On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:08:18PM -0400, Joe Polk wrote:
> I don't know what you mean "with telephone" and by 100mb I assume you mean
> with a 100MB switch (ie 4 port switch built in)? Any number will work, D-
> Link, NetGear, Linksys.
Technically, those aren'
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:04:25 -0800
Subject: DSL router recommendation
> can somebody please recommend a good DSL router with telephone and 100MB
> interface? something adequate will do.
>
> - Noah
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailt
can somebody please recommend a good DSL router with telephone and 100MB
interface? something adequate will do.
- Noah
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 16:46, Blake Thornton wrote:
> > I've been struggling to get my dsl connection working (pppoe) and I bought
> > a router which I set up using a windows machine.
> >
> > Now, when I boot up my linux (redhat 9) box, the eth0 connection f
I've been struggling to get my dsl connection working (pppoe) and I bought
a router which I set up using a windows machine.
Now, when I boot up my linux (redhat 9) box, the eth0 connection fails to
come up and does not appear in `ifconfig`.
So, I figured that there is a problem recognizi
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 16:46, Blake Thornton wrote:
> I've been struggling to get my dsl connection working (pppoe) and I bought
> a router which I set up using a windows machine.
>
> Now, when I boot up my linux (redhat 9) box, the eth0 connection fails to
> come up an
works great.
- Manish Kathuria
Jeff Bearer wrote:
I can't find an application that will allow me to equalize traffic
across two DSL lines such as this router does.
http://www.nexland.com/turbo.cfm
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/ma
el card to get this to work).
Hard to see how bonding could work for 2 DSL lines (but I've never tried
it). Might be possible with the intel software depending on the DSL setup.
--
Ian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Ian Mortimer
Tel: +61 7 3365 3436 Physics
Fax: +61 7 3365 124
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 05:32:59PM -0400, Jeff Bearer wrote:
>
> Does something like this exist and I simply didn't look in the right
> place?
$locate bonding
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
[...]
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/bonding.c
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/bonding.o
[.
I can't find an application that will allow me to equalize traffic
across two DSL lines such as this router does.
http://www.nexland.com/turbo.cfm
I understand why it's tricky and it wouldn't work with the normal
networking stack. But I'm surprised that nobody has some kerne
William Dolphin <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wednesday, 19
March 2003 16:35:
>> Does the RH6.2 server itself have an externally visible internet
>> address? If so what ports are visible to the internet?
>
> It has a static IP address assigned by the DSL ISP. What p
Does the RH6.2 server itself have an externally visible internet address?
If so what ports are visible to the internet?
It has a static IP address assigned by the DSL ISP. What ports may be
visible, I don't know.
Are you saying you have never applied any security patches?
I've not a
???
im not sure y i got this email
i am trying to install a dual boot system 1st winxp
2nd redhat 8.0
have had much troubles with the iso files i burnt to cd
i tried it twice just to make sure the media wasnt the problem
now when i try to install 8.0 i get a erroe message that a file c
William Dolphin <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wednesday, 19
March 2003 09:09:
> I'm willing to try anything, but it was working with current settings
> but now is not.
>
> No router, just a pair of "dumb" switches. The server uses
> the DSL gatew
William Dolphin said:
> Thanks, Nate. You're right about the kernel. I'll try what you suggest.
>
> Any reasons why any of this would have CHANGED? It's been working fine for
> a few years.
>
> Thanks again.
>
if nothing on the system has changed(that includes the system not being
rebooted or an
Thanks, Nate. You're right about the kernel. I'll try what
you suggest.
Any reasons why any of this would have CHANGED? It's been working fine
for a few years.
Thanks again.
-Wm.
At 02:31 PM 3/18/03 -0800, you wrote:
William Dolphin said:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a linux dunce trying to straighten out a
I'm willing to try anything, but it was working with current
settings but now is not.
No router, just a pair of "dumb" switches. The server uses the
DSL gateway, but sets a different one for the computers on the
LAN.
The gateway IP for the internal computers is currently set f
roblem for a LAN server running Red Hat 6.2.
>
> Small mixed LAN (win/mac) on Linksys dumb switches was fully operational
> and stable, no hardware or software changes. DSL connection went down 2
> days ago. Server reboot fixed, but went down again yesterday and won't come
>
William Dolphin said:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm a linux dunce trying to straighten out a sudden internet connection
> problem for a LAN server running Red Hat 6.2.
check to be sure ip_forwarding is enabled
redhat 6.2 I think comes stock with 2.2.x kernel, so
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
if it says
Hi all,
I'm a linux dunce trying to straighten out a sudden internet connection
problem for a LAN server running Red Hat 6.2.
Small mixed LAN (win/mac) on Linksys dumb switches was fully operational
and stable, no hardware or software changes. DSL connection went down 2
days ago. S
I am having problems browsing the web or while trying
to ping say yahoo.com. I think I am able to connect to
my ISP, as evident from below given outputs.
Of particular interest(at least I think so) are the
fields Peer and Name in tcpdump output.
I have highlighted them using '#'.
I have remov
Hello,
thank you for your help. My DSL-Connection works now. But if the Connection
ins activated in the Network-Configuration-Window, there is always a
connection. Is there a more simple way of opening and closing the connection, or do i
have to change this always in this window. Isn't th
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 14:27, Mauritius Hiller wrote:
> Hi Cliff,
>
> thanks for your hints. I just installed the rp-pppoe.rpm. Now I want to
> start the adsl-config, as it is saied in
> http://europe.redhat.com/products/linux/new/isdnadsl.php3 . But
> opening a terminal in GNOME, changing to root
Hi Cliff,
thanks for your hints. I just installed the rp-pppoe.rpm. Now I want to
start the adsl-config, as it is saied in
http://europe.redhat.com/products/linux/new/isdnadsl.php3 . But opening a terminal in
GNOME, changing to root by "su
root", and writing the command "adsl-config", nothing hap
On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 11:55, Mauritius Hiller wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> i just set up a new RH8.0. I want to install a networkcard, and then i wanne
> use DSL over this networkcard. I settet up the card just within the
> Installation-process, and gave the static IP 192.168.
Hi everybody,
i just set up a new RH8.0. I want to install a networkcard, and then i wanne
use DSL over this networkcard. I settet up the card just within the
Installation-process, and gave the static IP 192.168.0.100. I settet Netmask to
255.255.255.0. I didn't insert anythink for Gatewa
e other traffic on my network[1](not a whole lot but still),
downloading linux-2.2.23.tar.bz2 from kernel.org @ 106kByte/second
sustained. And I have a 1 megabit connection(downstream, 1 Megabit upstream
though with DSL protocol overhead it comes out to about 890KBPS).
kernel.org has a 250MBit con
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:29:44AM -0300, Javier Gostling wrote:
> > Check ttcp. It will give you a good speed measurement.
>
> Hmm...if this is the ttcp that Freshmeat reports, while it's quite
> interesting, it's a bit more experimental than I'm willing to
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:29:44AM -0300, Javier Gostling wrote:
> Check ttcp. It will give you a good speed measurement.
Hmm...if this is the ttcp that Freshmeat reports, while it's quite
interesting, it's a bit more experimental than I'm willing to drop into
a production server.
Thanks for the
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:51:52AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> Gentlefolk,
>
> The subject line sez it all. Is anyone aware of a Linux-native speed
> test utility wandering about somewhere? It'd probably have to tie into
> one of the hosts for Win-based testers, I'd think. (Infrastructure in
>
Gentlefolk,
The subject line sez it all. Is anyone aware of a Linux-native speed
test utility wandering about somewhere? It'd probably have to tie into
one of the hosts for Win-based testers, I'd think. (Infrastructure in
place already--test files of known size for transfer, etc.) Otherwise
it
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:22:22 -
"Andy Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can anyone recommed a DSL modem (pref USB) available in the UK to run on
>RH8?
I would *not* recommend a USB DSL modem especially if you plan to use it with
Linux. It is so much easier to configure
I don't think DirecTV DSL was ever available in the UK.
I also had their service and the gateway did work fine with Linux. The
actual reliablity of the service and availablity of their technical
support was a complettely different matter.
Btw, being complette jerks to their customers see
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DSL Modems Recommendations?
There are many "flavors" of xDSL (ADSL, SDSL, RDSL, etc.).
Whatever DSL
gateway or bridge model someone recommends may or may not work with
There are many "flavors" of xDSL (ADSL, SDSL, RDSL, etc.). Whatever DSL
gateway or bridge model someone recommends may or may not work with the
flavor you end up subscribing to. It is preferable to find a DSL provider
that claims to support Linux. It is also usually easier
Can't think of any brands but if you specify that you want an Ethernet DSL
modem, you should be fine.
<>
-- Original Message ---
From: "Andy Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:22:22 -
Subject: DSL Mode
I have no idea what is available in the UK but at my house I have an Alcatel
1000. The phone company gave it to me with my DSL. It plugs into the phone
jack (the filtered one) and my Ethernet card plugs into it - no dirvers for
the modem at all. It has been fairly reliable. If I had the choice I
Can anyone recommed a DSL modem (pref USB) available in the UK to run on
RH8?
Thanks
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
backbone providers. (their engineer claims I will be 3-4 hops
> from a top tier backbone) My question is, if I switch to ADN, my DSL
> circuit is still routed thru Pac Bell's CO, but will I get the same
> performance? The distance is not the issue, Pac Bell was much faster 1
> year ago,
I currently have Pacbell DSL with 5 statics (San Diego area) and want to
switch providers because pacbell has gotten very slow.
There is a provider called ADN that claims to have multiple T-3's to
several backbone providers. (their engineer claims I will be 3-4 hops
from a top tier backbon
At 16:59 28.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
>Unfortunaely all the logins have administrator rights, so that might
>work. I'll try that in a bit and let you all (the list) know how it goes.
[snip]
Isn't this th
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
At 23:01 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
Well, it does a little. It'd help even more if I could start whatever
server XP is blabbing about when I go to share the folder on the XP box
I'm wanting. Looks as if man smbc
At 23:01 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
>Well, it does a little. It'd help even more if I could start whatever
>server XP is blabbing about when I go to share the folder on the XP box
>I'm wanting. Looks as if man smbclient is just gonna be pure
Rodney Fulk wrote:
In order to access shared drives on an XP machine you will likely need to
add a user to the XP machine. (Not the machine name but the username logged
in as that will be accessing the drive.)
There are 7 user accounts on the computer atm.
--
Joseph A Nagy Jr
Founder and
On Behalf Of Joseph A Nagy Jr
> Sent: Sunday, 27 October 2002 12:05 p.m.
> To: redhat-list
> Subject: Networking WinXP and RH7.2 via Linksys DSL/Cable Router
>
>
> I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
> enable file sharing on the XP
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Networking WinXP and RH7.2 via Linksys DSL/Cable Router
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
> At 18:04 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
> [snip]
>
>>I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm
Ernest E Vogelsinger wrote:
At 18:04 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
enable file sharing on the XP box so that I can move files to/from the
XP computer to the Linux box.
-
At 18:04 27.10.2002, Joseph A Nagy Jr said:
[snip]
>I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
>enable file sharing on the XP box so that I can move files to/from the
>XP computer to the Linux box.
[snip]
002 11:05 AM
To: redhat-list
Subject: Networking WinXP and RH7.2 via Linksys DSL/Cable Router
I think the subject says it all, but in case it doesn't, I'm looking to
enable file sharing on the XP box so that I can move files to/from the
XP computer to the Linux box.
Is this at all possib
me friends indicated that this would
> be impossible but I'm not so sure that is impossible.
>
> I've searched both Google and TLDP.org for "Networking WinXP and RH7.2
> via Linksys DSL/Cable Router" and both return nothing, but then again it
> could be my query strin
not so sure that is impossible.
I've searched both Google and TLDP.org for "Networking WinXP and RH7.2
via Linksys DSL/Cable Router" and both return nothing, but then again it
could be my query string is too refined. *shrugs*
TIA
--
Joseph A Nagy Jr
Founder and Partner
Joseph
I'm not sure if I have that option. I'm still running RH 7.0 but I'll check when I get
home.
-- "Pablo Ferro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
From: "Pablo Ferro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DSL atr start
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 6:50 AM
Subject: DSL atr start up
> I just got my dsl set up and I want to have it run when my computer boots
up but adsl-start needs to be run as root and I dont always log in as root.
Ho
I just got my dsl set up and I want to have it run when my computer boots up but
adsl-start needs to be run as root and I dont always log in as root. How can I do this?
Matt
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or
]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: Network card(for DSL)
> Nevermind. I just rebooted my computer and the new settings I put in must
> have taken effect so everything is working now. Thanks for all your
> input.
>
> Matt
>
> On
Nevermind. I just rebooted my computer and the new settings I put in must
have taken effect so everything is working now. Thanks for all your
input.
Matt
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:17:56 -0700 Matt McElreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> I found part of the problem. My pppoe.conf file was looking at
I found part of the problem. My pppoe.conf file was looking at eth1 but
my card is at eth0. SO I changed that and added my username. When I run
adsl-setup it comes back with a Time Out. Can I just edit the pap-secrets
file myself. I was going to but I wasnt sure how to put all the info in.
If I re
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 06:14:50PM -0400, Brian wrote:
> For the most case it is here in the North America it's true almost 98
> percent. I have never heard anyone using PPPoA at home, have you? you can
Sure. BellSouth uses this and/or PPPoE. I doubt they are the only one
either.
> get a sta
. Thanks
Matt
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
=?iso-8859-1?q?Kjetil=20Tjensvold?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --- Matt McElreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > But
> my DSL uses dynamic IP. Does that matter?
>
> You must first test if your card is acces
lf Of Hal Burgiss
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network card(for DSL)
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:30:35PM -0400, Brian wrote:
> Is your NIC on the Redhat hardware compatible list? remember DSL
> uses PPPoE, cable modem uses eth0 or eth1.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 02:30:35PM -0400, Brian wrote:
> Is your NIC on the Redhat hardware compatible list? remember DSL
> uses PPPoE, cable modem uses eth0 or eth1.
This is not universally true by any means. There is DSL that is
routed/static and dhcp, in addition to PPPoE, and lets not
--- Matt McElreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > But
my DSL uses dynamic IP. Does that matter?
You must first test if your card is accessible.
Then if it is type /sbin/dhcpcd -n eth0
to get the dynamic ip adress from your isp.
>
>
> > Matt
> > It looks like that
Is your NIC on the Redhat hardware compatible list? remember DSL uses PPPoE,
cable modem uses eth0 or eth1. Did you setup adsl-start and enter the info
then bring-up the interface? you have to address the eth0 on your LAN and
when your DSL link comes up your ISP will assign an IP and DNS numbers
But my DSL uses dynamic IP. Does that matter?
> Matt
> It looks like that man. Try to assign an ip-address
with ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 up
>
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet a
--- Matt McElreath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > I'm
still trying to configure Red Hat for DSL and
> cant get it. Remember,
> I'm on 7.0 so I dont have the new network
> administration tool. I've been
> having trouble trying all your suggestions but I
>
I'm still trying to configure Red Hat for DSL and cant get it. Remember,
I'm on 7.0 so I dont have the new network administration tool. I've been
having trouble trying all your suggestions but I think its because my
computer is not recognizing my network card. When ifconfig
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:53:23 -0400, David wrote:
>It's broken in 7.3, it works fine under 7.2 I used the one supplied with 7.2
>without a hitch, when I moved to 7.3 I did a fresh install and it would lose
>connection every 3 or so seconds.
The setup scripts are missing in 7.2.
___
On Thursday 20 June 2002 12:53 pm, Duane Clark wrote:
> David wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 June 2002 11:52 pm, Kevin Myers wrote:
> >> For pppoe, look at the RoaringPenguin pages,
> >> http://www.roaringpenguin.com/pppoe/ The docs are good and I am using it
> >> now. Setup couldn't be easier! (Be ca
David wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 June 2002 11:52 pm, Kevin Myers wrote:
>
>> For pppoe, look at the RoaringPenguin pages,
>> http://www.roaringpenguin.com/pppoe/ The docs are good and I am using it
>> now. Setup couldn't be easier! (Be careful, the distro is broken in the 7.2
>> package, use the rp
essure on the
> company. They probably don't mind a single user leaving for the
> competition, but losing 10% market share might scare the sh*t out of
> them.
Well, BellSouth (US) has something like 1.5 million (dialup + DSL)
customers, so I doubt I'll find 150,000. Maybe 5
Hal Burgiss wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 09:47:20PM +, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
> >
> > Mark is absolutely right in this case, all we are really paying for
> > is the connection and the bandwidth and that's the end of it,
> > whatever the customer does with it is protected under the fi
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 18:11:23 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE DSL IP ROBBERY
>
> No, they don't have to allocate teh disk spac
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 09:47:20PM +, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote:
>
> Mark is absolutely right in this case, all we are really paying for
> is the connection and the bandwidth and that's the end of it,
> whatever the customer does with it is protected under the first
> ammendment, barring anyth
the ISP says he
is allowed to do, and he is only allocated what his contract/agreement
says he is allocated.
If it does not say he's allocated static IP, or that he's allowed to run
server type services, or that it is a home DSL or Cable connection, then
it's reasonable for the ISP to ass
No, they don't have to allocate teh disk space...but you're not saving
them money...you're in effect costing them more, by having to route the
extra traffic to you.
What do your terms of service say on the matter?
I'm assuming that the TOS assumes you're a home user, not a business user.
By
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Mark Neidorff wrote:
> Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 17:24:28 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mark Neidorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE DSL IP ROBBERY
>
> I
I disagree. I signed up for a connection to the Internet and
bandwidth--period--when I contracted with my isp. This recent nonsense of
blocking ports is just plain insulting.
Assuming that I am a responsible citizen (which any administrator needs to
be on ANY network) on the Internet, what I do
flipping out! but this DSL/CABLE COMPANY IP
> buck sucking is crazy
> at first there selling point was always on! no noise, the new wave what they
> really mean is pay but don't use!then pay some more people in general are
> stupid!they think MERGERS HAVE SCREWED US ALL WAKE
ver or is it impossible to mask?
>Im sorry if it seems like Im flipping out! but this DSL/CABLE COMPANY IP
>buck sucking is crazy
>at first there selling point was always on! no noise, the new wave what they
>really mean is pay but don't use!then pay some more people in general
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > >Is there a way an experience tech (their probably going to have one) can
> > >hide the fact your not on a dedicated server or is it impossible to mask?
> >
> > I'm not perfect, but I can see no way in which they could mask this, so
> I'd
> > call it "impo
I think this may be able to hide the fact your on a virtual server even
if you are root. http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 11:41, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > >Is there a way an experience tech (their probably going to have one) can
> > >hide the fact your not on a d
> >Is there a way an experience tech (their probably going to have one) can
> >hide the fact your not on a dedicated server or is it impossible to mask?
>
> I'm not perfect, but I can see no way in which they could mask this, so
I'd
> call it "impossible".
If you use something like VMware, then i
l broadband
connection.
On Wed, 15 May 2002, ebinc wrote:
> Is there a way an experience tech (their probably going to have one) can
> hide the fact your not on a dedicated server or is it impossible to mask?
> Im sorry if it seems like Im flipping out! but this DSL/CABLE COMPANY IP
>
At 5/15/2002 05:02 PM -0400, you wrote:
>Is there a way an experience tech (their probably going to have one) can
>hide the fact your not on a dedicated server or is it impossible to mask?
I'm not perfect, but I can see no way in which they could mask this, so I'd
call it "impossible".
>Im sorr
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Joshua Cragun wrote:
> Are you sure you have investigated all of your options? Remember,
> with DSL, the phone company just provides the line. Although they'd love to
> be your ISP as well, you can always opt out. Try calling a bunch of smaller
> ISP&#
Are you sure you have investigated all of your options? Remember,
with DSL, the phone company just provides the line. Although they'd love to
be your ISP as well, you can always opt out. Try calling a bunch of smaller
ISP's in your area and ask about having a static (or 5) IP
Is there a way an experience tech (their probably going to have one) can
hide the fact your not on a dedicated server or is it impossible to mask?
Im sorry if it seems like Im flipping out! but this DSL/CABLE COMPANY IP
buck sucking is crazy
at first there selling point was always on! no noise
There is an older version that does, look on there website for details
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Keith Morse
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PPP *and* DSL *and* local NIC...
On Tue, 2 Apr
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Brian wrote:
>
> Try going to http://www.fwbuilder.org/ and use this program
>
> Brian
>
I also am a big fan of this product. But I believe it does not support
ipchains, which is what Dave is using.
___
Redhat-list mail
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 07:40:27PM -0800, Keith Morse wrote:
> Generate another script(s) that accounts for the states that ppp0 will be
> in (up or down). Then with the scripts /etc/ppp/ip-up and
> /etc/ppp/ip-down you can change the state of your ipchains ruleset and also
> your routing tab
Try going to http://www.fwbuilder.org/ and use this program
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Dave Ihnat
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 7:21 PM
To: Redhat Mailing List
Subject: PPP *and* DSL *and* local NIC...
Gentlefolk,
I&#
On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> Gentlefolk,
>
> I've a RH 6.2 box (yeah, so sue me--it *works* like a rock) with ipchains.
> For(ever) a long time, I've been running it with a local network on eth0,
> and a DSL/cable (depends on when the provider gets weird a
r) a long time, I've been running it with a local network on eth0,
and a DSL/cable (depends on when the provider gets weird and I fire them)
on eth1. The dialup ppp0 has kind of lurked as a legacy that wakes
up periodically when the Internet link dies. I've a nice, survivable
firewall--at l
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 12:32:59PM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
>
> Since I'm not there it's hard to tell. I'll set up a cron job with wget
> to a non existant file so I have a record of when it's alive or not.
> That should give me a good idea. Good question though. The ip never
> changes btw.
>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:55:56AM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
> Anyone seen anything like this? Anyone know how to query rpm for all
> packages installed since a date (so I can see what else changed)
The following script will list all your packages sorted by the time they
were installed.
#!/bi
On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 12:12, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:55:56AM -0500, Charles Galpin wrote:
> >
> > Anyone seen anything like this? Anyone know how to query rpm for all
> > packages installed since a date (so I can see what else changed)
>
> rpm -qa --last (shows all in dat
I ran up2date on a 7.2 PC that was getting a bit behind in updates (but
running perfectly). One of the updates was the 2.4.9 kernel.
Since then it is constantly losing it's DSL connection. Since I'm
administering it remotely I'm having trouble figuring out what's going
wrong
At 10:19 AM 1/12/02 -0800, nit etc wrote:
>I have DSL thru Verizon, and their DHCP server
>provides more than one IP address, so I can have more
>than one computer on DSL with real IP addresses.
Two ways I can think of off-hand:
1. Just set your firwall up to use proxy ARP inst
Kevin,
I still have the problem of doing DHCP from the second
NIC (eth1) since DHCP only works on the wire of the
NIC that is requesting it, ie if my laptop requests
it, it hits eth1, and doesnt propgate through to if0
to Verizon. One solution is to connect the laptop and
eth1 to the DSL line
Nit,
Once you get this built, would you post the ifconfig settings,
IPChains/IPTables rulesets, route tables, etc?
Thanks!
Kevin
nit etc wrote:
>
> > Example:
> >
> > if0 encounters a packet for 192.168.1.3. The mask
> > on if0 tells the ip
> > stack that 192.168.1.3 is not in if0's network
1 - 100 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
