I have packaging of gnulib-l10n for Debian here: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnulib-l10n/
Some comments: 1) Where is version controlled sources? I see that README, configure.ac etc looks hand written, so I presume these are stored somewhere, and I think it makes sense to keep a git repository around for this. 2) Regarding license, the README says: "It is under LGPLv2+." Which is a bit thin. First, the file COPYING contains LGPL version 2.1 so clarifying which version helps. Is it intentional that configure.ac Makefile.am are GPLv3+? The essential part of this package, the po/*.po files, have various different license that aren't always completely clear, and not always LGPLv2+. For example po/af.po: # coreutils-5.2.1.af.po. # Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. # Petri Jooste <rkw...@puknet.puk.ac.za>, 2004. Coreutils or gnulib? GPL or LGP? po/ca.po: # GNU Mailutils Catalan translation. # Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # This file is distributed under the same license as the mailutils package. # Jordi Mallach <jo...@gnu.org>, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005. Huh? # Japanese gnulib messages # Copyright (C) 2000, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # This file is distributed under the same license as the gnulib package. Generally these non-specific license referrals are not clear. What license is gnulib released under? I don't think that is well-defined. # Norwegian messages for GNU textutils (bokm<E5>l dialect) # Copyright (C) 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # Eivind Tagseth <eivi...@multinet.no>, 1996, 1997, 1999. Textutils? /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
