On Saturday, December 18, 2010 10:18:59 am Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 18 December 2010 16:59, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs. Examples > > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like > > oowriter, oocalc, etc. I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not > > sure. > > > > Reasons: > > > > - It follows the pattern > > > > - It helps the memory > > > > - It will be easier to find them for people that don't know all the > > names. cs<tab> will quickly give all the alternatives > > > > - The prefix is more unique. For example, for tables, ta<tab> gives: > > tabs tac tail tailf talk tar taskset > > t<tab> gives 112 alternatives > > > > - It feels good :-) > > Yeah, this is very subjective, of course. > > I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, > name length does not matter that much, so I propose calligra prefix. > It's less geeky and more obvious. Yeah, fully agree with this.
Marijn _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
