issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix DISIDocIdStream::count so that it does not try to count beyond max [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix DISIDocIdStream::count so that it does not try to count beyond max [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix DISIDocIdStream::count so that it does not try to count beyond max [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Upgrade to gradle 8.14-rc-2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to gradle 8.14-rc-2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to gradle 8.14-rc-2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to gradle 8.14-rc-2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to gradle 8.14-rc-2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to gradle 8.14-rc-2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Upgrade to gradle 8.14-rc-2 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a non-deprecated assertThat, and change several test assertions to use assertThat [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sloppySin calculations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move sloppySin into SloppyMath from GeoUtils [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move sloppySin into SloppyMath from GeoUtils [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move sloppySin into SloppyMath from GeoUtils [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move sloppySin into SloppyMath from GeoUtils [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move sloppySin into SloppyMath from GeoUtils [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move sloppySin into SloppyMath from GeoUtils [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] IndexWriter forceMergeDeletes should return its MergeSpec [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] IndexWriter forceMergeDeletes should return its MergeSpec [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [Bug] Fix for stored fields force merge regression [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Bug] Fix for stored fields force merge regression [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Bug] Fix for stored fields force merge regression [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [Bug] Fix for stored fields force merge regression [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Ensuring skip list is read for fields indexed with only DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Provide better impacts for fields indexed with IndexOptions.DOCS [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Change uses of withReadAdvice to use hints instead [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use a hint to specify READONCE IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a hint to specify READONCE IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a hint to specify READONCE IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a hint to specify READONCE IOContext [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Tone down TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated (OOMs sometimes) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tone down TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated (OOMs sometimes) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tone down TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated (OOMs sometimes) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tone down TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated (OOMs sometimes) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tone down TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated (OOMs sometimes) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tone down TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated (OOMs sometimes) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Tone down TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated (OOMs sometimes) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] smokeTestRelease broken after versions.toml moved [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] smokeTestRelease broken after versions.toml moved [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] smokeTestRelease broken after versions.toml moved [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Run a workflow on dependabot's PRs (gradlew updateLicenses) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Run a workflow on dependabot's PRs (gradlew updateLicenses writeLocks) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Run a workflow on dependabot's PRs (gradlew updateLicenses writeLocks) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Run a workflow on dependabot's PRs (gradlew updateLicenses writeLocks) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Run a workflow on dependabot's PRs (gradlew updateLicenses writeLocks) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Run a workflow on dependabot's PRs (gradlew updateLicenses writeLocks) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.5-11 to 1.5.7-2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.github.luben:zstd-jni from 1.5.5-11 to 1.5.7-2 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting:randomizedtesting-runner from 2.8.1 to 2.8.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting:randomizedtesting-runner from 2.8.1 to 2.8.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump de.undercouch.download from 5.2.0 to 5.6.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump de.undercouch.download from 5.2.0 to 5.6.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump de.undercouch.download from 5.2.0 to 5.6.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump xerces:xercesImpl from 2.12.0 to 2.12.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump xerces:xercesImpl from 2.12.0 to 2.12.2 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Remove dependabot pr limit=1 for java and actions ecosystems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove dependabot pr limit=1 for java and actions ecosystems [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [10x] Move some DocValuesConsumer merge logic to helper methods. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [10x] Move some DocValuesConsumer merge logic to helper methods. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Move version catalog and enable dependabot scanning of gradle dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move version catalog and enable dependabot scanning of gradle dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move version catalog and enable dependabot scanning of gradle dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] test: AwaitFix TestIndexWriterMergePolicy.stressUpdateSameDocumentWithMergeOnX [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Dynamic threshold for DocIdSetBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic threshold for DocIdSetBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic threshold for DocIdSetBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Dynamic threshold for DocIdSetBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 5.2.0 to 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 5.2.0 to 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 5.2.0 to 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 5.2.0 to 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/stale from 5.2.0 to 9.1.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump flexmark from 0.61.24 to 0.64.8 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump flexmark from 0.61.24 to 0.64.8 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump flexmark from 0.61.24 to 0.64.8 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [10.x] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [10.x] Add support for determining off-heap memory requirements for KnnVectorsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Backport Bot [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backport Bot [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backport Bot [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Move some DocValuesConsumer merge logic to helper methods. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move some DocValuesConsumer merge logic to helper methods. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move some DocValuesConsumer merge logic to helper methods. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Move some DocValuesConsumer merge logic to helper methods. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix RegExp.toString generating invalid RE for CHAR and CHAR_RANGE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix RegExp.toString generating invalid RE for CHAR and CHAR_RANGE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix RegExp.toString generating invalid RE for CHAR and CHAR_RANGE [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix RegExp.toString generating invalid RE for CHAR and CHAR_RANGE [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: pin github actions versions in use [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: pin github actions versions in use [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: pin github actions versions in use [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: pin github actions versions in use [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: pin github actions versions in use [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: pin github actions versions in use [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: pin github actions versions in use [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] update PRs for java dependencies [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages