issues  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] [RFC] Add Random Access Write Support to IndexOutput [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Disable bypassing graph creation for HnswGraphTestCase#testReadWrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable bypassing graph creation for HnswGraphTestCase#testReadWrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable bypassing graph creation for HnswGraphTestCase#testReadWrite [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Disable bypassing graph creation for HnswGraphTestCase#testReadWrite [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump commons-codec:commons-codec from 1.19.0 to 1.20.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump commons-codec:commons-codec from 1.19.0 to 1.20.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.ibm.icu:icu4j from 77.1 to 78.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.ibm.icu:icu4j from 77.1 to 78.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.ibm.icu:icu4j from 77.1 to 78.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.ibm.icu:icu4j from 77.1 to 78.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.31.0 to 1.32.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.googlejavaformat:google-java-format from 1.31.0 to 1.32.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add fallback support to Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorsFormat getFloatVectorValues when there are no full-precision vectors present [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Is there a QuerParser which can parse query string to SpanNotQuery? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Is there a QuerParser which can parse query string to SpanNotQuery? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Is there a QuerParser which can parse query string to SpanNotQuery? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Is there a QuerParser which can parse query string to SpanNotQuery? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] perf(core): Implement sparse LiveDocs to reduce memory by up to 8x [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] TestParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery.testAdvance failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery.testAdvance failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery.testAdvance failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestParentsChildrenBlockJoinQuery.testAdvance failure [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Date Tiered Compaction [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Date Tiered Compaction [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Date Tiered Compaction [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Date Tiered Compaction [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Date Tiered Compaction [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Put sensible bounds on quantized scores [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Put sensible bounds on quantized scores [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Put sensible bounds on quantized scores [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Put sensible bounds on quantized scores [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Put sensible bounds on quantized scores [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Put sensible bounds on quantized scores [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [backport] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [backport] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Should we use a SparseFixedBitSet when deletes are sparse? [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Failing workflow instead of comment on missing changelog entry [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different docs and scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different docs and scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different docs and scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene104ScalarQuantizedVectorFormat returns different scores after merging [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Allow skip_factor to be set dynamically within QueryCache [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.42.0 to 2.43.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.42.0 to 2.43.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.42.0 to 2.43.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.42.0 to 2.43.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Improve round trip conversion of ValueSource <-> DoublesValueSource [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve round trip conversion of ValueSource <-> DoublesValueSource [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Improve round trip conversion of ValueSource <-> DoublesValueSource [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Check for changelog entry is bit aggressive [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Check for changelog entry is bit aggressive [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Check for changelog entry is bit aggressive [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] add .envrc to the gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add .envrc to gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add .envrc to gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add .envrc to gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add .envrc to gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] add .envrc to gitignore [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] What were these bugs about? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] What were these bugs about? [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] What were these bugs about? [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] LUCENE Jira board usage. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] LUCENE Jira board usage. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] LUCENE Jira board usage. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] LUCENE Jira board usage. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make ./gradlew eclipse regenerate the same file [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make ./gradlew eclipse regenerate the same file [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Make WrapperDownloader work for java >= 11 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make WrapperDownloader work for java >= 11 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] WrapperDownloader does not work with java < 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] WrapperDownloader does not work with java < 23 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] When doing something with gradle, don't reuse any caches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] When doing something with gradle, don't reuse any caches [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] When doing something with gradle, don't reuse any caches [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is comparative with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] NumericComparator: immediately check whether a segment is competitive with the recorded bottom [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Gradle 9.1+ doesn't allow exclusiveContent in pluginManagement repositories [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: vscode improvements and devcontainer support [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] build: make "gradlew eclipse" idempotent [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] build: make "gradlew eclipse" idempotent [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] build: make "gradlew eclipse" idempotent [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] build: make "gradlew eclipse" idempotent [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove some exclusions from formatting generated Java files [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages