Package: winetricks
Version: 0.0+20141009+svn1208-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I tried to install adobeair with winetricks but it failed because
either 4.0 sits at a different place now, or a newer version has to be
used. This is what how I patched the script:
#v+
-w_download
http://ai
Package: winetricks
Version: 0.0+20141009+svn1208-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
the winetricks script has insecure handling of /tmp filenames in a lot
of places. It doesn't create the files in a save way. Please consider
using mktemp from the coreutils package to create those files in
* intrigeri [2014-11-04 20:14:24 CET]:
> David Kalnischkies wrote (28 Oct 2014 14:00:40 GMT) :
> > Upgrading irssi from 0.8.16-1+b1 to 0.8.17-1 seems to break the OTR
> > plugin for me.
>
> I'm wondering if this could be a side-effect of #767230.
> Can you reproduce this after upgrading libotr5 t
Hi!
* Christoph Anton Mitterer [2014-10-16 20:47:00 CEST]:
> Apparently Debian deviates in a few of OpenSSH's hardcoded default
> settings, namely:
> - ForwardX11Trusted having set to yes
> - ServerAliveInterval being set to 300, when BatchMode is set to yes.
>
> Even though I've read that
Package: console-tools
Version: 1:0.2.3dbs-70
Severity: minor
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
from lib/misc-console-utils.c:
22 static int open_a_console(char *fnam)·
23 {
24 int fd;
25 ··
26 /* try read-only */
27 fd = open(fnam, O_RDWR);
28 ··
29 /* if failed, try read-only */
* Ian Zimmerman [2014-07-08 20:07:18 CEST]:
> Ian> socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 4
> Ian> fcntl(4, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
> Ian> setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> Ian> setsockopt(4, SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, [1], 4) = 0
> Ian> bind(4, {sa_family=AF_INET
* Thijs Kinkhorst [2014-06-12 13:31:13 CEST]:
> When using irssiproxy with kernel setting bindv6only = 1 (which is the
> default in Debain), irssi only binds to IPv6 and no longer accepts
> IPv4 connections to the proxy. The only reason I found to fix this
> is to disable bindv6only system-wide wh
severity 753913 normal
tag 753913 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
* Ian Zimmerman [2014-07-06 08:34:36 CEST]:
> Trying to connect to any server whatsoever, I get this:
>
> 23:30 -!- Irssi: Looking up chat.freenode.net
> 23:30 -!- Irssi: Connecting to chat.freenode.net [195.148.124.79] port 6667
Source: php5
Version: 5.6.0~beta3+dfsg-25.6.0~beta3+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Hi!
I can understand why the message about the development preview is in
there, and it's a good idea in general. But please get rid of it for
uploads to unstable. Users of stable/testing will see the message
* Andres Salomon [2014-05-12 17:28:41 CEST]:
> FYI, this is to deal with https://bugs.debian.org/747842, in case anyone
> else is having the same problem.
Erm, are you sort of abusing backports for getting bugfixes into
stable? I hope I misunderstand your intentions, but please don't use
backpo
* Guillem Jover [2012-06-17 19:46:50 CEST]:
> On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:02:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.16.4.2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > dpkg-gencontrol makes annoying noise like this:
> > dpkg-gencontrol: warning: File::FcntlLock not available; using flo
(closes: #743925)
+
+ -- Gerfried Fuchs Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:47:00 +0200
+
libopenobex (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix Docbook-XML build dependencies to build the application manual pages
diff -u libopenobex-1.5/debian/patches/series
libopenobex-1.5/debian/patches/series
--- libopenobex-
Package: gdm3
Version: 3.8.4-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
Since the upgrade last weekend I am unable to get any login possibility
to my X anymore with gdm3. The screen only keeps black. I can
ctrl-alt-f1 to the text console, so it doesn't freeze up comple
* althaser [2014-03-17 13:01:49 CET]:
> Could you please still reproduce this issue with newer gnome-shell version
> like 3.4.2-7+deb7u1 or 3.8.4-5+b1 ?
>
> I can't reproduce it here with 3.8.4-5+b1.
It still happens for me in current jessie, so yes, this is still an
issue. The user menu right
* Gerfried Fuchs [2014-02-14 08:08:14 CET]:
> Please find attach a proposed patch for the issue. I hope we can get
> around at work to test it properly within the next few days, but from
> what I can tell this should be a good approach.
And a patch on top of that. I had the false i
|
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los| Wir sind Helden
Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang
Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los|
>From e211b7ba4fdce03d66b9edc097349c4d17d94063 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerfried Fuchs
D
Package: mediathekview
Version: 4-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Hi,
when I store an abonnement, I can set a target path. If I choose to
select an absolute path (which works for downloading a single file) it
works. But stored in an abonnement it gets every / replaced by an - if
you
tags 735048 - moreinfo
severity 735048 normal
thanks
Dear Markus!
* Markus Koschany [2014-01-12 12:10:41 CET]:
> On 12.01.2014 11:20, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > I didn't want to wait the few days for the testing transition, so I
> > installed mediathekview from unst
Package: mediathekview
Version: 4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi!
I didn't want to wait the few days for the testing transition, so I
installed mediathekview from unstable into my testing system. But it
doesn't start at all, this is the output I receive:
Exc
severity 727122 normal
tags 727122 - security
thanks
Hi!
* Bastien ROUCARIÈS [2013-10-22 15:01:59 CEST]:
> By default gitolite3 install create a test repo (see gitolite.conf)
> repo testing:
> RW+ = @all
That's right.
> This repositionnery is writtable by every one and could lead to
* Nicolas Dandrimont [2013-10-25 12:30:46 CEST]:
> [Trimming down the Cc: list a bit]
> * Mike Gabriel [2013-10-25 09:39:41 +]:
>
> > I really wished someone with sufficient privileges could look at
> > this rather sooner than later. I start loosing track of my uploads
> > to wheezy-bpo (the
* Mike Gabriel [2013-10-21 22:11:22 CEST]:
> On Mo 21 Okt 2013 14:57:09 CEST, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Packages only appear on your DDPO page if you are either in the
> >Maintainer or the Uploaders control field in debian/control. This is
> >also true for uploads to backp
* milan.kral [2013-10-01 13:34:05 CEST]:
> www.debian.org is important main Debian web page, but it doesn't
> support https. Could it be possible to enable HTTPS? For example
> lists.debian.org, wiki.debian.org support HTTPS.
Because on lists.debian.org you have subscribe information, handing
ov
og
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+dnsval (2.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU to fix release critical FTBFS bugs.
+ * Add libssl-dev to Build-Depends to fix FTBFS (closes: #720728, #720817)
+ * override_dh_auto_test to be a NOP to avoid the lengthy network-requiring
+selftest suite to be run.
+
+ -- Gerf
* Gerfried Fuchs [2013-09-19 12:27:14 CEST]:
> P.S.: Would be nice if you could fix this in the near future, I'd like
>to upload a new irssi package with DANE support and it is waiting on
>libval-dev being available. Otherwise I'll have to consider doing an
>
p 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerfried Fuchs
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:18:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add libssl-dev to Build-Depends to fix FTBFS (closes:
#720728, #720817)
---
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |3 ++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/de
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.3-3.2+squeeze1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
Given that backports is now in the main pool and that the changelogs of
packages are available at the usual place, aptitude changelog should
show those changelogs, too.
I did a quick testbuild for myself, an
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
On http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ there is claimed that there is a
size check (for at least i386) to produce netinst images smaller than
180 MB in size - which isn't true anymore, the 7.0.0 image is 277 MB in
size.
I guess the part about
* Holger Levsen [2013-03-31 12:04:42 CEST]:
> On Sonntag, 31. März 2013, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > OTOH I am pretty sure that the majority of people using wheezy's "dch
> > --bpo" functionality will be generating backports for wheezy itself
> > and not for oldstable.
>
> to me thats what I'd cal
Package: dput
Version: 0.9.6.3+nmu1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
Today I got notified by a backports contributer that he wasn't able to
upload to backports anymore. While analying the issue I found out that
the following line in /etc/dput.cf is the cause, which was introduced
for fi
* Wouter Verhelst [2013-03-26 08:37:05 CET]:
> Apparently I accidentally sent this off-list first... oops :-)
>
> - Forwarded message from Wouter Verhelst -
>
> On 21-03-13 17:43, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Also, I'm not 100% convinced that wheezy
* Thomas Goirand [2013-03-26 07:54:24 CET]:
> On 03/22/2013 12:43 AM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > I rather expect developers to
> > use either testing or unstable for their developing environment
>
> For doing some backports??? This doesn't make sense. Of course, you
>
* David Prévot [2013-03-21 17:14:52 CET]:
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/03/2013 11:57, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
>
> > Invoking dch --bpo in Debian Wheezy produces:
> > devscripts (2.12.6~bpo60+1) squeeze-backports; urgency=low
> >
> > instead of writing:
> > devscripts (2.12.6~bpo70+1) wheezy-backports; urge
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 09:59:18AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I'm seeing the probably same issue on my laptop with an ATI graphic's
> card, so I don't think it's graphic driver related, given that people
> have reported the issue with different drivers.
I notic
* Michael Gilbert [2013-02-16 20:28:08 CET]:
> > Since the Steam for Linux is now available [1], this RFP is not useful
> > anymore.
>
> Why not?
Because your ITP/RFP was about running it through wine.
That aside, it makes a lot of sense to close this bugreport through the
upload of the nati
-1,3 +1,10 @@
+ldapvi (1.7-9) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Use fileencoding instead of encoding in vim modeline which makes recent
+versions of vim give an error (closes: #688129, #663121)
+
+ -- Gerfried Fuchs Mon, 21 Jan 2013 16:28:10 +0100
+
ldapvi (1.7-8) unstable; urgency=low
* R
Hi!
I stumbled upon this in Debian where the patch was carried in 2.13
already but got later submitted upstream. The patch to change the
translation for the month name of February from "Feber" (which is highly
underused only by small parts of the country) to "Februar" had
unfortunately
reopen 661760
thanks
Hi!
* Erwin Brandstetter [2012-03-01 04:38:53 CET]:
> While the exotic form "Feber" does exist in parts of Austria and
> southern Germany, it is by no means the standard. Some old folks still
> know it exists, hardly anybody in Austria actually uses it. It must be
> "Fe
Dear Zack,
* Zack [2012-12-26 13:48:05 CET]:
> When I have selected a file or folder, and I press the delete button, it would
> be most intuitive if the file was then moved to the wastbasket. This would
> allow faster use of nautilus, as it is much faster than using a menu, or even
> ctrl-de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gerfried Fuchs
* Package name: nafe
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : Eric Price
* URL : http://nafe.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : toolset for editing psf format
Version: 3.4.2-3
Hi!
* Евгений 'Rush' Непомнящий [2012-09-11 09:57:21 CEST]:
> 1. This bug happened when gnome -> network settings -> proxy set to
> "manual", so if you set it to "none", all things will work as you
> expect.
I can confirm that turning off the proxy setting *does* make the
Hi!
As this bugreport is explicitly about squeeze and squeeze-updates I
would assume it should get fixed in squeeze itself. Can you please run
this through a stable update?
Thanks in advance!
Rhonda
--
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus
* Adam D. Barratt [2012-09-02 15:32:04 CEST]:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 13:11 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Please give your ACK for an upload that will cover only this change
> > (besides the changelog entry, obviously):
> >
&g
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wesnoth-1.10
Please give your ACK for an upload that will cover only this change
(besides the changelog entry, obviously):
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-g
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
* Peter F. [2012-08-07 03:34:48 CEST]:
> On this page:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/libgruel0
>
> These links are broken:
> [gnuradio_3.6.1-1.dsc]
> [gnuradio_3.6.1.orig.tar.gz]
> [gnuradio_3.6.1-1.debian.tar.gz]
You are right. Reason bein
* Thomas Preud'homme [2012-07-12 17:59:19 CEST]:
> Le jeudi 12 juillet 2012 17:09:46, Gerfried Fuchs a écrit :
> > Did I miss a thread on debian-devel about this?
>
> There was a thread indeed. See this one:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/06/msg00232.htm
Hi,
* Raphaël Hertzog [2012-07-12 08:46:03 CEST]:
> Both the changelog and the copyright files are stored with a package's
> normal data (within data.tar in the .deb) but they are really package
> metadata (that should be part of control.tar in the .deb).
Are they? I consider them documenta
reopen 668037
fixed 668037 4.0-2
thanks
* Matej Vela [2012-05-18 14:34:54 CEST]:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 01:57:28PM +0200, Matthias Guentert wrote:
> > That still doesn't work on my side.
> >
> > $ jwhois -v 173.194.70.94
> > [Querying whois.arin.net]
> > [Unable to connect to remote host]
>
>
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [2012-06-04 21:30:28 CEST]:
> Hi!
>
> On 04.06.2012 19:56, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> >>> There seems to be just about 0 creative content in that file. What
> >>> exactly is the problem with it?
> >> Figlet 2.2.5 has just been released with the following changelog [1]
* George Danchev [2012-06-11 12:37:59 CEST]:
> On Monday 11 June 2012 10:51:34 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * George Danchev [2012-06-09 12:31:08 CEST]:
> > > dropping libwxgtk2.8-dbg from build-depends and also dropping the
> > > configure option --enable-debug is enou
tags 676538 - patch
thanks
* George Danchev [2012-06-09 12:31:08 CEST]:
> dropping libwxgtk2.8-dbg from build-depends and also dropping the
> configure option --enable-debug is enough to get pgadmin3 stripped and
> not depending on any *dbg packages, as well as providing detached
> debugging symb
Dear Erik!
* Erik Esterer [2012-05-30 12:59:11 CEST]:
> while translating campaign packages for wesnoth via the web
> interface DDTSS I discovered that the scenario numbers, the
> difficulty and even some descriptions of campaigns changed.
> But the changes were not made in the description of
Hi, Vincent!
* Vincent Cheng [2012-06-07 07:52:23 CEST]:
> Package: wesnoth-1.10
> Version: 1:1.10.2-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There's still time for wesnoth to be updated before the freeze hits.
> Nothing needs to be changed inside the source package aside from
> bumping debian/changelog (#
Hi there!
* Thomas Breitner [2011-11-06 20:55:28 CET]:
> upstream has version 2.6.0, please consider updating the package.
Ping? In the meantime there is version 3.0.0 available, it would be
really nice to get this upgraded. In case you need a sponsor, feel free
to ping me, but please at l
Dear Gürkan and Jeremy,
I once again looked for whether the ubuntu font is already in Debian,
and stumbled upon thiss bugreport to find that it still hasn't been
done ...
* Gürkan Sengün [2012-04-20 12:41:04 CEST]:
> If you find a sponsor, I will do the updates to the package and provide a
Package: debian-cd
Version: wheezy-DI-a1 kfreebsd-amd64 20120511-22:56
Severity: minor
Hi!
The documentation of the kfreebsd image speaks of that it being a "one
disc in a set containing the Debian GNU/Linux distribution", which I
higly doubt for the kfreebsd image. ;)
Found it in README.h
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
Please remove wesnoth-1.9, it's the obsolete devel release and
superseded by the wesnoth-1.10 stable release.
Thanks in advance!
Rhonda
--
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
Please remove wesnoth-1.8. It isn't meant to get shipped with wheezy,
and it was just around for a while to see whether there are any issues
with the side-by-side install still.
Thanks in advance,
Rhonda
--
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass en
* Martin Michlmayr [2012-03-23 16:28:24 CET]:
> - And Zack suggested sorting by % donated to Debian.
It still sounds fishy to claim that debian.ch donates 100% to Debian.
Actually, debian.ch is not a vendor but a reseller of goods from others,
and those organizations don't donate their profit t
= (
-authors => "Timo \'cras\' Sirainen, Mark \'znx\' Sangster",
-contact => "tss\@iki.fi, znxster\@gmail.com",
+authors => "Timo \'cras\' Sirainen, Mark \'znx\' Sangster, Gerfried Fuchs&q
Dear Manuel!
First of all, please be notified that if you only mail to
bugnumber@bugs the mail will only appear in the BTS and will *not* be
received by the submitter of the bug. It was rather a lucky incident
that I noticed that you mailed to the bugreport than anything else ...
Please use
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [2012-02-26 22:59:55 CET]:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:27:58AM +, George B. wrote:
> >
> > Package fails to install. Error message:
>
> I have done the install in a clean chroot and the installation does not fail.
> I cannot reproduce this bug in a clean env
Hey,
* Christoph Anton Mitterer [2012-01-22 01:47:20 CET]:
> I guess #368414 is long gone now and the related code form the postinst can
> be dropped again.
Looks like indeed, 1.1.1-3 is long gone.
> The chance of breaking something is now bigger than that of restoring
> something.
How so
* Stefano Zacchiroli [2012-01-17 23:11:48 CET]:
> [ TL;DR: would you object re-licensing www.d.o content under dual
> MIT/Expat + GPL-2 ? ]
Shouldn't that be GPL-2+ (or later option)? With MIT it isn't
explicitly needed, but still ... Ah, later in the text you wrote that
you mean the or lat
* jaalto [2012-01-13 13:14:15 CET]:
> On 2012-01-13 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> | Then please state it THERE, not HERE where the bugreport was about your
> | confusion with not reading the documentation and wanting to have the
> | intended way it works changed.
>
> In
* jaalto [2012-01-13 06:30:50 CET]:
> On 2012-01-13 01:23, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> | No, you didn't. What you did is pulling the issue that you reported in
> | 654189 and got handled through that by upstream already into this very
> | bugreport as a duplicate
>
>
* jaalto [2012-01-11 13:51:26 CET]:
> | It was warranted when it was added, but having it there isn't a bug, I
> | fail to see how you consider this to be a bug.
>
> - The patch tracker lists it as a change against upstream code (unnecessary)
The patch tracker has no concept of necessary or not
tags 653993 - patch
thanks
* Jari Aalto [2012-01-13 00:05:36 CET]:
> 2012-01-12 19:41 Don Armstrong :
> >
> >"Unsuccessful stat on filename containing newline at
> >/usr/share/gitolite/sshkeys-lint line 142, <> line 29. file not
> >found:"
> >
> | If you disagree with the
* jaalto [2012-01-12 11:41:00 CET]:
> On 2012-01-12 09:31, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> | * Jari Aalto [2012-01-11 13:25:21 CET]:
> | > reopen 653993
> | > thanks
> |
> | Thanks for yet another BTS abuse.
>
> The bug 653993
>
> Running the program with a le
* Jari Aalto [2012-01-11 10:59:39 CET]:
>
> Here is an improved patch.
You are aware that I already set this bugreport to pending?
Also, your patch shows that you clearly have no idea what
sensible-editor does. Please check it before sending in yet another
patch (it's a shell script after al
severity 655448 wishlist
thanks
* Jari Aalto [2012-01-11 10:43:58 CET]:
> There is a patch[1] in Debian that changes gl-setup from sh(1) to bash(1):
>
> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/gitolite/2.2-1
>
> This doesn't appear to be warranted, as gl-setup passes all tests:
It was w
hangelog
--- sl-3.03/debian/changelog
+++ sl-3.03/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+sl (3.03-16.0) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add patch to hide cursor (modifying 40_apply_sl-h and adding
+60_add_curs_set)
+
+ -- Gerfried Fuchs Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:27:19 +0100
+
sl (3.03-16) unstable; urgency=l
tag 653994 - pending
severity 653994 minor
thanks
Dear Jari,
it would be nice if you could read the BTS documentation on what the
tag pending means and what the severity serious stands for.
Thanks,
Rhonda
--
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh
reassign 653806 wesnoth-1.8 1:1.8.6-1
tag 653806 patch upstream
forwarded 653806 http://gna.org/bugs/?18399
thanks
Hi again,
after a short chat with wesnoth upstream, I got this link:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18399
I will pull that patch and apply it.
As additional hint, you missed the epoc
reassign 653806 boost1.48
thanks
* Steve M. Robbins [2011-12-31 02:39:49 CET]:
> Package failed to build using new Boost 1.48:
Not very surprising.
> Note that wesnoth-1.9 *does* build with Boost 1.48. Perhaps
> the old code could be adapted in a similar fashion to 1.9?
wesnoth 1.9 does *no
tag 653577 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
Dear Johan!
* Johan Walles [2011-12-29 14:57:24 CET]:
> the full-screen mode doesn't work for me. I get something like a
> maximized window. When I move the mouse close to the edges the screen
> scrolls and the "full-screen" window goes off-center.
reopen 531751
reopen 511377
thanks
Hi!
* Ryan Kavanagh [2011-12-23 01:03:25 CET]:
> - Fixes bugs in tabbed extension (Closes: #531751, #511377, #459924)
Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be true. I can't tell for 459924
because I was never able to reproduce the issue, but I download
* Paul Wise [2011-12-24 14:34:42 CET]:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Since we are now well past Y2K, it is probably time to delete this:
>
> http://www.debian.org/y2k/
>
> Any objections?
Uhm, quite frankly, yes. We are also well past 1997 and we don't think
of throwing awa
reassign boost1.48
thanks
* Lucas Nussbaum [2011-12-20 15:50:58 CET]:
> Source: wesnoth-1.8
> Version: 1:1.8.6-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20111220 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all p
Source: boost1.48
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
Hi,
the boost1.48 source contains an unfortunate bug that makes at least
wesnoth FTBFS because of a change in API that wasn't intentional. The
upstream bug tracker contains the patch for the bug, please get it
applied soonish so I can
Hey,
* Alexander Reichle-Schmehl [2011-12-03 16:29:00 CET]:
> I've prepared an NMU for qcake (versioned as 0.7.2-2.1). The diff
> is attached to this message.
Actually, what sense does an NMU make if the other RC for qcake is
still there? If you want to NMU, then please fix both, or none,
h
Hi,
* Malte S. Stretz [2011-01-30 16:20:58 CET]:
> If you lock out yourself from your gitolite and try to use
> /usr/share/gitolite/gl-emergency-addkey to fix up the mess, it will fail with
> the error message "/usr/share/gitolite/gl-emergency-addkey: 40:
> src/gl-compile-conf: not found".
>
tag 613406 moreinfo
thanks
Dear Gabor!
Thanks for using wesnoth, and sorry for my late response.
* Gabor Nagy [2011-02-14 16:45:17 CET]:
> In the last 2 days I had display lock up about 4 or 5 times. When this
> happens, the screen turns black and I can't exit the program, I can't
> change
Hi again,
* Yves-Alexis Perez [2011-10-13 20:59:43 CEST]:
> On jeu., 2011-10-13 at 15:12 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > it seems that the line 161 is actually a tar.bz2 file that gets
> > extracted and then used. Though, first there is some substitution of \r
> > and
Hi again,
it seems that the line 161 is actually a tar.bz2 file that gets
extracted and then used. Though, first there is some substitution of \r
and \n characters so that the "file" could go on one line.
IMHO this is not acceptable because there are no tools included or
commandline switc
* Jakub Wilk [2011-10-13 14:11:59 CEST]:
> * Gerfried Fuchs , 2011-10-13, 14:00:
> >The included waf script contains binary code in line 161 for which
> >no source is available, which is a clear policy violation.
>
> FWIW, the blob _does_ contain (compressed and pickled) sou
Package: midori
Version: 0.3.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Hi!
The included waf script does include binary data in line 161 to which
the source code isn't included, which is clearly a policy violation.
Please include the source code for that, and actually re-produce the
waf script from that sou
Package: postler
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
This was actually found in Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/873003
The included waf script contains binary code in line 161 for which no
source is available, which is a clear policy violation.
Please include the source for tha
Hello,
* François Jortay [2011-09-29 14:39:35 CEST]:
> Annoying Bug#591950 in Evolution is fixed in the 2.32.2-1 version.
> (source : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591950 )
> But there is still nothing about it in :
> http://packages.debian.org/en/squeeze-backports/mail ...
Hey,
* Debian FTP Masters [2011-09-09 23:56:28
CEST]:
> We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
> package(s) have been removed from unstable:
>
>gitosis | 0.2+20090917-11 | source, all
>
> --- Reason ---
> RoM; superseded by gitol
Hi,
* Martin Pitt [2011-09-09 06:43:18 CEST]:
> after discussions with Rhonda and Michael Banck, there were some
> requirements about keeping 9.0 around in unstable for some more time.
>
> My main concern is to get it out of testing, so that we don't have two
> major versions in wheezy. I don
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:43:57PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 18. August 2011, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > severity 617896 minor
> > thanks
>
> why do you think fullfilling a release goal (=a piuparts clean archive) is a
> minor bug?
Because piu
Hi again.
* Aron Xu [2011-08-30 13:51:26 CEST]:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 19:45, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Because ftp masters are only human too, and can make mistakes. Given
> > that there is no log of the discussion that dererk had with the unnamed
> > ft
Hi!
* Aron Xu [2011-08-30 13:14:59 CEST]:
> Sorry, I am on vacation, but I can be online sometimes... I didn't see
> where is your bug report on BTS, I think it would be better to roll in
> ftp-masters to the discussions then, so they have a chance to explain
> why it was accepted, and why b
Package: conky
Severity: serious
Hi!
* Vincent Cheng [2011-08-30 02:41:35 CEST]:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > I'm not sure if you actually received the reject mail through some
> > means, but in case you haven't, here it i
severity 617896 minor
thanks
* Holger Levsen [2011-03-12 10:10:14 CET]:
> Package: gitolite
> Version: 1.5.7-2
> Severity: important
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
>
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
> system aft
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
Sitting in the "quality metrics" talk at debconf I guess it is time to
finally make the decision of getting the package removed. There wasn't
any upstream progress on it since about five years, it is fairly easy to
make it segfault, and it unfort
Hi again,
* Bernd Zeimetz [2011-06-27 13:27:18 CEST]:
> On 06/27/2011 11:07 AM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > This is a feature used by various people, and breaking this feature for
> > them won't gain much here. If you could elaborate where in the
> > documentation yo
Hi againn.
* Gerfried Fuchs [2011-06-20 12:55:26 CEST]:
> I took the liberty to cherry-pick the first patch, and for the second,
> I did simply duplicate the entry and gave it the proper name. This is
> the debdiff:
Given that I was told that it's actually my own fault that t
.1/debian/changelog 2010-07-08 10:46:03.0 +0200
+++ dput-0.9.6.1+squeeze1/debian/changelog 2011-06-20 12:46:33.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+dput (0.9.6.1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Y Giridhar Appaji Nag ]
+ * Change the default backports configuration (Closes: #5
1 - 100 of 1559 matches
Mail list logo
