issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Use a temporary repository location to download certain ecj versions ("drops") [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a temporary repository location to download certain ecj versions ("drops") [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update the IOContext on IndexInput rather than the ReadAdvice [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update the IOContext on IndexInput rather than the ReadAdvice [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update the IOContext on IndexInput rather than the ReadAdvice [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update the IOContext on IndexInput rather than the ReadAdvice [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update the IOContext on IndexInput rather than the ReadAdvice [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update the IOContext on IndexInput rather than the ReadAdvice [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update the IOContext on IndexInput rather than the ReadAdvice [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor main top-n bulk scorers to evaluate hits in a more term-at-a-time fashion. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fixed incorrect Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ ( [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixed incorrect Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ ( [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fixed incorrect Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ ( [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Return MatchNoDocsQuery when IndexOrDocValuesQuery::rewrite does not match [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MatchNoDocsQuery when IndexOrDocValuesQuery::rewrite does not match [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Return MatchNoDocsQuery when IndexOrDocValuesQuery::rewrite does not match [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] An alternate implementation for RerankVectorQuery [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix AbstractRangeQueryNode#toQueryString [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix AbstractRangeQueryNode#toQueryString [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix AbstractRangeQueryNode#toQueryString [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix AbstractRangeQueryNode#toQueryString [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix AbstractRangeQueryNode#toQueryString [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix AbstractRangeQueryNode#toQueryString [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix AbstractRangeQueryNode#toQueryString [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add assumption to ignore test failures due to disconnected graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add assumption to ignore test failures due to disconnected graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add assumption to ignore test failures due to disconnected graphs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Minor access modifier adjustment to a couple of lucene90 backward compat types [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor access modifier adjustment to a couple of lucene90 backward compat types [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Minor access modifier adjustment to a couple of lucene90 backward compat types [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Could/should KNN queries use per-segment query caching? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Could/should KNN queries use per-segment query caching? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] DocIdRunEnd implementation missed in Lucene103PostingsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocIdRunEnd implementation missed in Lucene103PostingsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocIdRunEnd implementation missed in Lucene103PostingsReader [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] DocIdRunEnd implementation missed in Lucene103PostingsReader [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] org.apache.lucene.search.TestPatienceFloatVectorQuery.testFindAll failed [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit from 7.2.0.202503040940-r to 7.2.1.202505142326-r [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit from 7.2.0.202503040940-r to 7.2.1.202505142326-r [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.eclipse.jgit:org.eclipse.jgit from 7.2.0.202503040940-r to 7.2.1.202505142326-r [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.gradle.toolchains.foojay-resolver-convention from 0.10.0 to 1.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.gradle.toolchains.foojay-resolver-convention from 0.10.0 to 1.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.gradle.toolchains.foojay-resolver-convention from 0.10.0 to 1.0.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Implement AssertingPostingsEnum#intoBitSet. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speed up conjunctive queries that need scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up conjunctive queries that need scores. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up conjunctive queries that need scores. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix patience knn queries to work with seeded knn queries [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Try GroupVInt for writing HNSW neighbor node arrays? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Try GroupVInt for writing HNSW neighbor node arrays? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Try GroupVInt for writing HNSW neighbor node arrays? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Try GroupVInt for writing HNSW neighbor node arrays? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support for Pluggable Custom Vector Similarity Functions [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Integrate a JVector codec for KNN searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Integrate a JVector codec for KNN searches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Integrate a JVector codec for KNN searches [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] action failures sent to bui...@lucene.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] action failures sent to bui...@lucene.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] action failures sent to bui...@lucene.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] action failures sent to bui...@lucene.apache.org [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Specify and test that IOContext is immutable [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specify and test that IOContext is immutable [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Specify and test that IOContext is immutable [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't run changelog verifier on draft PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't run changelog verifier on draft PRs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't run changelog verifier on draft PRs [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use shasum on macosx and avoid checking the checksum if the wrapper file doesn't exist [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] gradle-wrapper.jar http 429 (too many requests) from github [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] gradle-wrapper.jar http 429 (too many requests) from github [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] gradle-wrapper.jar http 429 (too many requests) from github [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] gradle-wrapper.jar http 429 (too many requests) from github [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] gradle-wrapper.jar http 429 (too many requests) from github [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] gradle-wrapper.jar http 429 (too many requests) from github [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] gradle-wrapper.jar http 429 (too many requests) from github [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] tests: decrease maximum number of threads in seq number test to avoid OOM [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix for add char and token filters in Luke Analysis tab [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix for add char and token filters in Luke Analysis tab [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix for add char and token filters in Luke Analysis tab [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix for add char and token filters in Luke Analysis tab [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix for add char and token filters in Luke Analysis tab [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix for add char and token filters in Luke Analysis tab [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix for add char and token filters in Luke Analysis tab [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added toString() method to BytesRefBuilder [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Override ValueSource.FromDoubleValuesSource.getSortField [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we explore DiskANN for aKNN vector search? [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Nightly benchark regression on pre-filtered vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchark regression on pre-filtered vector search [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchark regression on pre-filtered vector search [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use per-segment K in filtered KNN fallback logic (fixes 14671) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use per-segment K in filtered KNN fallback logic (fixes 14671) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use per-segment K in filtered KNN fallback logic (fixes 14671) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speed up exhaustive evaluation. [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Improve BytesRef creation from String [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Fix termination condition in TestStressNRTReplication. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix termination condition in TestStressNRTReplication. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestStressNRTReplication may never terminate (exceed suite timeout) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Remove Telugu normalization of vu వు to ma మ from IndicNormalizer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update verifier comment to show label [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update verifier comment to show label [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update verifier comment to show label [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Update IndicNormalizer.java [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Mention label in changelog verifier comment [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Mention label in changelog verifier comment [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] asynchronous I/O + saturating NVMe bandwidth [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] asynchronous I/O + saturating NVMe bandwidth [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] asynchronous I/O + saturating NVMe bandwidth [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: configure 3 retries for all gradle Download tasks [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages