On 11/21/2011 04:36 AM, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
It also reveals the names (for those that weren't at the sprint). And yes
some were made as a joke, but in all fairness all proposed names were
brought to the vote.
1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as there is already a
spreadsheet application out there with this name. See
http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/deskutils/abacus.html
I agree. The sucks. Also the list of names is so bad that I don't wonder
it wins. Even more worse now we destroyed the nice idea the brand and
the app names had :-(
Also ubuntu ships with xabacus. Therefore I have a strong feeling we should
not use a name already used by a different open source project.
2. Spreads loses to Abacus by 6–3
3. Tables loses to Abacus by 8–2, loses to Spreads by 6–3
How exactly was the counting done?
4. Grids loses to Abacus by 6–2, loses to Tables by 6–4
5. Kiire (estonian for quick) loses to Abacus by 7–1, loses to Grids by
5–3 6. Blocks loses to Abacus by 8–0, loses to Kiire (estonian for quick)
by 4–3 7. Boxes loses to Abacus by 8–0, loses to Blocks by 4–1
8. Formula / formulas loses to Abacus by 7–1, loses to Boxes by 3–2
9. Flats loses to Abacus by 8–0, loses to Formula / formulas by 4–1
10. Numbers n shit loses to Abacus by 8–0, loses to Flats by 4–2
Now, for those voting it's quite clear that Abacus has a healthy margin.
I thus propose that we make the change.
I vote against :-)
_______________________________________________
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
