issues  

Messages by Thread

• Re: [PR] Make single value BKDReader instances lighter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Make single value BKDReader instances lighter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Extrace leaf-slice calculation path from IndexSearch#slices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Extract leaf-slice calculation path from IndexSearch#slices [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Extract leaf-slice calculation path from IndexSearch#slices [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize ConcurrentMergeScheduler for Multi-Tenant Indexing [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Incorrect use of fsync [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] [WIP] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [WIP] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] A specialized Trie for Block Tree Index [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Add a workflow generating gh stats for board summary reports [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add a workflow generating gh stats for board summary reports [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add a workflow generating gh stats for board summary reports [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add a workflow generating gh stats for board summary reports [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add a workflow generating gh stats for board summary reports [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Add a workflow generating gh stats for board summary reports [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Speedup merging of HNSW graphs [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Writing too many identical vector documents can cause flush blocking [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Writing too many identical vector documents can cause flush blocking [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Writing too many identical vector documents can cause flush blocking [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove some randomness in testRandomWithFilter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove some randomness in testRandomWithFilter [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid using time zones that emit warnings (jdk25+) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid using time zones that emit warnings (jdk25+) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid using time zones that emit warnings (jdk25+) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid using time zones that emit warnings (jdk25+) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestKnnGraph.testMultiThreadedSearch random test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestKnnGraph.testMultiThreadedSearch random test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestKnnGraph.testMultiThreadedSearch random test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestKnnGraph.testMultiThreadedSearch random test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestKnnGraph.testMultiThreadedSearch random test failure [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestKnnGraph.testMultiThreadedSearch random test failure [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python: enable all linting checks and type-hint the code [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add PR number to output of changelog action [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add PR number to output of changelog action [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Add changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Add changelog verifier [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Optimize commit retention policy to maintain only the last 5 commits [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] reformat the python code with 'make reformat' and enable format in CI check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reformat the python code with 'make reformat' and enable format in CI check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reformat the python code with 'make reformat' and enable format in CI check [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] reformat the python code with 'make reformat' and enable format in CI check [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] python scripts: enable standard type checking [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python scripts: enable standard type checking [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python scripts: enable standard type checking [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix DirectIOIndexInput seek to not read when position is within buffer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix DirectIOIndexInput seek to not read when position is within buffer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix DirectIOIndexInput seek to not read when position is within buffer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix DirectIOIndexInput seek to not read when position is within buffer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix DirectIOIndexInput seek to not read when position is within buffer [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix DirectIOIndexInput seek to not read when position is within buffer [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] python scripts: fix enough so that undefined variable analysis works [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] python scripts: fix enough so that undefined variable analysis works [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] lint python scripts in dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] lint python scripts in dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] lint python scripts in dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] lint python scripts in dev-tools [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize single value ranges for multivalue sortedset docvalues ranges. (#14276) [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [PR] Optimize single value ranges for multivalue sortedset docvalues ranges. [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Python release checker scripts need an update to use Java 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Python release checker scripts need an update to use Java 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Python release checker scripts need an update to use Java 23 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Python release checker scripts need an update to use Java 23 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestDirectIODirectory is slow on Ubuntu/Linux systems [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages