Source: xapian-core
Version: 1.4.28-1
Severity: serious
In the latest upload of xapian-core, libxapian changed its soname from
30 to 29 and a new binary package libxapian29 appeared out of nowhere.
If this were intended, the package would have needed to go threw NEW,
but since the package is not l
recommended packages can result in surprising effects.
The Debian Policy [1] says
Recommends
This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
The Recommends field should list packages that would be found
together with this one in all but unusual installations.
Package: isc-dhcp-client
Version: 4.4.3-P1-6
Along with the fix for #1055067, the apparmor file was renamed from
sbin.dhclient to usr.sbin.dhclient, but the old file remains on the
system after upgrades.
Please refer to dh_installdeb(1) and dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) for how
to properly rename a
uild-essential, this may cause a FTBFS.
> Consider dropping the unnecessary linkage already.
Thank you, Helmut. I intend to fix this as soon as the forky cycle
starts.
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Carles,
On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 07:05 +0100, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
>
> Subject: cryptsetup-nuke-password: Update/add debconf template
> translation [INTL:ca]
> Package: cryptsetup-nuke-password
> Version: 6
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> There is a merge
that.
Feel free to close the report. If I have something more substantial
(i.e. a more clear reproduction case), I'll update and reopen.
Danke,
Sven
Wouldn't "architecture-is-64bit" be more reasonable given that it
seems to successfully build on other 64bit (though inofficial)
architectures?
Cheers,
Sven
Source: ros-geometry2
Version: 0.7.7-3
See log:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/ros-geometry2.html
I can reproduce the same error on a rebuild in testing. See log excerpt
below.
Kind regards,
Sven
[ROSUNIT] Outputting test results to
/build/reproducible
Hi Matheus,
On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 22:37:48 -0300 mpolkorny
wrote:
> Control: owner -1 !
>
>
Now that libsmb2 has made it into unstable, please don't forget to also
close this ITP bug.
Thanks for packaging libsmb2!
Best,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195
into the script instead
of calculating it on the fly. It is a magick number anyways, nothing is gained
by
the calculation.
Grüße,
Sven.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug')
sounds a bit vague to me.
I'd recommend to make sure the translations make it into trixie.
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
3 orig/test-ncat-udp.sh test-ncat-udp.sh
--- orig/test-ncat-udp.sh 2025-03-10 14:06:56.0 +
+++ test-ncat-udp.sh2025-03-23 22:07:22.827289754 +
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
test_communication() {
transmit_udp_data
+sleep 0.05
if ! received_udp_data; then
echo "ncat UDP
Hi Hilko,
please find attached a patch fixing this bug.
Cheer,
Sven
Description: Fix passing argument 4 of ReadFile from incompatible pointer type
ReadFile returns the number of read bytes in a DWORD, i.e. unsigned long,
not in an int.
Mangle returned value into an int when it is used with
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:02:52 + Mcgiwer
wrote:
> Package: unhide
> Version: 20130526 (and newer)
> Severity: `wishlist, critical`
>
> The program's in the unhide package (unhide, unhide-linux, unhide-
posix, unhide-tcp, unhide_rb, unhide.
Hi Alexandre,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:22:29 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
> Source: python-pysnmp4
> Source-Version: 4.4.12-4
> Done: Alexandre Detiste
Thanks for the prompt upload.
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
Source: python-pysnmp4
Version: 4.4.12-3
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
1) Tag 4.4.12-2 should be replaced by debian/4.4.12-2 to follow the
pattern of the previous tags.
2) Version 4.4.12-3 does not seem to exist in the repository [1], there
is no respective tag. It looks like the diff debian
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 + patch
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 21:43:31 -0400 Louis-Philippe Véronneau
wrote:
> Source: python-pysnmp4
> Severity: important
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: asyncore-asynchat-deprecation
>
> Dear maintainer(s),
>
> In Python 3.6, asy
On Mon, 2025-03-17 at 13:57 +1100, Sam Lander wrote:
> ugh. please disregard this, there it is: firewalld
Thanks for communicating your finding.
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: nm-connection-editor
Version: 1.36.0-3+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I cannot view or edit the settings of a VPN of type VPNC anymore in nm-
connection-editor and also not in gnome-control-center. Fortunately the
configured VPN is still usable, connections yet succeed.
In nm-
>
> emacs testfile.cpt
>
There seems be a fix to this upstream, though not release yet [1].
Somebody knowledgable in Emacs and Lisp might know what to do with what
is written down in this bug report.
B
.
The below analysis shows that tests are running not against the newest
version (the one just built but against the system installation of the
indirect build dependency on itself).
Kind regards,
Sven
Analysis:
Since our version of trixie is based completely on rebuilds from
testing, we saw a build
regards,
Sven Grewe
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.14.0-rc5-next-20250307-grewe (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT
Hi,
$ reuse init # is no longer available since reuse v4.0.0
Version 1.x of the reuse tool may also not be complaint with the REUSE
specification any more but that's another issue.
Regards,
Sven Grewe
OpenPGP_0x8BABBCC7175C7DA0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signatur
Package: libkmod2
Version: 34.1-1
After the switch to dlopen() the lzma and zstd compression libraries,
libkmod2 does no longer depend on the liblzma5 and libzstd1 packages.
This is bad because kmod is not going to be automatically rebuilt should
one of these libraries change SONAME. Policy §8.6
Package: elpa-magit
Version: 4.3.1-1
Severity: important
The latest magit upload has dropped elpa-seq from Build-Depends, and
therefore elpa-seq got autoremoved from my system. While this seems
desirable, I foresee a problem with partial upgrades from bookworm,
because elpa-magit needs the seq-ke
ective, introducing a
Build-Depends: python3-pyasyncore
should fix this issue. At least this helped on my end, when I tried to
build package 'changeme' using python3-pysnmp4 as a dependency.
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
its dependency on elpa-seq
following the statement from seq-el upstream that seq won't be
released outside of emacs any longer (sufficiently stable). See also
https://bugs.debian.org/1098929
Full build log attached.
Kind regards,
Sven
package-lint-el_0.24-1_amd64-2025-03-04T12:49:20Z.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:58:27 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: pinfo
> Version: 0.6.13-1.1
>
> pinfo crashes on the "Fixed date options" node of gcal.info:
>
> $ dpkg-query -W gcal
> gcal 4.1-3.1
>
> $ pinfo --node='Fixed date options' gcal
> pinfo: initializelinks.c:159: find
xie. There are things like the Wifi
feature that looks broken in the setup but that's very likely an HP LIP
problem because it also appears in Ubuntu Noble Numbat (24.04).
Regards,
Sven Grewe
OpenPGP_0x8BABBCC7175C7DA0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descr
tian false positive (see bug#994716)
-unpack-message-for-deb-data ar failed for */libm.a
unpack-message-for-deb-data ar failed for */libmcheck.a
Cheers,
Sven
response to this ITS?
Best,
Sven
P.S.: I am already working on the package.
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e the attached patch should fix this.
Kind regards,
Sven
Index: libowasp-esapi-java-2.4.0.0/pom.xml
===
--- libowasp-esapi-java-2.4.0.0.orig/pom.xml
+++ libowasp-esapi-java-2.4.0.0/pom.xml
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
4.0.0
org.owasp.esapi
Package: adduser
Version: 3.142
Today I noticed two warnings when upgrading dbus packages, I think these
come from adduser.
,
| dbus-system-bus-common (1.16.2-1) wird eingerichtet ...
| warn: The home dir /nonexistent you specified can't be accessed: No such file
or directory
|
| fatal: The
Package: kmod
Version: 34-2
Commit 8ca034958ad7 removed the kmod init script, and the symlink to it
in /etc/rcS.d is now dangling:
,
| $ file /etc/rcS.d/S*kmod
| /etc/rcS.d/S08kmod: broken symbolic link to ../init.d/kmod
`
Could you please take care to remove that broken symlink as well?
-0:i386 (=
1.24.12-2+b2) but it is not installable
Breaks: gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad (!=
1.24.12-2+b2) but 1.24.12-2 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Thanks,
Sven
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
5 manpage is generated and
should not be patched directly (see also the comment at the top of the
file itself).
Cheers,
Sven
openjdk-21?
Cheers,
Sven
ned exit
status 2
----
Build finished at 2025-02-14T14:41:29Z
All in all, I wonder why you check the version again in debian/rules when
debian/control already has the proper dependencies?
Kind regards,
Sven
hat if the *default* config file didn't change between 2.89-1 and
> 2.90-4~deb12u1, there would not be a prompt.
Well, that's the normal behaviour of dpkg when it hits a changed config
file. Consequently this bug report doesn't report a real bug.
I am inclined to close this bug th
Control: reopen 950427 =
Control: found 950427 amule/1:2.3.3-3.2
Control: reopen 1039123 =
Control: found 1039123 amule/1:2.3.3-3.2
Rollback to the state of 1:2.3.3-3 as per the maintainer's request
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 20:33 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Yes, -3.2 seems best at this point, thanks
Did so. Also reverted my MR.
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 23:16 +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 16:45 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > yes, roll back asap, as you introduced this change with any
> > coordination nor agreement.
>
> I would upload a 1:2.3.3-3.2 then, reflec
:2.3.3-3.1+really3?
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:21:25 +0100 Sven Geuer wrote:
> I observered the same flaw with other packages in the past, vanishing
> eventually for unknown reasons.
The same meanwhile happened to the exifprobe package, no complains from
vcswatch anymore.
> Any idea what's going wrong
hould roll
back my changes, also, feel free to roll back yourself.
Attached you find the debdiff. Alternatively you can refer to my MR
[3].
Regards,
Sven
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039123
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950427
[3]
d the build logs [2] show a successful build at
2024-02-12. Maybe you saw the FTCBFS with a previous version of ipxe?
Cheers,
Sven
[1] http://crossqa.debian.net/src/ipxe
[2]
http://crossqa.debian.net/build/ipxe_1.21.1+git20220113.fbbdc3926+dfsg-4_arm64_20250212012736.log
--
GPG Fingerprint
3D
Package: pd-mediasettings
Version: 0.1.3-5
Severity: normal
When attempting to install pd-mediasettings:i386 on an amd64 system
with i386 as a foreign architecture, (or in the example below, an i386
chroot with amd64 as foreign architecture), I get:
Unsatisfied dependencies:
pd-mediasettings:amd
ntly issues a warning.
Leaving this bug open therefore, until the issue has been fixed in a
lintian-conform way.
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
vcswatch by clicking the "Scan now" button didn't fix the
issue.
I observered the same flaw with other packages in the past, vanishing
eventually for unknown reasons.
Any idea what's going wrong here?
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D58
On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 11:18 -0500, Kevin Otte wrote:
> I'm confused. If the VM won't launch iPXE from ROM, doesn't that make
> the EFI builds in this package moot?
>
> Yes, if I boot an iPXE upstream build from USB it works just fine.
> Again, that kind of defeats the purpose of having it in the
6a4c85-5.2 did not consider this configuration. For a
pristine iPXE experience you can ether chain-load ipxe.efi or boot from
ipxe.iso, both available from the ipxe binary package.
To sum up, I still cannot reproduce what you observed back in 2022.
Any idea how to proceed?
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprin
00:1a:34:c8)... ok
iPXE> initrd boot/initrd.gz
boot/initrd.gz... ok
iPXE> kernel boot/linux initrd=initrd.gz
boot/linux... ok
iPXE> imgstat
initrd.gz : 40734957 bytes
linux : 8189888 bytes [EFI] [SELECTED] "initrd=initrd.gz"
iPXE> boot
EFI stub
On Sat, 2025-01-25 at 18:34 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 04:02:50PM +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
> > Would you please check and report back?
>
> Sorry, I didn't expect Debian to react to a more than two years old bug
> report
>
Well, ipxe has a new
On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 11:36 +0800, Tianyu Chen wrote:
>
> Sven Geuer 于2025年1月17日周五 22:49写道：
> > I failed to detect the fix you mentioned. Can you give me a hint?
> >
> > Also note, I could not reproduce any issue upgrading from an unchanged
> > 2.89-1 installatio
On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 22:04 +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
> Looking at the code in /etc/grub.d/20_ipxe carefully reveals that the
> script _aways_ prints "Found iPXE image: /boot/ipxe.lkrn" [1] but
> inserts code which chooses ipxe.lkrn or ipxe.efi at run-time depending
> on
you can consider it a hickup to present EFI images on
a BIOS system and vice versa.
Conclusions:
- The only real flaw I currently see is the misleading static output
"Found iPXE image: /boot/ipxe.lkrn".
- I doubt it's vital to support 32 bit EFI nowadays, however this can
be ad
inux-kvm), netbooting VMs no longer works:
Reading through the messages to this bug, I am afraid there's nothing
that can be done about it anymore. Would you mind me closing the bug,
possibly flagged 'wontfix'?
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D5
113.fbbdc3926, I believe your case has been
covered. Unfortunately I have no environment available to verify this.
Would you please check and report back?
Best,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
you are running a 32 bit system
for which ipxe currently does not create an EFI binary at all. Not sure
what would happen if you would select ipxe's GRUB menu entry.
Admittedly ipxe's current GRUB script is somewhat messy and requires
improvements anyway. Thanks for pointing to memtest
in.
> As
> such, there is nothing to act on here.
I failed to detect the fix you mentioned. Can you give me a hint?
Also note, I could not reproduce any issue upgrading from an unchanged
2.89-1 installation [1].
Sven
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093274#19
--
dpkg does not know how to handle automatically, and not being
able to force an upgrade is a reasonable safety measure.
Overall, the issue you encountered to me seems behaviour to be expected
and I tend to at least downgrade the bug's severity, if not close it.
Best,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Thorsten,
see https://salsa.debian.org/sven-geuer/rng-tools-debian for what,
according to my tests, fixes the issue.
Cheers,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 20:28 +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, Sven Geuer wrote:
>
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504044#162
>
> > Applying ExecCondition to me seems the most reasonable solution to this
> > bug.
>
>
to start”
> conditions the same.
I believe the service should get skipped per ExecCondition also in this
case (no random device found/available).
>
> Thanks in advance,
> //mirabilos
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
by this.
Btw. it looks like you didn't Cc the original author. The bug tracker will not
automatically send mails to the original submitter when using
n...@bugs.debian.org [1]. nnn-submit...@bugs.debian.org would do this (but not
send a mail to the package maintainer).
Kind regards,
n.net/770299671/agg_1%3A2.7.0.r145+dfsg-1_1%3A2.7.0.r145+dfsg-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
nd is the symbols file. It mentions libagg2 but
should mention libagg2t64
Kind regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
s or the maintainer can spend time on this.
>
> Chris
Using memcpy instead of memset seems correct to. Commented out old code
shows that formerly bcopy was in use, providing the same funcionality
as memcpy.
I am working on providing a package containing the fix.
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5
On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 07:35 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 10-01-2025 00:13, Sven Geuer wrote:
> > After having updated from autopkgtest 5.39 to 5.41 running tests for
> > arno-iptables-firewall stopped at setting up the testbed for the second
> > test p
ou encountered trying apt and
aptitude.
Sorry for the disappointing news.
Best,
Sven
[1]
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=remmina-plugin-spice+&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Descriptio
Hi Bastian
On Tue, 2024-12-31 at 10:48 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 08:56:38PM +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
> > If you agree to this ITS please state your consent right away so
> > that I
> > can upload an updated package near-term.
>
> Sorry for
Package: postfix-doc
Version: 3.9.1-9
Severity: normal
Since version 3.9.1-8, the file /etc/postfix/postfix-files.d/doc.files
is no longer shipped[1], but it remains on the system as an obsolete
conffile. Can you please clean it up?
Thanks for maintaining postfix!
1.
https://salsa.debian.org/
Version: 1:9.2.0+ds-1
Done: Michael Tokarev
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:36:31 +0100 Martin Pitt wrote:
> Control: tag -1 fixed-upstream
>
> The fix for this landed upstream now:
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/fbdea3d6c13d5a75895c287a004c6f1a6bf6c164
The fix materialised in Debian.
;>thisver, that's all.
ipxe-qemu 1.21.1+git20220113.fbbdc3926+dfsg-1, currently in the
deferred queue, has the roms moved to /usr/share/qemu. According to my
tests and as you stated, qemu picks up the roms from the new location
easily.
Greetings,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ter sysinit.target. The result is that
wtmpdb-update-boot.service is skipped and boot times are no longer
recorded. I have bumped the severity to prevent testing migration.
"Before=sysinit.target" should probably be dropped, at least that is
what upstream has done[1].
Cheers,
Sven
1.
https://github.com/thkukuk/wtmpdb/commit/1855b60ac1c3bda79c091bdb5f621a7f09f1e4d7
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
as per ITS I've uploaded ipxe 1.21.1+git20220113.fbbdc3926+dfsg-1 to
DELAYED/10.
Best,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Michael,
just discovered
qemu-system-x86_64 -device help
does not list "eepro100" under network devices. Should the respective
roms be dropped then?
Cheers,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a
from qemu config, requiring ipxe-qemu >>thisver, that's all.
Not a problem, however, I think I should keep some symlinks pointing
from /usr/lib/ipxe/qemu/*.rom to /usr/share/qemu/*.rom to not confuse
people expecting the roms in /usr/lib/ipxe/qemu.
Or instead put symlinks into /usr
Hello Christian,
On Wed, 2024-12-18 at 15:08 +0100, Sven Geuer wrote:
> [...]
> splitting off grub-ipxe [2]
> [...]
> [2]
> https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/commit/?h=applied/ubuntu/trusty-updates&id=47f8bffacbe5e648ab959ce593a62c129725b118
Meanwhile I discovered
On Thu, 2024-12-19 at 01:22 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 18.12.2024 17:08, Sven Geuer wrote:
>
> > Depends: ipxe-qemu, grub-ipxe, ${misc:Depends}
> >
> > While the reason for making grub-ipxe a dependency is obvious, I
> > couldn't figure why ipxe-qem
oose to do so?
Would you mind me dropping this dependency?
I am aware you did this change years ago, still I hope you have an
explanation for me.
Best,
Sven
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1089184
[2]
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/commit/?h=applied/ubu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
From: Sven Hartge
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFS: radsecproxy/1.11.1-1 -- RADIUS protocol proxy supporting RadSec
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radsec
-- debconf information:
* postfix/destinations: turtle.local, turtle, localhost.localdomain, localhost
* postfix/root_address: sven
* postfix/dynamicmaps_conversion_warning: true
* postfix/mailbox_limit: 0
* postfix/mailname: localhost.localdomain
postfix/new
your case is or was a different one. I retitled the bug to
make more clear what it is about.
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: reopen -1
On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 17:48 -0300, Miguel Batista Silva wrote:
> I watched some videos after on YouTube, and apparently, this is some
> defense mechanism against viruses, because in a video, I saw, it said that
> when using Kodi with add-on, the Firewall could actually block acc
rashes on older hardware)
Your statement seems unrelated to bug #990954. Can you please elaborate
on how ProtonVPN and Firewalld affects kodi? Please also state which
version of kodi fixed the issue.
Thanks,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
De
u agree to this ITS please state your consent right away so that I
can upload an updated package near-term.
Looking forward to your reply.
Best,
Sven
[1]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/sven-geuer/ipxe
-- Sys
Package: postfix-sqlite
Version: 3.9.1-1
After upgrading postfix and postfix-sqlite from version 3.9.0-4, I noticed
that etckeeper had recorded the following change:
,
| $ sudo git show
| commit b2dc9d35c0143b3a4df3df26df98f04521dae4ab (HEAD -> master)
| Author: Sven Joachim
| Date:
gtest, but before doing so, I'd like you to check whether this
issue is indication of a bigger problem which needs fixing in the
iptables package.
See the logs at ci.d.n for further details [1] + [2].
Regards, Sven
[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/a/arno-iptables-firewall/testing/am
Package: darkstat
Version: 3.0.721-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@grewe.net
Dear Maintainer,
apt upgrade tried to upgrade darkstat to 3.0.721-1 which led to the
following error:
Setting up darkstat (3.0.721-1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/darkstat/init.cfg ...
chown: can
On 2024-11-26 23:19 +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: binutils-multiarch
> Version: 2.43.50.20241126-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> there is a file conflict between binutils and binutils-multiarch:
>
> Preparing to unpack .../4-binutils_2.43.50.20241126-1_amd64.deb ...
>
duce your observation probably due to the reworked
unit file in place since dnsmasq 2.90-1.
Is the delay still visible to you?
Best,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
by the sed in the init script.
I fail to spot this message in the logs running dnsmasq 2.90-4 and the
last change to the sed call under suspicion happened in dnsmasq 2.79-1.
Is this bug still visible for you? If so, can you provide a hint how to
reproduce the issue?
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/gwsw/less/issues/576
Control: tags -1 + upstream fixed-upstream
The issue has been fixed upstream in commit 5a369ed [1] and has been
released with less v668. Please package this or any newer version to
get this bug fixed in Debian too.
Thanks,
Sven
[1
Control: retitle -1 libssh-4 (0.11.1) lets qemu fail to access disk images via
ssh
Hello Martin,
Hello Qemu Maintainers,
On Thu, 2024-11-07 at 10:32 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Control: tag -1 upstream
> Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/libssh/libssh-mirror/-/issues/280
>
>
das geeignet zu kommunizieren.
Die Stelle im Code, an der die rng-tools derzeit geladen werden, ist
diese:
https://sources.debian.org/src/autopkgtest/5.42/setup-commands/setup-testbed/?hl=586#L586
Gruß,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
De
Hi Andrea,
On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 22:06 +0100, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> Hi Sven, thanks for the report,
>
> On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 5:33 PM CET, Sven Geuer wrote:
> > Source: mdocml
> >
> > Fortunately there seems to be a fix to this in upstream's vcs [1]
&
ackage.
It is part of the expect package, reassigning.
Cheers,
Sven
7;man fuseiso' to the
webview [0], most notably the SEE ALSO section.
Fortunately there seems to be a fix to this in upstream's vcs [1]
already, files man_html.c and man_validate.c, though not released yet.
Please consider cherry-picking the fix as groff 1.23.0 is already part
of tr
t;< 20070708-6~)
to cover all version before the transitional package (and its potential
backports).
Cheers,
Sven
--
GPG Fingerprint
3DF5 E8AA 43FC 9FDF D086 F195 ADF5 0EDA F8AD D585
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
1 - 100 of 4247 matches
Mail list logo
