issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Add support for two-phase iterators to DenseConjunctionBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for two-phase iterators to DenseConjunctionBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for two-phase iterators to DenseConjunctionBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for two-phase iterators to DenseConjunctionBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for two-phase iterators to DenseConjunctionBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add support for two-phase iterators to DenseConjunctionBulkScorer. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Specialise DirectMonotonicReader when it only contains one block [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specialise DirectMonotonicReader when it only contains one block [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specialise DirectMonotonicReader when it only contains one block [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specialise DirectMonotonicReader when it only contains one block [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specialise DirectMonotonicReader when it only contains one block [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] BooleanScorer doesn't optimize for TwoPhaseIterator [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] removing constructor with deprecated attribute 'onlyLongestMatch [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve PointRangeQuery's "inverse" optimization. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve PointRangeQuery's "inverse" optimization. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve PointRangeQuery's "inverse" optimization. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve PointRangeQuery's "inverse" optimization. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve PointRangeQuery's "inverse" optimization. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fetch PR branch to fix changelog workflow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fetch PR branch to fix changelog workflow [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve DenseConjunctionBulkScorer's sparse fallback. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve DenseConjunctionBulkScorer's sparse fallback. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] PointInSetQuery use reverse collection to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery use reverse collection to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery use reverse collection to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery use reverse collection to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] PointInSetQuery use reverse collection to improve performance [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [DRAFT] Case-insensitive matching over union of strings [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Could we have a different ANN algorithm for Learned Sparse Vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Could we have a different ANN algorithm for Learned Sparse Vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [DISCUSS] Could we have a different ANN algorithm for Learned Sparse Vectors? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Case-insensitive TermInSetQuery Implementation (Proof of Concept) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Opening of vector files with ReadAdvice.RANDOM_PRELOAD [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Make Lucene smarter about long runs of matches [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deduplicate standard BKDConfig records [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deduplicate standard BKDConfig records [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deduplicate standard BKDConfig records [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deduplicate standard BKDConfig records [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deduplicate standard BKDConfig records [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deduplicate standard BKDConfig records [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add venv to rat gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add venv to rat gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up scoring conjunctions a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up scoring conjunctions a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up scoring conjunctions a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up scoring conjunctions a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestIndexSortBackwardsCompatibility.testSortedIndexAddDocBlocks fails reproducibly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestIndexSortBackwardsCompatibility.testSortedIndexAddDocBlocks fails reproducibly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestIndexSortBackwardsCompatibility.testSortedIndexAddDocBlocks fails reproducibly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestIndexSortBackwardsCompatibility.testSortedIndexAddDocBlocks fails reproducibly [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speedup slice calculation in IndexSearcher [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup slice calculation in IndexSearcher [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup slice calculation in IndexSearcher [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi-HNSW graphs per segment? [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] New binary vector format doesn't perform well with small-dimension datasets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] New binary vector format doesn't perform well with small-dimension datasets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] New binary vector format doesn't perform well with small-dimension datasets [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] New binary vector format doesn't perform well with small-dimension datasets [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce Lucene90DocValuesProducer memory footprint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce Lucene90DocValuesProducer memory footprint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce Lucene90DocValuesProducer memory footprint [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Break the loop when segment is fully deleted by prior delTerms or delQueries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Break the loop when segment is fully deleted by prior delTerms or delQueries [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Make single value BKDReader instances lighter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make single value BKDReader instances lighter [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize slice calculation in IndexSearcher a little [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Extrace leaf-slice calculation path from IndexSearch#slices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Extract leaf-slice calculation path from IndexSearch#slices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Extract leaf-slice calculation path from IndexSearch#slices [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [WIP] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages