issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Create a bot to check if there is a CHANGES entry for new PRs [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] MultiTermQueryConstantScoreBlendedWrapper#createWeight#rewriteInner performance optimization ideas [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make Lucene better at skipping long runs of matches. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] introduce new parameter onlyLongestMatchNoSubwords replacing onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Recommend multi-stage retrieval pipelines in oal.search javadocs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Recommend multi-stage retrieval pipelines in oal.search javadocs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Recommend multi-stage retrieval pipelines in oal.search javadocs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Recommend multi-stage retrieval pipelines in oal.search javadocs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Recommend multi-stage retrieval pipelines in oal.search javadocs. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits by making nested test classes not extend LuceneTestCase [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits by making nested test classes not extend LuceneTestCase [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits by making nested test classes not extend LuceneTestCase [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestSysoutLimits still occasionally failing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestSysoutLimits still occasionally failing [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix lambdas for java 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix lambdas for java 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix lambdas for java 23 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we auto-adjust top score doc and top field collector manager based on slices? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we auto-adjust top score doc and top field collector manager based on slices? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make BlockPostingsEnum public. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose the ImpactsEnum impl in Lucene101PostingsFormat. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose the ImpactsEnum impl in Lucene101PostingsFormat. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose the ImpactsEnum impl in Lucene101PostingsFormat. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose the ImpactsEnum impl in Lucene101PostingsFormat. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] develocity build scans fail to upload sometimes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] develocity build scans fail to upload sometimes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] develocity build scans fail to upload sometimes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] develocity build scans fail to upload sometimes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] develocity build scans fail to upload sometimes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] develocity build scans fail to upload sometimes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Create vectorized versions of ScalarQuantizer.quantize and recalculateCorrectiveOffset [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestScorerUtil.testLikelyImpactsEnum fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestScorerUtil.testLikelyImpactsEnum fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestScorerUtil.testLikelyImpactsEnum fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestScorerUtil.testLikelyImpactsEnum fails [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump minimum required Java version to 23 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support JDK 24 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support JDK 24 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid unnecessary evaluations and skipping documents [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary evaluations and skipping documents [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary evaluations and skipping documents [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add support for querying multiple fields to QueryBuilder. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for querying multiple fields to QueryBuilder. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Support JDK 24 in Panama Vectorization Provider [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support JDK 24 in Panama Vectorization Provider [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Mark DocIdBitSet#bits deprecated also in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mark DocIdBitSet#bits deprecated also in subclasses [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove BitDocIdSet#bits method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove BitDocIdSet#bits method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove BitDocIdSet#bits method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove BitDocIdSet#bits method [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Replace usage of DocIdBitSet#bits in QueryBitSetProducer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Replace usage of DocIdBitSet#bits in QueryBitSetProducer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits occasionally failing. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits occasionally failing. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits occasionally failing. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits occasionally failing. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix TestSysoutLimits occasionally failing. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improve documentation for org.apache.lucene.search Sort class [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve documentation for org.apache.lucene.search Sort class [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve documentation for org.apache.lucene.search Sort class [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve documentation for org.apache.lucene.search Sort class [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve documentation for org.apache.lucene.search Sort class [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix optimization to help inline calls to live docs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix optimization to help inline calls to live docs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix optimization to help inline calls to live docs. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix optimization to help inline calls to live docs. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use DenseConjunctionBulkScorer for single queries sometimes. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecate the redundant DocIdSet#bits method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecate the redundant DocIdSet#bits method [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from ScorerSupplier#setTopLevelScoringClause signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from ScorerSupplier#setTopLevelScoringClause signature [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Stop duplicating per-segment work across segment partitions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Stop duplicating per-segment work across segment partitions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Stop duplicating per-segment work across segment partitions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove bits method from DocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove bits method from DocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove bits method from DocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove bits method from DocIdSet [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Deprecated DocIdSet#all [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Deprecated DocIdSet#all [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove unused DocIdSet#all method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove unused DocIdSet#all method [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] improve checkJavadocLinks.py to detect "invalid reference" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] improve checkJavadocLinks.py to detect "invalid reference" [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport error-prone changes from main to branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport error-prone changes from main to branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport error-prone changes from main to branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport error-prone changes from main to branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport error-prone changes from main to branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport error-prone changes from main to branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport error-prone changes from main to branch_10x [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] improve checkJavadocLinks.py to detect "invalid reference" [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] improve checkJavadocLinks.py to detect "invalid reference" [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove IOException from DocIdSet#iterator signature [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove IOException from DocIdSet#iterator signature [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages