it works now...i tried using another account and it worked like a charm...thanks anyways...i wonder why it doesnt work with the root account...security issues i bet"R.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i posted yesterday with another address but i dont have access to my old email so im using this one
Thanks a lot for the reply. I'd appreciate if you can let me know what
all software do I need to configure a mail server.
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Mortimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:45 PM
Subj
Thanks a lot for your reply. I appreciate that.
- Original Message -
From: "Ian Mortimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:45 PM
Subject: Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux
> >
> > I'm looking to
Thanks a lot for your reply. I appreciate that.
- Original Message -
From: "Le Ngoc Thach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: IMAP/POP server on Redhat Linux
> Hi Peram,
> You can file packag
Hi Peram,
You can file package imap in CDROM #2 of RedHat Linux 9 (file
"imap-2001a-18.i386.rpm").
Thach.
Peram's List wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to implement IMAP/POP3 server on Redhat. I did a search on
google but I could not get a correct answer.
I'd appreciate if you gurus can let me know the so
>
> I'm looking to implement IMAP/POP3 server on Redhat. I did a search on
> google but I could not get a correct answer.
> I'd appreciate if you gurus can let me know the software required for
> implementations on implementation of an IMAP/POP server for Redhat Linux
> 9.
# rpm -Uvh /mnt/cdrom/Re
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:47:31AM -0700, Jesse Millan wrote:
>
> Could someone give me a pointer on why IMAP would block all sessions but
> one? It even blocked localhost.
cat /etc/hosts.allow
cat /etc/hosts.deny
See if that gets you anywhere.
--
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Oswaldo,
I would go with Courier the benefits are endless. I think that you will
find that if you follow the instructions to install it, its fairly
straightforward especially if you install rpms.
Use LDAP, that is what ADS is anyway, the trick is to get it to work, I
think t
Greetings,
You could use pam_ldap.so in the nss_ldap RPM
(from www.padl.com) and /usr/sbin/authconfig to
enhance PAM on your RHL server (both included in
your RH Linux distro). Using this PAM lib, gives
any IMAP/POP3 server that uses PAM the ability to
authenticate using LDAP and/or your /
On 1/22/03 12:35 PM, "Bret Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to get imapd as distributed in 7.3 to empty (slurp)
> /var/spool/mail/user into /home/user/mbox like it does in imap-4.7-5
> (RHL 6.2).
>
> I think the issue is that the mbox must be in mbx format but I can't for
> the li
On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 11:35, Bret Hughes wrote:
> I am trying to get imapd as distributed in 7.3 to empty (slurp)
> /var/spool/mail/user into /home/user/mbox like it does in imap-4.7-5
> (RHL 6.2).
>
> I think the issue is that the mbox must be in mbx format but I can't for
> the life of me figure
I would go with the Courier-MTA package. It is all-in-one and has almost all
the features mentioned below.
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Kehres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:
Thanks all for your help. I wasn't real clear on the need
to move to virtual hosting for my email users. I also intentionally
left out "no money" (sorry). Gordon, Courier looks like the product
I need. Before I asked for help, I read through a Courier related site,
I /dev/null'd the idea a
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 11:10, Ken Sorensen wrote:
> Greetings,
> Does anyone have any experience with a IMAP/POP3 server that does
> not use /etc/passwd as the base? (Cyrus, others?) Our email users will
If you are interested in non open-source solutions
I recommend CommuniGate from www.stalk
Dear Ken,
Another option that you might want to check is the Internet Exchange
Messaging Server (http://www.ima.com). It is a full blown messaging
solution that runs under Linux. Full anti-spam, anti-virus, distribution
list, disclaimer insertion, gateway modules for cc:Mail and Lotus Notes and
Ken Sorensen said:
> Greetings,
> Does anyone have any experience with a IMAP/POP3 server that does
> not use /etc/passwd as the base? (Cyrus, others?) Our email users will
> soon grow past the UID limit, and I'm looking for a drop-in solution for
> the UW-IMAP I've been using for years (RedHat
On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 08:10, Ken Sorensen wrote:
> Greetings,
> Does anyone have any experience with a IMAP/POP3 server that does
> not use /etc/passwd as the base? (Cyrus, others?) Our email users will
> soon grow past the UID limit, and I'm looking for a drop-in solution for
> the UW-IMAP I'v
Chad Skinner said:
> I am thinking about setting up a mail server at home as I may need to
> learn to configure one for a small business. I have the O'reilly book on
> managing IMAP and have been reading it (covers uw-imap and cyrus), but
> would like others opinions, experiences, and advice before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Phipps wrote:
| Thanks for the help. I've already solved this problem. This post was
| sent two days ago. Not sure why it is posting now.
I've had the same thing where my posts from 2-3 days ago have reposted
MULTIPLE times.
- --
Rick Johnson
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IMAP setup on Red Hat 8.0
Just caught this thread, so this may have been mentioned, but here's an
idea.
Check what's in /etc/hosts.deny and /etc/hosts.allow? Is it possible
tcp-wrappers is blocking access to imapd?
Steve Anderson
>On Mon, 18 Nov
Just caught this thread, so this may have been mentioned, but here's an
idea.
Check what's in /etc/hosts.deny and /etc/hosts.allow? Is it possible
tcp-wrappers is blocking access to imapd?
Steve Anderson
>On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> > I am a newbie having some problems getting IM
Will Phipps wrote:
> >On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> > > I am a newbie having some problems getting IMAP/sendmail to work with RH
> > > 8.0. Can someone please steer me in the right direction?
> >
> >"chkconfig --list" should show imap on.
>
> this shows imap as on
>
> >
> >"kill -1" t
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> I am a newbie having some problems getting IMAP/sendmail to work with RH
> 8.0. Can someone please steer me in the right direction?
"chkconfig --list" should show imap on.
this shows imap as on
"kill -1" the xinetd process id#.
telnet localhost 143
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> I am a newbie having some problems getting IMAP/sendmail to work with RH
> 8.0. Can someone please steer me in the right direction? Here are some
of
> my config files to give you an idea of what I have and haven't done.
I also struggled a bit with this
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> I tried this and got the same result. When running netstat nothing
> shows up as listening on port 143.
In the message you topposted above of I saw a mentioning of Sendmail.
Port 143 is for IMAP. Is that installed and enabled in (x)inetd?
**
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> I tried this and got the same result. When running netstat nothing
> shows up as listening on port 143.
In the message you topposted above of I saw a mentioning of Sendmail.
Port 143 is for IMAP. Is that installed and enabled in (x)inetd?
--
Riemer
> telnet localhost 143
>
> I get the following:
>
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused
>
> Any ideas? I tried replying earlier but I'm not sure if my post got
> through (in case two reply's show up).
You running portsentry?
No, ju
> telnet localhost 143
>
> I get the following:
>
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> telnet: connect to address 127.0.0.1: Connection refused
>
> Any ideas? I tried replying earlier but I'm not sure if my post got
> through (in case two reply's show up).
You running portsentry?
---
Edward Dekkers (Direc
Reply test
Will Phipps
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
m not sure if my post got
through (in case two reply's show up).
Thanks for the help,
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Rune Berge
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IMAP setup on R
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> I am a newbie having some problems getting IMAP/sendmail to work with RH
> 8.0. Can someone please steer me in the right direction? Here are some of
> my config files to give you an idea of what I have and haven't done.
I also struggled a bit with this
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Will Phipps wrote:
> I am a newbie having some problems getting IMAP/sendmail to work with RH
> 8.0. Can someone please steer me in the right direction?
"chkconfig --list" should show imap on.
"kill -1" the xinetd process id#.
telnet localhost 143
and tell us what you get.
;Ragnar Wiencke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: imap rpm's needed
> Hi Jay,
>
> >It's a huge program. Why not just use the UW imap that
> comes with
Hi Jay,
>It's a huge program. Why not just use the UW imap that
comes with
>RedHat? called imap-2001???.rpm or something like that.
That is a good question. I search for it on the CD's an on
Redhats website but didn't find anything. But now I found it
on the second CD of the set.
Thanks,
Ragna
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Ragnar Wiencke wrote:
> Hi there guys.
>
> Aren't there any ready to use rpm's for the Cyrus imap
> server? I got a curus-imapd-2.1.5.tar.gz file and I am
> having huge problems trying to configur and compile them. At
> least it seams huge to me :(
>
> T
On 6/26/02 9:45 AM, "Ismael Touama" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just update for this security advisory
> (don't be scared, I'm not networking),
> and I was wondering if UW imap daemon
> was like zlib or something.
> I mean, is it a program or daemon that
> other programs use ?
>
> Be
Don't see an option for that in Outlook XP.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IMAP sent folder
> We are trying to use IMAP for this, but it seems
> We are trying to use IMAP for this, but it seems that in outlook at least,
> sent mail stays on the workstation.
In Outlook Express (I don't know if Outlook is different), go to
Tools/Accounts, select the account, clikck on Properties, and click on the
IMAP tab. Click on the "Store special fol
the beauty of IMAP is that you can change client easily.
thanks for your answers, I'll try them
At 12:28 PM 4/26/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>On 26/04 2002 00:54 Michael Scottaline wrote:
>>On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:07:57 -0500
>>"Ezra Nugroho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled intuitively:
>> >Does anyone k
On 26/04 2002 00:54 Michael Scottaline wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:07:57 -0500
> "Ezra Nugroho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled intuitively:
>
> >Does anyone know of a good IMAP client?
> >The best one so far is Mozilla mail, but maybe there are others.
> ==
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:07:57 -0500
"Ezra Nugroho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled intuitively:
>Does anyone know of a good IMAP client?
>The best one so far is Mozilla mail, but maybe there are others.
==
I prefer Sylpheed
Evolution also handles IMPAP quite w
> -Original Message-
> From: Ezra Nugroho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: imap client
>
>
> Does anyone know of a good IMAP client?
> The best one so far is Mozilla mail, but maybe there are others.
>
>
>
>
mutt
-Original Message-
From: Ezra Nugroho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: imap client
Does anyone know of a good IMAP client?
The best one so far is Mozilla mail, but maybe there are others.
Ezra Nugroho
Web/Datab
Thanks for the clarification, Dave.
The problem we were having is the pop server would not start for some
reason, and we were not able to see why.
I'll do as you suggest.
Thanks to all who helped with suggestions on nohup and renice, by the way -
it was just what I wanted.
cheers,
Julian.
===
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julian Opificius wrote:
>Myself, I have 7.2 running, and the imap service provides both imap and
>ipop services.
That's not technically true, though both daemons are part of the
University of Washington IMAP package that ships with Red Hat.
> Wa
Thanks Rodolfo, that did work, of course.
But I agree - generating the proper certs would be good. Can anyone point
me in a helpful direction on this?
Julian.
At 04:50 AM 1/25/02, you wrote:
>At 1/25/2002 01:18 AM -0600, you wrote:
>>"SSL Negotiation Failed: Cer
At 1/25/2002 01:18 AM -0600, you wrote:
>"SSL Negotiation Failed: Certificate Error; Cert Chain not trusted"
I forget the names of the files and I'm not near one of the servers, but
7.2 installs "dummy" certs since the server is enabled for encryption. Your
problem will immediately go away if y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Ed Wilts wrote:
>I use both Evolution and mutt to read IMAP mail on my local IMAP server.
>I use procmail to file the articles into separate folders, and access it
>all via IMAP. Works fairly well. I happen to be replying to this
Justin:
I've always believed that Linux has been missing a fully functional email
client that supports IMAP - and Windows to some degree as well as I'm sure
someone could make a commercial killing by developing a kick-ass client.
Evolution has impressed me with its progress so far but like yourse
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:51:00PM -0600, Justin Ellison wrote:
>
> Today marks the day that I find a new email client. Mozilla 0.9.6 just ate
>one
> of my Inboxes without a trace. Evolution has done the same to me before. I
> think I want to go with a more basic client, pine, mutt, e
do it."
Read: Do it our way or get fired.
So thats probably it. I had to make sure they didn't get into internet mode.
I have not looked at internet mode.
- Original Message -
From: Tong Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 200
DD space to waste with that program.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Costomiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: IMAP secure or insecure?
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:54:31PM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
> : Could have fool
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:54:31PM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
: Could have fooled me. I have Outlook 2000 and Outlook XP and while I ahve
: not looked at XP I could never figure out how to define ANYTHING but a pop3
: or a Exchange server. Mind sharing the wealth of knowledge so I know what to
: do ne
believe. Just some of the menus are
different. You go to services instead of account I believe.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Egli
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IMAP secure or insecure?
!
- Original Message -
From: Jason Costomiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: IMAP secure or insecure?
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:14:16AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
> : If you mean OutLook (lookout, thats good), Outl
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:14:16AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
: If you mean OutLook (lookout, thats good), Outlook does Pop3 ONLY. Not even
: pop3s that I'm aware of. Outlook Express will do pop3, pop3s, imap, and
: imaps.
Um, nope. Outlook does pop3, imap, pop3s and imaps.
--
Jason Costomiris <><
, November 28, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: IMAP secure or insecure?
> At 11/28/2001 09:13 AM -0500, you wrote:
> >Naked IMAP is just as bad as naked POP3... Secure them with SSL. Sure,
> >this limits the mailers you can use, but the security is worth it.
>
> But no worse, and
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:08:19AM +, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
: But no worse, and there are no known major reasons not to use IMAP, right?
Not at this time...
: Can one have the *option* of using SSL if available but going naked if
: necessary? I have 70 users, 50 of which are computer-illit
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 11/28/2001 09:13 AM -0500, you wrote:
> >Naked IMAP is just as bad as naked POP3... Secure them with SSL. Sure,
> >this limits the mailers you can use, but the security is worth it.
>
> But no worse, and there are no known major reasons not to u
At 11/28/2001 09:13 AM -0500, you wrote:
>Naked IMAP is just as bad as naked POP3... Secure them with SSL. Sure,
>this limits the mailers you can use, but the security is worth it.
But no worse, and there are no known major reasons not to use IMAP, right?
Can one have the *option* of using SSL
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:57:10AM +, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
: Is anyone aware of any reason why IMAP should *not* be run on a
: Net-connected webhosting server?
:
: We're looking at enabling IMAP on our mailservers, but one of my partners
: has heard horrible things about the insecurity of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>hi to all,
> i usually use the imap/pop3 package for the previous version of RH. but
>in RH7 i cant find the same rpm file for it. can someone help me whats the
>package iam gonna use for it?
Are you looking for the imap rpm? It has
Look in /etc/xinetd.d/ for imap and ipop3.
xinetd should be the rpm for that.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 2:15 PM
Subject: IMAP/POP3
> hi to all,
> i usually use the imap/pop3 package for the previous ver
> > Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
> > Sendmail book?
>
> No. The Sendmail tome is devoted solely to the arcana of sendmail.
Excellent man pages though. Try `man procmail` `man procmailrc` and
`man procmailex` but for procmail to serve you with this problem
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, David Talkington wrote:
>
> smtppop3pub.verizon.net - relays for any [EMAIL PROTECTED] envelope
> (30 January 2001)
>
> That's an embarrassment.
> - -d
you are way too kind :)
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Thornton Prime wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
>> Sendmail book?
>
>No. The Sendmail tome is devoted solely to the arcana of sendmail.
And arcana it is.
Mike: 'man procma
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
> Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
> Sendmail book?
No. The Sendmail tome is devoted solely to the arcana of sendmail.
thornton
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks! I'll look it up. Do you know if procmail is in the O'Reilly
Sendmail book?
mw
Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
>
> > I'm still a mail novice. Is procmail a part of sendmail? I've gotten by
> > safely so far using webmin to config sendmail. I need to e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Charles Galpin wrote:
>Yes, as dumb as it sounds it's true. So I can freely send email thru any
>of the smtp.gte.net servers is I say I am [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try
>it. Tell your spammer friends. I have told them numerous times and
>explained in exruciating detail
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
> I'm still a mail novice. Is procmail a part of sendmail? I've gotten by
> safely so far using webmin to config sendmail. I need to educate myself
> more.
It's not part of sendmail, but the default RH sendmail config delivers
through procmail. Procmail
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, David Talkington wrote:
>
> Y'all really don't need to mess with maintaining your own outbound
> mail relays on DSL lines, though. Use the ISP's relay, and let them
> worry about it; that's part of what you're paying them for!
Unless they are f*ing idiots like gte.net. My
I'm still a mail novice. Is procmail a part of sendmail? I've gotten by
safely so far using webmin to config sendmail. I need to educate myself
more.
Mike W
Thornton Prime wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
>
> > The problem: I have a domain. The registrar provides mail and U
Unfortunately, by RH7.0 box has a better uptime record that the local ISP.
The smtp/pop server was out for over 35 hours last week, and forget about
using mail on the weekend! But, they're the only ISP for DSL around here,
unless I roll my own.
Mike W
David Talkington wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PG
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Mike Watson wrote:
> The problem: I have a domain. The registrar provides mail and URL
> forwarding. BUT...all the mail forwarding goes to a single e-mail address.
> When the mail arrives for 4 different users into the same mail spool, can
> Sendmail place the mail into the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Mike Watson wrote:
>The problem: I have a domain. The registrar provides mail and URL
>forwarding. BUT...all the mail forwarding goes to a single e-mail address.
>When the mail arrives for 4 different users into the same mail spool, can
>Sendmail place the mai
I'm in a similar situation. I have a small network attached to DSL and a
single dynamic ip setup on a LinkSys router. All the internal boxes are
configured using IPs in 192.168.x.x. The RH7.0 box is used for a webserver
and mail gateway using sendmail. Since the system is dymanic, I'm using
Dy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Saul Arias Laso wrote:
>1. Which MTA program should I choose? I understand sendmail is overkill for
>my needs. We receive only around 50 emails from customers each day.
In theory, it doesn't matter. Assuming your connection is 24/7, you
can run sendmail right
%-> > The documentation that comes with this is pretty sparse. Anyone have
%-> > any ideas as to what is causing this and possible remedies?
%->
%-> Are these mbx format? I vaguely remember seeing something like
%-> this with
%-> nested folders...is that your case?
%->
%-> You could always check
On 4/10/00 9:55 AM, Kevin Diffily struck keys that formed the message:
> I have run into a serious problem with IMAP on my server. I can read
> and write to mailboxes but when I try to delete messages I receive a
> "read only mailbox error" from my email client.
>
> Relevant info:
> -Mailboxes
On 04-Oct-2000 Kevin Diffily spoke something to the effect:
> I have run into a serious problem with IMAP on my server. I can read
> and write to mailboxes but when I try to delete messages I receive a
> "read only mailbox error" from my email client.
>
> Relevant info:
> -Mailboxes are locat
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Steve Lee wrote:
> when four connection to the imap servers are made.
> the system drops out for 10 minutes because it
> thinks its being flooded when it is not. is there a setting
> for imap to accept around 40 connections without
> stopping connections.
>
It should accept
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Charles Galpin wrote:
>
> > Can you also explain what you mean about netscape. I don't use it's client
> > much. How do things like outlook express like maildirs?
>
> The clients don't have any idea the mail is stored in a Maildir. That's
> the se
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Charles Galpin wrote:
> > Can you also explain what you mean about netscape. I don't use it's client
> > much. How do things like outlook express like maildirs?
>
> Both netscape and outlook express are terrible IMAP clients. Netscape
> often requests message id -1, which
Charles Galpin wrote:
> When you converted to courier-imap and maildirs, how did you handle the
> conversion of all your old style mail files?
well, _I_ did it the hard way. I'd recommend using
http://www.qmail.org/mbox2maildir
to do the conversion en masse (did I spell that right? ;)
> I'm sti
Hi Gordon
When you converted to courier-imap and maildirs, how did you handle the
conversion of all your old style mail files?
I'm still trying to visualize what whooping a otter's ass by 10 yards is,
but it sure sounds good.
Can you also explain what you mean about netscape. I don't use it's c
"William B. Herman" wrote:
>
> When a user connects to the IMAP server, it downloads all the directories in
> their home directory. Is there anyway to have it only download their mail
> forders (mbox,mail/sent-items,mail/saved-items).
All files are valid mbox folders, according to the c-client
the client should have an option to specify the directory to look for
folders in. I don't think you can get a finer level of control.
I set mine to /home/me/mail/
charles
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, William B. Herman wrote:
> When a user connects to the IMAP server, it downloads all the directories i
I set up a Qmail/Imap Server for a small business that has been working fine.
In terms of the performance gains of the different types of mailboxes I don't
think this would be an issue with a small business though you will need to make
this call. Personally I set it up with generic Unix Style Mai
"Chad W. Skinner" wrote:
> that the "mbx" format is better than the default "Unix Spool" format. I am
> trying to find answers to the following questions, but if there are sources
> I could read let me know as well.
Maildir is better than that. Safe over NFS and fast access are its
benefits.
>
>
> Does anyone know what format the system uses when it moves the files out of
> the spool and into the users home directory and is mbx superior in terms of
> speed?
Well, it usually is not an issue of speed. The imap server, most likely
could move bytes faster than the connection iself.
Usin
On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 09:39:18PM -0800, Steve Lee wrote:
> i setup imap server. i can connect and retreive mail without
> removing it off the server. but when i try to delete it
> the emails seem to just display a red check mark in
> netscape. how do i remove it without staring at
> a bunch of
listen, I really can't tell you what's wrong. I'm hoping someone who has a
clue will step in here.
When you try telnet, you should be checking you logs. If you do a
ls -ltr /var/log
the files that were updated most recently will show up last. Take a look
at them and see if you get any errors.
Charles,
I tried it and got a "Connection to Server Lost" message. I am using telnet that
comes with NT 4.0.
Frank
Charles Galpin wrote:
> try this on tax152
>
> telnet linux1 143
>
> and let us know what happens. This shoild be the port imap is an alis for,
> and what netscape uses.
>
> char
try this on tax152
telnet linux1 143
and let us know what happens. This shoild be the port imap is an alis for,
and what netscape uses.
charles
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Frank A. Baldevarona wrote:
> My fault. I've confused even myself. Here goes:
>
> At tax152, if I type "telnet linux1 imap" I j
My fault. I've confused even myself. Here goes:
At tax152, if I type "telnet linux1 imap" I just get the login screen.
If I'm in linux1 as a user, then type in "telnet linux1 imap", I get the
proper IMAP prompt.
Sorry for the confusion and thanks for the help.
Frank
Charles Galpin wrote:
> O
Ok, looking at your original post, I'm a bit confused. You say that you
can
telnet linux1 imap
from the command line on tax152, but cannot from netscape on the same
machine?
seems kind of wierd. You could try using IP addresses in the hosts.allow.
Anyone else have any idea on this? Seems DN
FYI:
The command: telnet IMAPserver imap
This does not work correctly unless I am actually in the IMAP server telneting to
itself.
Frank
"Frank A. Baldevarona" wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Thanks for the tips. I opened a telnet session and ran
> tail -f /var/log/maillog
>
> When I set up the Netsca
Charles,
Thanks for the tips. I opened a telnet session and ran
tail -f /var/log/maillog
When I set up the Netscape client as a POP3 client and check for mail, I am prompted
for my password and then I get my mail. There are added log lines in the maillog file.
However when I switch the client t
Actually I'm looking to run netscape or some other Imap client but am not
sure where to start in the whole Imap experience.
Thanks,
Cory
> If you're talking about the daemon that's easy... install it and it
> runs... honest!
>
> If you're talking about an IMAP client... pine will do it and xfmail
On 29 Jun, Cory T. Lamb shaped the somewhat mellow bitstream to say:
> Thanks to everybody who helped w/ the mail thread, now I'm looking for a
> howto on imap and a step by step on howto get it running. Well if you've
> seen one let me know.
> Thanks,
> ~C
>
> ~
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
