issues  

Messages by Thread

• [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Lucene nightly benchmark regression on 29/01 [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] TestForTooMuchCloning failing on 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning failing on 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning failing on 10x [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] TestForTooMuchCloning failing on 10x [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce LargeNumHitsTopDocsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Avoid unnecessary DisjunctionMaxBulkScorer overhead [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Possible performance regression starting in Lucene 10.1.0 (dis_max + constant_score) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Performance regression starting in Lucene 10.1.0 (dis_max + constant_score) [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix tessellator failure by preferring the shared vertex that is the leftmost vertex of the hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix tessellator failure by preferring the shared vertex that is the leftmost vertex of the hole [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix tessellator failure by preferring the shared vertex that is the leftmost vertex of the hole [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix wrong BitSet result in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong BitSet result in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong BitSet result in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong BitSet result in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong BitSet result in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong BitSet result in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix wrong BitSet result in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] DocBase not set when switch to next LeafReader causing wrong bitset in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] DocBase not set when switch to next LeafReader causing wrong bitset in MemoryAccountingBitsetCollector [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Test failure in TestExitableDirectoryReader#testDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestExitableDirectoryReader#testDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestExitableDirectoryReader#testDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestExitableDirectoryReader#testDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Test failure in TestExitableDirectoryReader#testDocValues. [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Introduce DocValuesStatsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Introduce DocValuesStatsCollectorManager [lucene] via GitHub
• Re: [I] add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: fix precommit whitespace issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: fix precommit whitespace issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: fix precommit whitespace issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: fix precommit whitespace issues [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: fix precommit whitespace issues [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: fix/reformat python sources [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: fix/reformat python sources [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] docs: reformat markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: reformat markdown [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] docs: reformat markdown [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: add generated files lists/patterns to .gitattributes [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: remove executable permissions from non-executable java files [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: remove executable permissions from non-executable java files [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-go from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 in /.github/actions/eclint [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-go from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 in /.github/actions/eclint [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-java from 5.1.0 to 5.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump conda-incubator/setup-miniconda from 3.2.0 to 3.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump conda-incubator/setup-miniconda from 3.2.0 to 3.3.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/checkout from 6.0.1 to 6.0.2 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.barfuin.gradle.jacocolog from 3.1.0 to 4.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.barfuin.gradle.jacocolog from 3.1.0 to 4.0.1 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.87 to 0.89 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump holidays from 0.87 to 0.89 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.14.10 to 0.14.14 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump ruff from 0.14.10 to 0.14.14 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.3 to 5.0.4 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] deps(java): bump org.apache.groovy:groovy-all from 5.0.3 to 5.0.4 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.36.2 to 1.37.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build(deps): bump basedpyright from 1.36.2 to 1.37.2 in /dev-tools/scripts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] ci: bump actions/setup-python from 6.1.0 to 6.2.0 [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Lazily allocate ByteArrayDataInputs in SegmentTermsEnumFrame [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Allow TermsEnum to express a preference for seekExact to FrozenBufferedUpdates [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Allow TermsEnum to express a preference for seekExact to FrozenBufferedUpdates [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Fix FVH boost issue (#15442) [lucene] via GitHub
• [I] Adding Builder pattern in MMapDirectory.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Adding Builder pattern in MMapDirectory.java [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Adding Builder pattern in MMapDirectory.java [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Remove sorted path from FrozenBufferedUpdates.TermDocsIterator [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Use a more coarse-grained competitive iterator for skipper-based numeric sorts [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Reduce lock scope in StringHelper#randomId() [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] Add support for writing full-precision vector file in QuantizedVectorWriter [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added support for writing empty full-precision vector files [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added support for writing empty full-precision vector files [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Added support for writing empty full-precision vector files [lucene] via GitHub
• [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] build: integrate prek [lucene] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages