HUSTERGS commented on code in PR #14806:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14806#discussion_r2154727636
##########
lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/ReqExclBulkScorer.java:
##########
@@ -57,7 +57,10 @@ public int score(LeafCollector collector, Bits acceptDocs,
int min, int max) thr
exclDoc = exclApproximation.advance(upTo);
}
if (exclDoc == upTo) {
- if (exclTwoPhase == null || exclTwoPhase.matches()) {
+ if (exclTwoPhase == null) {
+ // from upTo to docIdRunEnd() are excluded, so we scored up to
docIdRunEnd()
+ upTo = exclApproximation.docIDRunEnd();
+ } else if (exclTwoPhase.matches()) {
Review Comment:
I think it's correct here, and I run lucene test locally, everything looks
fine. What I'm concerned here is that only `DocValuesRangeIterator` implement
it's own `docIdRunEnd` method for now, I'm not sure whether adding this will
hurt the performance or not
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
