---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110965/
---
(Updated June 15, 2013, 1 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been discar
> On June 12, 2013, 6:38 p.m., Jarosław Staniek wrote:
> > Thanks for testing this Friedrich,
> > Unfortunately this patch reverses my patch for unicode string constants as
> > well as unicode values. You can try to recreate report like on this
> > screenshot: http://wstaw.org/m/2013/06/12/plas
> On June 12, 2013, 6:38 p.m., Jarosław Staniek wrote:
> > Thanks for testing this Friedrich,
> > Unfortunately this patch reverses my patch for unicode string constants as
> > well as unicode values. You can try to recreate report like on this
> > screenshot: http://wstaw.org/m/2013/06/12/plas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110965/#review34247
---
Thanks for testing this Friedrich,
Unfortunately this patch rev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110965/
---
Review request for Calligra, Sebastian Sauer and Jarosław Staniek.
Descrip
On 11/22/2011 09:51 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
But I think renaming the application is really the
most bad thing you can do here. Especially if you only rename one of them.
There is difference in occurences of 'words' and 'tables' and 'plan'
and 'stage' nouns in our users' world (that maps to
On 22 November 2011 12:40, C. Boemann wrote:
> I agree that the specific Kexi problem is a non issue. "Export to spreadsheet"
> solves it imho.
Yes, Kexi case was selected as a clear example. Lack of precision when
using Tables name without Calligra prefix is a general trouble for me,
not experie
an amazing name for a spreadsheet application. :)
>
> -matus
>
> --
> Matus Uzak
> Software Designer
> Ixonos Slovakia s.r.o.
> Sturova 27, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia
> mobile 0421 918 718 958
> email: matus.u...@ixonos.com
> http://www.ixonos.com
>
>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 11:26 AM
To: Calligra Suite developers and users mailing list
Subject: Re: results from
On 22 November 2011 11:15, Uzak Matus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I discussed the name a bit with friends of mine. And the outcome is: Why
> to reinvent the name for a spre
On 22 November 2011 11:51, Uzak Matus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> .. why not to keep it simple, the application should use the capital S:
>
> "To open a spreadsheet in Spreadsheet:
> 1. Click Open button
> 2. Select a (spreadsheet) document from the list
> 3. Click "Open".
>
> Another example for "save as" f
Hello,
On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 11:26:29 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> We may care about the same as beofre: not to have this sentence in
> a handbook: "To open a spreadsheet in Spreadsheet:
> 1. Click Open button
> 2. Select spreadsheet document from the list
> 3. Click "Open".
> "
seems you a
lopers and users mailing list
Subject: Re: results from
On 22 November 2011 11:15, Uzak Matus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I discussed the name a bit with friends of mine. And the outcome is: Why
> to reinvent the name for a spreadsheet application? It's simply
> "spreadsheet".
On 22 November 2011 11:15, Uzak Matus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I discussed the name a bit with friends of mine. And the outcome is: Why
> to reinvent the name for a spreadsheet application? It's simply
> "spreadsheet". It's a common term that almost any of the potential users
> out there understands.
elvst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 9:21 PM
To: Calligra Suite developers and users mailing list
Subject: Re: results from
Den måndagen den 21:e november 2011 skrev Sebastian
Sauermailto:m...@dipe.org>>:
> On 11/21/2011 02:43 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
2011/11/22 Thorsten Zachmann :
> from what I have read about the rename of Calligra Tables into something else
> I must have to say that up to now I have not seen anthing I would say lets
> change it to this very very good new name. There has been not one very very
> good result that would justify
On 22 November 2011 03:39, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 03:29 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> The action in topic was about exporting directly and for whatever
>> reason it's specifically to Tables, not to an ODS file.
>
> Ah. So, Reports opens the Tables application and fills it sheets
On 22 November 2011 08:18, Adam Pigg wrote:
> To be clear, what it does is write an ods file,out does not open tables and
> populate it and does not open tables at the end. So maybe export to
> spreadsheet is more appropriate.
We indeed perform the generation in the background and we have started
On Tuesday 22 November 2011 Nov, Elvis Stansvik wrote:
> 2011/11/22 Thorsten Zachmann :
> > Hello all,
> >
> > from what I have read about the rename of Calligra Tables into something
> > else
> > I must have to say that up to now I have not seen anthing I would say lets
> > change it to this very
2011/11/22 Thorsten Zachmann :
> Hello all,
>
> from what I have read about the rename of Calligra Tables into something else
> I must have to say that up to now I have not seen anthing I would say lets
> change it to this very very good new name. There has been not one very very
> good result that
2011/11/21 Boudewijn Rempt :
> On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Markus Slopianka wrote:
>> The list of names is so terrible, I now understand why you fought so hard to
>> keep it
>> secret, handpicked eligible voters, and suppressed any attempt to make
>> suggestions after
>> your pseudo-democrati
To be clear, what it does is write an ods file,out does not open tables and
populate it and does not open tables at the end. So maybe export to
spreadsheet is more appropriate.the original thinking was to advertise our
brand names in the GUI, in the same way msa has analyse with word and
analyse wi
Hello all,
from what I have read about the rename of Calligra Tables into something else
I must have to say that up to now I have not seen anthing I would say lets
change it to this very very good new name. There has been not one very very
good result that would justify the rename in my point o
Den måndagen den 21:e november 2011 skrev Sebastian Sauer:
> On 11/21/2011 02:43 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
It
was a poll to cut down a list we compiled during the sprint. Out of
that
poll comes a suggestion. You are free to make another suggestion.
>>>
>>> Is that a proposal to redo
Some more naming branstorm;
=== Background ===
I think at the beginning there is a question. In the case of
OpenOffice.org it was probably something like "What you do with it"?
* You write something together => Writer
* You calculate something together => Calc
* You try to impress people => Im
On 11/21/2011 02:50 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
To be more productive on this one;
As far as I remember the idea was to establish one common brand: Calligra.
That means the application-names themself should not be used
"stand-alone" like they where before. So, it's Calligra Words and not
KWord, it's Ca
On 11/21/2011 03:20 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Please read what I've done for you: free research :) What you write is
a game - not in conflict more than the Words app from 2008 is with
Calligra Words.
Ah, indeed. Thanks :-)
What I wrote is Abacus THE spreadsheet that is dead. I have no prob
On 11/21/2011 03:29 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
I would like to start with defining the problem. That was greatly done
through I personally do not agree with the result that a renaming is needed.
I mean for the same reason we would need to rename Words cause ppl may
confuse it with a "Count word
Den måndagen den 21:e november 2011 skrev Sebastian Sauer:
> On 11/21/2011 02:43 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
It
was a poll to cut down a list we compiled during the sprint. Out of
that
poll comes a suggestion. You are free to make another suggestion.
>>>
>>> Is that a proposal to redo
On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Adam Pigg wrote:
> How about
> Calligra Abaci
> Calligra Worksheet (or workbook)
>
> Im not keen on Calligra Spread, sounds a bit like some bizare sexual
> position :)
Ah, a devotee of Oscar Wilde. To me, it sounds like something chemical to put
on bread...
--
B
How about
Calligra Abaci
Calligra Worksheet (or workbook)
Im not keen on Calligra Spread, sounds a bit like some bizare sexual
position :)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Elvis Stansvik wrote:
> Den måndagen den 21:e november 2011 skrev Sebastian Sauer:
>
> > On 11/21/2011 02:43 PM, C. Boemann
Den måndagen den 21:e november 2011 skrev Sebastian Sauer:
> On 11/21/2011 02:43 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
It
was a poll to cut down a list we compiled during the sprint. Out of
that
poll comes a suggestion. You are free to make another suggestion.
>>>
>>> Is that a proposal to redo
On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Markus Slopianka wrote:
> The list of names is so terrible, I now understand why you fought so hard to
> keep it
> secret, handpicked eligible voters, and suppressed any attempt to make
> suggestions after
> your pseudo-democratic vote started...
I don't think t
The list of names is so terrible, I now understand why you fought so hard to
keep it
secret, handpicked eligible voters, and suppressed any attempt to make
suggestions after
your pseudo-democratic vote started...
On Sonntag 20 November 2011 21:42:59 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here are the re
On Monday 21 November 2011 15:38:11 you wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:43 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> But that means we exclude him from the decision that could have taken
> place at our mailinglist (where him and me btw could have participated
> at) and not at the sprint (where neither him nor me where abl
On 11/21/2011 02:43 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
It
was a poll to cut down a list we compiled during the sprint. Out of that
poll comes a suggestion. You are free to make another suggestion.
Is that a proposal to redo the "poll / voting"? Cause else it would not
make any sense... or do you suggest to n
On 21 November 2011 15:17, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:39 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>
>> On 21 November 2011 13:50, Pierre Stirnweiss
>> wrote:
>
> 1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
Even if it won the competition it is a bad cho
On 21 November 2011 14:58, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:03 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 21 November 2011 13:50:38 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
>
> 1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
Even if it won the competition it is a bad choi
On 11/21/2011 02:39 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 21 November 2011 13:50, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as there is already a
spreadsheet application out there with this name. See
Pretty hard to ask a maintainer that hasn't responded since 1999.
I have little doubt that the commits are done by paid distribution employees.
Just like Montel and others sweeps by calligra from time to time.
On Monday 21 November 2011 15:09:18 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> Well, if he has updated
Well, if he has updated it to make it compile, it is still in a maintained
state. It shows the developer(s) is(are) still interrested at providing
their software. The very least we have to (and a strong emphasise on the
"have to") is to speak with him(them) before even pushing much further the
poss
On Monday 21 November 2011 14:58:18 you wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:03 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2011 13:50:38 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> 1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
> >>>
> >>> Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as th
On 11/21/2011 02:03 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2011 13:50:38 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as there is already a
spreadsheet application out there with this name. Se
On Monday 21 November 2011 14:47:54 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 11:55 AM, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2011 08:27:10 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And
>
On 11/21/2011 11:55 AM, C. Boemann wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2011 08:27:10 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And
yes some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names
were b
On Monday 21 November 2011 14:11:00 you wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 01:37 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2011 13:18:50 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2011 11:29 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> >>> On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, J
On 21 November 2011 13:50, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
>
>> > 1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
>>
>> Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as there is already a
>> spreadsheet application out there with this name. See
>> http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/de
On 11/21/2011 01:37 PM, C. Boemann wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2011 13:18:50 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 11:29 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauer
On Monday 21 November 2011 13:50:38 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote:
> > > 1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
> >
> > Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as there is already a
> > spreadsheet application out there with this name. See
> > http://www.freebsdsof
> > 1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
>
> Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as there is already a
> spreadsheet application out there with this name. See
> http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/deskutils/abacus.html
>
> If there is already a spreadsheet ap
On 11/21/2011 11:55 AM, C. Boemann wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2011 08:27:10 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And
yes some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names
were b
On 11/21/2011 11:40 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 21 November 2011 10:53, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauerwrote:
On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
It also reveals the names (for those that we
On Monday 21 November 2011 13:18:50 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 11:29 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> >>> On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011
On 11/21/2011 11:29 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
It also reveals the names (for those that
On Monday 21 November 2011 08:27:10 Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> >> It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And
> >> yes some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names
> >> were brought to the vote.
> >>
> >
On 21 November 2011 10:53, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>
>> On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
>
> It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And
>>
On Monday 21 November 2011 Nov, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> >> On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes
> >>
On 11/21/2011 09:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes
some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names were
bro
On 21 November 2011 08:27, Sebastian Sauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
>>
>>> It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes
>>> some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names were
>>> brought to the vote.
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Ab
On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes
some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names were
brought to the vote.
1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
Even if it
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 21:42:59 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here are the results of the poll
Can you please post the link to the result of the poll please.
> It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes
> some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all propose
On 20 November 2011 21:47, C. Boemann wrote:
> Hmm this mail went out too soon by mistake. Before writing a subject and
> before writing that I still believe Marijn should have the final say.
Yes, I'd like to emphasize that there was agreement among people
discussing this topic at the sprint:
to
On Sunday 20 November 2011 21:42:59 C. Boemann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here are the results of the poll
>
> It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes
> some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names were
> brought to the vote.
>
>
> 1. Abacus (Condorce
Hi
Here are the results of the poll
It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes some
were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names were brought to
the vote.
1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Spreads loses to Aba
63 matches
Mail list logo
