nmtc wrote:
> Can Redhat8 use usb adsl lan modem?
> My modem is e-tek usb adsl td-2002,and i can't find driver .
check out this link -> http://www.idir.net/~gromitkc/usblist.html
--
<>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux
Can Redhat8 use usb adsl lan modem?
My modem is e-tek usb adsl td-2002,and i can't find
driver .
Well,
I don't have a USB DSL connection, but I do have SBC/Yahoo DSL that uses
PPPOe. I use Smoothwall GPL. You can check their site to see if the USB
modem is supported.
Mark
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:34, Info wrote:
> How do i install an USB ADSL Modem? And how do i make it dial to
How do i install an USB ADSL Modem? And how do i
make it dial to my ISP and stay connected. And to reconnect once it is been
disconnected? My ISP uses PPPoE and the ISP assign dynamic IP only.
regards
> Could one of you experts please tell me how to install an Alcatel USB
modem on
> Red Hat 8. I know it can be done as I have seen it in action and the
Alcatel
> site provides linux drivers for download.
>
> Not sure on how to proceed after downloading the driver.
Not enough information to help yo
Ok - guess that one slipped through the cracks, so I'll try this again:
Have RH 7.3 and a DYNALINK ALE070 ADSL USB modem...
Have a client with the above stated unit - has anyone either gotten this
device to work under RH 7.3 (or better) or know of any particular
drivers that may work with this un
Hi
Could one of you experts please tell me how to install an Alcatel USB modem on
Red Hat 8. I know it can be done as I have seen it in action and the Alcatel
site provides linux drivers for download.
Not sure on how to proceed after downloading the driver.
Many thanks in advance.
--
redh
Have a client with the above stated unit - has anyone either gotten this
device to work under RH 7.3 (or better) or know of any particular
drivers that may work with this unit?
TIA
--
OzIT Support * http://www.ozitsupport.com.au
Stephen Kuhn | Help Des
Wednesday, December 04, 2002 1:57 AM
Subject: Speed Touch USB ADSL modem configuration
> I am trying to set-up my Speed Touch USB ADSL modem on Redhat 8.0 without
> much success, can someone on the list please give me some assistance, a
> starting point at this stage would be nice.
>
personal opinion.
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Alastair Roy wrote:
> I am trying to set-up my Speed Touch USB ADSL modem on Redhat 8.0 without
> much success, can someone on the list please give me some assistance, a
> starting point at this stage would be nice.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfr
> I am trying to set-up my Speed Touch USB ADSL modem on Redhat 8.0 without
> much success, can someone on the list please give me some assistance, a
> starting point at this stage would be nice.
The best site for this is the Open Source Driver site at
http://speedtouch.sourceforge.n
At 09:57 04/12/2002 +, you wrote:
I am trying to set-up my Speed Touch USB ADSL modem on Redhat 8.0 without
much success, can someone on the list please give me some assistance, a
starting point at this stage would be nice.
You need Alacatels proprietry microcode to make it work.
Look
I am trying to set-up my Speed Touch USB ADSL modem on Redhat 8.0 without
much success, can someone on the list please give me some assistance, a
starting point at this stage would be nice.
Thanks in advance
Alastair Roy
Visit Express Newspapers and OK Magazine online picture archive at
http
Hi,
You can try
http://forums.devshed.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=39216&highlight=ads
l as well. Again it's for a Speedtouch USB ADSL modem, but might give
you some pointers. Help me a lot :)
Pete.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Start reading here:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/DSL-HOWTO/
I am in the process of installing a Speedtouch USB ADSL modem and cannot offer
specific help. This might get you on the right track as it did for me.
Alcatel has written its own Linux driver, but it's still a great learning
exper
Can anyone tell me how to get an TopCom Webr@cer 850 modem
to work in Redhat 7.3.
I have never installed a USB modem in Linux before so don't realy know how
it's done
but i can't find the driver for that modem in my installation.
\_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_ \_
Jonny A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hossein S. Zadeh wrote:
>On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:03:26AM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
>> > I'm anticipating the usual "RedHat" bloat. ;-) I've got to
>> > confess I've never TRIED to install a minimal system, so
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:03:26AM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> > I'm anticipating the usual "RedHat" bloat. ;-) I've got to
> > confess I've never TRIED to install a minimal system, so I
> > don't know if it can be done. I've heard that you can do it
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:03:26AM -0400, John Aldrich wrote:
> I'm anticipating the usual "RedHat" bloat. ;-) I've got to
> confess I've never TRIED to install a minimal system, so I
> don't know if it can be done. I've heard that you can do it
> with 3-500 megs...
Well, you could always try on
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> >
> > 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> > including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> > serves out a couple of WEB pages, and filters mail.
> >
> > 103M used o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
David Talkington wrote:
>Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
>>Since my Net connection is only 128 Kbps and the NIC is 10 Mbps, can't I
>>just run both the outside and inside traffic off the one NIC?
>
>I know it can be done with IP aliasing, but from discussions I've see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>Since my Net connection is only 128 Kbps and the NIC is 10 Mbps, can't I
>just run both the outside and inside traffic off the one NIC?
I know it can be done with IP aliasing, but from discussions I've seen
here, trying to route and fir
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
>
> Besides...where're you gonna find a 500 meg hard drive
> these days??? ;-)
> John
>
My junk box. Also, Computer Geeks, if you don't mind used hardware.
Mikkel
On 2001.04.08 12:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>It's a completely useless machine; I only did it to prove that I
>could. What better way to spend a lazy Sunday?
I disagree; I want it as my firewall, NAT, DHCP box for the house. I
think
it should be able to handle the traffic from three computer
At 4/8/01 03:05 PM -0500, you wrote:
> >I disagree; I want it as my firewall, NAT, DHCP box for the house. I think
> >it should be able to handle the traffic from three computers just fine...
>
>Indeed. But only one ISA slot means only one network card, which made
>mine pretty un-useful as a gate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>"Network install" means FTP, HTTP, or NFS? 5.2 went into 8 MB?
I believe I used NFS. Memory didn't seem to be a problem. One thing,
though, the floppy controller on that thing seems really cheezy; it
can't be made to read an ext2 disk
At 4/8/01 02:48 PM -0500, you wrote:
> >How'd you do the install on 8MB? My tiny little box doesn't have a CD-ROM,
> >but it does have a network card. However, RH7 boot disks say it needs 20MB
> >RAM to do an FTP install.
>
>Oh, you know what, now that I think about it, I used Red Hat 5.2. The
>P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>At 4/8/01 01:21 PM -0500, you wrote:
>>I can top it ... PS/2e ,486SX/25, 8M, 100M with Red Hat 6. It won't
>>even run ssh; apparently the encryption is too much for it! As you
>>probably know, the SX doesn't even have a math co. ...
>
At 4/8/01 01:21 PM -0500, you wrote:
>I can top it ... PS/2e ,486SX/25, 8M, 100M with Red Hat 6. It won't
>even run ssh; apparently the encryption is too much for it! As you
>probably know, the SX doesn't even have a math co. ...
How'd you do the install on 8MB? My tiny little box doesn't have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>Don't joke... I just found an old PS/2 (486/33, 8MB, 320MB) that I'm going
>to set up as my home firewall. I just have to find a way to make it to 32MB
>RAM...
I can top it ... PS/2e ,486SX/25, 8M, 100M with Red Hat 6. It won't
even ru
On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> >Besides...where're you gonna find a 500 meg hard drive
> >these days??? ;-)
> > John
>
> Don't joke... I just found an old PS/2 (486/33, 8MB, 320MB) that I'm going
> to set up as my home firewall. I just have to find a way to make it to 32MB
At 4/8/01 08:30 AM -0400, you wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> > >
> > > 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> > > including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> > > ser
At 4/7/01 09:42 PM -0400, you wrote:
> > Ok, I think I've got this straight. I need another box. I have an
> unused 486DX50 VLB
> > with a nic and 32 meg ram, would that do for a firewall/router as you
> suggested?
Look into the Linux Router Project and something called Coyote. Don't know
wher
On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> >
> > 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> > including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> > serves out a couple of WEB pages, and filters mail.
On Sun, 08 Apr 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> 1-2G drive for a firewall? I have a RH 6.2 firewall system with 210M
> including 34M for swap. It would not need to be that bit but it also
> serves out a couple of WEB pages, and filters mail.
>
> 103M used out of 165M
>
I'm anticipating the
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
> Close. The 486 should do fine, especially if you don't
> install X. As for the USB, you still have the same problem
> -- you can't use that modem under linux. It doesn't have
> drivers for linux!
>
> As for drive
John Aldrich wrote:
> Close. The 486 should do fine, especially if you don't install X.
Great! That's what I wanted to hear. I'll start resurrecting the 486 this week.
