Hello,
LPD printing and ncpmount used to work on my system
and I run autorpm to update my system. I ran autorpm
on Friday and then on Monday my LPD printing didn't work
and ncpmount stopped working. The LPD just says LPD
restart failed and the ncpmount returns an error message
&
I didnt know you could start lpd from xinetd. If you find a solution
pleaselet me/us know.
It sucks that I have to start up lpd every boot, even though I rarely
use it. :( It should auto-start when ever a job gets sent.
Cheers,
Ryan
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 14:21, Jay Thompson wrote:
> I
I am trying to configure lpd in xinetd.
I am trying to run lpd from xinetd in Redhat 8.0.
When I manually launch lpd from command line and send a
print job, it works fine (confirming that printer setup and
lpd are working).
When I shut down lpd and activate lpd entry in xinetd.conf
I get
Glenn Remstedt wrote:
list, I'm running RH8.0
When trying to to start the "lpr" via :
/sbin/service lpd start
Starting lpd: Fatal error - Cannot bind to lpd port ' 515'
Way that ?
Thanks for any suggestion!
I had the same problem, I checked cupsd was running a
Glenn Remstedt wrote:
list, I'm running RH8.0
When trying to to start the "lpr" via :
/sbin/service lpd start
Starting lpd: Fatal error - Cannot bind to lpd port ' 515'
Way that ?
Probably as it is already running i.e. it is already using that port or
you are not
list, I'm running RH8.0
When trying to to start the "lpr" via :
/sbin/service lpd start
Starting lpd: Fatal error - Cannot bind to lpd port ' 515'
Way that ?
Thanks for any suggestion!
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?
Hi.
I've got this configurations about remote printers , the OKI print and
cut some midle pages and HP only print out special characters as
postscript. Have I eliminate filters ?
OKI:\
:ml=0:\
:mx=0:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/OKI:\
:af=/var/spool/lpd/OKI/OKI
G'day all
I am tring to print from a linux box to a HP950c printer shared on a windows
2000 machine.
I read the following howto http://www.linuxprinting.org/lpd-doc.html and
have followed there example about configuring the printcap file for lpd,
It tells me to add the line :af=/pa
hi,
* Christensen Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have set up LPD printing before, and its always just
> worked.. this is the first time I've ever had problems, (its also the first
> time I've ever set up LPD on RedHat 7.3) so I'm wondering if RedHat changed
>
print fine over the network.
This shows that lpd is working locally.
>However, my linux desktop, and my mac OSX laptop cannot connect. I
>opened ethereal to do some packet sniffing (OSX says "queue cannot be
>found", and linux doesn't give any error). the packet sniffing re
of "no connect
permissions". I have set up LPD printing before, and its always just
worked.. this is the first time I've ever had problems, (its also the first
time I've ever set up LPD on RedHat 7.3) so I'm wondering if RedHat changed
some setting somewhere to where th
Hi all,
How do you get lpd to accept requests from people who do not have local
accounts?
I've just set up a RH5.2 system to drive one of our line-printers because the
RH6.2 and 7.* system would not handle printer faults correctly.
Now, with 5.2, paper-outs and jams recover perfectl
Hi Ben - thanks for joining in. But I don't understand what you are
suggesting here - When I boot up I see two options - to get me into
set up and Esc to get me into "grub" after that it starts up all the
deamons and goes straight to a GUI with a login window. At that window
there appears to be
On 2002.06.04 05:29 Ben Logan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:58:54PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> > Hi Ben - thanks for joining in. But I don't understand what you are
> > suggesting here - When I boot up I see two options - to get me
> into
> > set up and Esc to get me into "grub" afte
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:58:54PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> Hi Ben - thanks for joining in. But I don't understand what you are
> suggesting here - When I boot up I see two options - to get me into
> set up and Esc to get me into "grub" after that it starts up all the
> deamons and goes
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:22:32PM -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> >
> Blundering ahead, I have found that the "umount /var" command fails due
> to
> umount: /var: device is busy
> What happens if I partial-force it: "umount -nrv /var" or full force it:
> "umount -f /var"? FYI I tried cl
Carole Womeldorf wrote:
>
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 07:57, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> > > Chris Watt wrote:
> > > > What does "df -h" tell you?
> > > >
> > > > You haven't mentioned disk space, so I apologize if this is too obvious...
> > >
> > > No need to apologize...
Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 07:57, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> > Chris Watt wrote:
> > > What does "df -h" tell you?
> > >
> > > You haven't mentioned disk space, so I apologize if this is too obvious...
> >
> > No need to apologize...You've hit it on the money -
> >
> > [carole
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 07:57, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> Chris Watt wrote:
> > What does "df -h" tell you?
> >
> > You haven't mentioned disk space, so I apologize if this is too obvious...
>
> No need to apologize...You've hit it on the money -
>
> [carole@bgp543409bgs etc]$ df -h
> Filesystem
Chris Watt wrote:
>
> At 22:40 2002/05/28 -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
> >Hi all - I sent this but it didn't show up on the posting so I'm sending
> >it again - sorry if you get it twice...
> >
> >I have three (at least) major problems that I've been struggling with
> >for a good while.
>
> Wh
/var/lib/rpm
# Make sure no programs have the files open already
fuser -v /var/lib/rpm/*
> 3) Recently when I try to print (RH 7.2, i686, HPD722C) I get the error
> message: "cannot open connection to localhost - Connection refused. Make
> sure LPD server is running on the server.&q
At 22:40 2002/05/28 -0400, Carole Womeldorf wrote:
>Hi all - I sent this but it didn't show up on the posting so I'm sending
>it again - sorry if you get it twice...
>
>I have three (at least) major problems that I've been struggling with
>for a good while.
What does "df -h" tell you?
You have
Hi all - I sent this but it didn't show up on the posting so I'm sending
it again - sorry if you get it twice...
I have three (at least) major problems that I've been struggling with
for a good while.
1) RPM doesn't work.
2) up2date does not and has never yet worked
3)
dex
Is this also a related problem?
Recently when I try to print (RH 7.2, i686, HPD722C) I get the error
message: "cannot open connection to localhost - Connection refused. Make
sure LPD server is running on the server." And when I type:
"/sbin/service lpd restart" - I get: Stoppin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Billy Davis wrote:
>When I changed our RH 7.2 system name to be linux1 in
>/etc/sysconfig/network, the lpd spooler failed to come up. An lpstat
>-t command gives a "Get_local_host: hostname: 'linux1' bad" error
>mess
Newbie question:
When I changed our RH 7.2 system name to be linux1
in /etc/sysconfig/network, the lpd spooler failed to come up. An lpstat -t
command gives a "Get_local_host: hostname: 'linux1' bad" error message.
Have I missed another file to change?
Also, does R
Statux wrote:
>
> > In poking around, I find that /etc/hosts has still got the static IP
> > info from my previous provider, along with the old host name. Should I
> > be change this file in some way?
>
> Yeah. Just keep that file up to date. Is it your problem? Could be. Try
> it. Now, with
> In poking around, I find that /etc/hosts has still got the static IP
> info from my previous provider, along with the old host name. Should I
> be change this file in some way?
Yeah. Just keep that file up to date. Is it your problem? Could be. Try
it. Now, with DHCP, don't hostnames change w
IP provider
> (@home) to a DHCP provider, optonline.net.
>
> As the optonline installation instructions said to use any host name one
> wanted, I changed mine. Upon reboot, lpd would not start, giving a boot
> message "Get_Local_Host failed", and X would not start. I on
I just had the weirdest problem. Just changed from a fixed IP provider
(@home) to a DHCP provider, optonline.net.
As the optonline installation instructions said to use any host name one
wanted, I changed mine. Upon reboot, lpd would not start, giving a boot
message "Get_Local_Host f
Jason Jesso wrote:
> In /etc/rc.d/init.d/lpd there is a program being called
>
> /usr/sbin/checkpc -f that complains about the error.
>
> Any ideas??
>
> On November 25, 2001 09:09 am, you wrote:
> > As of yesterday I noticed that my server name is something like
&g
In /etc/rc.d/init.d/lpd there is a program being called
/usr/sbin/checkpc -f that complains about the error.
Any ideas??
On November 25, 2001 09:09 am, you wrote:
> As of yesterday I noticed that my server name is something like
> CPE0060673AABA9
>
> I think rogers cable is cha
As of yesterday I noticed that my server name is something like
CPE0060673AABA9
I think rogers cable is changing things. I use dhcp.
In /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-eth0.info I see
HOSTNAME=CPE0060673AABA9
Now when I start lpd I get the following error:
0:jason> ./lpd start
Starting lpd: 2001-11
age d'origine-
> > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
> > John Weber
> > Envoyé : dimanche 1 avril 2001 19:13
> > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : RE: LPRng: lpd : unresolved symbol : stat
> >
> >
> > Where did yo
I just noticed that my lpd daemon is also broken. I just updated the
latest krb5 packages too!
Gerry
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Richard Potter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ray Curtis wrote:
>
> > Or even more simple until a fix is found, just do a force install of
> > the upgrad
I'm confused. If krb5-libs-1.2.2-3.i386.rpm broke printing, why would a
force install of krb5-libs-1.2.2-3.i386.rpm fix anything? (I think I had
to force the install when I did the upgrade anyway, at least I did a
--nodeps).
--
John S. Weber
System Administrator
Center for Computational Mathema
Sorry, I was aiming the question at the previous comment from Ray Curtis,
not yours.
John
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Richard Potter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, John Weber wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Richard Potter wrote:
>
> > > On 2 stock RH7 with all updates boxes here, it's the updates krb
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, John Weber wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Richard Potter wrote:
> > On 2 stock RH7 with all updates boxes here, it's the updates krb5-libs
> > that broke LPRng!
> Which version do you mean by "upgraded 'krb5' packages"? It's
> krb5-libs-1.2.2-3 that broke my printing.
I sa
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Richard Potter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ray Curtis wrote:
>
> > Or even more simple until a fix is found, just do a force install of
> > the upgraded 'krb5' packages.
>
> On 2 stock RH7 with all updates boxes here, it's the updates krb5-libs
> that broke LPRng!
>
>
> Ch
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Ray Curtis wrote:
> Or even more simple until a fix is found, just do a force install of
> the upgraded 'krb5' packages.
On 2 stock RH7 with all updates boxes here, it's the updates krb5-libs
that broke LPRng!
Cheers,
--
Richard Potter RHCE
DALAN Computer services
Kingsto
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, John Weber blurted out:
JW>An update to the previous message...
JW>
JW>The machine that I thought was OK isn't. it has the same problem.
RH knows about this and they are working on a fix. If you gotta have it
fixed now you can do what I did and install stuff from Rawhide to
//www-math.cudenver.edu/~jweber
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:03:09 -0700 (MST)
From: John Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lpd stooped working on RH7.0
Hi,
lpd stopped working seemingly after doing some upgrades. It seems to
have happened afte
Hi,
lpd stopped working seemingly after doing some upgrades. It seems to
have happened after doing the krb5 upgrades. This has happened on two
RH7.0 boxes, while a 3rd one is OK with the same upgrades. Here's some
info from one of the broken boxes...
[root@ceora autorpm]# /etc/rc.d/init.
> >> importantly, how can I fix it?
> >>
> >> Feb 20 00:15:43 cyrix lpd[30728]: cannot execv /var/spool/lpd/lp/filter
> >> Feb 20 00:15:43 cyrix lpd[30727]: lp: job could not be printed
>
[snip]
>
> /etc/printcap:
> ##PRINTTOOL3## SMB ljet4 600x600 letter {} La
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> I'm running RH 6.2, and the end result is that I can't print to any SMB
>> printers. Does anyone know what the following errors actually mean? More
>> importantly, how can I fix it?
>>
>> Feb 20 00:15:43 c
> Feb 20 00:15:43 cyrix lpd[30728]: cannot execv /var/spool/lpd/lp/filter
> Feb 20 00:15:43 cyrix lpd[30727]: lp: job could not be printed
Make sure your filter file looks like this, with root:root ownership and
755 permissions (at least that's how mine is).
-rwxr-xr-x1 ro
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> I'm running RH 6.2, and the end result is that I can't print to any SMB
> printers. Does anyone know what the following errors actually mean? More
> importantly, how can I fix it?
>
> Feb 20 00:15:43 cyrix lpd[30728]: canno
I'm running RH 6.2, and the end result is that I can't print to any SMB
printers. Does anyone know what the following errors actually mean? More
importantly, how can I fix it?
Feb 20 00:15:43 cyrix lpd[30728]: cannot execv /var/spool/lpd/lp/filter
Feb 20 00:15:43 cyrix lpd[30727]: lp:
I have tried that several times with rebooting afterward.
LPD is set as automatically starting but not running, of course.
There is something that prevents lpd from starting even after the correct
command is given.
Any idea what is missing for lpd to run?
Thank you,
>= Original Mess
As root, start linuxconf; click on control tab; in control panel select
control service activity and see if you can fix it there.
John
On 02/09/01, 01:03:40PM -0600, Francisco Estrada-Belli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having trouble restarting LPD on my RH 7.0 system. I tryed
> re
Hello,
I am having trouble restarting LPD on my RH 7.0 system. I tryed
restarting and setting as automatically restarting at boot time with
linuxconf. Also tried with /etc/rc.d/init.d/lpd restart, but nothing
seems to happen.
This is the error I get when trying to print or check the queue.
lpq
Hello,
I am having trouble restarting LPD on my RH 7.0 system. I tryed
restarting and setting as automatically restarting at boot time with
linuxconf. Also tried with /etc/rc.d/init.d/lpd restart, but nothing
seems to happen.
This is the error I get when trying to print or check the queue.
lpq
At 12:55 PM 12/1/00 -0800, Carson, Chuck wrote:
>
>I have recently had some RH7 boxes on my network hacked via a brute force
>thru the lpd service. Does anyone know if there is a fix for this?
This may be a simplistic answer, but why not filter out packets headed for
your ldp servic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Carson, Chuck wrote:
>
>I have recently had some RH7 boxes on my network hacked via a brute force
>thru the lpd service. Does anyone know if there is a fix for this?
Have you installed the lpr security update (LPRng-3.6.24-2.i386.rpm)?
- -d
-
Can you tell us what the current version of lpd is? I've been attempting
to keep my system up to date via up2date, but if there's anything I've
missed...
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
>
> Yes. It was released in errata the week after red hat 7 hit the wire,
Yes. It was released in errata the week after red hat 7 hit the wire,
and was rolled into the 7.0 respin. Unless this is a new one, and you've
already updated lpd.
Regards,
--Matt Galgoci
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 12:55:49PM -0800, Carson, Chuck wrote:
>
> I have recently had some R
I have recently had some RH7 boxes on my network hacked via a brute force
thru the lpd service. Does anyone know if there is a fix for this?
Thanks,
Chuck
Chuck Carson Sr. Systems Engineer
858.909.3505 Office eBuilt.com
760.212.5899 MobileSan Diego
Gerd Zemella wrote:
> Some days ago I had a similar problem. The partition was full.
> Gerd
>
Same sort of deal here. The NT driver for the hp5si would chew up over
250MB in about 2 min trying to print a pdf file. Went and got the new
version of the driver from HP and viola pdf files print and
Some days ago I had a similar problem. The partition was full.
Gerd
Edward Schernau schrieb:
>
> I had Win2000 printing via TCP/IP printing to my RH6.2 linux box.
>
> It has since stopped working. And I'm left scratching my head
> as to why. Any common stupid mistakes?
>
> Ed
>
> _
Not necessarily. WindowsNT and 2000 have the capability to print via
TCP/IP and LPR/LPD.
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:50:15 -0400 (AST), Marco Shaw wrote:
>
>I would imagine that to go from Windows to Linux, you're using Samba? Are
>smb and nmdb (I think those are the 2 daemons) run
I would imagine that to go from Windows to Linux, you're using Samba? Are
smb and nmdb (I think those are the 2 daemons) running?
Marco
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Michael Burger wrote:
> Is LPD still running?
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:30:02 -0500, Edward Schernau wrote:
>
Is LPD still running?
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:30:02 -0500, Edward Schernau wrote:
>I had Win2000 printing via TCP/IP printing to my RH6.2 linux box.
>
>It has since stopped working. And I'm left scratching my head
>as to why. Any common stupi
I had Win2000 printing via TCP/IP printing to my RH6.2 linux box.
It has since stopped working. And I'm left scratching my head
as to why. Any common stupid mistakes?
Ed
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mai
printing via Samba Server with LPRng on RH 7.0 it works for a few hours then
constantly stops working...I always have to do a killall -HUP lpd and it
magically works again.
I can't babysit this and would like to roll it out but this isn't RELIABLE at
all if one has to constantly reset l
I have the following problem with lpd on several machines (Redhat 6.1):
Printing to a given queue sometimes fail, and the corresponding
spool directory contains, in addition the the normal ones
(cf and df), files whose name starts with "lpdtemp"
In that case,
I have LPD setup to print to a PC (running an LDP daemon) and it works
great, but of course I know the destination IP and all is well.
Now I want to setup the remote printer (RedHat 6.2) dynamically. That is to
say that I want to check what IP an authorized (non-root) remote user is
using and
ed. I looked in the /var/spool/lpd/lp directory and there sits
the original ps file and a huge (around 60 megs) file converted into
laserjet commands. They just sit there, nothing is happening.
