issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Build: remove hard-coded Java versions from ecj.javadocs.prefs [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Early terminate visit BKD leaf when current value greater than upper point in sorted dim. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] MMapDirectory.PRELOAD_HINT should also consider FileTypeHint.INDEX [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Filters cannot be set in Analysis [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Filters cannot be set in Analysis [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] upgrade from rat 0.14 to rat 0.15 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade from rat 0.14 to rat 0.15 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add comment about using InverseIntersectVisit and IntersectVisitor. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add comment about using InverseIntersectVisit and IntersectVisitor. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add instructions to help/IDEs.txt for VSCode and Neovim [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add instructions to help/IDEs.txt for VSCode and Neovim [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] investigate jflex 1.9.x buffer size/expansion feature [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Enable changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Enable changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Segment count (merging) can impact recall on KNN ParentJoin queries [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Expressions: Avoid creating a dynamic constant with BSM if MethodHandle descriptor can be used [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove deprecations in expressions [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove deprecations in expressions [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Don't perform additional KNN querying after timeout, fixes #14639 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Don't perform additional KNN querying after timeout, fixes #14639 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Fix bad interaction between optimistic query and query timeout [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Fix bad interaction between optimistic query and query timeout [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] update commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.21 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] update commons-compress from 1.19 to 1.21 [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] upgrade commons codec from 1.13.0 to 1.16.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] upgrade commons codec from 1.13.0 to 1.16.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Moving CHANGES entry for #14609 from 11.0 to 10.3 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Question for nori analyer behavior change [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Multi range traversal for numeric range aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Multi range traversal for numeric range aggregations [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] fix TestSortedDvMultiRangeQuery.testDuelWithStandardDisjunction when … [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Clean up FileTypeHint a bit. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use the preload hint on completion fields and memory terms dictionaries. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Catch and re-throw Throwable rather than using a success boolean [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Refactor KnnVectorReader merging to not need a finishMerge method [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Refactor KnnVectorReader merging to not need a finishMerge method [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Return MergeSpec for IndexWriter forceMergeDeletes API [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] Uwe Schindler
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Nightly benchmark regression on 2025.05.01 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Backport #14510 to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Backport migration from ReadAdvice to hints to 10.x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix WindowsFS to support Windows [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Use diff exit code correctly in changelolg verifier [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary comparison for CELL_CROSSES_QUERY cases [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test testDeleteUnusedFiles() failed in TestIndexWriter [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter fixed token position and preserves original token [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] HyphenationCompoundWordTokenFilter fixed token position and preserves original token [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Backward compatibility of codecs in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Backward compatibility of codec formats in minor releases [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Adding benchmark for histogram collector over point range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding benchmark for histogram collector over point range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding benchmark for histogram collector over point range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding benchmark for histogram collector over point range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding benchmark for histogram collector over point range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding benchmark for histogram collector over point range query [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding benchmark for histogram collector over point range query [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Adding Ankit Jain to committer list [lucene-site] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Adding Ankit Jain to committer list [lucene-site] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.gradle.develocity from 3.19 to 4.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages