issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Document the Thai analysis output changes in the 10.6 migration guide [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Map vectors again for the merges #16749 missed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Map vectors again for the merges #16749 missed [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Map vectors again for every merge, keeping the caller's hints [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix the vectors merge mapping from #16749, and map again for Faiss merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix the vectors merge mapping from #16749, and map again for Faiss merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix the vectors merge mapping from #16749, and map again for Faiss merges [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Map vectors again for every merge, keeping the caller's hints [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix(util): require LiveDocs backing sets to be exactly maxDoc bits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(util): reject LiveDocs backing sets with bits beyond maxDoc [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix(util): reject LiveDocs backing sets with bits beyond maxDoc [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Could/should Lucene map the same file twice for different hints (`RANDOM`, `SEQUENTIAL`) instead of sharing one map? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Could/should Lucene map the same file twice for different hints (`RANDOM`, `SEQUENTIAL`) instead of sharing one map? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Could/should Lucene map the same file twice for different hints (`RANDOM`, `SEQUENTIAL`) instead of sharing one map? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Could/should Lucene map the same file twice for different hints (`RANDOM`, `SEQUENTIAL`) instead of sharing one map? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Revise strategy for opening an index for reading [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix outdated SegmentInfos#readCommit javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix outdated SegmentInfos#readCommit javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix outdated SegmentInfos#readCommit javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix outdated SegmentInfos#readCommit javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix outdated SegmentInfos#readCommit javadocs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix HNSW graph merge concurrency in case of intra-merge executor (#16729) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW graph merge concurrency in case of intra-merge executor (#16729) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix HNSW graph merge concurrency in case of intra-merge executor (#16729) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter to skip deleted docs when recomputing merge centroid [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up parent test class references to junit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up parent test class references to junit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up parent test class references to junit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up parent test class references to junit. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump the python group in /dev-tools with 7 updates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump the python group across 1 directory with 7 updates [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter includes deleted docs when recalculating the centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter includes deleted docs when recalculating the centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter includes deleted docs when recalculating the centroid [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsWriter includes deleted docs when recalculating the centroid [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump actionlint-py from 1.7.12.24 to 1.7.12.25 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump actionlint-py from 1.7.12.24 to 1.7.12.25 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260815 to 6.0.12.20260906 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump types-pyyaml from 6.0.12.20260815 to 6.0.12.20260906 in /dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump the actions group across 2 directories with 6 updates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump the actions group across 2 directories with 6 updates [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] HNSW graph reuse during merge is silently disabled under per-field codecs since 10.4.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up building cached bit sets in LRUQueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up building cached bit sets in LRUQueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up building cached bit sets in LRUQueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up building cached bit sets in LRUQueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up building cached bit sets in LRUQueryCache [lucene] github-actions[bot] (via GitHub) via issues
• [PR] Expose ramBytesUsed on Kuromoji and Nori UserDictionary [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose ramBytesUsed on Kuromoji and Nori UserDictionary [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expose ramBytesUsed on Kuromoji and Nori UserDictionary [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Extend migrate guide [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand migrate guide [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand migrate guide [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand migrate guide [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand migrate guide [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand migrate guide [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand migrate guide [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix incomplete double-checked locking in UkrainianMorfologikAnalyzer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incomplete double-checked locking in UkrainianMorfologikAnalyzer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix incomplete double-checked locking in UkrainianMorfologikAnalyzer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a holder class for UkrainianMorfologikAnalyzer defaults [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a holder class for UkrainianMorfologikAnalyzer defaults [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a holder class for UkrainianMorfologikAnalyzer defaults [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Significant increase in IOPS during segment merge in Lucene 10 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Dedup vector reader / writer initialization: close all files on hitting exceptions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dedup vector reader / writer initialization: close all files on hitting exceptions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Dedup vector reader / writer initialization: close all files on hitting exceptions [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize IndexedDISI by implementing binary search for sparseDocs in … [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Let a merge read the vectors through its own mapping [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove merge scorer tests that check exact byte equality [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove merge scorer tests that check exact byte equality [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove vector merge scorer tests that check exact byte equality [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestDedupHnswScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat.testRandomExceptions fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDedupHnswScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat.testRandomExceptions fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDedupHnswScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat.testRandomExceptions fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDedupHnswScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat.testRandomExceptions fails [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDedupHnswScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat.testRandomExceptions fails [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Stop reading merged float vectors back to build the HNSW merge scorer (#16696) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stop reading merged float vectors back to build the HNSW merge scorer (#16696) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Stop reading merged float vectors back to build the HNSW merge scorer (#16696) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Rank late interaction `SUM_MAX_SIM` by raw `MaxSim` [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Rank late interaction `SUM_MAX_SIM` by raw `MaxSim` [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [10.5] Ensure BitSetConjunctionDISI exhausts all sub-iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [10.5] Ensure BitSetConjunctionDISI exhausts all sub-iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [10.5] Ensure BitSetConjunctionDISI exhausts all sub-iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [10.5] Ensure BitSetConjunctionDISI exhausts all sub-iterators [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Introduce TermGroupFacetCollectorManager for concurrent grouped faceting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TermGroupFacetCollectorManager for concurrent grouped faceting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TermGroupFacetCollectorManager for concurrent grouped faceting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce TermGroupFacetCollectorManager for concurrent grouped faceting [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix CharArraySet equals/hashCode contract [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix CharArraySet equals/hashCode contract [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize cached-filter conjunction batching [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize cached-filter conjunction batching [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Expand long overlapping LZ4 matches with bulk copies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand long overlapping LZ4 matches with bulk copies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand long overlapping LZ4 matches with bulk copies [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expand long overlapping LZ4 matches with bulk copies [lucene] AndreKurait (via GitHub) via issues
  • Re: [PR] Expand long overlapping LZ4 matches with bulk copies [lucene] dweiss (via GitHub) via issues
  • Re: [PR] Expand long overlapping LZ4 matches with bulk copies [lucene] dweiss (via GitHub) via issues
• [PR] build: support java 27 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: support java 27 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: support java 27 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: support java 27 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: support java 27 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] java 27 support [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] BufferedChecksum JMH benchmark [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] NumericComparator: build DVSkipper competitive iterator immediately in case of search_after [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: build DVSkipper competitive iterator immediately in case of search_after [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Skipping scorer construction for clauses with zero cost [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Update code comment after bumping block size to 256. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Can we use DocValuesSkipper for range facets? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Clarify the status of Kuromoji dictionaries [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Disable verify-changelog-and-set-milestone workflow [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Speed up slow tests [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Speed up slow tests [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Record FST ramBytesUsed correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Record FST ramBytesUsed correctly [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Record FST ramBytesUsed correctly [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] LUCENE-15108 commit writer before opening DirectoryReader to fix test [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] GITHUB#15480 Make SortField.comparatorSource final [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add TurboQuant rotation-based vector quantization codec to sandbox [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use shallow size for all boxed primitives in RamUsageEstimator.sizeOfObject [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shallow size for all boxed primitives in RamUsageEstimator.sizeOfObject [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shallow size for all boxed primitives in RamUsageEstimator.sizeOfObject [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shallow size for all boxed primitives in RamUsageEstimator.sizeOfObject [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shallow size for all boxed primitives in RamUsageEstimator.sizeOfObject [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shallow size for all boxed primitives in RamUsageEstimator.sizeOfObject [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shallow size for all boxed primitives in RamUsageEstimator.sizeOfObject [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add delegate method copyFrom for FilterDirectory (#14985) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add delegate method copyFrom for FilterDirectory (#14985) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add ProactiveMergePolicy and merge selectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ProactiveMergePolicy and merge selectors [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add ProactiveMergePolicy and merge selectors [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Removing unused 9.x versions from backward-codecs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Removing unused 9.x versions from backward-codecs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Removing unused 9.x versions from backward-codecs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Discuss lowering min supported major version to 9 in main [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages