On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs. Examples > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like > oowriter, oocalc, etc. I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not sure. > > Reasons: > > - It follows the pattern > > - It helps the memory > > - It will be easier to find them for people that don't know all the names. > cs<tab> will quickly give all the alternatives > > - The prefix is more unique. For example, for tables, ta<tab> gives: > tabs tac tail tailf talk tar taskset > t<tab> gives 112 alternatives > > - It feels good :-) > Yeah, this is very subjective, of course.
After reading this whole thread, and especially what Jaroslaw wrote, I would recommend going with: * calligrawords * calligratables * calligraplan etc. -- Mark Kretschmann Amarok Developer, Software Engineer at KO GmbH Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe http://amarok.kde.org - http://fsfe.org - http://kogmbh.com _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
