Your message dated Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2003 00:21:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 19:21:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pc1-leed3-6-cust171.ldst.cable.ntl.com (shiri.gloaming.local)
[80.6.171.171] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19F142-00065T-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 19:21:10 -0500
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19F13z-00023n-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 May 2003 01:21:07 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: atlas_3.2.1ln-7(unstable/arm): FTBFS
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 01:21:07 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: atlas
Version: 3.2.1ln-7
Severity: serious
Justification: is making other packages unreleasable
Camm, any chance you could help with this? Since octave2.1 now
depends on atlas, the lack of it arm is causing other packages
(e.g. plplot) to be held out of testing. I've installed atlas'
build-depends in debussy's unstable chroot, if you want to try a build
yourself.
[I'm not quite sure what's going on here. The first time it died after
the default inactivity-timeout (300 mins), so I upped the timeout to
1000 mins and retried; that still died, so I upped it to 10,000
minutes and retried again. The strange part is that, even though
this was all on the same machine, the last build log didn't try
single NFLOP iterations. Why did it change this time around?]
| Automatic build of atlas_3.2.1ln-7 on smackdown by sbuild/arm 1.170.1
| Build started at 20030511-1219
| ******************************************************************************
[...]
| ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
| Build-Depends: expect5.31, debhelper, patch, g77, g77-3.0 [alpha], blas-dev,
sharutils, lapack-dev, lapack-pic, blas-test, help2man
[...]
| make[8]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/tune/blas/gemm/Linux_base_static'
| NB=28, MU=5, NU=4, KU=28: rerun with higher reps; variation exceeds tolerence
|
| pre=s, muladd=0, lat=6, nb=28, mu=1, nu=1, ku=28, mflop=256.98
|
| pre=s, muladd=0, lat=6, nb=28, mu=1, nu=1, ku=28, mflop=256.98
|
| pre=s, muladd=0, lat=6, nb=28, mu=4, nu=2, ku=28, mflop=1450.08
| make[7]: *** [res/snreg] Error 255
| make[7]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/tune/blas/gemm/Linux_base_static'
| make[6]: *** [res/snreg] Error 2
| make[6]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/tune/sysinfo/Linux_base_static'
| xsyssum: ../GetSysSum.c:135: getmmnreg: Assertion `system(fnam) == 0' failed.
| /build/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/bin/Linux_base_static/ATLrun.sh: line 4: 13080
Aborted $atldir/$*
| make[5]: ***
[/build/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/include/Linux_base_static/atlas_ssysinfo.h] Error
134
[...]
| ERROR 393 DURING CACHESIZE SEARCH!!. CHECK INSTALL_LOG/Stage1.log FOR
DETAILS.
| make[3]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/atlas-3.2.1ln/bin/Linux_base_static'
A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=arm&pkg=atlas&ver=3.2.1ln-7
--
James
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 192990-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 19:16:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 09 12:16:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2ZaN-00064c-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:16:27 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 5F82964D54; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8EEDF838B; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:16:09 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
This package has been removed from Debian since it's superseded by a
new version (atlas3). I think your bug is specific to version 2 (or
that there's already one for v3) but if that's not the case, please
let me know.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
