I've recently found out that pairs can be enabled without a real 
"release".

Can you give me a list of what improvements you expect to see ? Is it 
just the vocabulary? I didn't understand what you meant by "strange 
characters".

Would anyone be against me converting fr-ca to:

* three-letter codes
* monolingual language packages
* adding lexical selection support

?

Fran

A 2015-12-20 19:03, Joan escrigué:
> Hello, 
> 
> Thanks for  your answers. But, for what I see, a new release is
> necessary. Who makes it? Forecast?
> 
> Respect to the incorporation of new words, there are ideas (perfect!)
> and on the other hand there are users in wikipedia disposed to
> collaborate.
> 
> Besides, (Francis Tyers, Tino DIdriksen?, Amire...) there are
> technical problems in wikipedia in the fr-ca translation which it
> is necessary to solve (it adds strange caracters). You can answer
> here, or in wikipedia, user:Pallares
> 
> In summary, we would like to be able continue using this translator
> in wikipedia, but it is necessary soon to implement the improvements.
> 
> Thankyou
> Joan
> 
> 2015-12-07 17:06 GMT+01:00 Daniel Torregrosa <[email protected]>:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> while its not about reporting bad translations, but about lowering
>> the access barrier to contribute on dictionaries, we have a tool
>> that tries to simplify the process of inserting words in the
>> dictionaries.
>> 
>> It follows a simple workflow: dictionaries (and config files) get
>> uploaded, some words get added, and the dictionaries get exported,
>> either as a whole or as a diff patch. 
>> 
>> There are some problems with the tool, namely
>> 
>> * no metadix support
>> * it can only insert one kind of Apertium dictionary node
>> * configuration file generation needs a total rework
>> * patch download uses gnu diff format. Ideally, it should use a
>> git-like diff format that can be easily merged by a dev
>> 
>> There is a description of how the tool works
>> at http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/User:Dtr5 [1], and you can
>> download it
>> 
> from http://sourceforge.net/p/apertium/svn/HEAD/tree/trunk/apertium-simpledix/
>> [2] and set it up in your local linux machine.
>> 
>> While I haven't looked at it since I "released" it late 2012, I
>> think its possible to continue working on it if there is interest on
>> this kind of tool. 
>> 
>> Also, there used to be a live version of the tool in
>> http://apertium.vm.bytemark.co.uk/simpledix [3], but it is no longer
>> working. Can somebody with access rights have a look at it?
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> 2015-12-07 15:10 GMT+01:00 Xavi Ivars <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> 2015-12-07 10:35 GMT+01:00 Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
>> <[email protected]>:
>> wei2912 <[email protected]> čálii:
>> 
>>> Could this be created as a couple of Google Code-in tasks? To
>> create
>>> an interface that allows users to propose words or mark
>> translations
>>> as wrong and set up a system that allows developers to
>> incorporate
>>> changes instantly. This lowers the barrier for contributions to
>> the
>>> language pairs.
>> 
>> Flammie had some ideas:
>> http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Html-tools/GCI_suggests_and_stuff [4]
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just to give my opinion here:
>> 
>> I implemented some years ago (time flies) a similar form defined in
>> 1) for es-ca, at Softcatalà.
>> 
>> And even if it worked, and the amount of feedback received was
>> pretty big, it was hard to find "valuable" feedback: most of the
>> entries were just "this doesn't work", "I'd rather say X than Y to
>> translate Z", "it only returns one translation, but I'd like all
>> translations to be returned" (mostly when translating a single word
>> that could be both a verb or a noun), etc.
>> 
>> In the end, I just disabled the form and added an email address
>> instead. Now the amount of feedback that I receive is smaller, but
>> most of the times is real feedback (missing words, etc). I really
>> prefer this so I don't need to dig too much into the feedback to
>> find useful one...
>> 
>> I'm not saying such a feature won't be useful for other people, but
>> at least for me became almost useless after a while because of the
>> huge amount of nonsense feedback.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> < Xavi Ivars >
>> < http://xavi.ivars.me [5] >
>> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
>> Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
>> Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
>> Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for
>> multiple OSs.
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
>> [6]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff [7]
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
>  Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
>  Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
>  Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for
> multiple OSs.
>  http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140 [6]
> _______________________________________________
>  Apertium-stuff mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff [7]
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/User:Dtr5
> [2] 
> http://sourceforge.net/p/apertium/svn/HEAD/tree/trunk/apertium-simpledix/
> [3] http://apertium.vm.bytemark.co.uk/simpledix
> [4] http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Html-tools/GCI_suggests_and_stuff
> [5] http://xavi.ivars.me
> [6] 
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&amp;iu=/4140
> [7] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to