When this happens, SOMETIMES doing "/etc/rc.d/init.d/lpd restart" will
cause a job to print, s
Okay, I need a hint!
RH 6.0 stable for about a year. Currently up for 59 days. Remote print
que setup on an HP LaserJet4M Plus has been working okay until
recently. Tonight not a print.
ps ax | grep lpd reports a lpd daemon present
>lpc status reports that no lpd daemon is present
I have a client who is running lpd on a 5.2 system with several serial
printers. A few months ago he had a problem where no jobs would print and
would just stay in the queue. lpr would give the message, "no daemon
present" but ps would show it running. We finally got it working by
re
I have had printing going for sometime, but for some reason at some
unknown time it has stopped working, though it appears on one hand to be
working:
[root@localhost /new_soft]# grep lpd /var/log/messages*
/var/log/messages:Feb 10 23:29:06 localhost lpd: lpd shutdown succeeded
/var/log
> Regards
> Enrico
> -Original Message-
> From: Enrico Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 10 January 2000 08:57
> Subject: lpd problem
>
>
> >Recently my server stopped printing to my remote p
...
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Enrico
-Original Message-
From: Enrico Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 January 2000 08:57
Subject: lpd problem
>Recently my server stopped printing to my remote printers.
> email:
> lpc: connect: Connection refused
>couldn't start daemon
>
>
> The lpd daemon is running when I try this, although I have also tried this
> with out the lpd daemon running.
>
> I am not sure if this is permissions re
;t start daemon
--------
The lpd daemon is running when I try this, although I have also tried this
with out the lpd daemon running.
I am not sure if this is permissions related, or if there is something
more serious.
Any one else have any ideas/solutions?
Regards
Enrico
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
On 6 Jan, Joe Brenner wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Also, RH6.1 did not detect my parallel port. so something
>> is screwed up with the parport package as well. A fix is
>> to set the alias:
>>alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
>> in /etc/conf.modules, as given by a bug report
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, RH6.1 did not detect my parallel port. so something
> is screwed up with the parport package as well. A fix is
> to set the alias:
>alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
> in /etc/conf.modules, as given by a bug report in the
> bugzilla system. I would think t
did the exact same thing with a RH5.1 system on a laptop with no
>> > problems. Any record of any lpd problems?
>
> Get the lpr package from updates or rawhide. I recommend the latter.
>
Thanks, Bernhard! I didn't realize that lpr was buggy in RH6.1. It's not on
the
th no
> > problems. Any record of any lpd problems?
Get the lpr package from updates or rawhide. I recommend the latter.
LLaP
bero
--
Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM.
-- Bill Gates, 1983
Windows 98 requires 16 MB RAM.
-- Bill Gates, 1999
Nob
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm new to the list here. Please forgive redundancy. I recently installed
> RH6.1 on a new Athlon box. Trying to set up a remote printer seems to be a
> problem. I did the exact same thing with a RH5.1 system on a laptop with no
> problems
I'm new to the list here. Please forgive redundancy. I recently installed
RH6.1 on a new Athlon box. Trying to set up a remote printer seems to be a
problem. I did the exact same thing with a RH5.1 system on a laptop with no
problems. Any record of any lpd problems? Or clues on debuggin this
ED]>
Date: Sunday, December 26, 1999 2:06 PM
Subject: atalk and lpd permissions problem
>I have netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.0a-1 and lpr-0.46-0.5.2 lpr is running fine
>when used locally but when I send a job via netatalk from my mac it gets
>queued up in /var/spool/lpd/lp2 for example but
I have netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.0a-1 and lpr-0.46-0.5.2 lpr is running fine
when used locally but when I send a job via netatalk from my mac it gets
queued up in /var/spool/lpd/lp2 for example but permissions are rw-r-
and the file is oned by root and the group is root as well.
As soon as the
lpr package had a bug, updated to the one listed in the errata for rh6.1
thanks
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Nitesh Dhanjani wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just setup a new machine and use the same /etc/printcap. When I lpr a
> file, it doesnt print and the "Total Size" shows up as "0 bytes" when I
> do a lpq
Hi,
I just setup a new machine and use the same /etc/printcap. When I lpr a
file, it doesnt print and the "Total Size" shows up as "0 bytes" when I
do a lpq. Any suggestions?
thanks!
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
.
Ihave since tried stopping and starting the lpd daemon, rebooting the server
and deleting and recreating the print queues, with no print being spooled to
the printer. The prints are all buffered in the print spooler...
The printers are all remote printers, and I have ensured that the host
file
essage results ...
> >
> > lpr: connect: Connection refused
> > jobs queued, but cannot start daemon.
> >
> > This is of course not true and a ps aux|grep lpd gives the following
> >
> > root 436 0.0 0.0 11360 ?SW 14:20 0:00 [lpd
>
> When ever any user tries to print to any printer, the following
> error message results ...
>
> lpr: connect: Connection refused
> jobs queued, but cannot start daemon.
>
> This is of course not true and a ps aux|grep lpd gives the following
>
> root 436 0.
daemon.
This is of course not true and a ps aux|grep lpd gives the following
root 436 0.0 0.0 11360 ?SW 14:20 0:00 [lpd]
root 535 0.0 0.5 1200 328 ?S14:20 0:00 [lpd]
Now I have the vague memory that I had dealt with this before and that it
had
Hi !
Sorry that i cannot help you solving your prob, but cxi printers from HP
are not always winprinters. I have the HP DJ 895Cxi that runs smoothly with
Linux and even prints out the ps-tiger in colours when i set the printer up
as a HP DJ 5xx colour printer. I dunno exactly about the HP
blem however, it took adding at the
end of:
/etc/rc.d/rc.local
/sbin/modprobe parport
/sbin/modprobe parport_pc
/sbin/modprobe lp
Previously with and without the "upgrade" even doing an 'rm -f -r
/var/spool/lpd/lp'
and deleting the previous entry in 'printtool' I c
is enabled
no entries
no daemon present
lpc>
No daemon present??: --
[root@rackmount /root]# ps aux |grep lpd
root 1357 0.0 1.3 824 408 ? S04:24 0:00 lpd
root 5846 0.0 0.7 784 220 p2 R12:03 0:00 grep lpd
/etc/hosts.lpd has all my hosts in
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Gate wrote:
> I have an HP 855cxi printer, and am running RH 5.2. I set everything up
> using printtool, but when I try to print anything it doesn't do anything.
> My printer light flashes, and nothing else. Is there something I'm
> missing? Anyone else have this problem? The
I have an HP 855cxi printer, and am running RH 5.2. I set everything up
using printtool, but when I try to print anything it doesn't do anything.
My printer light flashes, and nothing else. Is there something I'm
missing? Anyone else have this problem? The logs show nothing, no errors
or anything.
I have had this problem since at least RHL5.0, and now it is still
in RHL5.1.
I have a printer set up on my server, and it works perfectly...
I then have a client machine, that uses the remote printer, and
is set up the same way, except it goes through a remote lp queue
instead of directly to th
Hmm, I have a very similar setup, but mine seems to work ok. Let me
describe my network to you (briefly of course).
Windows NT 4.0 Server running LPD
* All clients print through this machine, including:
* Win95, Win98
* Win NT
* Mac
* Solaris 2.x
* Linux
I
I am running RH5.1 and setting up a network printer that prints over IP
(LPR; not Samba), to a WinNT server that is running LPD. I use the
printer configuration utility from X-windows, but am having some
problems.
Here are the symptoms:
1. The NT LPD has been configured and works properly
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Wolfgang Brungert wrote:
>
> Hi Lionel,
>
Hi
> i have another problem related to printing from a Windows NT Server. Under
> Redhat 5.0 with lpr-0.21 or Redhat 5.1 with lpr-0.31 i'm not able to print any
> job. When i stop the queue, i see the job in the spool directory
Hi Lionel,
>
> Yes, this is a bug. lpd tries to fork the printing process with the
> username of the user who is printing.
> I have submitted this bug to the RedHat bugs page.
>
> I made some changes on the sources of the lpr package to be able to print.
> If you want my
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Jacob A. Langford wrote:
> lpd is broken (i386 version at least).
>
> redhat 5.1 -> lpr 0.21.2 -> updated to lpr 0.31.1
> redhat 5.1 -> lpr 0.31.4
>
> Between 0.17 and 0.21 something got broken. The daemon
> acts as if every printcap
Yes, this is a bug. lpd tries to fork the printing process with the
username of the user who is printing.
I have submitted this bug to the RedHat bugs page.
I made some changes on the sources of the lpr package to be able to print.
If you want my solution, please mail me.
Lionel
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
