I thought it was all those millions of trillions of electrons floating around in memory. Have you ever noticed thatwith a digital camera, that it gets heavier as you fill up the memory card?
Tom C. >From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: N80 Viewfinder, etc. (Adam?) >Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:39:10 +0100 > >A lot of the weight is probably down to the operating software being >written in COBOL, with lots of superfluous code. They should use a >lightweight language and operating system like Oberon. > >Also, pixels weigh the same (15.34 luctograms) whatever size they are, >so the more they force onto a same-size sensor, the heavier it all >gets. > >-- > Bob > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi > > Sent: 28 September 2007 17:10 > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > Subject: Re: N80 Viewfinder, etc. (Adam?) > > > > Yes, most DSLR bodies tend to be a bit thicker than 35mm film SLRs. > > > They have more stuff in them... > > > > "stuff" ... That's a technical term. ;-) > > > > Godfrey > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
