so i also tested to include poppler2 manually in an html file in addition to
bootstrap.js (without bundle) and then the dropdown works.
So the bundle is apparently broken because popper isnt really bundled, but to
fix it, popper2, not 1 needs to be included. Either in the package or by
adding
confirming this for unstable and backports 5.3.3 versions and also the
bookworm 5.2.3 version.
I also tested if the behaviour matches the upstream binary, e.g. from
https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/bootstrap@5.3.3/dist/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js
and with the upstream version there is no problem to g
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:34 AM Alberto Garcia wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 04:14:20PM +0200, Henning Sprang wrote:
>
> > I have massive problems with Webbrowsers constantly crashing as soon
> > as I do anything serious on webpages with JavaSCript in them.
>
>
Package: webkit2gtk
Version: 2.36.7-1~deb11u1
Hello,
Since I have made the upgrade as described in details below in the apt
history, invlolving multiple binary üackages from the here mentioned source
üackage, I have massive problems with Webbrowsers constantly crashing as
soon as I do anything s
r the late reply…
I myself can not upload or sponsor, but i talked to Carsten (email aboce)
and he agreed to help!
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
nt hesitate to let me know.
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
Package: python3-marshmallow-sqlalchemy
Version: 0.19.0-1
The current upstream version of this package is 0.26.0.
The version in the Debian archive is from september 2019.
Upstream does not provide any documentation anymore for this version
on it's website, and likely no security support whatsoe
Package: python3-flask-marshmallow
Version: 0.10.1-4
The current upstream version of this package is 0.14.0, available
since 2020-09-28.
Debian archive version 0.10.1-4 is from May 2019. For this version,
there isn't even any documentation any more on the upstream's web
site, which makes it very
Package: python3-marshmallow
Version: 3.10.0-1
The current upstream version of this package is 3.12.1 - please
consider updating it.
Package: nodejs
Version: 12.21.0~dfsg-4
Severity: important
This version has security issues, which have been fixed with 12.21.1 -
see
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V12.md#12.22.1
Also, the upstream maintenance support for Version 12 will end in
April 2022,
the package on salsa already, not up
to date with upstream, but more current:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/flask-sqlalchemy
That’s probably what has been mentioned in the earlier conversations about
this bug.
But it seems not to have made it to the archive...
Thanks,
Henning
--
re accepted for Bullseye so
> the answer is going to be no.
Can i still help to update it so the next release will be more up to date?
( an an eventual transition to newer versions before the next release less
painful)
> --
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
Hello,
Is there any help needed to solve this issue?
Is there any chance we can get this one year old bug solved before the
Bullseye release so it ships with a current instead of a 6 years old
version of the library?
Please let me know what I can do to help.
Thanks,
Henning
--
Henning Sprang
Package: python3-pg8000
Version: 1.10.6-2
The upstream version of this package in the archive is from 2016.
The current upstream version of this package is 1.19.0 from March 28, 2021.
Also, the homepage given in the Debian package tracker is not correct anymore.
The current one is https://githu
is the time to migrate to another virtualization backend with vagrant?
Only, last time I tried with another backend(dont remember which, the
next lxc?) it was not running so smooth.
But that's another topic...
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
Package: cloud.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: henning.spr...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I am setting up a system with the debian/testing64 Box provided in the Vagrant
Cl
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Henning Sprang
wrote:
> Just, it's not giving us a deb that we can use in automated
> mass-deployment as we intend to do :)
oops, and I should read the manual before writing.
Didn't realize dkms also has a mkdeb function as I just see... wil
Hi Russ,
Thanks for your quick reply!
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> It's probably too late to fix anything like this for wheezy, since this
> isn't release-critical. (DKMS is now the recommended way of handling all
> kernel modules.)
O.K, I might only get back at this i
Hi,
I'm having the exact same problem as Christoph describes - for openafs
1.6 it seems to be impossible to build modules with make-kpkg.
I tried to get it done with
* plain squeeze buildsystem - with kernel 2.6.X
* Squeeze with Backports - kernel 2.6 and 3.2
* Wheezy - kernel 3.2
My current ob
On 2010-04-25 22:45, Thomas Lange wrote:
> This change was intentionally, since the disk size is not needed by
> FAI any more. If you need the size in some of your scripts, you have
> to define it in your own scripts and you can use the code used
> before. IMO this is not a bug at all, it's just
package: fai-quickstart
When trying to upgrade from fai 3.2.17 to 3.3.1,
and keeping the existing configs in /etc/fai
The installscript fails completely to install the package (even though,
if I already have fai-quickstart installed, users probably don't care
for fai-quickstart to copy the exa
Holger Levsen wrote:
> sigh.
Too high expectations? :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Thomas Lange
wrote:
>> I think: none! people seeing this logo are already using FAI.
> So, all software that have a logo should disable it, because people are
> already using the software.
I didn't say the logo must be removed because people are already using
the
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> it would be better it fcopy ignored parts of the filesystem it
> had no buisness with.
Actually, if I understand this description right, I see no reason at
all why fcopy should do anything but placing a file from the files
directory in th
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Eymen Alyaz wrote:
> I had a chat with a fai developer about our local site (about 250
> installations) at the weekend. He advised me to
> report the feature request at this site. Just to let you know.
It's basically right that the bug will finally(eventually) be f
this bug must be reported in launchpad, npot bugs.debian.org!
Please post it there, and do it fast - it would also prove that there
are people using fai-client withut fai-server, because people are
currently discussing about removing the whole fai package because some
problems with fai-server!
He
ai-client...
One could start with /srv/fai/config ...
So, after a fai-quickstart and coyping the sample config, the server
can serve clients and at the same time be managed itself with
softupdates.
Henning
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> again, why not?
Here it seems to me that the situation is made clear in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390545#22 quite well
:)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> why dont you want to fix this issue? The provided patch looks sane and
> non-intrusive and is generally helpful, so?
ACK, +1
Thomas, good error checking, and dying early, is part of good software
developpment techniques.
Si
7;: No such file or directory
chroot: cannot run command `update-initramfs': No such file or directory
Log file written to /var/log/fai/make-fai-nfsroot.log
Re-exporting directories for NFS kernel daemon
FAI setup finished."
Someone can help me?
Thanks
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de
+49 (0) 176 82188257
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, a Ubuntu bug only?
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:06:04 +0100
From: Lothar Brendel
To: Henning Sprang
CC: linux-...@uni-koeln.de
References: <49aba9f5.4030...@uni-due.de> <49afd694.7090...@sprang.de>
Henning Sprang wrote:
> Lothar Brendel wrote:
>
>> Now, AFAICS the 2.6.26-p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As far as I understood the original request it's rather:
"FAI should remove all packages not listed in package configs"
And I think this bug should be named like this
And I'd add: "...taking dependencies etc. of listed packages into
account" - as ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In the meantime, there is a xen-linux-system package in testing as well
in unstable!
Please let this package into testing...
Henning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.m
hanged" a file
previoulsy with fcopy!
Otherwise softupdates are totally impossible.
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de | http://lazyb0y.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whole softupdate forcedly interactive, and renders
"automatic softupdates" totally impossible.
(at least, as far as I understand these given descriptions).
Henning
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de | http://lazyb0y.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Package: fai-server
Ryan, filing your isse as a bug to the BTS.
Seems like make-fai-nfsroot will delete a mirror mounted via NFS.
When reading again, what I don't reall understand here, why the nfs
mount takes place on the server, anyway, I'd think that the install
_client_ mounts the mirror
Jonathan Beckman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well, I was doing it the same way as with cvs: simply copy the authentication
data to the nfsroot by copying recursively a properly setup .subversion
directory ;)
Sounds like a bad solution :) I'd
If read correctly, I think the whole description of the fai-client
package needs a full rewrite, and so I did that:
Concrete proposal for a new description for fai-client:
Description: Fully Automatic Installation client package
This is the client package for the FAI automatic installation an
up to date java
implementation available in Lenny.
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de | http://lazyb0y.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to let people know:
while the exports file looks "ugly" like that, it really works as an
export entry for the whole subnet, not just the single host!
(that's the main reason why this bug is minor, not normal)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: fai-server
fai-cd fails at the cd createion step without any helpfulk error
(because all output is sent to /dev/null, which can only be avoided by
hacking the script directly).
Looking at the output uncovers that the mkisofs (which is a symlink to
genisofs) error is that the directo
Package: fai-server
Severity: minor
when purging a (completely unused before) fai-server, I get:
"rmdir: failed to remove /var/run/fai: no such file or directory"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maybe interesting additional info:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/07/msg00259.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fai
Severity: wishlist
Having basefiles inside the configspace does not work well for everybody
who loads the configspace from Subversion or another VCS.
The basefiles location should be made configurable - it can either be in
the configspace, for those that have it in a filesystem,
Package: fai
rsyslogd is standard in debian now, and we should use it, too.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fai-client
Please merge these files, as FAI is made for linux mainly, there's not
much reason to have the functions in two files.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
What about dynamically creating/modifying the disk_config/* files?
Its a good idea to workaround a (in my humble opinion) missing feature.
I agree and see the usefulness of that feature.
But: Setup Storage is just newly written, brand new in FAI,and it's
basic func
Package: fai-server
Tags: patch
fai-setup has an error that results in this message short before finishing:
...
Log file written to /var/log/fai/make-fai-nfsroot.log
/usr/sbin/fai-setup: line 160: [: missing `]'
...
It can be fixed with the attached patch
160c160
< [ -e .rhosts] && chown
Frederic Boiteux wrote:
I've patched setup_harddisks to let me set some ext2 format options
in disc partitionment files through setup_harddisks : -L , -b
and -v. Can you include it in the official fai-client
package ?
It's unlikely that this will happen, as setup_harddisks is about to be
ob
Package: fai-server
Version: 3.2.7
Henning Sprang wrote:
Running fai-mirror I get this:
install:~# fai-mirror /var/fai-mirror/
Using configuration files from /etc/fai
Getting package information
bzip2: (stdin) is not a bzip2 file.
bzip2: (stdin) is not a bzip2 file.
Failed to fetch
http
package: fai-client
In softupdate mode, ainsl create multiple entries.
Something like
ainsl $target/etc/crontab "15 6 * * * root
/usr/local/bin/backup-subversion.sh > /dev/null"
(and another, similar entry for trac)
leads to a crontab like this after three softupdates:
15 6 * *
Holger Levsen wrote:
Only if you installed with FAI, which is not a requierement to use
softupdates.
Indeed, the system where I used it was not installed with FAI.
At some point you have to start using FAI even if you don't have a FAI
server in a specific network. So I used softupdates to pull
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
The attached patch is supposed to fix this, but should be carefully reviewed.
Most of them seem reasonable.
But I am not sure with this:
--- start ---
Index: examples/simple/scripts/GRUB/10-setup
===
---
package: fai-client
The man page of ftar says this:
--- start ---
EXAMPLES
Suppose the source directory /files/etc/alternatives consists of the
following files:
DATALESS.tar.gz ant01.tar.bz2
Each file is a compressed archive. If only class DATALESS is defined,
the following comman
Proposal to make this a bit better, as I fell into it just again when
setting up new systems:
add a comment in fai.conf with an working example, tell that the
username is always required.
Adding, below the nfs example in fai.conf:
#
FAI_CONFIG_SRC=svn://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/infrastruktur/trunk
Holger Levsen wrote:
cat: /sys/block/rd/c0d0/removable: No such file or directory
/usr/lib/fai/disk-info: line 17: [: -eq: unary operator expected
Is dash the default shell on that system?
No it isn't even installed.
This problem ist usually happening when bash scripts try to evaulate an
e
package: fai-client
When running fai softupdate on some system (sorry, I don't have details
about the hardware, as I got it prepared from others), I get this
message at the beginning:
cat: /sys/block/rd/c0d0/removable: No such file or directory
/usr/lib/fai/disk-info: line 17: [: -eq: unary
package: fai-client
Hi,
I'd like to use FAI softupdates on a system where I have the configspace
only locally, for now. So, I set
FAI_CONFIG_SRC=file:///etc/fai/config
in fai.conf, and place a proper configspace in there.
But it doesn't run as it should, instead I get this:
--- start ---
Oliver Ripka wrote:
Package: fai-doc
Version: 3.1.8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
After the installation of Ubuntu Hardy according to
the multidistribution wiki page
Thanks for your helpful input.
Still, the wiki is not the fai-guide, which this sugtracking system and
package fai-doc is abo
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Hi. Any hope of having this fixed soon. There is less than 15
packages left in the archive without init.d dependency headers. This
package is one of them.
Thomas Lange, the maintainer of FAI, is quite busy ATM.
But, even if adding this fix in tis package might r
package: fai-doc
From a discussion on linux-fai it resulted that the docs are inaccurate
at some point - citing the thread:
Original Message
Subject: Re: task_chboot: SERVER not defined
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:16:18 +0100
From: Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-fa
do to help
you solve this problem, which has a very grave impact on my, and I
believe many other's day to day computer usage.
Thank you,
Henning
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de | http://lazyb0y.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hi,
Just to inform you that the problem seems not to hit only a minor amount
of people: I have the same, probably also since the last security update
(not sure, I played around with evolkution, but wanted to switch back to
icedove now, to see that I can't as it is unusable in the current state)
I
0_defosof
# $HOSTNAME
test
# LAST
LAST
I'd be happy if some of you can test the patch and give some feedback.
Cheers,
Raphaël
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de | http://lazyb0y.blogspot.com/
--- fai-3.2.4/bin/fai-class 2007-11-10 14:55:28.0 +0100
+++ fai-
int} =
"da"); # non-fs data
$MPOptions{$mountpoint} = $options;
if($test == 1){
print
"$mountpoint,$MPMinSize{$mountpoint}-$MPMaxSize{$mountpoint},";
--- 532,537
Thanks.
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
Henning Sprang
http://www.sprang.de | http://lazyb0y.blogspot.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: virtualbox-ose-guest-utils
Version: 1.5.4-dfsg4
/usr/lib/virtualbox/x11config.pl is mentioned in README.Debian, but is
is actually in /usr/share/virtualbox
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fai-server
Severity: Wishlist
Everytime a user tests some stuff in FAI, and it does not directly all
go well, he has to debug stuff.
This goes for newbie user who try their first FAI installs, and it is
also true for FAI developers.
Then, always, the "nice" FAI colorlogo come in their
Package: fai-doc
Severity: wishlist
The FAI guide should give a howto for installing 32 bit systems from an
amd64 system - there is an extra nfsroot needed for this, which has to
be created manually, and clients have to be pointed to this somehow.
For example, a start for this can be found in the
Package: fai-doc
Severity: wishlist
Have a walk-through of all the simple example's functionality.
What classes are there, what do they do and how.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: fai-doc
Severity: wishlist
The FAI Guide does not tell the user that there is a NEWS and changelog
file.
It would be good to mention these files at some place in the guide.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: xen-tools
When using xen-delete-image, I am always confused about what it really
did, as it doesn't report any info about success or failure of it's run.
For example, I can run
xen-delete-image grml-live-testing
as often as I want, it's output is always plain nothing - no way to
differ
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Holger, who sincerly believes NICs which dont support PXE and etherboot
> should just be ignored. A new gigabit NIC costs, what, 7 euro?
7 Euro NICS normally don't have PXE!
I have some which are not even old, and they do not work.
Henning
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Or, as still some people might(and do!) have NIC'S that cannot PXE and
don't boot with etherboot, rename it to "fai-make-boot-iso" and make it
produce isos (as floppies are too small for the kernel, but iso's not)
:)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Rafał Krypa wrote:
> [...]
> But I am using FAI 3.2.1 on Debian testing. It seems that default FAI
> configuration is lacking, because fai-setup uses packages from Etch to
> create its environment and required package live-initramfs is not there.
> Adding 'deb http://www.backports.org/debian etch-b
Rafał Krypa wrote:
> [...]
> It seems to be related to package live-initramfs missing in Etch, DebianLive
> FAQ
> suggests "Add latest live-initramfs deb package into
> config/chroot_local-packages
> directory and rebuild" for exactly this problem and fai-setup complains about
> unknown package "
Michael Prokop wrote:
> Any suggestions what could be the best solution for this? Does a
> patch which would allow disabling need for FAI_CONFIG_SRC sound
> reasonable to you?
Generally sounds desireable to make softupdate in a chroot, and in some
cases even without having to use nfs/svn/...
But
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...]
> I guess you might want to either tag it unreproducible, and wait for
> some time before closing it, or close it right away.
As I also couldn't reproduce it on another install: ACK!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: fai-server
I still need to search for the actual reasons of my error here, but I
think it'Äs definitely bad, especially for unexperienced users, that
make-fai-nfsroot finishes with "finished properly", even if a lot of
errors occured. As experienced user I see at a glance, that there must
Thomas Lange wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:47:10 +0200, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>
> > So SYNOPSIS should read:
>
> >fai-cd [OPTION]... -m SOURCEDIRECTORY [-u TARGETDIRECTORY]
> FILENAME
> SOURCEDIRECTORY is not a correct description (it's the direct
Thomas Lange wrote:
> IMO your patch reverts the patch made in r4538. Please check
> with svn diff -r4537:4538 if you patch was made from an older copy of
> get-fai-configdir-svn. IMO this is the case. How can we handle this in
> the future?
If the patch was made against an not up to date copy:
Severity: normal
I think, this is not only a wishlist bug - when stopped, e.g. by ctrl-c,
fai should clean up it's state.
This doesn't happen, I found that the file
/var/run/fai/fai_softupdate_is_running
still exists after a broken run of fai softupdate, and this is what
makes fai "think" it's
Package: fai-client
Severity: Wishlist
I just fought quite a while wondering why fai doesn't use the up to date
configspace from subversion.
finally I saw:
svn: Unknown hostname 'svn.lazy'
somewhere in the fai output.
I configured fai to use an svn repository as config source, and
resolving it'
Fathi Boudra wrote:
> hi,
>
> as a workaround (or not), just add your user to vboxusers group like kvm of
> fuse package do. Maybe add it to README.Debian too.
That would not help.
As I wrote (but cannot approve with the newest version, while somebody
else did), the problem is, the dev file is
Package: fai-client
When trying to run softupdate, I get this error, and it refused to run:
Performing FAI system update. All data may be overwritten!
Calling task_softupdate
Another fai softupdate is already running. Aborting.
End of /usr/sbin/fai
But it definitely is not running anymore.
I hav
Package: fai-client
when using the setting
FAI_CONFIG_SRC=svn://svn.lazy/infrastruktur/trunk/configs/fai/configspace
in a softupdate, it seems as fai script get-config-svn is not able to
parse a config line given without a username for anonymous access.
After many tries to get the svn url right,
Henning Sprang wrote:
> [...]
> (will check everything with the new 1.5.0 OSE sources these days...
> maybe that also solves my problem with being unable to run X in VM's)
I did that(upgrade to virtualbox-ose 1.5.0.*) now.
despite some other guy reported to have the problem with 1.
Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> [...]
> dpkg -L virtualbox-ose | grep udev
>
> and if it exists there, can you please cat it and give me the content? This
> is quite strange since It works on my system (and on some other systems
> without any problems here).
I have that file (I din't do the tests yo
Package: rubygems
Version: 0.9.0
I installed rails with rubygems. Now, apart from being not happy with
the problems reported in #403407 I face another inconsistency:
When searching for the reason of rails bin not being the path befre
finding bug #403407, the gems contents command cannot find rail
Package: virtualbox
Version: 1.4.0svn4130-dfsg-1
After installing virtualbox and the kernel modules, I have this ownership:
crw-rw 1 root root 10, 62 Sep 2 19:38 /dev/vboxdrv
That way, I cannot run virtualbox as normal user without further actions.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> mkisofs is the actively maintained original software.
> It makes no sense to advertize for defective forks like "genisoimage"
> that are based on obsolete code.
>
> Look into the debian bug tracking system to find a list of genisoimage bugs
> that are not present in the or
Hans wrote:
> [...]
> # this kernel package will be used when booting the install clients
> KERNELPACKAGE=/usr/lib/fai/kernel/linux-image-2.6.18-fai-kernels_1_i386.deb
>
> to
>
> # this kernel package will be used when booting the install clients
> KERNELPACKAGE=/usr/lib/fai/kernel/linux-image-2
Trent W. Buck wrote:
> [...]
> fai-server assumes /srv is writable, this is not the case on my
> workstation where /srv is a root-squashed nfs mount. I'm not sure
> which one of us is doing the Wrong Thing.
> [...]
see
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYST
I checked, and got the reply that not this, but another fix of the "long
domain names problem" in xendomains has been incorporated in xen
unstable - see the bugzilla report.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could it be that the bug is rather fixed because you increase the number
of characters cut checks for the domain name?
You mix in your patch some complex logic to determine stuff with the
minor change of setting these characters up to 40.
It is a known, but still unfixed bug in Xen upstream that
Tags: patch
BTW: a fix by h0lger is available in svn people/h0lger/softupdate-git-rpm.
When testing this to install rhel on a debian host via dirinstall, I
realized some more is to be done:
Holgers patch is enough when only running softupdate on a non-debian host.
But, when the target distribut
Tags: patch
the patch is now contained in the branch
people/lazyboy/bugfixes/etch-doc-fixes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tracked down this problem:
as we removed HOST in the main fai script, we also removed the line in
fai-class which checked id HOST is set, and only if not, it set the
HOSTNAME from uname.
Now, always HOSTNAME is newly exported , even in dirinstall(where,
before, HOST way set), which makes the HO
BTW: this has probably something to do with the changes happened in fai
around the HOST and HOSTNAME variables done in the first days of debcamp
between 10th and 20th of june 2007
probably the old setting should just be restored - or, all this
HOST/HOSTNAME handling should be better documented and
Package: fai-client
Version: 3.2~beta4
So this doesn't get lost in private mail:
in the new beta versions the -u switch for giving an explicit hostname
for dirinstall doesn't work anymore - instead always the name of the
host fai is run on is used - which is in nearly no case what one wants
when
Tags: patch
This bug can be closed as soon as changset 4356 from the subversion
(changes in people/lazyboy/bugfixes/dirinstall-doc) is applied to the
trunk.
All other new undocumented features have their own bug number in the
meantime.
I forgot to add this bugnumber in the commit, sorry.
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
