Your message dated Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:21:59 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#329342: fetchmail: wrong message in ja.po for return code 8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 09:01:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 02:01:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from s5.mex.nia.ad.jp [211.13.218.205] (postfix)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EI0U3-0006mY-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:01:43 -0700
Received: from cyberonix.co.jp (25.212.244.43.ap.yournet.ne.jp [43.244.212.25])
        by s5.mex.nia.ad.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 09776B917
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:01:38 +0900 (JST)
Received: from hama (at local machine)
        by skyplate.cyberonix.co.jp (sssendmail);
        Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:01:54 +0900
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0729160280=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Takeshi Hamasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: fetchmail: wrong message in ja.po for return code 8
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:01:54 +0900
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===============0729160280==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.2.5-18
Severity: minor


I found wrong message in Japanese when fetchmail ends with return code
8.
In fact, this is same as I reported in #233634 and once fixed in 6.2.5-3.
I attach the patch again.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.EUC-JP, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.EUC-JP (charmap=EUC-JP) (ignored: 
LC_ALL set to ja_JP.EUC-JP)

Versions of packages fetchmail depends on:
ii  adduser                       3.63       Add and remove users and groups
ii  base-files                    3.1.2      Debian base system miscellaneous f
ii  debianutils                   2.8.4      Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  libc6                         2.3.5-4    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libssl0.9.7                   0.9.7e-3   SSL shared libraries

Versions of packages fetchmail recommends:
pn  ca-certificates               <none>     (no description available)

-- no debconf information

--===============0729160280==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/x-po; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="japodiff"

--- po/ja.po.bak        2005-09-21 17:41:34.000000000 +0900
+++ po/ja.po    2005-09-21 17:41:34.000000000 +0900
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@
 
 #: fetchmail.c:367 fetchmail.c:376
 msgid "fetchmail: no other fetchmail is running\n"
-msgstr "fetchmail: $BB>$N(B fetchmail $B$,<B9TCf$G$9!#(B\n"
+msgstr "fetchmail: $B<B9TCf$N(B fetchmail $B$OB8:_$7$^$;$s!#(B\n"
 
 #: fetchmail.c:382
 #, c-format

--===============0729160280==--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329342-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2005 17:21:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 09:21:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mfep7.odn.ne.jp ([143.90.131.185] helo=t-mta7.odn.ne.jp)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EfhG1-00073t-LE
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:21:09 -0800
Received: from syd.odn.ne.jp ([219.66.183.231]) by t-mta7.odn.ne.jp
          with SMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:20:58 +0900
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#329342: fetchmail: wrong message in ja.po for return code 8
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:47:08 +0200".
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22PL7-deb] 2003-09/29(Mon)
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:21:59 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

I became fetchmail ja.po maintainer few days ago,
and the first submission was accepted.
Now Translation Project at sourceforge has the newest ja.po for 6.2.9-rc9.
So I close the bug.

Thanks,
--------------------------------------------------
    Takeshi Hamasaki
    E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

nico>> so if you found a solution on which you can work please 
nico>> close the bug by sending a short message to 
nico>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to