On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek <stan...@kde.org> wrote: > On 19 December 2010 15:02, Cyrille Berger Skott <cber...@cberger.net> wrote: >> On Saturday 18 December 2010, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >>> I agree with the intention. Since you mentioned the tab completion, >>> name length does not matter that much, so I propose calligra prefix. >> Actually name length does matter. On my computer if I want to access to >> calligrawords, I would need to type calligraw<tab> (or calli<tab>w<tab>) >> While >> I would only need to type csw<tab>, cst<tab>, csf<tab>, csst<tab> and >> cspl<tab>. > > You have 'alias' command for customized experience.. want geek's > experience, use geek's tools... > Clarity is important. > > Optionally we can ship symlinks like: cswords -> calligrawords.
That may be a good idea, although I would say that it should be the other way around for the process issue Jaroslaw mentioned > PS: on my computer cs is a command, there's also csh and a few other > things prefixed with cs I have 14 commands that start with cs. What about using cali* as a compromise? -Todd _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
