* jaalto <jari.aa...@cante.net> [2012-01-13 13:14:15 CET]: > On 2012-01-13 10:21, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > | Then please state it THERE, not HERE where the bugreport was about your > | confusion with not reading the documentation and wanting to have the > | intended way it works changed. > > In 653993 the bug was closed with reasoning that with the suggested > change, by adding a check and warning, it would deny other uses of > program.
That's right. > By closing the bug, it unfortunately left the reported error > unhandled. It didn't because you filed said reported error in #653994. > | > 653994: > | > > | > "This should be considered my fault, in that v2.2 had a bug in > | > gl-setup, (wouldn't deal well with blank lines in > | > ~/.ssh/authorized_keys), I fixed it a few commits late" > | > > | > The latest code in upstream Git with the above fix, doesn't solve the > | > reported problem. See diff in upstream Git. > | > | So for the last time, note that there, because this very bugreport is > | about a completely different issue. > > You probably mean the subject of the bug message. And the very body of your initial message in that bugreport. Let me quote yourself that you can find what I am talking about: # For some reason the filename is taken as admin name. Isn't the first # parameter supposed to be SSH *.pub key? > It appears that I was referring to the body (the error debug log), so > there might have been miscommunication. You were referring to a single specific line at the very end of the debug log attached, not the proper body of the message. Said specific single line at the very end of the debug log was though reported by yourself in 653994. > Indeed, perhaps 653993 and 653994 should be merged, because the error > is the same in both cases. The error is the same, but the core of the bug (main body that triggered you to file it and the subject you chose for the bug) is not. Thus this one is closed while the other is open. > To clarify: the patch fixes the error exhibited in both 653993 (body, > the error message) and possibly 653994. The bug is not fixed by the > upstream change expressed in 653994 (see quote above). Then tell that to 653994 and not her, for god's sake. How hard is that to understand? Are you really intentionally trolling? You managed to get on my nerves and also on upstream nerves to the extend that I start to consider to /dev/null any further message from you and ignore any bug that you might (or in this case, might not) find. A last hope, and please take it clear: If you continue to annoy and don't allow this bug to get archived where it belongs because it isn't a bug you leave me no other chance than to find a way to avoid having to read anything from you again. Bye, Rhonda -- Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los | Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los | Wir sind Helden Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
