Title: Mii-tool - set the link speed and duplex setting for eth0
Hi all,
I have used mii-tool from net-tools in Redhat 8.0 to set the link speed and duplex setting for the eth0 interface card.
Used the following command :
mii-tool -F 100baseTx-FD eth0 (and verified the settings using
Hello Brett;
Thanks a lot for the help on this issue.
The cure to the problem is... Instead of hand-rolling my own
ifcfg-eth0:x files, I used the GUI. Oddly enough this works. The only
real difference I can see from A to B was that the subinterface files
had a LOT more detail to them. More
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 02:32, Chris Johnston wrote:
> Hello there;
>
> I have just upgraded to RedHat 9. I have a base interface eth0 and 5
> sub-interfaces (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc...) So laet's say it looks like
> this:
>
> eth0: 192.168.49.70
> eth0:1
Hello there;
I have just upgraded to RedHat 9. I have a base interface eth0 and 5
sub-interfaces (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc...) So laet's say it looks like
this:
eth0: 192.168.49.70
eth0:1 192.168.49.71
eth0:2 192.168.49.72
eth0:3 192.168.49.73
eth0:4 192.168.49.74
et
Hello there;
I have just upgraded to RedHat 9. I have a base interface eth0 and 4
sub-interfaces (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc...)
So laet's say it looks like this:
eth0: 192.168.49.70
eth0:1 192.168.49.71
eth0:2 192.168.49.72
eth0:3 192.168.49.73
eth0:4 192.168.49.74
I can i
log files are kept in /var/log/ directory.
but actual filename depends on configuration of /etc/syslog.conf
the easiest way to record err message is to use error redirection.
eg.
root#ifconfig eth0 up 2>error
then all errors will be kept in the file name in error.
At 04:39 AM 7/19/03 -0
In an xterm at the command prompt use the command dmesg to see the
latest kernel messages.
Steve
Farschad Torabi wrote:
Edward,
i tried "ifup eth0" and the message is something like this:
"Determining IP information for eth09... failed; no link present.
Check cable??
what&#
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 12:39, Farschad Torabi wrote:
> Edward,
> i tried "ifup eth0" and the message is something like this:
> "Determining IP information for eth09... failed; no link present. Check
> cable??
The card is not detecting a heartbeat on the network
/var/log/messages
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Farschad Torabi
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 6:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Activating ETH0
Edward,
i tried "ifup eth0" and the message is something like this:
"
There are a number of reasons:
1. DHCP not running/enabled.
2. Is the machine physicall connected at both ends (plugged in securely to
eth0 and into hub/switch?)
3. Did you set up or migrate networking during the update from RH8 to RH9?
4. Run ifconfig to see if you get any output for eth0.
5. if
Edward,
i tried "ifup eth0" and the message is something like this:
"Determining IP information for eth09... failed; no link present. Check
cable??
what's up?? i am not too familiar with UNIX environment :^P
and where is the log file??
this message appears on the screen!
Farschad Torabi wrote:
Hi,
I have a PiV pc with a 3COM LAN card. the model of the card is
3c905c-tx-m and it worked
properly with RH8.0 as well as RH9.0 longs ago. but now, i reinstalled
the RH9 but it messaged
me that "unable to activate ETH0, check cable?"
what's wrong?? w
model of the card is
3c905c-tx-m and it worked
| properly with RH8.0 as well as RH9.0 longs ago. but now, i reinstalled
the RH9 but it messaged
| me that "unable to activate ETH0, check cable?"
|
| what's wrong?? what should i do??
| i don't know if i return to RH8.0 whether this p
Hi,
I have a PiV pc with a 3COM LAN card. the model of the card is 3c905c-tx-m
and it worked
properly with RH8.0 as well as RH9.0 longs ago. but now, i reinstalled the
RH9 but it messaged
me that "unable to activate ETH0, check cable?"
what's wrong?? what should i do??
i don
-0400
Subject: System freeze while bringing up eth0 interface
> Second Post.
>
> I have RH7.3 installed from downloaded ISO images.
> The system is basically web server with PHP and MySQL.
> After the installation the system works fine for several days or even
> weeks.
>
> Unfor
eth0 interface.
I can get into Linux using the interactive mode and skipping all deamons,
but I can
not start the network.( Starting network either manually or during
interactive mode
hangs on bringing up loopback interface instead of eth0).
I did some research on the web but can not find anything
I have RH7.3 installed from downloaded ISO images.
The system is basically web server with PHP and MySQL.
Right after the installation the system works fine.
After several days of usage after reboot the system hangs during bringing up
eth0 interface.
I can get in using the interactive mode and
change the cable and check or check if there is a problem in the switch
or hub.
- Original Message -
From: "ajay raghuraj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:40 PM
Subject: Eth0 issue
> I have a redhat 7.1 box with a na
I have a redhat 7.1 box with a natsemi etho driver. When i ping from the box to a
machine in the network, it gives a warning message
"Warning: time of day goes back, taking countermeasures." It laso shows pscket losses.
what do i do now?
Regards,
Ajay
--
___
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Mikevl wrote:
> Hi Werner
>
> Yes this sound like what I wanted. Can I achieve the same thing by using
> "ifdown" and then run rmmod alias eth1 3c59x.
Yes, as long as the 3c59x module is not used by another network adapter.
Otherwise rmmod for 3c59x won't work.
>
> Will r
Werner Puschitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: Reset Interface statistics eth0
>
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Mikevl wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > As part of my tracking of the monthly DSL traffic I would like
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Mikevl wrote:
> Hi
>
> As part of my tracking of the monthly DSL traffic I would like to be able to reset
> the interface statistics as shown in if config or /proc/net/dev. I have tried
> "ifdown, ifup" although this stops the interface it does not reset the statistics
> f
is lying about usage.
Many thanks
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan M. Slivko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: Reset Interface statistics eth0
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash
05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Reset Interface statistics eth0
Hi
As part of my tracking of the monthly DSL traffic I would like to be
able to reset the interface statistics as shown in if config or
/proc/net/dev. I have tried "ifdown, ifup" although this stops the
interface it does no
Hi
As part of my tracking of the monthly DSL traffic I
would like to be able to reset the interface statistics as shown in if config or
/proc/net/dev. I have tried "ifdown, ifup" although this stops the interface it
does not reset the statistics for the interface. Obviously I could reset th
Hello Gordon,
Thanks for the prompt responce.
dmesg would be cleared as soon as I rebooted right?
I'll check the logs though.
The nic is a RTL8139.
In fairness, these boxen run for months without a reboot.
I just wanted to take a proactive action with this.
Thanks again,
j
Gordon Messmer said:
>
Jesse Jacobs wrote:
My question, What should I have done to correct this?
Check the output of "dmesg" for indications that the kernel module had
trouble, or that the card was disabled. Then check the "messages" log
for errors from the dhcp client.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
Timeout.
I instructed the gentle user to bring up a xterm & /sbin/ifconfig.
Only lo was listed. So it was time to actually go there.
Yes only loopback was working.
So I /sbin/service network restart.
Now eth0 was revealed and picked up a ip from dhcp. /etc/resolv.conf
contained the correct DN
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Haisam K. Ido wrote:
> There is no entry for it in modules.conf, but claims to be eth0 when the PDA is
> turned on
>
> How do I block CDCEther from ever being used?
add the line
CDCEther
to /etc/hotplug/blacklist.
rday
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubs
There is no entry for it in modules.conf, but claims to be eth0 when the PDA is
turned on
How do I block CDCEther from ever being used?
Dylan Baxter wrote:
Make the change in /etc/modules.conf
- Original Message -
From: "Haisam K. Ido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMA
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Haisam K. Ido wrote:
> Thanks. The system chose CDCEther. How do I prevent it from doing that
> or how do I change eth0 from CDCEther to lets say eth2. I'll checkout
> usbdnet.
for what it's worth, i have an ongoing documentation project
discussing run
Make the change in /etc/modules.conf
- Original Message -
From: "Haisam K. Ido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:30 PM
Subject: eth0 and Zaurus SL 5500
> My Zaurus SL 5500 PDA is given eth0 if it is on and hence
Thanks. The system chose CDCEther. How do I prevent it from doing that or how do I
change eth0 from CDCEther to lets say eth2. I'll checkout usbdnet.
nate wrote:
Haisam K. Ido said:
My Zaurus SL 5500 PDA is given eth0 if it is on and hence blocks my eth0
(nic) from acquiring dhcp ip.
Haisam K. Ido said:
> My Zaurus SL 5500 PDA is given eth0 if it is on and hence blocks my eth0
> (nic) from acquiring dhcp ip. Under mandrake the PDA was given usb0 as
> the alias. How does one change eth0 for the PDA to usb0 under RH 8.0.94
your using the wrong module, you need th
My Zaurus SL 5500 PDA is given eth0 if it is on and hence blocks my eth0 (nic) from
acquiring dhcp ip. Under mandrake the PDA was given usb0 as the alias. How does
one change eth0 for the PDA to usb0 under RH 8.0.94
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
Use Iface
192.168.x.x * 255.255.255.0 U
0 0 0 eth0
192.168.23.0* 255.255.255.0 U
0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U
0 00 lo
default 192.168.x.x 0.0.0.0 UG0
On 27 Feb 2003 at 8:31, nate wrote:
> Stefan Neufeind said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running a separate bind-daemon as secondary-dns on some server
> > of a friend. He assigned me an IP (eth0:0) which I can use to bind
> > my own DNS-instance to. But when it com
Stefan,
His server is probably sending to you via the default route which is his primary IP.
A netstat -nr output would be nice...
See man page for route command for options to add a route using a specific interface.
I think it would be:
route add -host -gw eth0:0
or some variation of this
Stefan Neufeind said:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a separate bind-daemon as secondary-dns on some server of a
> friend. He assigned me an IP (eth0:0) which I can use to bind my own
> DNS-instance to. But when it comes to zone-transfers the
> secondary-DNS still connects to m
Hi,
I'm running a separate bind-daemon as secondary-dns on some server of
a friend. He assigned me an IP (eth0:0) which I can use to bind my
own DNS-instance to. But when it comes to zone-transfers the
secondary-DNS still connects to my primary-DNS using the "official"
eth0 ..
100.o)
driver.
At boot the ethernet initialisation is delayed and ifconfig shows that eth0
does not exist. I tried to modprobe the eepro100.o driver but get a message
something like "module init is busy". Since lsmod shows no eepr100 I figured
this was due to an IRQ or ioport conflict
ing, and what is confusing me, is that, checking the etc/modules.conf, the card is aliased properly..
checking the .etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file, the file is configured for dhcp,...
and doing an ifup and ifdown gives me the same error,..
doing an lsmod command, I do not see the module loa
Hi
Bapi
I am
sorry..I dont mean to frustrate you...I am just a newbie at this aspect of
RH...
the
issues that I am seeing, and what is confusing me, is that, checking the
etc/modules.conf, the card is aliased properly..
checking the .etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file, the
An addendum:
You can edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file, if you need to and then do ifdown ifcfg-eth0 and ifup ifcfg-eth0. Then start network service.
Jaideep
Bapi Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't understand why you cannot compile. If you had the kernel
it's in resident kernel memory and it's already loaded. If you alias the device in modules.conf, and that module is loaded at boot time, your card should work, provided, of course, your module is not messed up in any way.
Please do ifconfig eth0 [ipaddr] and then do ifconfig -a to see
devices eth0 and
eth1 in the gateway, whereas I am getting connected with the gateway from other
clients.
What will be the problem ?
9. Re: Reg. eth0 and eth1 (Edward Dekkers)
Message: 9
From: "Edward Dekkers"
To:
Subject: Re: Reg. eth0 and eth1
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:39:11 +080
devices eth0 and
eth1 in the gateway, whereas I am getting connected with the gateway from other
clients.
What will be the problem ?
9. Re: Reg. eth0 and eth1 (Edward Dekkers)
Message: 9
From: "Edward Dekkers"
To:
Subject: Re: Reg. eth0 and eth1
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:39:11 +080
> The system having two ethernet (178.1.222.11 & 178.1.221.1) hostname is
np. I can reach np from clients. But I am unable to ping the two IPs from
np. I am trying to configure np as a proxy & firewall server. This my first
trial. So if I asked silly questions please dont mind.
OK, so you're sayin
-Original Message-From: Bapi Ghosh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:49
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: delaying eth0
initialization
You just need to have the kernel headers installed, and if you got the
kernel source, good enough. Try the following
: delaying eth0
initialization
You just need to have the kernel headers installed, and if you got the
kernel source, good enough. Try the following:
-D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -O -Wall -I/usr/include/ -D__KERNEL__
-DMODULE -DLINUX -O -Wall -I/usr/include/linux/modversions.h
If it
You just need to have the kernel headers installed, and if you got the kernel source, good enough. Try the following:
-D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -O -Wall -I/usr/include/ -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -O -Wall -I/usr/include/linux/modversions.h
If it still complains, get rid of the modversions.h.
to no avail
thanks
-Original
Message-From: Bapi Ghosh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:38
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: delaying eth0
initialization
Anonmous ftp is always better. Get the right driver for your type of card
and compile it
Anonmous ftp is always better. Get the right driver for your type of card and compile it. You can install the kernel-headers and kernel-source rpms for your kernel type, if you don't have them already. Please compile using gcc with the correct optimization and the includes. That's exactly the way I
:56
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: delaying eth0
initialization
Do an ifconfig -a to see what is there. Run netconfig to ensure you
haven't set any arbitrary IRQ or MEM. Perhaps your driver is just messed
up. In that case, simply get the source code for the driver of your
Do an ifconfig -a to see what is there. Run netconfig to ensure you haven't set any arbitrary IRQ or MEM. Perhaps your driver is just messed up. In that case, simply get the source code for the driver of your card from the manufacturer's website and compile it directly in your kernel (I guess you h
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:08
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: delaying eth0
initialization
Several things you need to check:
1. Do not set IRQ or MEM in netconfig.
2. If you wish, set IRQ to AUTO in BIOS. Let the system pick it up.
3. Check the dri
edium of Switch, be sure that you use cross cables and
not same cables.
Amzy
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: "Edward Dekkers"
To:
Subject: Re: Reg. eth0 & eth1
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:26:09 +0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I have to do further ?
Stop posting in HTML for starters,
> What I have to do further ?
Stop posting in HTML for starters, then let us know what you mean that you
can't ping the NICs.
You're trying to ping from another machine on the network and they are on
the same subnet?
Have you disabled your firewall?
---
Edward Dekkers (Director)
Triple D Comput
Ensure that u have connected the wires properly, if u have connected 2 machines via the medium of Switch, be sure that you use cross cables and not same cables.Amzy
___Get the FREE email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2worl
Message: 1From: "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: Re: Reg. eth0 & eth1Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:04:26 +0800Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> I have a machine with RH7.2 with two NICs. I configured using networkconfiguration in GNOME sys
> I have a machine with RH7.2 with two NICs. I configured using network
configuration in GNOME system menu. ifconfig shows both the devices are up
after restarting /etc/init.d/network restart without any problem. But I am
unable to ping both the IPs of the NICs. The entry for
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_
the module is already loaded. If it is, do rmmod first and reload using the above commands.
5. Check the ifcfg-eth0 file.
If it works, you still need to do ifconfig and then modify the kernel routing table (for routing things of course).
Hope this helps.
Jaideep
"Go, Jeffrey" <[EM
hello list
having issues with my eth0 config.
Running RH 7.2..
in modules.conf, the alias for eth0 is 3c59x..
i do an insmod and I get an error...saying no such device..its also saying that such
errors can be caused by invalid IO or IRQ params
any thoughts?
thanks
--
redhat-list mailing
Hi,
Thanks for your information.
I'll try this mii-tool.
Thanks!
Shi-Ping
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Beast wrote:
> At 12:06 AM 1/17/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I have Server1 which runs RH6.0 with 10baseT eth0 card, and Server2 which
> >runs RH7.
Dear Friends,
I have a machine with RH7.2 with two NICs. I configured using network configuration in GNOME system menu. ifconfig shows both the devices are up after restarting /etc/init.d/network restart without any problem. But I am unable to ping both the IPs of the NICs. The entry for /proc/sys/
At 12:06 AM 1/17/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I have Server1 which runs RH6.0 with 10baseT eth0 card, and Server2 which
>runs RH7.1 with 10/100 eth0.
>
>I found out that some client computers cannot see/ping Server2. But they
>can see/ping Server1.
>
>Is this
Hi,
I have Server1 which runs RH6.0 with 10baseT eth0 card, and Server2 which
runs RH7.1 with 10/100 eth0.
I found out that some client computers cannot see/ping Server2. But they
can see/ping Server1.
Is this because the eth0 speed problem? Can some one tell me how to set
10Mbs vs. 100Mbs
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 01:39, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Could someone please provide me with the two commands I'd need to run
> (presumably the second would look something like:
>
> iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -d 10.1.0.34:80 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.2
On Linux 2.4, you'd do this:
LOCAL_IP=10.1.0.3
t do iptables.
>
> That doesn't matter to me, I'll just install RH7.3. My problem is that when I
> started looking at IPTables (and IPChains for that matter) my brain hurt.
>
> Put simply, I don't want to allow any forwarding except port 80.
>
> Asuming my firew
in hurt.
Put simply, I don't want to allow any forwarding except port 80.
Asuming my firewall has eth0 on 10.1.1.20 and eth1 on 192.168.1.1 and I want
to forward traffic for 10.1.0.34 through 192.168.1.2 which will be a Cisco
router, I guess I'll have to
Set the default to not forwardin
We're still stuck with the point that kernel 2.2.x doesn't do iptables.
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, David Busby wrote:
> For this you can tell iptables (get latest kernel) to port forward from a
> specifc inbound IP address.
> This avoids using eth0:1, you say (but I forget how)
For this you can tell iptables (get latest kernel) to port forward from a
specifc inbound IP address.
This avoids using eth0:1, you say (but I forget how) to take all inbound
packets for PUBLICIP:PORT and forward to PRIVATEIP:PORT. Look at the -m
and -p switches for iptables
/B
- Original
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nick Lindsell wrote:
> At 14:16 15/01/2003 +, you wrote:
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >I have a Watchguard firebox II which is based on a 2.2 kernel. With this
> >box,
> >I can define IP addresses within the subnet of the public I/F and have that
> >traffic forwarded to a host wit
At 14:16 15/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a Watchguard firebox II which is based on a 2.2 kernel. With this
box,
I can define IP addresses within the subnet of the public I/F and have that
traffic forwarded to a host within my DMZ.
For example the public I/F of the firewall is 213
Hi Folks,
I have a Watchguard firebox II which is based on a 2.2 kernel. With this box,
I can define IP addresses within the subnet of the public I/F and have that
traffic forwarded to a host within my DMZ.
For example the public I/F of the firewall is 213.38.87.130, but I have
configured the
Tan, Julien wrote:
hi Ben,
so what should i do now ..please advise. All the cards comes default
with the machines.
The tg3 driver module is an open source driver for the Broadcom Gig
NIC's and some 3com Nics as well.
The bcm5700 is a binary driver that broadcom provides.
I think that by def
://unix.pg.patch.intel.com/index.asp
*Any doubt please call.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Russo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eth0 is not bringing up
Tan, Julien wrote:
> Hi anthony,
> mee too hainving th
Tan, Julien wrote:
Hi anthony,
mee too hainving the same problem with the same version installed on
Compaq DL360. Well here is that is says in the modules.conf
alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
alias eth0 eepro100
alias eth1 eepro100
alias scsi_hostadapter cciss
alias eth2 t3g
alias eth3 t3g
Tan, Julien wrote:
alias eth2 t3g
alias eth3 t3g
Shouldn't that be tg3? Not t3g?
-Ben.
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Hi anthony,
mee too hainving the same problem with the same version installed on
Compaq DL360. Well here is that is says in the modules.conf
alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
alias eth0 eepro100
alias eth1 eepro100
alias scsi_hostadapter cciss
alias eth2 t3g
alias eth3 t3g
alias
On 06-Jan-2003/18:07 +0530, gihas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I installed linux 7.2 and while installing time it is asking IP address and I
>configured properlly.But while system booting time it is showing
>eth0 is failed.Because of that I am not able to connect to internet.
>
Gihas:
My name is Tony Caskey. I am rather new to Linux, but if your ethernet card
is attached to an ADSL modem, perhaps I can help you. With the help of a
Mr. Neil Ablong of the Philipines, I figured out how to get eth0 and pppOe
going not long ago.
For the ethernet device, I set it up to
Hai,
I installed linux 7.2 and while installing time it is asking IP address and
I
configured properlly.But while system booting time it is showing
eth0 is failed.Because of that I am not able to connect to internet.
Can u suggest some solution for that.
Regards
gihas.
---
What values did
Hai,
I installed linux 7.2 and while installing time it
is asking IP address and I
configured properlly.But while system booting time
it is showing
eth0 is failed.Because of that I am not able
to connect to internet.
Can u suggest some solution for that.
Regards
gihas.
thanks for trying
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, 07 November 2002 03:54:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can't activte eth0 in red hat 8
That is entirely possible. I'm sorry I couldn't have been more help.
On Thu, 7 Nov 20
e
> module in 8 as 7.3 works.
>
> ---Original Message---
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thursday, 07 November 2002 03:30:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: can't activte eth0 in red hat 8
>
> My bad...it should have been "insmod 81
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can't activte eth0 in red hat 8
My bad...it should have been "insmod 8139too" or, even better, "modprobe
8139too"
That's the command to actually load the module into the running kernel.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Nifty Fredo wrote:
smod
> 8139too.o
>
> like i said i am new to linux.
>
> ---Original Message---
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thursday, 07 November 2002 03:00:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: can't activte eth0 in red hat 8
>
> Did you try:
>
the alias line is already in modules.conf but what do u do with insmod 8139too.o
like i said i am new to linux.
---Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, 07 November 2002 03:00:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can't activte eth0 in red hat 8
Did you try:
insmod 8139too.o
and then add:
alias eth0 8139too
in your /etc/modules.conf?
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Nifty Fredo wrote:
>
> Has anyone had a problem with activating eth0 in version 8. I have an Aopen
> ethernet card with the Realtek RTL8139 chipset which works ok in
Has anyone had a problem with activating eth0 in version 8. I have an Aopen ethernet card with the Realtek RTL8139 chipset which works ok in 7.3. I am using a broadband router which assigns ip addresses and this works fine with 7.3 as i just install the OS and i am on the net. with 8.0 it
Thanks
It worked. Now my boot is clean
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: The boot process can't activate interfaz eth0
> And the command for "s
OK Mike
>
> I can edit the ifcfg-eth0 file.
> But Could you tell me where are the IPADDR and NETMASK field please?
> And what is the command for "service network restart".
>
> I am new in Linux
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Burger&quo
That's right...if it was set for DHCP, you wouldn't have those fields.
You'll have to add them.
IPADDR=your.ip.address.here
NETMASK=your.net.mask.here
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Manuel Tejada wrote:
> OK Mike
>
> I can edit the ifcfg-eth0 file.
> But Could you tell
OK Mike
I can edit the ifcfg-eth0 file.
But Could you tell me where are the IPADDR and NETMASK field please?
And what is the command for "service network restart".
I am new in Linux
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[E
Your system is set to get the IP via DHCP. The system can't find a DHCP
server.
You'll want to edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, and chagne
"BOOTPROTO=" from dhcp to none.
Then, you're going to want to set the IPADDR, and NETMASK fields to the
c
7.2 is working "fine" but during the boot time it fail
to activate the interface eth0. I see this message:
"Activating interfaz eth0..(it looks for something during almost 1
minute)Determining the information IP for eth0 FAILED". Then the
booting process goes well.
U
TECTED]]On Behalf Of Adrian
GillittSent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:07 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Eth0 not
loading
Have just installed red hat 7.3 on
a 200MMX and I have a D-link 538 NIC, how do you get it to initialise at start
up, do you have to create an alias to the module
Have just installed red hat 7.3 on a 200MMX and I have a
D-link 538 NIC, how do you get it to initialise at start up, do you have to
create an alias to the module and if so how? Another problem, when I load kde,
and try and access the shell it crashes, what could this be (application crash
h no issues.
Here are the specifics on the nic driver. Info is extracted from dmesg
from a 7.2 & 7.3 machine.
Requires a ThunderLAN driver v1.14a
TLAN: eth0, irq=5, io=6000, Compaq Intergrated NETFLEX-3/P, Rev. 16
TLAN: 1 device installed, PCI:1 EISA:0
How does one start this eth0 at boot time?
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
