Bug#336895: marked as done (digikam: Rotating updates image but not thumbnail)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336895: fixed in digikam 0.8.0-1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#325262: marked as done (digikam: 0.8.x would be nice)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325262: fixed in digikam 0.8.0-1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#340822: marked as done (small mistake in /etc/cron.d format file quick description)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:15:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340822: small mistake in /etc/cron.d format file quick description has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#327728: marked as done (chkrootkit: False positive with reaim)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:50:43 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327728: chkrootkit: False positive with reaim has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#306449: marked as done (chkrootkit: complains when it can't find wtmp)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:47:27 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line chkrootkit: complains when it can't find wtmp has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#322629: marked as done (f-prot-installer: Script /usr/bin/f-prot doesn't work with f-prot 4.6.0)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:22:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line oops has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#267632: marked as done (ccache: should handle PATH in /etc/profile)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:32:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267632: fixed in ccache 2.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#333519: marked as done (pump does not take option "interface-mtu" into account)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333519: fixed in pump 0.8.24-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#340062: marked as done (pspp: FTBFS: texi2dvi missing)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:17:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340062: fixed in pspp 0.4.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#337967: marked as done (adjtimex: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337967: fixed in adjtimex 1.20-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#333124: marked as done (adjtimex: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333124: fixed in adjtimex 1.20-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#336333: marked as done ([INTL:pt_PT] Portuguese translation for adjtimex (debconf))

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336333: fixed in adjtimex 1.20-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#331733: marked as done (adjtimex depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331733: fixed in adjtimex 1.20-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#279254: marked as done (adjtimex: Spelling mistake in german debconf)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#279254: fixed in adjtimex 1.20-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#327194: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: Default sort order should be highest # hits on top)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327194: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#327188: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: "Bitzi Metadata" menu item has no (visible) effect)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327188: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#313758: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313758: fixed in gtk-gnutella 0.96b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#340782: marked as done (mv target `/dev/.udev/db/' is not a directory: No such file or directory)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:02:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340782: fixed in udev 0.076-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#340802: marked as done (upgrade failure: mv: target `/dev/.udev/db/' is not a directory)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:48:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340802: upgrade failure: mv: target `/dev/.udev/db/' is not a directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#340788: marked as done (vips: unnoticed soname change)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340788: fixed in vips 7.10.16-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#340800: marked as done (udev bug)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:23:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340798: upgrade error: mv: target `/dev/.udev/db/' is not a directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#340773: marked as done (FTBFS on m68k)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:17:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340773: fixed in octave2.1 2.1.72-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#301708: marked as done (anon-proxy: please depend upon xerces26 instead of xerces25)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:30:10 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line obsolete has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Processed: Oops

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 340798 Bug#340798: upgrade error: mv: target `/dev/.udev/db/' is not a directory 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Bryan Donlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopp

Bug#332313: marked as done (autoconf-archive: acx_pthread.m4 doesn't work)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:01:37 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332313: autoconf-archive: acx_pthread.m4 doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#340458: marked as done (lablgtkmathview - FTBFS: ocamlfind: Package `gdome2' not found)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:42:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340458: lablgtkmathview - FTBFS: ocamlfind: Package `gdome2' not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#116181: marked as done (xpenguins erases nautilus desktop icons)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:35:10 -0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xpenguins erases nautilus desktop icons has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#314842: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: Segfaults after a while)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:13:11 +1100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in versions 0.95.4 and above has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#323101: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: Implicitly search for URN:sha1 for any files being downloaded)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:01:28 +1100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line implemented URN:sha1 checks has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#294900: marked as done (gtk-gnutella: Deleting corrupted files instead of saving them)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:59:33 +1100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line deleting corrupted files is supported has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#338329: marked as done (python2.4-setuptools: New upstream release setuptools-0.6a7)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:13:50 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 0.6a8-0.1 available has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#340772: marked as done (libofx-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libofx.a', which is also in package libofx2)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340772: fixed in libofx 1:0.8.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#336294: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: dmesg complains hdc: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error })

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336294: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#335492: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: /var/run/laptop-mode-nolm-mount-opts doesn't always exist)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335492: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#328432: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: '/etc/init.d/laptop_mode' status gives 'BLKRAGET: Inappropriate ioctl for device')

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328432: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#335493: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: VERBOSE might be set to yes by /etc/default/rcS)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328118: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#328118: marked as done (/usr/sbin/laptop_mode: line 199: [: yes: integer expression expected)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328118: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#333203: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: Laptop-mode complains when hdparm is not installed)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328028: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#328028: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: Invokes hdparm unconditionally)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328028: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#327028: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: changing from laptop mode to laptop mode spins up disks)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327028: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#326433: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: reads /var/run/laptop-mode-nolm-mountopts which is not there)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326433: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#325186: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools crasher: "hda: DMA timeout error")

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325186: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#324457: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: laptop-mode.conf file should fit in 80 char wide screen)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324457: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#324137: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: use /etc/default/laptop-mode.conf instead of /etc/laptop-mode/laptop-mode.conf)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324137: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#323623: marked as done (laptop-mode-tools: cpufreq stuff)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323623: fixed in laptop-mode-tools 1.11-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#340754: marked as done (aspell-he: Incorrect "contents" file created)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340754: fixed in aspell-he 0.9+0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#340689: marked as done (/etc/rcS.d/S05keymap.sh exits)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340689: fixed in console-common 0.7.55 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#340692: marked as done (taskjuggler - FTBFS: missing build dependency)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:48 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340692: fixed in taskjuggler 2.2+beta2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#340663: marked as done (beagle: Fails to find libebook-1.2.so.3... missing dependency?)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340663: fixed in beagle 0.1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#340551: marked as done (beagle: depends on libraries from experimental)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340550: fixed in beagle 0.1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#340550: marked as done (beagle depends on packages that are probably in experimental)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340550: fixed in beagle 0.1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#340308: marked as done (commons-httpclient: package should provide link to the .jar without version in its name)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340308: fixed in commons-httpclient 2.0.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#336916: marked as done (gimp-gap: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336916: fixed in gimp-gap 2.2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#338650: marked as done (php-clamavlib: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338650: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#335532: marked as done (php-clamavLib: French debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335532: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#336626: marked as done (gimp-gap: new upstream release (2.2.0))

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336626: fixed in gimp-gap 2.2.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#335520: marked as done (php-clamavlib.po: French debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335521: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#335521: marked as done (php-clamavlib.po: French debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335521: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#335520: marked as done (php-clamavlib.po: French debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335520: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#334056: marked as done (php-clamavlib: Typo in debconf templates)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334056: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#335521: marked as done (php-clamavlib.po: French debconf templates translation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335520: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#333984: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of php-clamavlib debconf messages)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:41 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333984: fixed in php-clamavlib 0.12a-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#331085: marked as done (FTBFS: Cannot apply indexing with [] to expressions of type Beagle.Hit)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331085: fixed in beagle 0.1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#303630: marked as done (mkisofs: isovfy and friends seg fault when using dev=target)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:28:20 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#303630: mkisofs: isovfy and friends seg fault when using dev=target has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#330489: marked as done (not able to install with KDE 3.4.2)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:32:00 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330489: not able to install with KDE 3.4.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#340691: marked as done (cdrdao - FTBFS: install: cannot stat `debian/cdrdao.overrides': No such file or directory)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
#x27;: No such file or directory > make: *** [install-arch] Error 1 > ** > Build finished at 20051125-0144 > FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 340691-close) by bugs.deb

Bug#340760: marked as done (installation-reports)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 20:18:56 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340760: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#340591: marked as done (gnucash: gnucash (1.8.10-19) does not install because of dependency issues)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:14:34 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340591: gnucash: gnucash (1.8.10-19) does not install because of dependency issues has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#340437: marked as done (Transcode DEPENDS error)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:23:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340437: Transcode DEPENDS error has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#340202: marked as done (udev: Failure to create /dev/input/ on 2.6.15-rc1+)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:17:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340202: fixed in udev 0.076-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#340100: marked as done (udev-udeb: /lib/udev/hotplug.functions missing)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:17:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340100: fixed in udev 0.076-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#339569: marked as done (udev: conflict with current initramfs-tools)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:17:23 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339569: fixed in udev 0.076-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#333489: marked as done (xwine: Corrupt icons after imlib upgrade)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:20:45 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Solved has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#327458: marked as done (polypaudio: Fails to load module)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:18:36 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Went away on reboot the same day has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#308142: marked as done (util-linux-locales: Wrong output from su with Swedish UTF-8 locale)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:22:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#340744: marked as done (postgresql-common: 'Unknown Debian release: 3.1')

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:14:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340744: postgresql-common: 'Unknown Debian release: 3.1' has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#340649: marked as done (Problem installing package fetchmail (stable))

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:14:57 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [pkg-fetchmail-maint] Bug#340649: Problem installing package fetchmail (stable) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#328126: marked as done (polypaudio: Problems with dmix)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:14:11 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#321417: marked as done (sawfish: frames broken after "sticky" window appears on AMD64 system)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:15:11 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#321417: Known issue; patch exists has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#309511: marked as done (Please get postgrey into volatile.debian.net with the first update after Sarge release)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:08:48 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line uploaded has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen

Bug#340140: marked as done (postgrey: Please add arcor to whitelist)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:47:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340140: fixed in postgrey 1.23-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#340749: marked as done (vorbis-tools: please compile with speex support)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:40:19 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340749: vorbis-tools: please compile with speex support has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#340391: marked as done (xmms: consistantly segfaults while playing specific mp3s)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:22:09 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340391: xmms: consistantly segfaults while playing specific mp3s has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#329342: marked as done (fetchmail: wrong message in ja.po for return code 8)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:21:59 +0900 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329342: fetchmail: wrong message in ja.po for return code 8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#340376: marked as done (libcommandline-ruby1.8: incomplete doc-base files break installation)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340376: fixed in libcommandline-ruby 0.7.10-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#339757: marked as done (kernel-image: kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:683! invalid operand: 0000 [#4])

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:37:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339757: kernel-image: kernel BUG at mm/page_alloc.c:683! invalid operand: [#4] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#340736: marked as done (udev doesn't check for more than one available LUN)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:38:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340736: udev doesn't check for more than one available LUN has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#187973: marked as done (ITP: typo3 -- A web content management system with many features)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:20:44 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line typo3 is packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#340520: marked as done (package still ships gconf schemas in /etc)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 06:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340520: fixed in glunarclock 1:0.32.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#330718: marked as done (dh-make-php: .lock and .filemap are not removed)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 06:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330718: fixed in dh-make-php 0.0.12-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#295755: marked as done (module-init-tools: reads user's backup files in /etc/modprobe.d)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:54:32 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295755: module-init-tools: reads user's backup files in /etc/modprobe.d has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#340721: marked as done (helix-player points to non-free software instead of playing movie)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:12:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This is helix-player, not real-player has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#338681: marked as done (curl: bad behaviour if --limit-rate 10KB or XYKB (not XYK) MINOR)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338681: fixed in curl 7.15.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#338680: marked as done (Bad message error if FTP-path does NOT exists)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338680: fixed in curl 7.15.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#334888: marked as done (cannot install libcurl3-openssl-dev together with heimdal-dev)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334888: fixed in curl 7.15.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#334754: marked as done (installation-reports)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334754: fixed in discover1-data 1.2005.11.25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#334472: marked as done (Promise SATA controller not detected)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334472: fixed in discover1-data 1.2005.11.25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#331107: marked as done (installation-reports)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:02:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331107: fixed in discover1-data 1.2005.11.25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#340711: marked as done ((no subject))

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 03:47:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340711: fixed in wzdftpd 0.5.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#338359: marked as done (libdiscover1 needs more strict shlibs)

2005-11-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2005 03:47:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#338359: fixed in discover1 1.7.16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

  1   2   >