Somebody was dumping NOS then, MSRP on the N80 alone was twice that (the 
F100 was a $1200+ body new). The only Nikon film cameras available new 
now are the F6 and (cosina-built) FM10, and the latter is only new as 
Nikon knows the day after they discontinue it the Bessaflex F will be 
announced.

-Adam


Glen Tortorella wrote:
> True, but I purchased a brand new N80 and MB-16 for the price I  
> indicated--with box, manual, etc.--and the price also included  
> shipping.  Whenever I could, I tend to prefer buying new.
> 
> Glen
> 
> On Sep 28, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> 
>> Glen,
>>
>> An extra $90 would have gotten you into the F100 from KEH ($265 in  
>> BGN condition) ;-)
>>
>> Note the F100 uses AA's even without the grip (Unlike th N80, the  
>> AA's and slightly better handling are the sole reasons to get an  
>> MB-16. The F100's MB-15 grip increases FPS to 5 from 4.5 and offers  
>> a rear control dial, shutter release and AF-On button, it takes 6  
>> AA's or a dedicated rechargable pack vs the 4 AA's that the body's  
>> AA carrier takes).
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>> Thank you for the detailed commentary, Adam.
>>>
>>> Wow, the N80 "feels like flimsy plastic" compared to the F100. Since
>>> I have gotten the N80, I have been thinking that it makes my ZX-M
>>> feel like flimsy plastic--a scant 320 grams vs. 515 for the N80.  I
>>> am sure that the F100 is quite a nice body, and, if I had the funds,
>>> I might try one.  Considering the deal I got on the N80 ($175 for
>>> body and MB-16 pack...which seems unimaginable to me in view of the
>>> N80's functionality, etc.), though, it makes it seem almost senseless
>>> to think about the F100...but I am the type that would think about
>>> it, anyway :-)
>>>
>>> Glen
>>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's quite noticably larger, especially with the vertical grip
>>>> (It's actually a bit larger than an F5 with the grip attached). The
>>>> F100 is notably heavier, much more solid feeling (it makes the N80
>>>> feel like flimsy plastic).
>>>>
>>>> The F100's dimensions are: 155 x 113 x 66mm and it weighs 785g. The
>>>> F80/N80's dimensions are:141.5 x 98.5 x 71mm and it weighs 515g.
>>>> That's a fairly significant difference. Note the F80 is plastic
>>>> over metal frame, while the F100 is a full metal body with
>>>> rubberized grips.
>>>>
>>>> The viewfinder is also significant, with the F80 having 92%
>>>> coverage at .71-.75x magnification (depending on diopter settings)
>>>> with an early-generation LCD overlay (which dims the finder,
>>>> especially when the camera is off). The F100's finder has 96%
>>>> coverage at .76x without the LCD overlay (Note Nikon has seriously
>>>> improved the LCD overlays, with the newest generation costing
>>>> almost no brightness when the camera is turned on, the F80 was the
>>>> first camera to use this technology and it did not have the same
>>>> performance).
>>>>
>>>> You'd really need to use the F100 to appreciate it. It's not a
>>>> small camera, but it is simply one of the best handling AF cameras
>>>> ever. And it delivers incredible performance in a small package (To
>>>> get similar performance from most other cameras would require a
>>>> large battery grip)
>>>>
>>>> -Adam
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>>>> I was not aware of the fact that the F100 body is larger than  
>>>>> the N80
>>>>> body.  I am glad, then, that I opted for the N80.  How much  
>>>>> larger is
>>>>> the F100, as I have not completely ruled out that body (in terms  
>>>>> of a
>>>>> possible future purchase)?   Does it feel significantly larger?
>>>>>
>>>>> Glen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 28, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Glen,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I dislike the N80 finder, however I've been spoiled by the
>>>>>> excellent finders in Nikon's higher-end bodies (as well as the LX
>>>>>> and MX). The N80 finder will compare well to the very similar
>>>>>> finders in Pentax's consumer bodies. I also find the body to be  
>>>>>> too
>>>>>> small, but I'm used to the larger F100, F2, F3 and my Mamiya 645
>>>>>> kit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yes, Digitals tend to be a bit thicker, they need the extra
>>>>>> thickness for the LCD, main circuit board and sensor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Adam
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>>>>>> Adam: I do not know if you were able to read a post I wrote a
>>>>>>> couple
>>>>>>> of days ago regarding my N80 body purchase, but, anyway, I  
>>>>>>> received
>>>>>>> the body and am quite impressed.  I thought the smallish  
>>>>>>> viewfinder
>>>>>>> magnification (supposedly .75x) might be a hinderance, but I find
>>>>>>> that, so far, the viewfinder is not all that bad.  In fact, it
>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>> as if may be even a tad better than my ZX-M's finder, which is
>>>>>>> supposedly 0.77x.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The N80 is loaded with functionality, and I find that, with the
>>>>>>> MB-16
>>>>>>> pack attached, it has good balance and a comfortable feel in my
>>>>>>> hand.  I had the D40 and K100D in my hand yesterday, and I  
>>>>>>> thought
>>>>>>> both bodies were a bit thick for my hand.  The K100D's body is a
>>>>>>> bit
>>>>>>> thinner, and thus it felt a little better, but the N80 is just
>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>> perfect for my somewhat small hand.  Perhaps this is how all
>>>>>>> digital
>>>>>>> bodies tend to be (a bit thick)?  When comparing the feel of the
>>>>>>> ZX-M
>>>>>>> and N80 to the digital bodies I have mentioned, it is similar to
>>>>>>> holding a baseball as opposed to a softball.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Glen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>>>>>> and follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>>>> and follow the directions.
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
>> and follow the directions.
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to