On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Marijn Kruisselbrink <m.kruisselbr...@student.tue.nl> wrote: > On Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:18:59 am Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> On 18 December 2010 16:59, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: >> > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs. Examples >> > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like >> > oowriter, oocalc, etc. I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not >> > sure. >> > >> > Reasons: >> > >> > - It follows the pattern >> > >> > - It helps the memory >> > >> > - It will be easier to find them for people that don't know all the >> > names. cs<tab> will quickly give all the alternatives >> > >> > - The prefix is more unique. For example, for tables, ta<tab> gives: >> > tabs tac tail tailf talk tar taskset >> > t<tab> gives 112 alternatives >> > >> > - It feels good :-) >> > Yeah, this is very subjective, of course. >> >> I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, >> name length does not matter that much, so I propose calligra prefix. >> It's less geeky and more obvious. > Yeah, fully agree with this.
Agreed as well. -- Mark Kretschmann Amarok Developer, Software Engineer at KO GmbH Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe http://amarok.kde.org - http://fsfe.org - http://kogmbh.com _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
