Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:07:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322119: conserver-server: conserver not built with PAM by  
default
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 06:49:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 08 23:49:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au [129.94.242.59] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E2Nvl-0007bP-00; Mon, 08 Aug 2005 23:49:45 -0700
Received: From
        smtp-dist.unsw.edu.au ([149.171.97.18] == 
smtp-dist-03.services.comms.unsw.EDU.AU)
        (for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) By tone With Smtp ;
        Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:49:41 +1000 
Received: from localhost (avspam-04.services.comms.unsw.edu.au [149.171.100.19])
        by smtp-dist.unsw.edu.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j796nffF024217
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:49:41 +1000 (EST)
Received: from smtp.unsw.edu.au ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (swoop [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP
 id 14692-27 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Tue,  9 Aug 2005 16:49:40 +1000 (EST)
Received: from tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU 
[129.94.242.59])
        by smtp.unsw.edu.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j796ndAY008357
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:49:39 +1000 (EST)
Received: From zarquon.ken.nicta.com.au ([203.143.160.111]) (auth-user andrewb)
        (for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) By tone With Smtp ;
        Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:49:38 +1000 
Received: from zarquon.ken.nicta.com.au (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by zarquon.ken.nicta.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j796nddK012577
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:49:39 +1000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
        by zarquon.ken.nicta.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j796nd8l012576
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:49:39 +1000
From: Andrew Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 16:49:38 +1000
Subject: conserver-server: conserver not built with PAM by default
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
X-Operating-System: Mungi-1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-CSE-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on 
        tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU
X-CSE-Spam-Level: 
X-CSE-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=3.0.4
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: conserver-server
Version: 8.1.1-2
Severity: important


Conserver isn't built with PAM by default. The debian/rules file specifies
--with-pam, but the configure script ignores that silently if the PAM headers
aren't found (which seems to be the case in the standard binary packages). I 
think it should have a build dependency on libpam0g-dev.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages conserver-server depends on:
ii  debconf                     1.4.52       Debian configuration management 
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries 
ii  libpam0g                    0.76-22      Pluggable Authentication Modules 
ii  libssl0.9.7                 0.9.7e-3     SSL shared libraries

conserver-server recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  conserver-server/upgrade_800_flag: true
  conserver-server/listen_address:
  conserver-server/base_port:
  conserver-server/port: 3109
  conserver-server/run_as_root: false
* conserver-server/tcp_wrappers:

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322119-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 20:07:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 09 13:07:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h60n2c2o1023.bredband.skanova.com (fizban.hagg) [213.64.165.60] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E2aO6-0006HE-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:07:50 -0700
Received: from trollhassel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by fizban.hagg (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j79K7nVN004986
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:07:49 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#322119: conserver-server: conserver not built with PAM by 
 default
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: jevim v3.24
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 22:07:49 +0200
From: Joergen Haegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        HAS_PACKAGE,MIME_QP_NO_CHARSET autolearn=ham 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


Package: conserver-server
Version: 8.1.11-6

>Conserver isn't built with PAM by default. The debian/rules file specifies
>--with-pam, but the configure script ignores that silently if the PAM head=
ers
>aren't found (which seems to be the case in the standard binary packages).=
 I=20
>think it should have a build dependency on libpam0g-dev.

I've recompiled conserver with pam-support, it also source-depends
on libpam0g-dev as suggested.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to