On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:08:19AM +0000, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
: But no worse, and there are no known major reasons not to use IMAP, right?
Not at this time...
: Can one have the *option* of using SSL if available but going naked if
: necessary? I have 70 users, 50 of which are computer-illiterate basically.
: However, for the other 20 encryption of POP3 or IMAP over SSL would be
: *fantastic* and has been a dream of mine for a while.
Yes, you can use both. Just make sure the proper ports are available.
The current uw-imap packages that RH ships are linked against openssl
libs to provide the POP3/IMAP over SSL capabilities.
: Also, "this limits the mailers." Which ones can? Eudora is one, right?
: Which ones can't? Are LookOut and LookOut Express in that list?
The ones I know of...
Windows: Outlook, Outlook Express, Netscape, Mulberry
Mac: Outlook Express, Entourage, Netscape, Mullberry
*nix: Sylpheed, Evolution, Mulberry
: Is only authentication encrypted or all mail transported encrypted?
:
: >To configure this:
: >
: >cd /usr/share/ssl/certs
: >mv imapd.pem imapd.pem.orig
: >make imapd.pem
:
: Just like that?
Yes, just like that...
: >You don't want to use the default (and widely known!) key value, right? :)
:
: Er... what's a key value? And what's the default? (I understand why not:
: everyone will already have a copy. I just don't know what we're talking
: about here.)
You know, the encryption key. The default value is what's in the stock
imapd.pem file.
--
Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human.
jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org | http://www.jasons.org/
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
My account, My opinions.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
