On Monday 21 November 2011 14:58:18 you wrote: > On 11/21/2011 02:03 PM, C. Boemann wrote: > > On Monday 21 November 2011 13:50:38 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > >>>> 1. Abacus (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices) > >>> > >>> Even if it won the competition it is a bad choice as there is already a > >>> spreadsheet application out there with this name. See > >>> http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/deskutils/abacus.html > >>> > >>> If there is already a spreadsheet application with this name, then this > >>> is > >> > >> an absolute no-go for me. How would we feel if some other project was > >> developping an application suite with: > >> YetAnotherApplicationSuite Words: text processor > >> YAAS Stage: presentation > >> YAAS Kexi: DB > >> YAAS Krita: painting > >> .... > >> > >> Don't do others what you wouldn't want to be done to you. > >> > >> My 2 cts, > >> > >> PierreSt > > > > except that that other Abacus has been dead for 14 years or so > > 1) It's in the openSuse and Ubuntu repos. > 2) The last change in the changelog at > http://pkgs.org/opensuse-11.4/opensuse-contrib-i586/xabacus-7.4.1-1.2.i586. > rpm.html is from 2008 what makes it 3 years old and not 14. > 3) The last change in the changelog at > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xabacus/+changelog is from 2011 > what means it's still activly developed. > > In any case I think that are exactly the reasons why we should have a > discussion at the mailinglist before. Take a closer look at the changelog at: http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/deskutils/abacus.html
It's quite clear it has only been updated to make it compile - no active development. _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
