issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add maxValueCount to DocValuesSkipper metadata [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [BACKPORT] Try using Murmurhash 3 for bloom filters (#12868) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BACKPORT] Try using Murmurhash 3 for bloom filters (#12868) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [BACKPORT] Try using Murmurhash 3 for bloom filters (#12868) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanQuery: narrow bulk scoring when FILTER matches primary index sort [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add experimental columnar indexing api [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocValuesRangeIterator uses SkipBlockRangeIterator as its approximation [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer: reuse inner collector and inline score reset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer: reuse inner collector and inline score reset [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Can we add configuration on dropping raw vectors from quantized formats after some period of time? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix nightly test fail after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix nightly test fail after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix TestBlockPostingsFormat2 after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestBlockPostingsFormat2 after adding custom_term_freq; fixes #15984 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] Fix(15831): Resolve race condition in ReferenceManager.doMaybeRefresh [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestBlockPostingsFormat2.testTTFBlockSize broken in branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestBlockPostingsFormat2.testTTFBlockSize broken in branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestBlockPostingsFormat2.testTTFBlockSize broken in branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support jdk.CPUTimeSample event in ProfileResults for Java 25+ (JEP 509) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix undercounting of RAM used by vectors buffered in in-memory segments [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improve clause ordering for multi-field DocValues range conjunctions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve clause ordering for multi-field DocValues range conjunctions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve clause ordering for multi-field DocValues range conjunctions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve clause ordering for multi-field DocValues range conjunctions [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Bypass total frequency check if field uses custom term frequency [LUCENE-10048] [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport: introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager (#15603) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport: introduce TopGroupsCollectorManager (#15603) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add a de-duplicating flat vector format [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] De-dup raw vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW InfoStream duplicate times and add per-chunk completion logging [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] test-framework JUnit 5 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] test-framework JUnit 5 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] test-framework JUnit 5 support [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize trie builder [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Store DocValuesSkippers in a separate file [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Store DocValuesSkippers in a separate file [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use explicit version check in Lucene90BlockTreeTermsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use explicit version check in Lucene90BlockTreeTermsWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Avoid reload block when seeking backward in SegmentTermsEnum. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reload block when seeking backward in SegmentTermsEnum. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Break the loop when segment is fully deleted by prior delTerms or delQueries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Break the loop when segment is fully deleted by prior delTerms or delQueries [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Leverage sorted dim when visiting BKD leaf. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Leverage sorted dim when visiting BKD leaf. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestDocValuesQueries reproducible failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDocValuesQueries reproducible failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDocValuesQueries reproducible failure [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages