Bug#191189: marked as done (grap: Fails to build with current flex)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#191189: fixed in grap 1.36-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#286911: marked as done (grap: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): no matching function for call to 'DisplayString::DisplayString(DisplayString)')

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#286911: fixed in grap 1.36-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#321335: marked as done (ITA: grap -- A program for typesetting graphs)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321335: fixed in grap 1.36-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#313955: marked as done (openssh-krb5: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 21:54:35 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313955: openssh-krb5: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#313251: marked as done ([l10n] Updated Czech translation of krb5 debconf messages)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 21:52:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313251: [l10n] Updated Czech translation of krb5 debconf messages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#318636: marked as done (libsdl-perl: Rebuild against xorg libraries)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:42:54 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line this bug has been fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibil

Bug#322107: marked as done (buildd.debian.org: Error on PHP)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:13:48 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322107: buildd.debian.org: Error on PHP has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#322173: marked as done (php4: Couldn't see php page from internet)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:38:50 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322173: Bugs corrected has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Bug#321068: marked as done (ip6tables-restore segfaults)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:29:16 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line ip6tables-restore segfaults has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#322197: marked as done (Missing OSS_GETVERSION ioctl)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:17:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322197: fixed in kfreebsd-5 5.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#322104: marked as done (azureus: works with gij-4.0)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:19:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322104: azureus: works with gij-4.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#322165: marked as done (setfont from 1.2-12 seems broken)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 16:02:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322165: fixed in kbd 1.12-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#306491: marked as done (ITP: libfile-fdkeeper-perl -- store open filehandles in another process for later use)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:49:26 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line O: libfile-fdkeeper-perl -- store open filehandles in another process for later use has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#294539: marked as done (ITP: jama -- a basic linear algebra library for java)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294539: fixed in jama 1.0.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#294756: marked as done (ITP: jts -- implementation of the OGC spatial data model in java)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294756: fixed in jts 1.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#306484: marked as done (ITP: libfile-fdpasser-perl -- module for passing open filedescriptors between unrelated processes)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:44:19 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libfile-fdpasser-perl -- module for passing open filedescriptors has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#322218: marked as done (gcc -O2 optimization bug)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:40:08 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322218: gcc -O2 optimization bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#252711: marked as done (udo: New upstream release available (6.4.0))

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:26:44 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252711: fixed in udo 6.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#322223: marked as done (sl-modem-source: doesn't build with 2.6.12.4)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:17:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#33: fixed in sl-modem 2.9.9d-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#297565: marked as done (eboard: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Board*' to 'unsigned int' loses precision)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297565: fixed in eboard 0.9.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#289043: marked as done (ITP: perlprimer -- Graphical design of primers for PCR [med-bio])

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:12:29 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289043: fixed in perlprimer 1.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321952: marked as done (ITP: libapache2-mod-vhost-ldap -- Apache 2 module for Virtual Hosting from LDAP)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:10:27 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321952: fixed in mod-vhost-ldap 0.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: reassign

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 322186 Bug#322186: XCdroast doesn't work 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Grzegorz Sapierzynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thank Stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#316621: marked as done (ITP: alps-light1 -- ALPS Physics Simulation Algorithms)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:06:58 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316621: fixed in alps-light1 1.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#320040: marked as done (cln: FTBFS (ppc64): #error "Define cl_word_alignment for your CPU!")

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:02:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320040: fixed in cln 1.1.9-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#268534: marked as done (openjade: Incorrect use of "it's" in package description)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:07:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268534: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#277258: marked as done (package description typo(s) and the like)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:07:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#277258: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#314414: marked as done (openjade: FTBFS: GPL-2 text has changed)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:07:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314414: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#321543: marked as done (openjade: uninstallable due to missing libosp4)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:07:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321543: fixed in openjade 1.4devel1-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#321404: marked as done (fig2sty: dpatch >= 2.0.14 required)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321404: fixed in fig2sty 1:0.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#309009: marked as done (nag2 claims to create task (but doesn't))

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:02:37 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line nag2 claims to create task (but doesn't) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#322234: marked as done (inn2: slog from filter_innd.pl does not work)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:38:34 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Just forget it has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#319305: marked as done (Does not depend on libxinerama-dev)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319305: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#317500: marked as done (libqt3c102-mt-psql: it fails to be built because of changes about transition to Postgresql-8.0)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317500: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#305919: marked as done (qt3-designer: tools/designer/tools/createcw should be included rather than compiled)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305919: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#290402: marked as done (qt3-designer: wrong section in KDE menu)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#290402: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#282217: marked as done (qt3-dev-tools-embedded: qvfb(1) is duplicated)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#282217: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#182366: marked as done (libqt3-headers: where are qinterlacestyle.h and qvfbhdr.h)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#182366: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#268882: marked as done (qt3-linguist: missing manpage for linguist)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268882: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#303065: marked as done (Please add certain patches from qt-copy)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303065: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#311562: marked as done (qt3-dev-tools: /lib64 directory references in qmake.conf on AMD64)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311562: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#317768: marked as done (qt3-designer: qt3 programs does not compile with g++4.0)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:31:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317768: fixed in qt-x11-free 3:3.3.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#322204: marked as done (Redirect from /pkgreport.cgi to /cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi broken)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:42:39 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322204: Redirect from /pkgreport.cgi to /cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#322189: marked as done (gnus: Please include 'emacsen' in dependencies)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322189: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20050809-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#320125: marked as done (gnus: [INTL:fr] French debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320125: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20050809-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#301490: marked as done (asterisk: Please add patch for Italian syntax)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:02:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in previous upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#302669: marked as done (Warning: Size mismatch while decoding)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302669: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20050809-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#318648: marked as done (gnus: mm-w3m-local-map-property has not been removed)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:02:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318648: fixed in gnus 5.10.6-1.NO.20050809-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#299083: marked as done (debugging messages on stdout/err)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:10:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closed since the advent of libdebtags1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#318935: marked as done (c2faxsend: expects config file at wrong location)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318935: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#314046: marked as done (heroes: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314046: fixed in heroes 0.21-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#312942: marked as done (asterisk package install croaks with various errors)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:52:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line User reinstalled fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#312097: marked as done (INTL:vi)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312097: fixed in jpilot 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#303917: marked as done (capi4hylafax: two sets of differing config files)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303917: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#295880: marked as done (Script to address both ttySx and CAPI modems)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295880: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#235714: marked as done (heroes-common: ships /usr/share/info/dir(.old).gz)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#235714: fixed in heroes 0.21-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#297314: marked as done (heroes: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'tile_set_img' follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297314: fixed in heroes 0.21-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#307523: marked as done (entries in /etc/default/asterisk are case sensitive)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:50:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line wontfix has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#310906: marked as done (jpilot: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider using the attached translation instead of the one currently in use)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310906: fixed in jpilot 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#317038: marked as done (jpilot-sync crashes when jpilot-plugins are installed)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:19 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317038: fixed in jpilot 0.99.7-0.99.8-pre10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#318907: marked as done (capi4hylafax: README.Debian tells wrong position of config.faxCAPI)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318907: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#318941: marked as done (capi4hylafax: missing manual pages for c2faxsend and c2faxrecv)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318941: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#318949: marked as done (ITA: capi4hylafax - Faxing over CAPI 2.0 device)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:32:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318949: fixed in capi4hylafax 1:01.02.03-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#305734: marked as done (asterisk: On PowerPC, hanging up on voicemail causes non-stop log messages)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:43:51 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in previous upload. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Processed: john

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Bug is tagged both experimental and fixed-in-experimental > close 320011 Bug#320011: john: 1.6.38 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#286115: john: New version available Bug closed, send any further explanation

Bug#322119: marked as done (conserver-server: conserver not built with PAM by default)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:07:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322119: conserver-server: conserver not built with PAM by default has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#197764: marked as done (gnus: Fails on authenticated server after some timeout)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:56:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This has very likely been fixed in recent Gnus has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#283762: marked as done (gnus-agent-fetch-groups takes 100% of the CPU)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:56:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This has very likely been fixed in recent Gnus has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#170910: marked as done (gnus: N and P occasionally break in summary view)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:56:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This has very likely been fixed in recent Gnus has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#322191: marked as done (gnus: 2 versions of gnus on my system)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:06:33 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322191: gnus: 2 versions of gnus on my system has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#320160: marked as done (Conflicting files of 'blas-test' and 'refblas3-test')

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#318525: marked as done (FTBFS: Memory inputs not directly addressable)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#310992: marked as done ([INTL:ja] Japanese po-debconf template translation)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#280708: marked as done (libdebtags: FTBFS with g++-3.4: Template lookup errors)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:18:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#200249: marked as done (package sends 3 (!) debconf notes at install time)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#303319: marked as done (lapack control file doesn't contain blas in Build-Depends)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#263354: marked as done (libtagcoll: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: there are no arguments to `end' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `end' must be available)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:18:30 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#192990: marked as done (atlas_3.2.1ln-7(unstable/arm): FTBFS)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#310261: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of atlas debconf messages)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#312181: marked as done (INTL:vi)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#313127: marked as done (INTL:vi)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#318153: marked as done ([l10n] Czech translation for lapack)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#322126: marked as done (policycoreutils: restorecon gives a lot of error messages at startup)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 14:01:11 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322126: policycoreutils: restorecon gives a lot of error messages at startup has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: closing 284739

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > close 284739 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 Bug#284739: mozilla-firefox: Mozilla crashes trying to print http://www.auto-amd.com/find.asp 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bu

Processed: closing 200950

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > close 200950 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 Bug#200950: mozilla-firebird: when url-pasting a wrong url with middle mouse button you can't go back 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debia

Processed: closing 238528

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > close 238528 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 Bug#238528: mozilla-firebird: Animated GIF triggers massive memory-leak 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. B

Bug#320870: marked as done (pioneers: One-line description very undescriptive)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:32:12 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320870: fixed in pioneers 0.9.19-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#269033: Mailed about wrong bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 269033 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 Bug#269033: /usr/bin/firefox: Scroll wheel does not work in preferences 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#279557: mozilla-firefox: cannot use scrollwheel in preferences Bug

Bug#295886: marked as done (nws install fails: post-installation script returned error exit status 30)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:17:40 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295886: nws install fails: post-installation script returned error exit status 30 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#320741: marked as done (libopengl-ruby: Misspelled function: GLUT.SetCurcor should be GLUT.SetCursor)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#320741: fixed in libopengl-ruby 0.32f-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Re: Bug#298810: Fixed in experimental

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 298810 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 Bug#298810: mozilla-firefox: Scroll Wheel doesn't work when scroll bar is on left side of page 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.0.99+deerpark

Processed: Re: Bug#279557: Fixed in Deerpark

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 279557 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 Bug#279557: mozilla-firefox: cannot use scrollwheel in preferences 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#269033: /usr/bin/firefox: Scroll wheel does not work in preferences Bug

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#319183: Fixed in Deerpark

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 319184 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 Bug#319184: childsplay: Missing menu icon 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1, send any further explanations to 1.0.99+de

Bug#251074: marked as done (gnome-terminal doesn't respond to keybindings such as new_tab (++T), etc ...)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:34:56 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gnome-terminal doesn't respond to keybindings such as new_tab has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#322019: marked as done (lib-dom-java: Dummy package still needed?)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 10:32:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322019: fixed in lib-dom-java 0.19990107-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Close Bug#319184

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 319184 Bug#319184: childsplay: Missing menu icon 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#322127: marked as done (Installation aborts due to missing /etc/gksu.conf)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 10:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322127: fixed in gksu 1.3.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#322182: marked as done (emacs-snapshot-gtk: Dependences problems(?))

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 19:07:44 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#322182: emacs-snapshot-gtk: Dependences problems(?) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#319184: marked as done (childsplay: Missing menu icon)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:47:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319184: fixed in childsplay 0.80.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#313682: marked as done (childsplay: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:47:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313682: fixed in childsplay 0.80.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

  1   2   >