issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning: too many calls to IndexInput.clone during TermRangeQuery: 7 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning: too many calls to IndexInput.clone during TermRangeQuery: 7 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning: too many calls to IndexInput.clone during TermRangeQuery: 7 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning: too many calls to IndexInput.clone during TermRangeQuery: 7 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Initial upgrade to Gradle 8.14 (rc2) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial upgrade to Gradle 8.14 (rc2) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial upgrade to Gradle 8.14 (rc2) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial upgrade to Gradle 8.14 (rc2) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial upgrade to Gradle 8.14 (rc2) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial upgrade to Gradle 8.14 (rc2) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Initial upgrade to Gradle 8.14 (rc2) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps: set pip/actions to monthly, unbottleneck [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps: set pip/actions to monthly, unbottleneck [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix leadCost calculation in BooleanScorerSupplier.requiredBulkScorer [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] [Bug] Lead cost in boolean conjunction queries can be miscalculated [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [Bug] Lead cost in boolean conjunction queries can be miscalculated [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.21.0 to 3.27.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.21.0 to 3.27.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.27.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.27.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.27.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.commons:commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.27.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.5 to 0.11.6 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.11.5 to 0.11.6 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.28.5 to 1.29.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.28.5 to 1.29.0 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.70 to 0.71 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.70 to 0.71 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.70 to 0.71 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Allow Histogram Collection using PointTree when SortedNumericDocValues is absent [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow Histogram Collection using PointTree when SortedNumericDocValues is absent [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow Histogram Collection using PointTree when SortedNumericDocValues is absent [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Leverage multi range traversal Histogram Collection for PointRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Leverage multi range traversal Histogram Collection for PointRangeQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Stop duplicating per-segment work across segment partitions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Stop duplicating per-segment work across segment partitions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Improve user-facing docs for geo package [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve user-facing docs for geo package [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve user-facing docs for geo package [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make competitive iterators more robust. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning.test fails [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] speed up numDeletesToMerge of SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] speed up numDeletesToMerge of SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] speed up numDeletesToMerge of SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Advance doc instead of offset in competitive iterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Advance doc instead of offset in competitive iterator [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Impl intoBitset for IndexedDISI and Docvalues [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix broken intellij 2025.1 gradle import. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix broken intellij 2025.1 gradle import. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce NeighborArray heap memory [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce a mapping to map sparse labels to a continuous range [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Odd nightly error in buildAndPushRelease: NoSuchMethodException: no such method: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.linkToStatic [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Odd nightly error in buildAndPushRelease: NoSuchMethodException: no such method: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.linkToStatic [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update jenkins configurations after min JDK version bump [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated a monster test and force FSDirectory to prevent OOM. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated a monster test and force FSDirectory to prevent OOM. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make TestIndexWriterDelete.testDeleteAllRepeated a monster test and force FSDirectory to prevent OOM. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use Arrays#mismatch in FSTEnum#rewindPrefix. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use Arrays#mismatch in FSTEnum#rewindPrefix. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add AnytimeRankingSearcher for SLA-Aware Early Termination with Bin-Based Score Boosting [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make task executor non-final [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Speed up soft delete [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Strange stack traces for new bitset focused doc iterators [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] [Bug] Postings force merge regression between Lucene 9.12 and Lucene 10.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] intobitset term ord comp [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Shore up some intoBitSet impls and add paranoid protections [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Correct TermOrdValComparator competitive iterator intoBitSet implementation [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages