* Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> [2013-03-31 12:04:42 CEST]: > On Sonntag, 31. März 2013, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > OTOH I am pretty sure that the majority of people using wheezy's "dch > > --bpo" functionality will be generating backports for wheezy itself > > and not for oldstable. > > to me thats what I'd call "obvious behaviour" and "obvisouly sane behaviour".
Thanks for the ad-hominem. Great discussion style. > If it wouldn't wheezy's (or actually,any releases) dch would break, once > oldstable (and therefore it's backports suite) will be moved to archive.d.o, > which will eventually happen. It's a default that can easily be overridden, it's not like it's something that can't be changed through an option. > Also it seems more logical to create backports for the suite one is running, > and not an outdated suite. So you call stable to be outdated? Interesting approach, and maybe part of the reason stable has more RC bugs than testing. Enjoy, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los | Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
