the CouchDB PMC instead?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, at 20:02, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> # ASF Podling Proposal for PouchDB
>
> ## Abstract
>
> PouchDB is
# ASF Podling Proposal for PouchDB
## Abstract
PouchDB is an open-source JavaScript database inspired by [Apache CouchDB]
(http://couchdb.apache.org/) that is designed to build offline-capable web
applications.
## Proposal
PouchDB is an open-source JavaScript database inspired by [Apache
t;>> @Hulk I'll reach out to you offline. Your experience working on Apache
>>> Kvrocks could be very valuable for Iggy as we plan to build connectors for
>>> a bunch of other Apache projects in the areas of big data processing,
>>> databases, data lakes, etc., as
hem would have to deal with
> > large-scale data/message streaming in their ingestion pipelines.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kranti
> > >
> > > > On Jan 28, 2025, at 7:31 PM, hulk wrote:
> > > > The proposal looks good a
he areas of big data processing,
> databases, data lakes, etc., as all of them would have to deal with
> large-scale data/message streaming in their ingestion pipelines.
> >
> > Best,
> > Kranti
> >
> > > On Jan 28, 2025, at 7:31 PM, hulk wrote:
&g
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 15:31, tison wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kranti Parisa is an initial committer of the Iggy Proposal [1]. He
> > would like to edit the page but found himself cannot see the edit
> > button.
> >
> > I check the page without an
I think you'll need to raise an Infra issue. An alternative is for
people without edit rights to send their edits to someone who has.
On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 15:31, tison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Kranti Parisa is an initial committer of the Iggy Proposal [1]. He
> would like to edi
Hi,
Kranti Parisa is an initial committer of the Iggy Proposal [1]. He
would like to edit the page but found himself cannot see the edit
button.
I check the page without any restriction and Kranti Parisa has an
account under the same name.
Anyone who is familiar with Confluence settings can
st,
> Kranti
>
> > On Jan 28, 2025, at 7:31 PM, hulk wrote:
> > The proposal looks good and interesting. I'm interested in serving as
> > a mentor if needed.
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 01:56, Ayush Saxena wrote:
> >>
> >> The proposal
would have to deal with large-scale data/message
streaming in their ingestion pipelines.
Best,
Kranti
> On Jan 28, 2025, at 7:31 PM, hulk wrote:
> The proposal looks good and interesting. I'm interested in serving as
> a mentor if needed.
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 0
The proposal looks good and interesting. I'm interested in serving as
a mentor if needed.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 01:56, Ayush Saxena wrote:
>
> The proposal looks good.
>
> Good Luck!!!
>
> -Ayush
>
> > On 28 Jan 2025, at 10:44 PM, Kranti K. Parisa
> > wr
The proposal looks good.
Good Luck!!!
-Ayush
> On 28 Jan 2025, at 10:44 PM, Kranti K. Parisa wrote:
>
> No problem, Atri. Thanks for your support.
>
> We will try to find more mentors as we move forward. In fact, if anyone from
> Incubator PMC is interested in join
y, due to certain unforeseen reasons, will have to step down
> from the role of a mentor for the project.
>
> Will follow it closely
>
>> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 7:20 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yonik
>>
>> The proposal looks interest
Unfortunately, due to certain unforeseen reasons, will have to step down
from the role of a mentor for the project.
Will follow it closely
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 at 7:20 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Yonik
>
> The proposal looks interesting and it's pretty clear.
> G
Hi Yonik
The proposal looks interesting and it's pretty clear.
Good luck with the proposal !
Regards
JB
On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 9:22 PM Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> Hi Apache Incubator,
>
> We would like to propose a new project: Iggy.
> Iggy is a message streaming platform wri
uch as
> > > possible. But we also want to keep them independent with dedicated
> > > CI/CD pipelines to allow us release the important fixes/updates as
> > > needed.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Kranti
> > >
> > >> On Jan 2
; > needed.
> >
> > Best,
> > Kranti
> >
> >> On Jan 26, 2025, at 1:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a very interesting proposal there are a number of clients for the
> >> rust based service.
> >>
> >> The
gt; Kranti
>
>> On Jan 26, 2025, at 1:55 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>> This is a very interesting proposal there are a number of clients for the
>> rust based service.
>>
>> The following repositories are listed.
>>
>> https://github.com/apach
ote:
>
> This is a very interesting proposal there are a number of clients for the
> rust based service.
>
> The following repositories are listed.
>
> https://github.com/apache/iggy <https://github.com/apache/incubator-iggy>
> https://github.com/apache/iggy-docs
>
This is a very interesting proposal there are a number of clients for the rust
based service.
The following repositories are listed.
https://github.com/apache/iggy <https://github.com/apache/incubator-iggy>
https://github.com/apache/iggy-docs
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-
proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Iggy+Proposal
Thanks,
-Yonik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Thanks Mick for starting the thread and our mentors for supporting the
proposal! I am very excited to hear feedback on it!
Best,
Alex
On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 8:57 AM Lari Hotari wrote:
> Great work on the proposal, Mick and team!
>
> I'm signing up as one of the mentors.
>
&g
Great work on the proposal, Mick and team!
I'm signing up as one of the mentors.
-Lari
On 2024/11/11 14:34:56 Mick Semb Wever wrote:
> Hi Apache Incubator folks,
>
> Proposing a new project: Hunter.
>
> Hunter is a tool that detects statistically significant changes i
This seems like a really interesting tool. Look forward to seeing it go
through Apache.
John
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 8:58 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 11, 2024, at 7:59 AM, Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Mick for sharing the proposal.
> &
> On Nov 11, 2024, at 7:59 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>
> Thank you Mick for sharing the proposal.
>
> Il giorno lun 11 nov 2024 alle ore 15:36 Mick Semb Wever <mailto:m...@apache.org>>
> ha scritto:
>
>> Hi Apache Incubator folks,
>>
>> Pro
Thank you Mick for sharing the proposal.
Il giorno lun 11 nov 2024 alle ore 15:36 Mick Semb Wever
ha scritto:
> Hi Apache Incubator folks,
>
> Proposing a new project: Hunter.
>
> Hunter is a tool that detects statistically significant changes in
> time-series data stored eith
decide whether code should be deployed to production. It
is a young project with already good diversity, and a valued user base, and
is well positioned for the advantages that belonging in the ASF would bring.
Here is the proposal:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR
Back in September Craig Russell made a proposal on this list to adopt a new
vote format for podlings [1]:
> I'm proposing that for votes, that a standard form be used for
> registering and tallying votes. For registering votes, include
> the ASF id in the vote line, e.g.
&g
Hi Kent，
Thanks for the mentorship offering. I will add you as a mentor to the
proposal.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:33 PM Kent Yao wrote:
>
> +1 for CloudBerry's entry into Apache Incubator. I'm interested in serving as
>
high concurrency
> > and high availability. It can perform quick and efficient computing
> > for complex tasks, meeting the demands of managing and computing vast
> > amounts of data. It has evolved from Open Source version of the
> > Pivotal Greenplum DatabaseⓇ and inheri
its original Apache License
> v2.
>
> Here is the proposal:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CloudberryProposal
>
> Two mentors on the project are going to be Willem Jiang and myself.
>
> Please note (and you may read about it in more details in t
Thanks Roman for putting this together.
It's my pleasure to be the mentor of this project.
Please let us know if you have any thoughts about this proposal.
Thanks,
Willem Jiang
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 11:19 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> Hi Apache Incubator folks,
>
>
Thanks Roman as the champion for proposing this proposal.
Now we can see Cloudberry has a small but active, fast-growing, and diverse
contributors team and community. It can be an open-source offer to the
original Greenplum users after the GP went closed-source. Since then, I
talked with many
the demands of managing and computing vast
> amounts of data. It has evolved from Open Source version of the
> Pivotal Greenplum DatabaseⓇ and inherits its original Apache License
> v2.
>
> Here is the proposal:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/CloudberryP
Dear Roman and Apache Incubator community,
As the chairperson of Apache MADlib PMC, I want to express my full support for
the Apache Cloudberry proposal. I believe this project presents a crucial
opportunity for the open-source MPP database community, particularly in light
of recent
availability. It can perform quick and efficient computing
for complex tasks, meeting the demands of managing and computing vast
amounts of data. It has evolved from Open Source version of the
Pivotal Greenplum DatabaseⓇ and inherits its original Apache License
v2.
Here is the proposal:
https
On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Christofer Dutz
wrote:
> ...Pro-tip from a freshly former board member: Many TLPs would consider
> that interfering with their freedom to do wtftw ...
That's if you wanted to make this a requirement, which I don't think
it's needed.
Presenting it as a best practice
1 - 100 of 10903 matches
Mail list logo
