On Sunday, December 19, 2010 16:11:14 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 19 December 2010 15:02, Cyrille Berger Skott <cber...@cberger.net> wrote: > > On Saturday 18 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, > >> name length does not matter that much, so I propose calligra prefix. > > > > Actually name length does matter. On my computer if I want to access to > > calligrawords, I would need to type calligraw<tab> (or calli<tab>w<tab>) > > While I would only need to type csw<tab>, cst<tab>, csf<tab>, csst<tab> > > and cspl<tab>. > > You have 'alias' command for customized experience.. want geek's > experience, use geek's tools... > Clarity is important. > > Optionally we can ship symlinks like: cswords -> calligrawords. > > PS: on my computer cs is a command, there's also csh and a few other > things prefixed with cs
I agree that there should be links from cswords to calligrawords .... One additional point I would like to raise is that I think it would also be good to have prefixed libs like cswordsprivate to avoid the problem of coninstallability with the whatever koffice of group A will be called. Thorsten _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