> As for the USB, you still have the same problem -- you can't use that modem under
>linux. It
> doesn't have drivers for lin
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Ok, I think I've got this straight. I need another box. I have an unused 486DX50 VLB
> with a nic and 32 meg ram, would that do for a firewall/router as you suggested? I
> doesn't have USB but I heard that USB add-on cards are available. Which means I w
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Ok, I think I've got this straight. I need another box. I have an unused 486DX50 VLB
> with a nic and 32 meg ram, would that do for a firewall/router as you suggested? I
> doesn't have USB but I heard that USB add-on cards are available. Which means I w
John Aldrich wrote:
> What I'm saying is do NOT plug your modem directly into the hub/switch for your
> network. You want to either plug the ethernet modem into a linux router box with
> firewall, etc and then plug a second nic into your hub/switch, OR you can get a
> cable/dsl router (approxim
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Are you saying that I don't want to share the DSL with all my boxes or are you
> saying I don't want to share a USB modem with all my boxes?
>
What I'm saying is do NOT plug your modem directly into the
hub/switch for your network. You want to either p
"Gill, Vern" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Actually, to clarify a little. Most PacBell installs in the last 8
> months or so are DMT only. They use Alcatel DSLAMS. If your line is a
> Covad line, the only CAP device was the Flowpoint 2100 ADSL Router. One
> of the m
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Are you reading the DSL-HOWTO at linuxdoc.org? Pretty much every issue you've raised
> is discussed in there. If something does not make sense
> to you. let me know.
Yes, and you're doing a great job maintaining it. It's very easy to read and follow.
I've even printed part o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually, to clarify a little. Most PacBell installs in the last 8
months or so are DMT only. They use Alcatel DSLAMS. If your line is a
Covad line, the only CAP device was the Flowpoint 2100 ADSL Router.
One of the more prevalent USB ADSL modems bein
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:26:26AM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I should have clarified this point. I have an ADSL account with
> Ameritech and they recommended the SpeedStream 4060 USB modem, which I
> have purchased. Ameritech hasn't really told me what type of
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> The question gets down to which type of ADSL. The most common is DMT.
> CAP ADSL is another that isused in a few places (pacbell maybe?), but
> DMT is much more prevalent. These require completely different modems.
> If yours is the Alcatel USB (you never did clarify this AFA
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:12:26AM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> I am new to all of this. I've been reading a lot of HOWTOS but I'm not sure what
> to do or what to do first. Any guidance you can offer would be greatly
> appreciated.
Are you reading the DSL-HOWTO at linuxdoc.org? Pretty much eve
John Aldrich wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2001, you wrote:
>
> > I do have a small network that I want to share DSL with all the boxes. So what
> do you suggest I do?
> >
> You DON'T want to do that!
Are you saying that I don't want to share the DSL with all my boxes or are you
saying I don't want to
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:10:19PM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
>
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> > Yes, there are many ethernet bridge/modems around. This is a much
> > better way to go.
>
> Would you be kind enough to name a few that are compatible with
> Linux?
Any of them are 'compatible' with Li
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Yes, there are many ethernet bridge/modems around. This is a much better way
> to go.
Would you be kind enough to name a few that are compatible with Linux?
Thank you.
Jerry
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
On Fri, 06 Apr 2001, you wrote:
> > Yes, good advice. The only reason to use the Alcatel USB is just that
> > you absolutely can't find another option (aka ethernet).
>
> Are you saying that ADSL modems are available to connect to a hub? That is
> what I would have prefered but all I could find a
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:31:36AM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:06:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so
> > you might want to consider a kernel upgrade.
> >
> > Actuall
Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:06:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so
> you might want to consider a kernel upgrade.
>
> Actually 2.4 is required for the Alcatel USB drivers. But not because of
> USB, but
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:06:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so
> you might want to consider a kernel upgrade. I don't know anything
Actually 2.4 is required for the Alcatel USB drivers. But not because
of USB, but ATM sup
I know kernel 2.4.x has better USB support. RH7 ships with 2.2.x so you
might want to consider a kernel upgrade. I don't know anything
specifically about the Alcatel USB modems. But I know I switched mine
out for a regular external one that requires an ethernet card. I'm
prety sure if you trie
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 05:09:40PM -0400, Jerry Human wrote:
>
> I have finally received my new DSL modem but I'm having problems
> getting it to work in RH 7.0. First of all, it is a USB modem and
> since I don't have anything else that uses USB, I can't verify that
> it's working. Second, the A
Hello Good People:
I have finally received my new DSL modem but I'm having problems getting
it to work in RH 7.0. First of all, it is a USB modem and since I don't
have anything else that uses USB, I can't verify that it's working.
Second, the ADSL HOWTO is basically about wiring and barely menti
57 matches
Mail list logo
