issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] Lucene 9.11: Make AbstractKnnVectorQuery.searchLeaf() overridable to enable custom KNN instrumentation [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't revisit knn query results unless optimistic collection was used… [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] BytesRefIntMap's INIT_RAM_BYTES uses shallowSizeof() instead of shallowSizeOfInstance() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BytesRefIntMap's INIT_RAM_BYTES uses shallowSizeof() instead of shallowSizeOfInstance() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] BytesRefIntMap's INIT_RAM_BYTES uses shallowSizeof() instead of shallowSizeOfInstance() [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Faceting + Data Sketches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Faceting + Data Sketches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Faceting + Data Sketches [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor computeCommonPrefixLengthAndBuildHistogram [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] MultiIndexMergeScheduler: a production multi-tenant merge scheduler [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case test random 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case test random 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case test random 10x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case.test random [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Parent block join knn vector query test case.test random [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multiple Major Versions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Relax Lucene Index Upgrade Policy to Allow Safe Upgrades Across Multi… [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add AcceptDocs interface for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs interface for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AcceptDocs abstraction for accepted KNN docs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport change to improve off-heap byte vector scoring at query time [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.27 to 4.0.28 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 4.0.27 to 4.0.28 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.41.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.38.0 to 2.41.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.27.1 to 1.28.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools from 2.5.4 to 2.5.5 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools from 2.5.4 to 2.5.5 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Optimistic knn query breaks nested vector search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Wraps all iterator with likelyImpactsEnum under BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Wraps all iterator with likelyImpactsEnum under BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Wraps all iterator with likelyImpactsEnum under BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Wraps all iterator with likelyImpactsEnum under BlockMaxConjunctionBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graph during singleton merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid reconstructing HNSW graphs during segment merging. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] remove IndexReader.registerParentReader() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] remove IndexReader.registerParentReader() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] remove IndexReader.registerParentReader() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] remove IndexReader.registerParentReader() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] remove IndexReader.registerParentReader() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove full integrity check from SortingStoredFieldsConsumer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove full integrity check from SortingStoredFieldsConsumer [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene 5.x to 9.12.1 Migration – Change in Search Result Ordering [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 5.x to 9.12.1 Migration – Change in Search Result Ordering [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 5.x to 9.12.1 Migration – Change in Search Result Ordering [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 5.x to 9.12.1 Migration – Change in Search Result Ordering [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene 5.x to 9.12.1 Migration – Change in Search Result Ordering [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance bottleneck in IndexReader.registerParentReader with many parentReaders [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages