Re: nftables debian 13 bug

2025-07-19 Thread err404
please check if your network interface was not renamed and still the same:         iifname "ens18" accept ...         oifname "ens18" masquerade

nftables debian 13 bug

2025-07-19 Thread Nite Neal
I updated my virtual machine from Debian 12 to 13, after which it began to work incorrectly with nftables. Incoming letters do not work, nftables does not work correctly. It is impossible to receive or send a letter in the local network. At the same time, from the external network (Internet, sm

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-16 Thread Max Nikulin
$skip_next). You may wish to inspect the source or the @records. not in steps of 5. curl -s 'https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800627' | grep -o ']\+>'

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-16 Thread Nate Bargmann
Is it possible that when opening a bug, the first four messages are administrative in nature and not shown? The first followup then gets message number 5? - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-16 Thread Thomas Schmitt
.. But there $msg_num looks like being incremented in single steps, not in steps of 5. It starts by either 0 or $msg - 1. So i guess it's the latter and $msg is already 5 or whatever we see in the bug reports. When looking for $msg i see a comment in https://sources.debian.org/src/debbugs/2.6.4/

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-15 Thread Greg
On 2025-07-15, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > There i see #5, #10, #22, #33, #38 and various control mails without > a HTML label. Hijacking the thread here, but I've never understood the versioning numbers of kernels or browsers (after the first or second decimal point I mean). Anyway.

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-15 Thread tuxifan
Hi, The easier way to figure this out would most likely be to just read the source code. On Tuesday, July 15, 2025 10:03:59 AM Central European Summer Time Thomas Schmitt wrote: > One would have to make experiments.

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-15 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i can contribute https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800627 (Original: Year 2028 problem in ISO 9660 kernel driver. Later: Year 2038 problem, which hopefully will get fixed by kernel 6.16 to be safe up to year .) There i see #5, #10, #22, #33, #38 and various

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-14 Thread Dan Ritter
Stefan Monnier wrote: > > How come messages are numbered like Message #5, #10, #15, rather than > > Message #1, #2, #3, ...? > > You mean like https://bugs.debian.org/1095863 ? But not https://bugs.debian.org/1095866 which starts with 5 and has a lot of multiples of 3 in it. -dsr-

Re: Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-14 Thread Stefan Monnier
> How come messages are numbered like Message #5, #10, #15, rather than > Message #1, #2, #3, ...? You mean like https://bugs.debian.org/1095863 ? Stefan

Why are bug comment numbers multiples of 5?

2025-07-14 Thread techlord8
How come messages are numbered like Message #5, #10, #15, rather than Message #1, #2, #3, ...? [This page](https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting) contains no explanation for it.

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Jeffrey Walton
t; > something about the file description? > > Sure. However in this case the destination folder contents is also displayed > in a window, and it is updated every time new files arrive. I think the bug > is related just to displaying the folder contents. Is the filesystem a NFS mount?

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Dan Purgert
On Jul 11, 2025, Dan Ritter wrote: > Dan Purgert wrote: > > On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Greg (HE12025-07-11): > > > > Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move > > > > rather > > > > than a copy? > > > > > > The fact that it is on the same disk is not

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread John Dow
> On 11 Jul 2025, at 16:45, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Dan Purgert wrote: >>> On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote: >>> Greg (HE12025-07-11): Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move rather than a copy? >>> >>> The fact that it is on the same disk is n

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Dan Ritter
Dan Purgert wrote: > On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > > Greg (HE12025-07-11): > > > Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move > > > rather > > > than a copy? > > > > The fact that it is on the same disk is not relevant. Apart from that, I > > suggest you re-re

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Dan Purgert
On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > Greg (HE12025-07-11): > > Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move rather > > than a copy? > > The fact that it is on the same disk is not relevant. Apart from that, I > suggest you re-read Dan's mail more carefully, everything

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Nicolas George
Greg (HE12025-07-11): > Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move rather > than a copy? The fact that it is on the same disk is not relevant. Apart from that, I suggest you re-read Dan's mail more carefully, everything was in it. -- Nicolas George

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Dan Ritter
Greg wrote: > On 2025-07-11, Nicolas George wrote: > > Greg (HE12025-07-11): > >> On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote: > >> > > >> > If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is > >> > a full copy followed by a delete of the source. > >> Is that true? > > > > Yes, absoltely. > >

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Greg
On 2025-07-11, Nicolas George wrote: > Greg (HE12025-07-11): >> On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote: >> > >> > If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is >> > a full copy followed by a delete of the source. >> Is that true? > > Yes, absoltely. > >> If the source is deleted as pa

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Nicolas George
Greg (HE12025-07-11): > On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote: > > > > If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is > > a full copy followed by a delete of the source. > Is that true? Yes, absoltely. > If the source is deleted as part of the process it's no longer a "copy." Indeed

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Greg
On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote: > > If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is > a full copy followed by a delete of the source. Is that true? If the source is deleted as part of the process it's no longer a "copy."

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Dan Purgert
On Jul 11, 2025, mick.crane wrote: > On 2025-07-11 10:52, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > > > > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to > > > > another with standard "Files"

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread mick.crane
folder contents is also displayed in a window, and it is updated every time new files arrive. I think the bug  is related just to displaying the folder contents. Perhaps there is an error with one of the files. Maybe transfer blocks of files at a time. mick

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Andrew Makhorin
lso displayed in a window, and it is updated every time new files arrive. I think the bug  is related just to displaying the folder contents.

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Dan Ritter
mick.crane wrote: > > When moving files on the same disk impression is, at least with dragging in > the desktop file manager, it seems instant. Whereas to another disk seems to > make new files. I guess that when on the same disk the OS changes only > something about the file description? That's

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 13:39:44 +0100, mick.crane wrote: > When moving files on the same disk impression is, at least with dragging in > the desktop file manager, it seems instant. Whereas to another disk seems to > make new files. I guess that when on the same disk the OS changes only > something

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread mick.crane
On 2025-07-11 10:52, Andrew Makhorin wrote: On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another > with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of > files in the distination folder is abou

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Dan Purgert
On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > > > > On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > > > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another > > > with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the > > > number

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-11 Thread Andrew Makhorin
> > On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another > > with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of > > files in the distination folder is about 4,500, the "Files&

Re: a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-10 Thread Dan Purgert
On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote: > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another > with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of > files in the distination folder is about 4,500, the "Files" application >

a bug on moving files with "Files" in Gnome environment

2025-07-10 Thread Andrew Makhorin
I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of files in the distination folder is about 4,500, the "Files" application deadly hangs, and only restaring the system helps. The

Re: is there a bug in cp command ?

2025-05-20 Thread 🦓
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106192 got filed now. why does reportbug not present me with coreutils' latest git-history now? why is there no apt debug coreutils mechanism yet? presenting everything in git-history with gdb-symbols and all object files for quick increm

Re: is there a bug in cp command ?

2025-05-20 Thread 🦓
Op di 20 mei 2025 om 20:05 schreef Greg Wooledge : > It's more likely to be something in your environment. What does "type -a > cp" say? It is likely to say Debian 12 environment in bugs.debian.org/coreutils after Uwu's reportbug cp On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 19:21:50 +0200, uw...@online.de wrote

Re: is there a bug in cp command ?

2025-05-20 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 19:21:50 +0200, uw...@online.de wrote: > I solved the Problem for me by copy the File /usr/bin/cp from Debian 11 to > /usr/bin/cp2 on Debian 12 > > Now i can run "cp2 -ax / /mnt" and it works like expected. > > "cp -ax / /mnt" with original debian 12 cp brings error on thi

Re: is there a bug in cp command ?

2025-05-20 Thread uw...@online.de
fference between the old and the new cp Program or a Bug. cp is my way to clone a disk to a second disk with different size. i do it this way many years with no Problems. i create Partition, format with ext4, mount on /mnt, copy all Files with cp -ax, install Grub, boot and have fun. So i c

Debian 13 Trixie RC1 bug

2025-05-18 Thread Al Rice
The Windows Button on Panel no longer honors the "Show Windows From All Monitors" when it is checked OFF for at least the evolution email package.

Re: Potential bug report for Realtek MicroSD Card Reader

2025-04-19 Thread Max Nikulin
On 19/04/2025 02:10, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: sudo apt install -t bookworm-backports linux-image-amd64 Installing a unsupported backports kernel will not actually fix the problem. It is better to file a bug against the stable kernel and let the developers determine if they need to

Re: Potential bug report for Realtek MicroSD Card Reader

2025-04-18 Thread Anssi Saari
Brandan Ballantyne writes: > Hey Team! This is a list for Debian users. > I'm new to Debian and running the latest Debian 12.10 with > updates. I'm having an issue with my MicroSD card reader and I'm not > sure how to proceed. Looks like you didn't actually specify what the problem is? Your li

Re: Potential bug report for Realtek MicroSD Card Reader

2025-04-18 Thread Timothy M Butterworth
Enable backports in sources.list, then run > > sudo apt install -t bookworm-backports linux-image-amd64 > Installing a unsupported backports kernel will not actually fix the problem. It is better to file a bug against the stable kernel and let the developers determine if they need to back

Potential bug report for Realtek MicroSD Card Reader

2025-04-18 Thread Brandan Ballantyne
Hey Team! I'm new to Debian and running the latest Debian 12.10 with updates. I'm having an issue with my MicroSD card reader and I'm not sure how to proceed. My hardware is identified in lspci as :31:00.0 Unassigned class [ff00]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTS525A PCI Express Card

Re: kernel 6.12.12 panic, where and how to place a bug report

2025-03-24 Thread songbird
y to use Debian stable. But as this > backported kernel will soon run stable Trixie, I think it wouldn't harm > to anyway provide a bug report. FYI - testing aka trixie is currently at: 6.12.19-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.12.19-1 (2025-03-16) x86_64 GNU/Linux songbird

kernel 6.12.12 panic, where and how to place a bug report

2025-03-24 Thread Marco Möller
backported kernel will soon run stable Trixie, I think it wouldn't harm to anyway provide a bug report. Concerning a bug report, how to activate the proper log file, and where to find it then? I assume the best would be to have the log file collecting the necessary data about several boots,

Re: Laptop trackpoint (pointing stick) detected as "PS/2 Generic Mouse". Bug?

2025-03-24 Thread Jaime
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 10:36, Marco Moock wrote: > You can change the speed, either in the gui or with xinput. > xinput gives you the list, xinput list-props ID gives the values. > You can then increase the speed. Hi Marco. Thank you for your reply. Yes, I have changed the speed to maximum using

Laptop trackpoint (pointing stick) detected as "PS/2 Generic Mouse". Bug?

2025-03-24 Thread Jaime
be psmouse protocol=any but the trackpoint is always detected as a generic mouse. Also, the problem persists whether I use the stable kernel (6.1.0) or the backports kernel (6.12.12). Is this a kernel bug? Is there a workaround?

Re: is there a bug in cp command ?

2025-03-11 Thread Frank Guthausen
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:56:47 +0100 "uw...@online.de" wrote: > > #root@Server001:~# cp -ax / /mnt > #cp: das Verzeichnis '/mnt/' kann nicht angelegt werden: Datei oder > Verzeichnis nicht gefunden # LANG=C.UTF-8 cp -ax / /mnt provides English error messages. Are you sure you mounted something t

Re: is there a bug in cp command ?

2025-03-10 Thread Bob McGowan
always the same. is it a bug or a new feature ? best regards uwe t Hi, I am running Debian 12.9. First it seems like a bad idea to try to copy a directory into a subdirectory of itself. So without a disk mounted to /mnt I would expect cp -ax / /mnt to fail.  And it does for me with this err

is there a bug in cp command ?

2025-03-10 Thread uw...@online.de
Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden translated: the subdir /mnt/ cannot be created. file or subdir not found. i try to copy a ext4 filesystem to an second disk with ext4 filesystem. you can try with and without mounting a disk to /mnt the error is always the same. is it a bug or a new featu

Re: Debian Trixie update, possible bug:

2025-02-26 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 20:41 +1300, Lee Hinkleman wrote: > Hi debian-user: > Updates of Trixie stop on a technical issue, as quoted below. > Thank you. > Sincerely, > Lee > > > " > DDependency resolution failed: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: libkdecorations3-6: > Breaks: lib

Debian Trixie update, possible bug:

2025-02-26 Thread Lee Hinkleman
Hi debian-user: Updates of Trixie stop on a technical issue, as quoted below. Thank you. Sincerely, Lee " DDependency resolution failed: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libkdecorations3-6: Breaks: libkdecorations2-6 but 4:6.2.5-1 is to be installed "

Re: MariaDB not installing looks like previous error (unresolved bug?)

2025-02-17 Thread Michael Bonert
rg Subject: Re: MariaDB not installing looks like previous error (unresolved bug?) [You don't often get email from johndoe65...@mail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] On 2/16/25 20:24, Michael Bonert wrote: > I get the following when trying

Re: MariaDB not installing looks like previous error (unresolved bug?)

2025-02-17 Thread Dan Ritter
Michael Bonert wrote: > invoke-rc.d: initscript mariadb, action "stop" failed. > Failed to stop mysql.service: Unit mysql.service not loaded. > invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action "stop" failed. > Attempt to stop MariaDB/MySQL server returned exitcode 5 > There is a MariaDB/MySQL server running,

Re: MariaDB not installing looks like previous error (unresolved bug?)

2025-02-17 Thread john doe
On 2/16/25 20:24, Michael Bonert wrote: I get the following when trying to install mariadb: # apt install mariadb-server-core Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done mariadb-server-core is already the newest version (1:10.11.6-0+deb12u1).

MariaDB not installing looks like previous error (unresolved bug?)

2025-02-16 Thread Michael Bonert
I get the following when trying to install mariadb: # apt install mariadb-server-core Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done mariadb-server-core is already the newest version (1:10.11.6-0+deb12u1). mariadb-server-core set to manually instal

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-12 Thread Boyan Penkov
Hello Jeff and folks, Not 100% certain yet, but your suggestion may have saved the day here -- after a BIOS update, which I had not considered, no crashes for 24 hours or so. So, my suggestions about iwlwifi and the kernel versions are all retracted -- thanks sof your perspectives here! Cheers!

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-11 Thread Boyan Penkov
Hey Jeff -- yes, good point; I just looked at the manufacturer's page and saw a bunch of BIOS updates; I'll try this next here (well, at the next crash...). Cheers! On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 1:33 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 4:47 AM Boyan Penkov wrote: > > > > Anybody else

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-11 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 4:47 AM Boyan Penkov wrote: > > Anybody else seeing this in the current testing kernel? I am not experiencing the problem; but I used wired ethernet, and not wifi. Is the machine's BIOS/UEFI up to date? That is the very first place I would start. dmidecode is usually a goo

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-11 Thread Max Nikulin
: invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI may be caused by a too old microcode package. Have you tried to search for some error in the kernel bug tracker?

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-10 Thread Boyan Penkov
:14 deanmachine kernel: kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:62! Feb 10 16:11:14 deanmachine kernel: Oops: invalid opcode: [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI Feb 10 16:11:14 deanmachine kernel: CPU: 49 UID: 1000 PID: 30845 Comm: python Not tainted 6.12.12-amd64 #1 Debian 6.12.12-1 Feb 10 16:11:14 deanmachine ker

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-10 Thread Boyan Penkov
On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 9:33 PM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 07/02/2025 22:55, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > I uninstalled firmware-iwlwifi (this machine is wired either way...), > > and the problem has not reared its head in a few hours -- not sure if > > that means its solved... > > I believed that crashe

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-09 Thread Max Nikulin
On 07/02/2025 22:55, Boyan Penkov wrote: I uninstalled firmware-iwlwifi (this machine is wired either way...), and the problem has not reared its head in a few hours -- not sure if that means its solved... I believed that crashes related to iwlwifi affect just network connectivity, but nothing

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-07 Thread Boyan Penkov
I uninstalled firmware-iwlwifi (this machine is wired either way...), and the problem has not reared its head in a few hours -- not sure if that means its solved... Cheers! On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 10:27 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 07/02/2025 13:57, Boyan Penkov wrote: > > > > Anybody else seeing

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-07 Thread Max Nikulin
On 07/02/2025 13:57, Boyan Penkov wrote: Anybody else seeing this in the current testing kernel? Notice that most of call traces in your log are related to some python processes (and btrfs) rater than to iwlwifi. Taking into account your gnome-shell issue, your troubles may be related to RAM

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-07 Thread Boyan Penkov
Sorry, this is a bit beyond my understanding, but the first lines that come up in red on dmesg are: ``` Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine kernel: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine kernel: #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Feb 07 01:12:33

Re: iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-07 Thread gene heskett
And wht is it we are looking for? Contect please. On 2/7/25 01:58, Boyan Penkov wrote: Hello, Anybody else seeing this in the current testing kernel? Cheers! Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in tha

iwlwifi bug in 6.12?

2025-02-06 Thread Boyan Penkov
Hello, Anybody else seeing this in the current testing kernel? Cheers! -- Boyan Penkov Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine kernel: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine kernel: #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode Feb 07 01:12:33 themachine

Re: Location of Bug?

2025-01-20 Thread Johannes Krottmayer
Hi! On 1/20/25 23:59, Jamie Charbonneau wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to report a bug, but I'm not sure what package the bug is in. The > issue I am having is that when I run sound through my external soundcard > (steinberg/yamaha), the sound is out of synch with

Re: Location of Bug?

2025-01-20 Thread George at Clug
h external sound cards or what linux drivers, if any, are being used. Have you install any particular firmware drivers for this hardware? Are you using Debian 12?  What brand/model computer are you using? George. On Tuesday, 21-01-2025 at 09:59 Jamie Charbonneau wrote: Hi, I'd like

Location of Bug?

2025-01-20 Thread Jamie Charbonneau
Hi, I'd like to report a bug, but I'm not sure what package the bug is in. The issue I am having is that when I run sound through my external soundcard (steinberg/yamaha), the sound is out of synch with video. If I run the sound straight to a tv, bypassing the soundcard, the issue i

Re: Report Bug

2025-01-15 Thread Max Nikulin
On 15/01/2025 10:45, watt kennet wrote: When using the Persian (Windows) keyboard layout , the right Alt+Shift shortcut can switch the keyboard from English to Persian, but it does not switch back from Persian to English. The issue appears to be specific to the Persian (Windows) layout. Steps

Re: Report Bug

2025-01-14 Thread tomas
On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 07:15:30AM +0330, watt kennet wrote: > When using the Persian (Windows) keyboard layout , the right Alt+Shift > shortcut can switch the keyboard from English to Persian, but it does not > switch back from Persian to English. The issue appears to be specific to > the Persian

Report Bug

2025-01-14 Thread watt kennet
When using the Persian (Windows) keyboard layout , the right Alt+Shift shortcut can switch the keyboard from English to Persian, but it does not switch back from Persian to English. The issue appears to be specific to the Persian (Windows) layout. Steps to Reproduce:

Re: gdm Bug: 61-gdm.rules sets Wayland to false, but X is not installed, then freezes

2024-12-20 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 20 Dec 2024 08:32 +, from soc...@teclab.at: > I filed a bug: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/issues/959 > > Not sure if you want/need me to file another bug in the Debian bug system. > > Asking for advice. Generally the recommended way to do it is to file a bug

gdm Bug: 61-gdm.rules sets Wayland to false, but X is not installed, then freezes

2024-12-20 Thread soc...@teclab.at
Dear Debian Users, I filed a bug: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/issues/959 Not sure if you want/need me to file another bug in the Debian bug system. Asking for advice. Regards Thomas

Re: playonlinux - bug?

2024-11-03 Thread Jeffrey Walton
is made for stretch and Jessie (read on the > homepage), but as it is still available in bookworm. > > Thus, before I file a bugreport, I want to make sure, there is areal bug and > not a misconfiguration on my site. > > The described appearance is on both of my debian/b

Re: playonlinux - bug?

2024-11-03 Thread Hans
nt to know, if playonlinux is supporting some app. However, in ealier times playonlinux showd several categories, like "games", "office", "graphics" and so on. Thwese are gone, but I found no clue, if this is changed accidently by playonlinux developers or if it

Re: playonlinux - bug?

2024-11-02 Thread George at Clug
) for the x-coordinates and then it works. No idea if that would be a formal fix but it works for me. > > In earlier versions by clicking on "install" I got a bunch of categories > showed. These are all missing now. > > Yes, I know, Playonlinux is made for stretch and

playonlinux - bug?

2024-11-02 Thread Hans
in bookworm. Thus, before I file a bugreport, I want to make sure, there is areal bug and not a misconfiguration on my site. The described appearance is on both of my debian/bookworm systems. Best Hans

Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

2024-10-29 Thread Richard Owlett
I am trying to track what I suspect is a documentation bug. There are circular references. To logically break the chain I need to know the date package XYZ was installed. I thought this would be an "apt" related question. But its manpage gave no indication that "when install

Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

2024-10-29 Thread Richard Owlett
On 10/29/24 5:56 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:53:38AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: Why/When did pdfminer get installed? My goal was to have "pdf2txt". /var/log/apt/* Cheers Thank you. Problem solved. Was no documentation bug. I forgot what I did late last night ;}

OOPS Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

2024-10-29 Thread Richard Owlett
SeaMonkey has a bug. I had chosen "Reply to sender only". Obviously it went to the list. I didn't proof the "To:" ;{ I'll report the bug.

Re: NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

2024-10-29 Thread tomas
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 05:53:38AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > Why/When did pdfminer get installed? My goal was to have "pdf2txt". /var/log/apt/* Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

NOTE TO SELF Re: Documenting a bug -- WHEN was package XYZ installed

2024-10-29 Thread Richard Owlett
Why/When did pdfminer get installed? My goal was to have "pdf2txt". On 10/29/24 5:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: I am trying to track what I suspect is a documentation bug. There are circular references. To logically break the chain I need to know the date package XYZ was installed.

Re: It IS at least one bug - was [STRANGENESS (typographical error???) at http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/README]

2024-10-19 Thread tomas
redirect debian-archive -> debian-archive/ -- remember: the web is messy. Anyway, there seems to be a pseudo-package www.debian.org [1] against which to file a bug of this kind. Cheers [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=www.debian.org;dist=unstable -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

It IS at least one bug - was [STRANGENESS (typographical error???) at http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/README]

2024-10-19 Thread Richard Owlett
Later in this thread Tomas references "Apache HTTP Server Documentation"[1] which explicitly states "Directories require a trailing slash...". Therefore http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/README should *NOT* read "Older releases of Debian are at http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive"; *BUT* sho

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-17 Thread Stefan Monnier
> (I do use less, FWIW). FWIW, I do use less more as well, but I also use more, tho less so. Stefan

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread tomas
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 03:45:44PM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:26:33AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Chris Green wrote: > > > > > > Hasn't the whole linus/unix world moved to using less instead or more? > > > > If it continues to build and work, there's no reason to dis

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Charles Curley
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:49:20 -0400 Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > Some people have habits ingrained over 40 years, more or less. > > This could be the next big emacs vs vi religious debate. More or less. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.com https://charlescurley.c

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 3:20 PM Dan Ritter wrote: > > Chris Green wrote: > > > > Hasn't the whole linus/unix world moved to using less instead or more? > > If it continues to build and work, there's no reason to discard > it. > > Some people have habits ingrained over 40 years, more or less. This

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi all, Am 16.10.2024 um 16:45 schrieb Chris Green: On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:26:33AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: Chris Green wrote: Hasn't the whole linus/unix world moved to using less instead or more? If it continues to build and work, there's no reason to discard it. Some people have hab

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread David Wright
On Wed 16 Oct 2024 at 10:38:53 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:14:20 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > > Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:48:07 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > > Exporting MORE set to some unknown option (I did MORE=-q) leads to > > >

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:26:33AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > Chris Green wrote: > > > > Hasn't the whole linus/unix world moved to using less instead or more? > > If it continues to build and work, there's no reason to discard > it. > > Some people have habits ingrained over 40 years, more or

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Dan Ritter
Chris Green wrote: > > Hasn't the whole linus/unix world moved to using less instead or more? If it continues to build and work, there's no reason to discard it. Some people have habits ingrained over 40 years, more or less. -dsr-

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:14:20 +0100, Chris Green wrote: > Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:48:07 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > > Exporting MORE set to some unknown option (I did MORE=-q) leads to > > > more complaining and refusing service (so it seems to behave as if >

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Chris Green
Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:48:07 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Exporting MORE set to some unknown option (I did MORE=-q) leads to > > more complaining and refusing service (so it seems to behave as if > > one passed that option directly in the command line). > > D'oh!

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Nicolas George
Greg Wooledge (12024-10-16): > I still think that *conditionally* exporting MORE=-e (after performing > whatever version-number-checking backflips are needed) Do not check the version number, check if the option is supported: if more -e /dev/null; then MORE=-e export MORE fi Regards, --

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread tomas
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:54:32AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:48:07 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > Exporting MORE set to some unknown option (I did MORE=-q) leads to > > more complaining and refusing service (so it seems to behave as if > > one passed that option d

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:48:07 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > Exporting MORE set to some unknown option (I did MORE=-q) leads to > more complaining and refusing service (so it seems to behave as if > one passed that option directly in the command line). D'oh! What a disaster. OK, now I have

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread tomas
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 09:41:41AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:34:51 +0300, Anssi Saari wrote: > > $ ls|more -e > > more: unknown option -e > > Try 'more --help' for more information. > > > > I included the reason in my post by listing the Linux environments I use > >

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 15:34:51 +0300, Anssi Saari wrote: > $ ls|more -e > more: unknown option -e > Try 'more --help' for more information. > > I included the reason in my post by listing the Linux environments I use > and where I expect this to work. Interestingly the man page for more in > Deb

Re: Bug in 'more' command

2024-10-16 Thread Anssi Saari
Greg Wooledge writes: > Why did you make it so complicated? What's wrong with simply: > > alias l='ls -lF|more -e' > > or perhaps: > > export MORE=-e > alias l='ls -lF|more' $ ls|more -e more: unknown option -e Try 'more --help' for more information. I included the reason in my pos

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >