On 18 December 2010 16:59, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to prefix our binaries with cs. Examples > would be cswords, cstables and so on. OOo does this with binaries like > oowriter, oocalc, etc. I *think* Libreoffice does the same but I'm not sure. > > Reasons: > > - It follows the pattern > > - It helps the memory > > - It will be easier to find them for people that don't know all the names. > cs<tab> will quickly give all the alternatives > > - The prefix is more unique. For example, for tables, ta<tab> gives: > tabs tac tail tailf talk tar taskset > t<tab> gives 112 alternatives > > - It feels good :-) > Yeah, this is very subjective, of course.
I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, name length does not matter that much, so I propose calligra prefix. It's less geeky and more obvious. BTW, I prefer to stay with kexi name though, it'll be still unique. > _______________________________________________ > calligra-devel mailing list > calligra-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel > -- regards / pozdrawiam, Jaroslaw Staniek http://www.linkedin.com/in/jstaniek Kexi & Calligra (kexi-project.org, identi.ca/kexi, calligra-suite.org) KDE Software Development Platform on MS Windows (windows.kde.org) _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
