On Friday, January 16, 2015 09:26:37 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 16 January 2015 at 09:14, Inge Wallin <i...@lysator.liu.se> wrote: > > On Friday, January 16, 2015 01:26:20 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> Hi, > >> For those willing to work on porting, two repos have been created: > >> > >> git clone kde:scratch/staniek/kproperty > >> git clone kde:scratch/staniek/kreport > >> > >> These are files cut off from calligra/2.9, with history. > >> It's best if you work in own scratch repos. > > > > Why this? That makes all cooperation impossible. The best thing would be > > if somebody took the effort to port the CMakefiles to use KF5 but after > > that it should be possible for anybody to port individual aspekts of it > > independently, right? > > Well, imagine that at this early stage I had to push with -force > already once for these repos... not something expected in calligra/ > It's just not ready for use, porting these libs within calligra/ does > not seem justified to me: we'd fix paths for example to reflect > conventions of Qt 5 but paths and namespaces will change after > extraction to separate libs => extra work.
That's not what I was replying to. My point was that "It's best if you work in own scratch repos." makes no sense since it will be impossible to cooperate. > BTW, these two are only used by Kexi and no refactoring happen, just > semi-automatic work. And after all these are easier libs so give us > get some real experience. > > > At least, that is how it has worked in kde-edu and that gave no problems > > whatsoever. > > > >> Porting hints: https://community.kde.org/Kexi/Porting_to_Qt%26KF_5 _______________________________________________ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
