Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-19 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
On Sunday, December 19, 2010 16:11:14 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 19 December 2010 15:02, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > On Saturday 18 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, > >> name length does not matter that much, so I

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-19 Thread Mark Kretschmann
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Inge Wallin wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs.  Examples > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like > oowriter, oocalc, etc.  I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not sure. > > Reasons: > >

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-19 Thread todd rme
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 19 December 2010 15:02, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: >> On Saturday 18 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >>> I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, >>> name length does not matter that much, so I propo

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-19 Thread Mark Kretschmann
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 19 December 2010 16:23, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: >> On Sunday 19 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >>> want geek's >>> experience, use geek's tools... >> to be honest... command lines is only for geeks ;) I think non-geek user

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-19 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 19 December 2010 16:23, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Sunday 19 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> want geek's >> experience, use geek's tools... > to be honest... command lines is only for geeks ;) I think non-geek user don't > give any importance at how the executables are named ;)

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-19 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 19 December 2010 15:02, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Saturday 18 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, >> name length does not matter that much, so I propose calligra prefix. > Actually name length does matter. On my co

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-19 Thread Mark Kretschmann
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: > On Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:18:59 am Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 18 December 2010 16:59, Inge Wallin wrote: >> > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs.  Examples >> > would be cswords, cstables and so

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-18 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:18:59 am Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 18 December 2010 16:59, Inge Wallin wrote: > > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs. Examples > > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like > > oowriter, oocalc, etc. I

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-18 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 18 December 2010 16:59, Inge Wallin wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs.  Examples > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like > oowriter, oocalc, etc.  I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not sure. > > Reasons: > >  - It

Re: Names of the binaries

2010-12-18 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Saturday, December 18, 2010 07:59:58 am Inge Wallin wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs. Examples > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like > oowriter, oocalc, etc. I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not > sure. > > R

Names of the binaries

2010-12-18 Thread Inge Wallin
I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs. Examples would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like oowriter, oocalc, etc. I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not sure. Reasons: - It follows the pattern - It helps the memory - It will b