On Wednesday, April 08, 2015 22:07:46 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi Yue,
>
> good to see that you among other things have already turned Karbon back to
> life in the Qt5/KF5 spheres :) Rock on!
>
> Now, the plan for Calligra 3.0 was to focus on porting all code to Qt5 and
> KF5.
>
> No re
On Sunday, April 05, 2015 18:01:02 Robert Mathias Marmorstein wrote:
> > On March 10, 2015, 4:35 a.m., Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> > > The patch looks good to me.
> >
> > Robert Mathias Marmorstein wrote:
> > I downloaded the tests from calligratests, but haven't been able to
> > get the QP
On Sunday, April 05, 2015 12:00:35 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > On March 10, 2015, 4:35 a.m., Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> > > The patch looks good to me.
> >
> > Robert Mathias Marmorstein wrote:
> > I downloaded the tests from calligratests, but haven't been able to
> > get the QPro plugi
lt styles for footnotes etc? And regarding the anchors, shouldn't they
be superscript by default?
- Inge Wallin
On March 31, 2015, 1:25 p.m., Camilla Boemann wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123165/#review78155
---
Ship it!
Looks ok to me.
- Inge Wallin
On March 28, 2015
Kuplyakov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122546/
> ---
>
> (Updated March 24, 2015, 5:53 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Calligra, Camill
diff into the
review request like is normally done?
- Inge Wallin
On March 18, 2015, 7:34 p.m., Adam Pigg wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
On Saturday, March 14, 2015 11:28:06 Станислав Долганов wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm student of Moscow State University, Faculty of Computation Mathematics
> and Cybernetics.
>
> I want to participate in Summer of Code with Calligra. There is only one
> Calligra's project idea on the KDE ideas page an
e3
filters/sheets/xlsx/XlsxXmlDrawingReader.h 69c75ac
filters/sheets/xlsx/XlsxXmlDrawingReader.cpp def1ff6
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122045/diff/
Testing
---
There is no new code at all, only rearrangement. But all the filters work as
expected.
eader/OdtReaderBackend.h ae321ab
filters/libodfreader/OdtReaderBackend.cpp cdc59f1
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122035/diff/
Testing
---
Tested with extensive traces and existing filters that use the library.
Thanks,
Inge W
> On Feb. 24, 2015, 8:40 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > libs/rdf/KoDocumentRdf.cpp, line 57
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122546/diff/1/?file=348543#file348543line57>
> >
> > Probably so that the #define can be commented out quickly when you want
is Author only so far, right?
Can we leave it as it is for now and then discuss how we want to proceed
with this during the porting effort?
- Inge Wallin
On Feb. 12, 2015, 9:22 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an aut
> On Feb. 16, 2015, 11:11 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > Wouldn't a much better solution be to make the Private class of the
> > KoMarker shared? If so, we could have the collection store KoMarkers
> > instead of a collection of KoMarker*s. Making KoMarker itself a Q
> On Feb. 16, 2015, 11:11 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > Wouldn't a much better solution be to make the Private class of the
> > KoMarker shared? If so, we could have the collection store KoMarkers
> > instead of a collection of KoMarker*s. Making KoMarker itself a Q
class of the KoMarker
shared? If so, we could have the collection store KoMarkers instead of a
collection of KoMarker*s. Making KoMarker itself a QSharedData feels very
strange and is different than anything else in Calligra.
- Inge Wallin
On Feb. 16, 2015, 2:26 a.m., Sven Langkamp
Hi Tomas,
It is obvious that you have really thought this through. But although your
technical solution seems solid, I think you are missing one aspect: how the
user interaction should work.
The problem, as you say, right now is that the user can edit shapes but then
has no easy way to get ba
Testing
---
manual testing according to the bug report.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
ix first, though and then estan
can fix the strange behaviour since it's in his new code.
Diffs
-
words/part/KWView.cpp f20199a
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122306/diff/
Testing
---
manual testing according to the bug repor
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 14:11:39 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Thursday, January 29, 2015 12:57:35 Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
> > > On Янв. 27, 2015, 7:34 п.п., Camilla Boemann wrote:
> > > > libs/kotext/KoSectionManager.cpp, line 120
> > > > <https://git.re
has many things like own
> style, name and so on (and I can't say that delimiter could have style).
> And KoSectionEnd is a simple helper class that links to corresponding
> KoSection.
>
>
> - Denis
>
>
> ------
x27;m satisfied.
- Inge Wallin
On Jan. 27, 2015, 10:48 a.m., Camilla Boemann wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard
I think instead that all layout should be in shape coordinates, i.e. from
(0, 0) to (sizeX, sizeY). This handling of world coordinates inside a shape is
an abomination to all that is good in linear algebra.
But I understand that this is perhaps not the time and place to change
tha
res that are ready to merge to master right now or within the next few
days.
> On 25 January 2015 at 17:42, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 January 2015 14:26:01 Inge Wallin wrote:
> >> So let's have a short window before the porting starts then.
> >
> > Could
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 13:59:57 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2015, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > I, myself, see no reason why we cannot open master for patches of this
> > type
> > already now, but I will let you decide whether opening master now or wait
> >
Hi,
As you have probably seen I have two patches that I deem mature on the review
board right now. These are branches that have been Ok'ed and are ready to
merge. And I know that there are others with similar branches laying around.
It would be a pity to let them bitrot more than necessary.
I
d.
Update: I learned later that there is macro that takes care of this, so
maybe just document that a bit and it's fine.
- Inge Wallin
On Jan. 25, 2015, 1:40 a.m., Camilla Boemann wrote:
>
> ---
> This
explanation what this struct is good for?
libs/kotext/commands/ChangeStylesMacroCommand.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122238/#comment51762>
This should be commented out
- Inge Wallin
On Jan. 24, 2015, 8:27 p.m., Camilla Boemann wrote:
>
> --
d or discussed. Frankly it sounds strange to
me.
If nothing else comes up, I will do a normal merge tonight around 9pm.
-Inge
> On Thursday, 22 January 2015, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 22, 2015 14:34:07 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
why don't you revert it in 2.9 already?
-Inge
> On Thursday, 22 January 2015, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:02:47 Cyrille Berger wrote:
> >> On 2015-01-19 22:35, Inge Wallin wrote:
> >> > On Monday, January 19, 2015 17:25:33 Inge
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:02:47 Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On 2015-01-19 22:35, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Monday, January 19, 2015 17:25:33 Inge Wallin wrote:
> >> On Monday, January 19, 2015 17:26:45 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> >> > If you do, I think it should be a
On Monday, January 19, 2015 17:25:33 Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Monday, January 19, 2015 17:26:45 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > If you do, I think it should be an ordinary merge, not a squash.
>
> yes, agree.
Done. It went totally without problems.
I think we should do this every 3-
On Monday, January 19, 2015 17:26:45 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> If you do, I think it should be an ordinary merge, not a squash.
yes, agree.
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > I talked with Boud today about various things and one thing that came up
> > were all
I talked with Boud today about various things and one thing that came up were
all the fixes for 2.9. There are a lot of them and almost all of them are only
on the 2.9 branch right now. This situation is potentially dangerous and will
become worse as time goes by.
I volunteered to merge 2.9 in
I have probably missed something important but the fact is that I am unable to
find any written plan for our porting effort anywhere on community.kde.org. Can
somebody point me to where the plan is?
Stranger is that I have also failed to find anything definite in the calligra-
devel archives goi
On Friday, January 16, 2015 22:23:42 Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2015 21:43:35 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > That's a good question, and it depends on what is in them. They probably
> > should not go in the 2.9 release, which is what is pre-occupying my mind
> > right now, but if you
On Sunday, January 18, 2015 09:57:30 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > On Jan. 18, 2015, 4:01 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > > karbon/ui/KarbonView.cpp, line 1214
> > > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122115/diff/1/?file=342472#file342472
> > > line1214>> >
rs work as
expected.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
rts
from anywhere. Note that the parsing code from various formats are in the
filters, and not in libodf2.
- Inge
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122045/#revi
7;s generic chart stuff. The same class could be used for, say, Lotus
1-2-3 import, but then a specific reader for that format has to be written.
See above for why it belongs in libodf2.
- Inge Wallin
On Jan. 13, 2015, 10:18 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122115/#comment51536>
But this define is for both plugins and actual libraries, isn't it? Is
this safe?
dded
- Inge Wallin
On Jan. 17, 2015, 11:17 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
>
> ---
>
> On Jan. 17, 2015, 10:42 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > Applies without issues on OS X; any suggestions how to check/test the new
> > functionality?
>
> Inge Wallin wrote:
> This are two parts to the patch:
> 1. Less code using smart macros to do the sam
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122035/#review74201
---
On Jan. 13, 2015, 3:30 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
o one after the other is finished.
> Rejecting this workflow is another topic. There are just two workflows
> the above being for special (short) time.
>
> On 16 January 2015 at 09:26, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Friday, January 16, 2015 09:26:37 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> >>
On Friday, January 16, 2015 09:26:37 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 16 January 2015 at 09:14, Inge Wallin wrote:
> > On Friday, January 16, 2015 01:26:20 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> For those willing to work on porting, two repos have been created:
> >>
On Friday, January 16, 2015 01:26:20 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Hi,
> For those willing to work on porting, two repos have been created:
>
> git clone kde:scratch/staniek/kproperty
> git clone kde:scratch/staniek/kreport
>
> These are files cut off from calligra/2.9, with history.
> It's best if y
states what default values are, and we try not to write out
> > default values in other cases.
>
> Inge Wallin wrote:
> 1. I don't remember anymore how relevant this was to the bug mentioned in
> the description, but I will look at it again and come back.
> 2.
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 21:58:49 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Inge: did you post a link to a review request or something? If you did I
> can't find it anymore. And if you didn't ... maybe you should! ;)
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122035/
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122045/
> Oh, an
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 21:54:40 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Tuesday January 13 2015 21:43:35 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > That's a good question, and it depends on what is in them. They probably
> > should not go in the 2.9 release, which is what is pre-occupying my mind
>
> I haven't yet loo
s.txt 1f992dd
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122045/diff/
Testing
---
There is no new code at all, only rearrangement. But all the filters work as
expected.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
#x27;t work too hard if you are recovering!
> >
> > Adam
> >
> > On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 18:44:17 Inge Wallin wrote:
> >> [resent, since the ML apparently ate the first version. Apologies if this
> >> somehow turns up twice.]
> >>
> >> Hi ever
eader/OdtReaderBackend.cpp cdc59f1
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122035/diff/
Testing
---
Tested with extensive traces and existing filters that use the library.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122035/diff/
Testing
---
Tested with extensive traces and existing filters that use the library.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
[resent, since the ML apparently ate the first version. Apologies if this
somehow turns up twice.]
Hi everybody,
Some of you know already that I have been very sick but perhaps not everybody.
However, I am much better now and recovery has gone so far that I feel that I
can come back into the K
Hi everybody,
Some of you know already that I have been very sick but perhaps not everybody.
However, I am much better now and recovery has gone so far that I feel that I
can come back into the KDE and Calligra families again and be active. The most
lasting difference between now and before is
ment46146>
I prefer FIXME before TODO since that is what I grep for. (As a side note I
think we should unify the use of FIXME, TODO and @todo in Calligra.)
- Inge Wallin
On Sept. 9, 2014, 2:07 p.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>
> ---
iff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118643/diff/
Testing
---
Lots of manual testing during development
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
wboard.kde.org/r/118643/#review64181
---
On Aug. 10, 2014, 4:02 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118643/
> --
/WikiExport.cpp PRE-CREATION
filters/words/wiki/export/words_wiki_export.desktop PRE-CREATION
filters/words/wiki/wiki-format.xml PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118643/diff/
Testing
---
Lots of manual testing during development
Thank
is correct (according to the comment, didn't read the spec),
wouldn't it be clearer to use == instead of != ?
- Inge Wallin
On Aug. 3, 2014, 10:34 p.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically gen
> On July 6, 2014, 2:10 p.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Was this ever committed?
>
> Camilla Boemann wrote:
> Don't think so but I also don't think it belongs to calligra anymore.
> Laurent, what do you think?
Hmm, why not? What would be a better place?
I agree that if all word p
automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110928/#review61727
---
On June 10, 2013, 7:18 p.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
> Thi
What is this variable for? I can understand the rest of the members
without a comment but not this one.
- Inge Wallin
On July 4, 2014, 2:32 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To r
> On June 29, 2014, 4:45 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > In general looks good. But shouldn't the same idea be used in the other
> > apps too?
>
> Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> It's something that is going away in the mvc branch in any case.
Ok. I would love to
18984/#comment42595>
Not strictly necessary since DocBase::DocBase already has the same
Q_ASSERT. If you want to keep it, I'm fine with that too.
- Inge Wallin
On June 27, 2014, 10:25 p.m., Jarosław Staniek wrote:
>
> -
days now and we have
already gotten into the nitpick stage of the review, I will take the liberty to
say "good job!" and "ship it!".
I am sure that any remaining problems can be fixed post merge.
Denis: don't forget to use --squash when you merge the branch.
- Inge Wal
32/#comment42332>
same here
words/part/dockers/KWDebugWidget.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118532/#comment42333>
EBN will complain that you're using a string for one character. :)
- Inge Wallin
On June 22, 2014, 8 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
>
> -
> On June 22, 2014, 8:13 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
> > test
>
> Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
> Sorry, for this. Ignore it.
Aw... I was hoping... :)
- Inge
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.rev
xt 2bf1b0b
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118643/diff/
Testing
---
Lots of manual testing during development
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
Testing
---
Lots of manual testing during development
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
On Thursday, June 05, 2014 22:02:43 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Dear All,
> Just added a list of tools known as useful in C/C++ static code
> analysis. Some are already used in our development, some need
> volunteers. This is rather very interesting area - let's make Calligra
> more bug-free, and it'
>
In general I prefer capital letter in front and a period after a sentence.
This goes for many places in this patch.
- Inge Wallin
On June 5, 2014, 12:41 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an
g/r/118510/#comment41244>
OPD??
- Inge Wallin
On June 4, 2014, 1:04 a.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboar
#comment41234>
spelling
libs/kotext/opendocument/KoTextWriter_p.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118532/#comment41235>
I don't understand this comment.
libs/kotext/opendocument/KoTextWriter_p.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118532/#comment41236>
same h
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 06:18:45 Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> On Monday, April 28, 2014 10:31:45 PM Inge Wallin wrote:
> > * Represent styles as text attributes wherever possible so that they can
> > be
> >
> > complete, i.e. not throw away style data.
>
> I&#
On Sunday, April 27, 2014 06:21:55 Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> On Friday, April 25, 2014 12:50:15 PM Inge Wallin wrote:
> > I would like to have the opinion of the community for a certain issue. The
> > first version of the docx export filter is now merged and it's time to
&
On Friday, April 25, 2014 12:50:15 Inge Wallin wrote:
> So here is the question: When we move forward with the docx filter, should
> we either:
>
> - add stream reading capabilities and maybe storage of properties
> represented as text to the objects in libs/odf
>
> o
I would like to have the opinion of the community for a certain issue. The
first version of the docx export filter is now merged and it's time to take the
next step. But this next step involves a decision which needs the input from
the rest of the Calligra community.
The docx filter uses stream
board.kde.org/r/117626/diff/
Testing
---
Testing with a number of odt files. Lassi did all the testing involving MS
Office since I don't have that.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.
/KoZipStore.cpp 4235134
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/diff/
Testing
---
Testing with a number of odt files. Lassi did all the testing involving MS
Office since I don't have that.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel m
91#file266891line152>
> >
> > BTW, return false on failure as we do everywhere
Agree but out of scope for this patch. That should be done in master and
separately.
- Inge
---
This is an automatically generated e-
is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/#review56104
---
On April 20, 2014, 8:11 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> -
29f34
libs/odf/KoZipStore.h 90ffcb0
libs/odf/KoZipStore.cpp 4235134
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/diff/
Testing
---
Testing with a number of odt files. Lassi did all the testing involving MS
Office since I don't have that.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
4
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/diff/
Testing
---
Testing with a number of odt files. Lassi did all the testing involving MS
Office since I don't have that.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
tically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/#review56039
-------
On April 18, 2014, 9:38 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an
tors.
> >
> > I propose to commit this fix independently to master and 2.8.
> >
Committed to master.
- Inge
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kd
--
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/#review56039
---
On April 18, 2014, 9:38 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
it:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/#review56043
---
On April 18, 2014, 9:38 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To rep
> On April 19, 2014, 10:14 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > filters/words/docx/export/FileCollector.cpp, line 46
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/diff/1/?file=266871#file266871line46>
> >
> > I don't understand. What is d
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/#review56043
-------
On April 18, 2014, 9:38 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
>
tps://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117626/#comment39114>
I don't understand. What is duplicated?
- Inge Wallin
On April 18, 2014, 9:38 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To r
.kde.org/r/117626/#comment39103>
Why only 2007? It's not clear which version of ooxml we are targetting. I
suggest not changing this until we have decided.
- Inge Wallin
On April 18, 2014, 9:38 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
>
>
s. Lassi did all the testing involving MS
Office since I don't have that.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
ng involving MS
Office since I don't have that.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
ice that you shouldn't omit the "the").
But actually I think "smallest integer" is better so I like the original
text.
- Inge Wallin
On March 2, 2014, 3:12 p.m., Swarn Kumar wrote:
>
> ---
&g
> On March 16, 2014, 9:34 p.m., Jarosław Staniek wrote:
> > Hi, please use "Update -> Update Diff" command on you previous review -
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116746/ - instead of opening a new one.
> > Thanks.
>
> Jarosław Staniek wrote:
> Also, the rule of interaction in revi
, I'm fine with merging this
branc. Nice work!
- Inge Wallin
On March 11, 2014, 12:06 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.review
/textshape/AnnotationTextShape.cpp 311d6bf
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114243/diff/
Testing
---
Testing with my standard text documents with annotations.
Thanks,
Inge Wallin
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://ma
th : Could you help me for starting?!
>
> Before i send this mail to list i contact Inge Wallin and Jaroslaw Staniek
> in IRC.
> I want to create a plugins for Author (Section Separator).
>
> If anyone work on Author and it's Plugins please guidance!
>
> Thanks
I have m
/KWNavigationWidget.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116662/#comment37091>
Btw, I think I missed this in my last review. Normally we use this layout
in calligra:
Foo::Foo()
: FooBase
, m_member1(0)
, m_member2(xyz)
{
...
}
- Inge Walli
e training
spaces if I remember correctly.
- Inge Wallin
On March 8, 2014, 6:18 p.m., Denis Kuplyakov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply
1 - 100 of 605 matches
Mail list logo
